Skip to content

Efficacy of B7A BSIgG Against E. Coli Strain B7A Challenge

Protective Efficacy of Orally Delivered Bovine Serum Immunoglobulin (BSIgG) Specific for the Colonization Factor CS6 Following Challenge With the CS6-expressing Enterotoxigenic E. Coli (ETEC) Strain B7A

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03040687
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-02-02
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2019-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Volunteer

Keywords

ETEC, Escherichia coli, enteritis, challenge, CS6, B7A

Brief summary

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a major cause of diarrhea worldwide. Vaccines and therapeutics are under development to prevent ETEC disease in children and travelers. One approach is to use passive protection (antibodies) to prevent infection. The purpose of this study are to assess the safety of serum-derived bovine immunoglobulins in healthy adult subjects when orally administered and to estimate protective efficacy of those preparations against moderate-severe diarrhea upon challenge with the ETEC strain B7A.

Detailed description

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is one of the most common causes of infectious diarrhea in children in resource limited countries, and is also a frequent cause of traveler's diarrhea in civilian and military travelers to endemic countries. ETEC strains express a variety of colonization factors (CF) that help them attach to the intestinal wall. Each colonization factor has one or more surface antigens (CS). One of the major surface antigens of ETEC is CS6 (Coli surface antigen 6). Vaccines and treatments to prevent ETEC disease are under development. Some of these target specific enterotoxins or colonization factors. For over 40 years, we have used ETEC human challenge studies to understand the ETEC disease process, immune response, and more recently, to determine whether treatments or vaccines are protective or effective in mitigating disease. B7A is the only CS6 expressing ETEC challenge strain currently used. A modality that has shown some success in the prevention of diarrhea is passive, oral administration of bovine milk IgG with specific activity against viral, bacterial and parasitic enteropathogens. Passive oral administration of Bovine Serum Immunoglobulins (BSIgG) may protect against ETEC-mediated infectious diarrhea. The hypothesized mechanism of protection stems from the passive administration of bovine anti-tip adhesion or fimbriae antibodies preventing their adherence in the human small intestine (the initial step in pathogenesis), thereby preventing downstream pathogenic processes and symptomatic illness. This study will establish the foundation for evaluating BSIgG products against numerous ETEC CFs. This study will explore if anti-B7A and anti- CS6 BSIgG provides protection against oral challenge with B7A in healthy adult volunteers. There will be two inpatient admissions of approximately 30 subjects (up to 60 total). They will receive one of three investigational products (IP) three times daily following meals beginning 2 days prior to challenge. Each volunteer will be challenged with CS6 expressing ETEC B7A on Day 0. The investigational product/placebo will be administered for a total of 7 days, or until antibiotic treatment has been administered. The investigators hypothesize that anti-CS6 BSIgG will provide protection against B7A mediated moderate to severe diarrhea upon challenge.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAnti CS6 BSIgG product (Lot PD1601105CS)
BIOLOGICALAnti B7A BSIgG product (Lot PD1601132ET)
BIOLOGICALBovine Immunoglobin Negative Control (Lot PD161071NC)
BIOLOGICALB7A- CS6-expressing ETEC challenge strain

Sponsors

Naval Medical Research Center
CollaboratorFED
United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female between 18 and 50 years of age, inclusive. * General good health, without significant medical illness, abnormal physical examination findings or clinical laboratory abnormalities as determined by principal investigator (PI) or PI in consultation with the research monitor and sponsor. * Demonstrate comprehension of the protocol procedures and knowledge of ETEC illness by passing a written examination (pass grade ≥ 70%) * Willing to participate after informed consent obtained. * Available for all planned follow-up visits. * Negative serum pregnancy test at screening and negative serum and/or urine pregnancy test on the day of admittance to the inpatient phase for female subjects of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing potential must agree to use an efficacious hormonal or barrier method of birth control during the study. Abstinence is acceptable. Female subjects unable to bear children must have this documented (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy).

Exclusion criteria

General health criteria * Presence of a significant medical condition, (e.g. psychiatric conditions or gastrointestinal disease, such as peptic ulcer, symptoms or evidence of active gastritis or gastroesophageal reflux disease, inflammatory bowel disease, alcohol or illicit drug abuse/dependency, or other laboratory abnormalities which in the opinion of the investigator precludes participation in the study. * Immunosuppressive illness or Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency (serum IgA \< 7 mg/dL or below the limit of detection of assay) * Evidence of confirmed infection with HIV, HBsAg, or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), with confirmatory assays. * Use of any investigational product within 30 days preceding the receipt of the investigational products, or planned use during the active study period * Significant abnormalities in screening lab hematology or serum chemistries, as determined by PI or PI in consultation with the research monitor and sponsor. * Lactation or breastfeeding. Research-related exclusions applicable to challenge * History of microbiologically confirmed ETEC or cholera infection in last 3 years. * Occupation involving handling of ETEC or Vibrio cholerae currently, or in the past 3 years. * Travel to countries where ETEC or cholera infection is endemic (most of the developing world) within 3 years prior to dosing. * Symptoms consistent with Travelers' Diarrhea concurrent with travel to countries where ETEC infection is endemic (most of the developing world) within 3 years prior to dosing, OR planned travel to endemic countries during the length of the study. * Vaccination for or ingestion of ETEC, cholera, or E coli heat labile toxin within 3 years prior to dosing. * Any prior experimental infection with ETEC strain B7A. Study-specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)28 daysNumber of Participants with adverse events in groups receiving B7A- and CS6- hyperimmune (BSIgG) compared with the group receiving the nonhyperimmune product.
Efficacy of B7A and CS6- Hyperimmune Bovine Serum Immunoglobin to Protect Against Moderate to Severe Diarrhea After Challenge With the CS6 Expressing ETEC Strain B7A28 daysComparison of the number and percentage of volunteers in the arms receiving the B7A- and CS6 BSIgG vs the arm receiving the nonhyperimmune BSIgG who develop moderate to severe diarrhea.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Sixty healthy adult naive subjects enrolled and received one of the three BSIgG products. Fifty-nine of those subjects were challenged with ETEC strain B7A.

Pre-assignment details

Study specific screening occurred prior to enrollment. Eighty-two subjects signed study specific consent forms. Nineteen subjects screened failed. Three subjects were randomized but did not receive BSIgG.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anti-CS6 Group
Anti-CS6 BSIgG and challenge strain CS6-expressing ETEC (B7A) Anti CS6 BSIgG product (Lot PD1601105CS) B7A- CS6-expressing ETEC challenge strain
20
Anti-whole Cell B7A
Anti- whole cell B7A (killed) BSIgG and challenge strain CS6-expressing ETEC (B7A) Anti B7A BSIgG product (Lot PD1601132ET) B7A- CS6-expressing ETEC challenge strain
20
Control Immunoglobulin Group
Negative Control (Nonhyperimmune BSIgG placebo) and challenge strain CS6-expressing ETEC (B7A) Bovine Immunoglobin Negative Control (Lot PD161071NC) B7A- CS6-expressing ETEC challenge strain
20
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnti-CS6 GroupTotalControl Immunoglobulin GroupAnti-whole Cell B7A
Age, Continuous33.5 years34 years35.5 years35.0 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants7 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants53 Participants17 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants48 Participants15 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants10 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants60 participants20 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants22 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants38 Participants11 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 2017 / 2020 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy of B7A and CS6- Hyperimmune Bovine Serum Immunoglobin to Protect Against Moderate to Severe Diarrhea After Challenge With the CS6 Expressing ETEC Strain B7A

Comparison of the number and percentage of volunteers in the arms receiving the B7A- and CS6 BSIgG vs the arm receiving the nonhyperimmune BSIgG who develop moderate to severe diarrhea.

Time frame: 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anti-CS6 GroupEfficacy of B7A and CS6- Hyperimmune Bovine Serum Immunoglobin to Protect Against Moderate to Severe Diarrhea After Challenge With the CS6 Expressing ETEC Strain B7A12 Participants
Anti-whole Cell B7AEfficacy of B7A and CS6- Hyperimmune Bovine Serum Immunoglobin to Protect Against Moderate to Severe Diarrhea After Challenge With the CS6 Expressing ETEC Strain B7A7 Participants
Control Immunoglobulin GroupEfficacy of B7A and CS6- Hyperimmune Bovine Serum Immunoglobin to Protect Against Moderate to Severe Diarrhea After Challenge With the CS6 Expressing ETEC Strain B7A14 Participants
Primary

Safety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)

Number of Participants with adverse events in groups receiving B7A- and CS6- hyperimmune (BSIgG) compared with the group receiving the nonhyperimmune product.

Time frame: 28 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Anti-CS6 GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Headache0 Participants
Anti-CS6 GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Defecation Urgency0 Participants
Anti-CS6 GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Abdominal Distension1 Participants
Anti-CS6 GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Flatulence3 Participants
Anti-CS6 GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Abdominal Pain2 Participants
Anti-CS6 GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Nausea0 Participants
Anti-CS6 GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)None14 Participants
Anti-whole Cell B7ASafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)None11 Participants
Anti-whole Cell B7ASafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Abdominal Distension2 Participants
Anti-whole Cell B7ASafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Abdominal Pain0 Participants
Anti-whole Cell B7ASafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Defecation Urgency0 Participants
Anti-whole Cell B7ASafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Flatulence4 Participants
Anti-whole Cell B7ASafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Headache2 Participants
Anti-whole Cell B7ASafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Nausea1 Participants
Control Immunoglobulin GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Flatulence2 Participants
Control Immunoglobulin GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Headache0 Participants
Control Immunoglobulin GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Abdominal Distension0 Participants
Control Immunoglobulin GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)None16 Participants
Control Immunoglobulin GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Defecation Urgency1 Participants
Control Immunoglobulin GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Nausea0 Participants
Control Immunoglobulin GroupSafety of Serum Derived Bovine Immunoglobulins (BSIgG)Abdominal Pain1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026