Skip to content

Adenovirus Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor D (AdvVEGF-D) Therapy for Treatment of Refractory Angina Pectoris

Clinical Development and Proof of Principle Testing of New Regenerative Adenovirus Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF-D) Therapy for Cost-effective Treatment of Refractory Angina. A Phase II Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study (ReGenHeart)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03039751
Acronym
ReGenHeart
Enrollment
63
Registered
2017-02-01
Start date
2019-10-19
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractory Angina Pectoris, Gene Transfer, Coronary Artery Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter mediated endocardial adenovirus-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor-D (AdVEGF-D) regenerative gene transfer in patients with refractory angina to whom revascularisation cannot be performed.

Detailed description

Study overview: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter mediated AdVEGF-D regenerative gene transfer in patients with refractory angina to whom revascularisation cannot be performed. Primary objectives: To test the efficacy of the therapy to improve functional capacity using 6 minute walking test after 6 months follow-up and improvement of symptoms assessed by Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class. Secondary objectives: Efficacy of the gene transfer to increase to improve functional capacity using 6 minute walking test and improvement of symptoms assessed by CCS class after 12 months as well as increase in myocardial perfusion assessed 6 months after the gene transfer. In addition, at 6 and 12 months timepoints, the improvement quality of life (QoL), the use of angina pectoris medication, major adverse cardiac events related to coronary artery disease (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization and hospital admission due to coronary artery disease) or a combined endpoint of the above (Major Adverse Cardiac Events, MACE) will be evaluated. Study design: ReGenHeart is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre phase II study which will be conducted at 6 centers. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter mediated endocardial AdVEGF-D regenerative gene transfer in 180 patients with angina pectoris or equivalent symptom despite optimal medical therapy and who are not suitable candidates for coronary revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (refractory angina patients). Study population: 180 patients will be recruited from the six centers in 2 years. The patients will be selected for the trial on the basis of medical history, general status, laboratory analyses, coronary angiogram and 6-minute walking test. Patients with CCS 2-3 angina pectoris despite optimal medical therapy and who are not eligible for coronary angioplasty or bypass operation due to diffuse coronary stenosis, small coronary vessels, repeated revascularization or too high risk for operation, will be included. The number of subjects to be recruited and randomized to the trial will be 180 (2:1 ratio to the treatment and control groups). Investigational drug product: First generation replication-deficient AdVEGF-D produced in 293 cells will be injected into ten sites in the endocardium. The dose of 1x1011 vp in a total volume of 2 ml (10 times 0.2 ml) will be used. Control patients will be treated and operated exactly in the same way except that placebo (buffer solution without gene) injection into the myocardium is used.

Interventions

DRUGAdvVEGF-D

AdvVEGF-D will be injected into 10 sites of the myocardium

Placebo (buffer solution without gene) will be injected into 10 sites of the myocardium

Sponsors

Queen Mary University of London
CollaboratorOTHER
University College, London
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of Vienna
CollaboratorOTHER
Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
CollaboratorOTHER
FinVector Vision Therapies Oy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Euram Limited
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Kuopio University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* informed consent signed * age \> 30 but \< 85 years * significant angina pectoris (CCS 2-3) despite of optimal medication * significant stenosis (\> 60%) in coronary angiography (\< 6 months) * contraindication to CABG or PCI due to diffuse or distal stenosis, chronic total occlusion, vessels with difficult anatomy, stenosis with severe calcifications and stenosis in small vessels (\<2.5 mm)) * angina pectoris or equivalent symptoms in the 6-minute walking exercise test * left ventricle wall \> 8 mm detected by transthoracic echocardiography or magnetic resonance imaging (treatment area)

Exclusion criteria

* women in fertile age * diabetes mellitus with severe complications such as diabetic retinopathy or nephropathy * clinically significant anemia (hemoglobin count \< 120 mg/l in male, \< 110 mg/l in female; hematocrit \< 0.36), leukopenia (b-leukocyte count \< 3.0x109/l), leukocytosis (b-leukocyte count \> 12.0x109/l) or thrombocytopenia (b-thrombocyte count \< 100x109/l) * renal insufficiency (P-creatinine \> 160 mg/l) * liver insufficiency (P-alanine aminotransferase or P-alkaline phosphatase over 2 x normal) * haematuria of unknown origin * severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 200 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \> 110 mmHg) or significant hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg) * significant obesity (Body Mass Index \> 35) * acute infection * immunosuppressive medication * significant impairment of left ventricular function (ejection fraction \< 25% in echocardiography) * symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class 3-4) * haemodynamically significant (grade 3-4/4) aortic or mitral regurgitation or other heart disease needing surgery * recent (\< 6 weeks) acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction, PCI or CABG, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) * current or suspected malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional capacity at 6 months6 months after gene transferImprovement of exercise capacity 6 months after the treatment as measured by 6 minute walking test (walking distance in meters)
Severity of angina pectoris symptoms at 6 months6 months after gene transferRelieve of angina symptoms 6 months after the treatment (CCS class)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial perfusion at 6 months6 months after gene transferImprovement of myocardial perfusion (myocardial perfusion reserve, MPR) at 6 months assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
Quality of Life (EQ-5) at 6 and 12 months6 and 12 months after gene transferImprovement of QoL assessed with EQ-5 score with three levels of severity and visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 and 12 months
Quality of Life (Short-Form Health Survey) at 6 and 12 months6 and 12 months after gene transferImprovement of QoL assessed with Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) score at 6 and 12 months
Functional capacity at 12 months12 months after gene transferImprovement of exercise capacity 12 months after the treatment as measured by a 6 minute walking test (walking distance in meters)
Angina pectoris medication at 6 and 12 months6 and 12 months after gene transferUse of short-acting nitrates to relieve symptoms of angina pectoris at 6 and 12 months (number of oral/sublingual nitrate tablets or nitrate spray inhalations during the preceding 4 weeks).
Adverse cardiac events at 6 and 12 months6 and 12 months after gene transferIncidence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization or hospital admission due to coronary artery disease and a combined endpoint of Major Adverse Cardiac Events MACE (combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization or hospital admission due to coronary artery disease) at 6 and 12 months.
Quality of Life (Seattle Angina Questionnaire ) at 6 and 12 months6 and 12 months after gene transferImprovement of QoL assessed with Seattle Angina Questionnaire score at 6 and 12 months
Severity of angina pectoris symptoms at 12 monthsTime Frame: 12 months after gene transferRelieve of angina symptoms 12 months after the treatment (CCS class)

Countries

Denmark, Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026