Skip to content

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of RO7239361 in Ambulatory Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of RO7239361 in Ambulatory Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03039686
Enrollment
166
Registered
2017-02-01
Start date
2017-07-06
Completion date
2020-04-28
Last updated
2020-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Keywords

muscular dystrophy, Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy, DMD

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of two different weekly doses of RO7239361 in ambulatory boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD).

Interventions

Take RO7239361 subcutaneously on specified days over a 48 week blinded period

DRUGPlacebo for RO7239361

Take placebo subcutaneously on specified days over a 48 week blinded period

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
6 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with DMD by confirmed medical history and genetic testing * Able to walk without assistance * Minimum North Star Ambulatory Assessment score of 15 at screening * Able to walk up 4 stairs in 8 seconds or less * Weigh at least 15 kg (33 lbs) * Taking corticosteroids for DMD

Exclusion criteria

* Any behavior or mental issue that will affect the ability to complete the required study procedures * Previously or currently taking medications like androgens or human growth hormone * Use of a ventilator during the day * Unable to have blood samples collected or receive an injection under the skin * Concomitant or previous participation at any time in a gene therapy study Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline for the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total ScoreBaselineThe NSAA is a functional scale specifically designed for ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) that can provide information about motor function. The NSAA is a 17-item test of standing, ability to transition from lying to sitting, sitting to standing, and other mobility assessments. Each of the 17 items is evaluated on an ordinal scale of 0-2: 0 = unable to achieve independently, 1 = modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another, or 2 = normal with no obvious modification of activity. Total score range is 0 to 34. Higher scores reflect better performance.
Change From Baseline in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The NSAA is a functional scale specifically designed for ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) that can provide information about motor function. The NSAA is a 17-item test of standing, ability to transition from lying to sitting, sitting to standing, and other mobility assessments. Each of the 17 items is evaluated on an ordinal scale of 0-2: 0 = unable to achieve independently, 1 = modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another, or 2 = normal with no obvious modification of activity. Total score range is 0 to 34. Higher scores reflect better performance. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline for the Time to Stand From SupineBaselineThe time required for a participant to stand from supine position. A longer time reflects a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Stand From Supine VelocityBaseline, Week 48The time required for a participant to stand from supine position. A longer time reflects a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).
Baseline Time for 10 Meter Walk/RunBaselineThe time required for a participant to run or walk a distance of 10 meters as quickly as possible. A longer time reflects a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in 10 M Walk/Run VelocityBaseline, Week 48The time required for a participant to run or walk a distance of 10 meters as quickly as possible calculated as velocity (distance/time). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).
Baseline for the Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility SubscaleBaselineThe PODCI is designed to be completed by the parent/guardian of a child who has knowledge of the child's conditions. The Transfer and Basic Mobility scale is one of the subscales of the PODCI. The results are standardized into a scale of 0-100 with a higher score reflecting better performance.
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility SubscaleBaseline, Week 48The PODCI is designed to be completed by the parent/guardian of a child who has knowledge of the child's conditions. The Transfer and Basic Mobility scale is one of the subscales of the PODCI. The results are standardized into a scale of 0-100 with a higher score reflecting better performance. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).
Baseline Time for 4 Stair ClimbBaselineThe time to complete the 4 stair climb was measured at baseline.
Baseline for the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)BaselineThe 6MWD measured the distance a participant was able to traverse while walking for 6 minutes. A longer distance reflects a better outcome.
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Baseline, Week 48The 6MWD measured the distance a participant was able to traverse while walking for 6 minutes. A longer distance reflects a better outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).
Percentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The CGI-C was used to assess the participant's overall condition on a 7-point scale, using the status markers very much improved, much improved, slightly improved, no change, slightly worse, much worse or very much worse at Week 48 as compared to baseline.
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in 95th Percentile Stride VelocityBaseline, Week 48Stride velocity was recorded with the ActiMyo device in a subset of the overall study population. The ActiMyo device measures the daily movement and activity levels of the participant. The device consists of two sensors worn on each ankle. A higher velocity reflects a better outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)During DB period (48 weeks) and Whole study (up to approximately 34 months)An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDuring DB period (48 weeks) and Whole study (up to approximately 34 months)An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. Reported here is the number of participants with AEs that led to study discontinuation.
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthBaseline, Week 48Proximal lower extremity flexor (knee extension and knee flexion) strength was measured using manual myometry. A higher score reflects a better outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in 4 Stair Climb Velocity (4SCV)Baseline, Week 484SCV was calculated as the ratio of the number of stairs climbed (4) divided by the number of seconds taken to complete the 4-stair climb. The results were converted into velocity (distance/time). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo solution subcutaneously (SC) on specified days of the 48-week double-blind (DB) period. Following the DB period participants received low dose or high dose RO7239361 on specified days for up to 192 weeks during the open-label period followed by 24 weeks of follow-up.
56
RO7239361 Low Dose
Participants received low dose RO7239361 SC on specified days of the 48-week DB period. Following the DB period participants received low dose RO7239361 on specified days for up to 192 weeks during the open-label period followed by 24 weeks of follow-up.
55
RO7239361 High Dose
Participants received high dose RO7239361 SC on specified days of the 48-week DB period. Following the DB period participants received high dose RO7239361 on specified days for up to 192 weeks during the open-label period followed by 24 weeks of follow-up.
55
Total166

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double-blind PeriodAdministrative Reason by Sponsor242521
Double-blind PeriodDeath001
Double-blind PeriodSubject Request to Discontinue Study Treatment120
Double-blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject221
Open Label PeriodAdministrative Reason by Sponsor03441
Open Label PeriodSubject Request to Discontinue Study Treatment010
Open Label PeriodWithdrawal by Subject031

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRO7239361 Low DoseRO7239361 High DoseTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous8.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
8.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
8.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
8.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Age, Customized
Children (6-11 years)
55 participants55 participants166 participants56 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants6 Participants18 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
41 Participants43 Participants127 Participants43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants6 Participants21 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 participants7 participants23 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants2 participants10 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
45 participants45 participants132 participants42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants55 Participants166 Participants56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 560 / 551 / 550 / 140 / 130 / 240 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
43 / 5643 / 5547 / 558 / 147 / 1313 / 2412 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 562 / 554 / 550 / 140 / 130 / 240 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Baseline for the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score

The NSAA is a functional scale specifically designed for ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) that can provide information about motor function. The NSAA is a 17-item test of standing, ability to transition from lying to sitting, sitting to standing, and other mobility assessments. Each of the 17 items is evaluated on an ordinal scale of 0-2: 0 = unable to achieve independently, 1 = modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another, or 2 = normal with no obvious modification of activity. Total score range is 0 to 34. Higher scores reflect better performance.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBaseline for the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score23.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
RO7239361 Low DoseBaseline for the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score24.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
RO7239361 High DoseBaseline for the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score22.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Primary

Change From Baseline in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 48

The NSAA is a functional scale specifically designed for ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) that can provide information about motor function. The NSAA is a 17-item test of standing, ability to transition from lying to sitting, sitting to standing, and other mobility assessments. Each of the 17 items is evaluated on an ordinal scale of 0-2: 0 = unable to achieve independently, 1 = modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another, or 2 = normal with no obvious modification of activity. Total score range is 0 to 34. Higher scores reflect better performance. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment. MMRM analysis included all participants at baseline and the following number of participants by Week 48: Placebo n=30, Low Dose n=29, High Dose n=33.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 48-2.99 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 48-3.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 48-2.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
95% CI: [-2.17, 1.27]
95% CI: [-1.1, 2.26]
Secondary

Baseline for the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

The 6MWD measured the distance a participant was able to traverse while walking for 6 minutes. A longer distance reflects a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBaseline for the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)388.33 meters (m)Standard Deviation 69.59
RO7239361 Low DoseBaseline for the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)399.73 meters (m)Standard Deviation 68.35
RO7239361 High DoseBaseline for the 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)370.73 meters (m)Standard Deviation 93.35
Secondary

Baseline for the Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility Subscale

The PODCI is designed to be completed by the parent/guardian of a child who has knowledge of the child's conditions. The Transfer and Basic Mobility scale is one of the subscales of the PODCI. The results are standardized into a scale of 0-100 with a higher score reflecting better performance.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBaseline for the Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility Subscale85.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.21
RO7239361 Low DoseBaseline for the Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility Subscale86.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.52
RO7239361 High DoseBaseline for the Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility Subscale84.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.76
Secondary

Baseline for the Time to Stand From Supine

The time required for a participant to stand from supine position. A longer time reflects a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBaseline for the Time to Stand From Supine6.28 secsStandard Deviation 4.75
RO7239361 Low DoseBaseline for the Time to Stand From Supine6.15 secsStandard Deviation 4.07
RO7239361 High DoseBaseline for the Time to Stand From Supine7.24 secsStandard Deviation 9.22
Secondary

Baseline Time for 10 Meter Walk/Run

The time required for a participant to run or walk a distance of 10 meters as quickly as possible. A longer time reflects a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBaseline Time for 10 Meter Walk/Run5.38 secsStandard Deviation 1.48
RO7239361 Low DoseBaseline Time for 10 Meter Walk/Run5.51 secsStandard Deviation 1.68
RO7239361 High DoseBaseline Time for 10 Meter Walk/Run5.68 secsStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Baseline Time for 4 Stair Climb

The time to complete the 4 stair climb was measured at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBaseline Time for 4 Stair Climb3.81 seconds (secs)Standard Deviation 1.55
RO7239361 Low DoseBaseline Time for 4 Stair Climb3.85 seconds (secs)Standard Deviation 1.61
RO7239361 High DoseBaseline Time for 4 Stair Climb3.92 seconds (secs)Standard Deviation 1.91
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in 10 M Walk/Run Velocity

The time required for a participant to run or walk a distance of 10 meters as quickly as possible calculated as velocity (distance/time). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment. MMRM analysis included all participants at baseline and the following number of participants by Week 48: Placebo n=30, Low Dose n=29, High Dose n=31.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 10 M Walk/Run Velocity-0.23 m/secStandard Error 0.06
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 10 M Walk/Run Velocity-0.14 m/secStandard Error 0.07
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 10 M Walk/Run Velocity-0.23 m/secStandard Error 0.06
95% CI: [-0.08, 0.27]
95% CI: [-0.17, 0.18]
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in 4 Stair Climb Velocity (4SCV)

4SCV was calculated as the ratio of the number of stairs climbed (4) divided by the number of seconds taken to complete the 4-stair climb. The results were converted into velocity (distance/time). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment. MMRM analysis included all participants at baseline and the following number of participants by Week 48: Placebo n=30, Low Dose n=29, High Dose n=33.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 4 Stair Climb Velocity (4SCV)-0.15 stairs/secStandard Error 0.07
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 4 Stair Climb Velocity (4SCV)-0.15 stairs/secStandard Error 0.07
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 4 Stair Climb Velocity (4SCV)-0.07 stairs/secStandard Error 0.07
95% CI: [-0.21, 0.2]
95% CI: [-0.12, 0.27]
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

The 6MWD measured the distance a participant was able to traverse while walking for 6 minutes. A longer distance reflects a better outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment. MMRM analysis included all participants at baseline and the following number of participants by Week 48: Placebo n=29, Low Dose n=25, High Dose n=31.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)-41.3 meters (m)Standard Error 8.7
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)-39.6 meters (m)Standard Error 9
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)-30.0 meters (m)Standard Error 8.7
95% CI: [-21.1, 24.6]
95% CI: [-11, 33.6]
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in 95th Percentile Stride Velocity

Stride velocity was recorded with the ActiMyo device in a subset of the overall study population. The ActiMyo device measures the daily movement and activity levels of the participant. The device consists of two sensors worn on each ankle. A higher velocity reflects a better outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 95th Percentile Stride VelocityBaseline1.69 m/secStandard Deviation 0.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 95th Percentile Stride VelocityChange from Baseline at Week 48-0.25 m/secStandard Deviation 0.39
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 95th Percentile Stride VelocityBaseline1.54 m/secStandard Deviation 0.35
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 95th Percentile Stride VelocityChange from Baseline at Week 48-0.22 m/secStandard Deviation 0.22
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 95th Percentile Stride VelocityBaseline1.57 m/secStandard Deviation 0.46
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in 95th Percentile Stride VelocityChange from Baseline at Week 48-0.28 m/secStandard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility Subscale

The PODCI is designed to be completed by the parent/guardian of a child who has knowledge of the child's conditions. The Transfer and Basic Mobility scale is one of the subscales of the PODCI. The results are standardized into a scale of 0-100 with a higher score reflecting better performance. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment. MMRM analysis included all participants at baseline and the following number of participants by Week 48: Placebo n=31, Low Dose n=29, High Dose n=34.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility Subscale-5.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.79
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility Subscale-7.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.83
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Transfer and Basic Mobility Subscale-4.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.77
95% CI: [-6.76, 2.77]
95% CI: [-3.71, 5.63]
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor Strength

Proximal lower extremity flexor (knee extension and knee flexion) strength was measured using manual myometry. A higher score reflects a better outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthBaseline: Knee Extenders5.58 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthChange from Baseline at Week 48: Knee Extenders-1.19 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthBaseline: Knee Flexors5.04 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthChange from Baseline at Week 48: Knee Flexors0.15 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.24
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthChange from Baseline at Week 48: Knee Flexors0.08 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.53
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthBaseline: Knee Extenders6.25 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 3.63
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthBaseline: Knee Flexors5.70 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 3.08
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthChange from Baseline at Week 48: Knee Extenders-0.47 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.43
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthChange from Baseline at Week 48: Knee Flexors-0.13 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.29
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthChange from Baseline at Week 48: Knee Extenders-0.88 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.97
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthBaseline: Knee Flexors5.04 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.72
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Proximal Lower Extremity Flexor StrengthBaseline: Knee Extenders5.76 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 3.53
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Stand From Supine Velocity

The time required for a participant to stand from supine position. A longer time reflects a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Based on the mixed-effect model of repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment. MMRM analysis included all participants at baseline and the following number of participants by Week 48: Placebo n=28, Low Dose n=28, High Dose n=32.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Stand From Supine Velocity-0.05 1/secStandard Error 0.01
RO7239361 Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Stand From Supine Velocity-0.02 1/secStandard Error 0.01
RO7239361 High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 48 in Stand From Supine Velocity-0.02 1/secStandard Error 0.01
95% CI: [0, 0.06]
95% CI: [0, 0.06]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.

Time frame: During DB period (48 weeks) and Whole study (up to approximately 34 months)

Population: Safety population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy. Data are presented for the arms in the DB period as well as for all RO7239361-treated participants in the whole study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Double-Blind Period46 participants
RO7239361 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Double-Blind Period48 participants
RO7239361 High DoseNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Double-Blind Period49 participants
RO7239361 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Whole Study57 participants
RO7239361 High Dose Whole StudyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Whole Study56 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. Reported here is the number of participants with AEs that led to study discontinuation.

Time frame: During DB period (48 weeks) and Whole study (up to approximately 34 months)

Population: Safety population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study therapy. Data are presented for the arms in the DB period as well as for all RO7239361-treated participants in the whole study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDouble-Blind Period0 participants
RO7239361 Low DoseNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDouble-Blind Period0 participants
RO7239361 High DoseNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDouble-Blind Period0 participants
RO7239361 Low DoseNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to DiscontinuationWhole Study0 participants
RO7239361 High Dose Whole StudyNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to DiscontinuationWhole Study0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48

The CGI-C was used to assess the participant's overall condition on a 7-point scale, using the status markers very much improved, much improved, slightly improved, no change, slightly worse, much worse or very much worse at Week 48 as compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who received a randomization treatment assignment. Included in the analysis are only those subjects for whom an efficacy assessment was completed at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Minimally worse16.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Much worse5.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Very much worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Minimally improved13.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Very much improved0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48No change58.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Much improved5.6 percentage of participants
RO7239361 Low DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Minimally worse18.9 percentage of participants
RO7239361 Low DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Minimally improved13.5 percentage of participants
RO7239361 Low DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Much worse10.8 percentage of participants
RO7239361 Low DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Much improved2.7 percentage of participants
RO7239361 Low DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48No change54.1 percentage of participants
RO7239361 Low DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Very much worse0 percentage of participants
RO7239361 Low DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Very much improved0 percentage of participants
RO7239361 High DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Very much worse0 percentage of participants
RO7239361 High DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Very much improved0 percentage of participants
RO7239361 High DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Much improved3.2 percentage of participants
RO7239361 High DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Minimally improved19.4 percentage of participants
RO7239361 High DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48No change51.6 percentage of participants
RO7239361 High DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Much worse3.2 percentage of participants
RO7239361 High DosePercentage of Participants for Each Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Assessment Status at Week 48Minimally worse22.6 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026