Skip to content

GNRH Agonist Trigger and Modified Luteal Phase Adding a Bolus of GnRHa at the Time of Implantation: a RCT

GnRH Agonist Trigger and Modified Luteal Phase Support, Adding a Mid-luteal Bolus of GnRHa: a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03039049
Enrollment
328
Registered
2017-02-01
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2017-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

GnRH agonist trigger, IVF, Luteal phase support, Mid-luteal GnRH agonist

Brief summary

Purpose:The aim of this project is to prospectively determine whether a single dose of GnRH-agonist administered at the time of implantation increases or not the reproductive outcome in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization ( IVF)/ intracytoplasmatic sperm injection(ICSI) triggered by a GnRH-agonist followed by a small bolus of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG 1500 IU) the day of oocyte retrieval.

Detailed description

It has been reported in previous publications that the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was eliminated when GnRH agonist was used to trigger ovulation and the delivery rate has improved after modified luteal support especially when a small bolus of hCG is used on the day of oocyte retrieval. (OMEGA/HCG 1500 IU). However, a risk difference of 7% in delivery rates is still in favor of HCG trigger. Thus, further modifications in the luteal phase supplementation are required in order to optimise the reproductive outcome after GnRH-agonist triggering. Recently, many papers showed, that independently of the GnRH analogue used to prevent the premature LH surge, the addition of GnRH-agonist during the luteal phase seems to be beneficial in terms of pregnancy. Nevertheless, their use in practice is not yet admitted because of controversial results in terms of efficacy and safety particularly on the conceptus.

Interventions

a single dose of Triptorelin 0.1 mg subcutaneously administered 6 days after oocyte retrieval.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ibn Rochd
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Female age \< 40 years No uterine (fibroids, mullerian malformations), ovarian ( endometrioma) or adnexa (hydrosalpinx) abnormalities• Baseline FSH and LH \< 12 IU/l.Patients with at least one embryo at transfer time

Exclusion criteria

* Very high risk of OHSS (\> 30 follicles \> 12 mm the day of ovulation triggering). • Reduced ovarian reserve * Fertilization failure * Severe endocrinopathy * Azoospermia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implantation rateTime Frame: 5 weeks after IVF/ICSInumber of gestational sacs per number of embryos transferred

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Delivery rateTime Frame: 26 weeks after IVF/ICSIbirth of baby beyond 26 weeks of gestation
positive pregnancy testTime Frame: 2 weeks after IVF/ICSIconfirmed by beta-hCG 14 days post embryo transfer
Ongoing pregnancyTime Frame: 12 weeks after IVF/ICSIpresence of foetal heart beat at 12 weeks of gestation
Early pregnancy lossTime Frame: miscarriage before 5 weeks of gestationloss of embryo before 5 weeks of gestation, chemical pregnancy and extra-uterine pregnancy

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome OHSSTime Frame: from date of triggering until 2 weeks after pregnancy test]early and late onset Ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome

Countries

Algeria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026