Skip to content

Randomised Study Comparing Two HIV Screening Strategies

Randomised Study Comparing Two HIV Screening Strategies in the Emergency Department Using an Electronic Tablet Questionnaire: The PETTSEQ Study (PErformance of Two Testing Strategies by Electronic Questionnaire)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03038724
Acronym
PETTSEQ
Enrollment
160
Registered
2017-02-01
Start date
2015-08-11
Completion date
2015-12-15
Last updated
2017-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

HIV testing

Brief summary

A randomised, single-blind study (the study investigator will not know which arm each patient is assigned to) conducted to examine the most effective strategy for conducting HIV testing in the Emergency Department (ED) using an electronic tablet. The study will take place in the ED at Lausanne University Hospital (LUH) between August and December 2015 in the context of the Masters project of a medical student studying at the Faculty of Medicine at Lausanne University.

Detailed description

In Switzerland, the national HIV testing recommendations have proposed targeted and diagnostic HIV testing since 2007. These recommendations list medical conditions and populations at risk in which HIV testing is indicated. The difficulty with this targeted approach is that it relies on medical personnel 1) to be aware that the medical conditions listed have an association with HIV infection and 2) to be able to identify their patients as coming from at-risk populations. In other countries, notably the United States, France and the United Kingdom, national HIV testing recommendations propose non-targeted screening whereby everyone presenting to a medical facility is tested if the HIV seroprevalence in the catchment population is above a defined threshold (0.1% for the US and France; 0.2% for the UK). As HIV seroprevalence in Switzerland already exceeds these thresholds, the current study will be performed to see whether non-targeted HIV testing using electronic tablets is acceptable and feasible in our Emergency Department (ED). ED patients will be randomised to a targeted or non-targeted arm after consenting to participate. Eighty patients will be assigned to each study arm. Participating patients will be issued with an electronic tablet and invited to follow the instructions on the screen. Targeted arm patients will be invited to complete a questionnaire on HIV risk factors and, if one or more risk factors are present, they will be informed that HIV testing is indicated and will be invited to take a free rapid HIV test. Non-targeted arm patients will be provided with information about HIV and HIV testing and will then be invited to take a free rapid HIV test without any questions regarding risk factors. Patients in each arm who are either not offered (targeted arm) or who decline rapid testing (non-targeted arm) will undergo secondary cross-screening in which targeted arm patients will be automatically directed by the tablet to the non-targeted arm information page and non-targeted arm patients will be directed to the targeted arm questionnaire. The primary endpoint is patient acceptance of HIV testing. The secondary objective is to examine the effect of cross-screening strategies.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTRapid HIV test

Sponsors

University of Lausanne Hospitals
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

The study investigator will not know which arm each patient is assigned to.

Intervention model description

Randomised, single-blind study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years old * Patients admitted to an ED examination cubicle within the preceding 12 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Patients clinically unstable (admitted to resus or considered unstable by the treating ED doctor) * Patients transferred from another hospital * Patients unable to provide informed consent (for example, through cognitive impairment, acute alcohol intoxication or intoxication by opiates or other psycho-active substances, acute psychosis, being hard of hearing or not French-speaking and with no interpreter) * Patients of known HIV+ status * Patients who have already been offered HIV screening during their ED visit by the treating ED doctor prior to enrolment in the study * Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient acceptance of rapid HIV testing in the ED4 monthsPatient acceptance of rapid HIV testing when offered by electronic questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HIV testing rate after cross-screening strategy4 monthsHIV testing accepted when patients without risk factors are offered testing or if patients offered testing without risk factor assessment then complete an assessment which shows they have risk factors for HIV acquisition

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ease of use of electronic questionnaire4 monthsDegree of assistance required by patients when they use the electronic tablet

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026