Skip to content

Impact of Liraglutide 3.0 on Body Fat Distribution

Impact of Liraglutide 3.0 on Body Fat Distribution, Visceral Adiposity, and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers In Overweight and Obese Adults at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03038620
Enrollment
235
Registered
2017-01-31
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2020-10-13
Last updated
2021-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Fat Disorder, Obesity, Visceral

Keywords

Obesity, Visceral, Cardiovascular Disease, Fat

Brief summary

This study is a clinical study to investigate the efficacy of liraglutide compared to placebo in reducing visceral adiposity measured by MRI in overweight or obese subjects at high risk for cardiovascular disease after 40 weeks on-treatment.

Detailed description

Obesity has long been recognized as a risk factor for all-cause mortality and morbidity, including the development of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, insulin resistance, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Obesity has recently been formally defined as a chronic disease characterized by pathophysiological processes that result in increased adipose tissue mass and can result in increased morbidity and mortality. Although the health risks associated with obesity are clear, there is an emerging appreciation that obesity per se, as defined by simple anthropometric measures such as waist circumference or body mass index (BMI), is neither necessary nor sufficient to promote cardiometabolic disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. As a result, BMI alone is an insufficient marker of risk and may not accurately identify individuals at elevated risk for ASCVD. There is a pressing need to more accurately phenotype obesity to identify individuals at elevated risk for ASCVD that may benefit from more intensive preventive and therapeutic strategies

Interventions

DRUGLiraglutide

Liraglutide is administered once daily by subcutaneous injections with the pen-injector, either in the abdomen, thigh or upper arm. Injections can be done at any time of day irrespective of meals. Subjects will be instructed to escalate the liraglutide dose to 3.0 mg/day over a 4 week period following an initial dose of 0.6 mg/day and weekly dose escalation steps of 0.6 mg/day.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo is administered once daily by subcutaneous injections with the pen-injector, either in the abdomen, thigh or upper arm. Injections can be done at any time of day irrespective of meals. Subjects will be instructed to escalate the placebo dose to 3.0 mg/day over a 4 week period following an initial dose of 0.6 mg/day and weekly dose escalation steps of 0.6 mg/day.

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 35 years * Able to provide informed consent * BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 or ≥ 27 kg/m2 with metabolic syndrome * Metabolic syndrome is defined as at least three of the following:3 1. waist circumference \> 102 cm (40 in) in men and 88 cm (35 in) in women 2. triglycerides \> 150 mg/dL or on treatment for hypertriglyceridemia 3. HDL cholesterol \< 40 mg/dL in men and \< 50 mg/dL in women 4. blood pressure \> 130/85 mmHg or on treatment for hypertension 5. fasting glucose \> 100 mg/dL

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (including liraglutide, exenatide or others as they become available), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or insulin within the last 3 months. * Receipt of any anti-obesity drug or supplement within 1 month prior to screening for this trial. * Self-reported or clinically documented history of significant fluctuations (\>5% change) in weight within 3 months prior to screening for this trial. * History of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2) or on treatment with anti-diabetes medication. * History of chronic pancreatitis or idiopathic acute pancreatitis (current or prior history). * History of gallbladder disease (cholelithiasis or cholecystitis). * Chronic kidney disease stage III or greater (eGFR\<60 mL/min). * Obesity induced by other endocrinologic disorders (e.g. Cushing Syndrome). * Current or history of treatment with medications that may cause significant weight gain, within 1 month prior to screening for this trial, including systemic corticosteroids (except for a short course of treatment, i.e., 7- 10 days), tri-cyclic antidepressants, atypical antipsychotic and mood stabilizers (e.g., imipramine, amitryptiline, mirtazapine, paroxetine, phenelzine, chlorpromazine, thioridazine, clozapine, olanzapine, valproic acid and its derivatives, and lithium). * Diet attempts using herbal supplements or over-the-counter medications within 1 month prior to screening for this trial. * Current participation in an organized weight reduction program or within the last 1 month prior to screening for this trial. * Participation in a clinical trial within the last 3 months prior to screening for this trial. * Familial or personal history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 or familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. * Personal history of non-familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. * History of Major Depressive Disorder within the last 2 years. * History of other severe psychiatric disorders, e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder. * Any lifetime history of a suicide attempt. * A history of any suicidal behavior in the last month prior to randomization. * Surgery scheduled for the trial duration period, except for minor surgical procedures, at the discretion of the Investigator. * Known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial product(s) or related product(s). * Known or suspected abuse of alcohol or narcotics. * Language barrier, mental incapacity, unwillingness or inability to understand. * Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant or are not using adequate contraceptive methods. These include abstinence and the following methods: diaphragm with spermicide, condom with spermicide (by male partner), intrauterine device, sponge, spermicide, Norplant®, Depo-Provera® or oral contraceptives.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative Percent Reduction in Visceral Adipose Tissue Mass Measured by MRIBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in visceral adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint as a percent of the baseline. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Reduction in Visceral Adipose Tissue VolumeBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in visceral adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.
Relative Percent Reduction in Body WeightBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in body weight after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.
Absolute Reduction in Body WeightBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in body weight after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.
Relative Percent Reduction in Waist CircumferenceBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in waist circumference after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.
Absolute Reduction in Waist CircumferenceBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in waist circumference after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.
Relative Percent Reduction in Total Body Adipose TissueBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in total body adipose tissue (fat) mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.
Absolute Reduction in Total Body Adipose TissueBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in total body adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.
Relative Percent Reduction in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose TissueBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.
Absolute Reduction in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose TissueBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.
Relative Percent Reduction in Lower Body Subcutaneous Adipose TissueBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in lower body subcutaneous adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.
Absolute Reduction in Lower Body Subcutaneous Adipose TissueBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in lower body subcutaneous adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.
Relative Percent Reduction in Liver Fat PercentBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in liver (hepatic) fat percentage measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Negative values reflect an increase in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.
Absolute Reduction in Liver Fat PercentBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in liver (hepatic) fat percentage measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Negative values reflect an increase in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.
Relative Percent Reduction in Total Body Lean VolumeBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in total body lean volume (fat-free mass) measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.
Absolute Reduction in Total Body Lean VolumeBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in total body lean volume (fat-free mass) measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.
Relative Percent Reduction in Total Thigh Muscle VolumeBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in total thigh muscle volume measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.
Absolute Reduction in Total Thigh Muscle VolumeBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in total thigh muscle volume measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.
Absolute Reduction in Mean Anterior Thigh Muscle Fat Infiltration PercentBaseline,40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in mean anterior thigh muscle fat infiltration percent measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Negative values reflect an increase in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower risk for metabolic disease
Change From Baseline in VAT/SAT RatioBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute reduction from baseline in Visceral adipose tissue/subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT/SAT) ratio measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. This is the ratio of visceral adipose tissue to subcutaneous adipose tissue and it is thought that lower values (relatively less visceral adipose tissue) are better.
Change From Baseline in Total Fat/Fat-free Mass RatioBaseline, 40 weeksThe effect on absolute change from baseline in total fat/fat-free mass ratio measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. This is a ratio of fat to lean mass and it is believed that lower values (less fat relative to lean mass) is better.
Relative Percent Change in Fasting Blood GlucoseBaseline, 40 weeksThe relative percent change in fasting blood glucose from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Negative values reflect a reduction. This is a blood based biomarker for diabetes in which normal levels are desirable (70-100 mg/dL).
Relative Percent Change in InsulinBaseline, 40 weeksThe relative percent change in insulin from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Positive values reflect an increase. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. This is a blood based biomarker in which lower fasting levels are desirable.
Relative Percent Change in HOMA-IRBaseline, 40 weeksThe relative percent change in HOMA-IR from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Positive values reflect an increase. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. The relative percent change in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) from baseline to study end point by treatment group measures insulin resistance. Levels above 1.9 signal early insulin resistance, while levels above 2.9 signal significant insulin resistance. There will be optimal insulin sensitivity if HOMA-IR is less than 1.
Relative Percent Change in C-reactive ProteinBaseline, 40 weeksThe relative percent change in biomarker of inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Negative values reflect a decrease. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. This is a blood based test for which lower values are associated with less inflammation and lower risk for cardiovascular events.
Relative Percent Change in Triglyceride/HDL-C RatioBaseline, 40 weeksThe relative percent change in triglyceride/HDL-C ratio from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Negative values reflect a decrease. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. Lower ratio of triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol is associated with less insulin resistance and lower cardiovascular risk.
Relative Percent Change in Nt-proBNPBaseline, 40 weeksThe relative percent change in N-terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptides (Nt-proBNP) from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Negative values reflect a decrease. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. NT-proBNP is a blood based biomarker. Lower levels are associated with lower risk for heart failure and cardiovascular events.
Absolute Change in Fasting Blood GlucoseBaseline,40 weeksThe change in fasting blood glucose from baseline to study end point by treatment group.
Absolute Change in InsulinBaseline, 40 weeksThe absolute change in insulin from baseline to study end point by treatment group. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits.
Absolute Change in HOMA-IRBaseline, 40 weeksThe absolute change in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) from baseline to study end point by treatment group measures insulin resistance. Levels above 1.9 signal early insulin resistance, while levels above 2.9 signal significant insulin resistance. There will be optimal insulin sensitivity if HOMA-IR is less than 1. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits.
Absolute Change in CRPBaseline, 40 weeksThe change in Markers of inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline to study end point by treatment group. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits. This is a blood based test for which lower values are associated with less inflammation and lower risk for cardiovascular events.
Absolute Change in Triglyceride/HDL-C RatioBaseline, 40 weeksThe change in triglyceride/HDL-C ratio from baseline to study end point by treatment group. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits. Lower ratio of triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol is associated with less insulin resistance and lower cardiovascular risk.
Absolute Change in Nt-proBNPBaseline, 40 weeksThe change in N-terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptides (Nt-proBNP) from baseline to study end point by treatment group. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits. NT-proBNP is a blood based biomarker. Lower levels are associated with lower risk for heart failure and cardiovascular events.
Change From Baseline in Heart RateBaseline, 40 weeksThe change in heart rate/pulse from baseline to study endpoint visit by treatment group.
Change From Baseline in Blood PressureBaseline, 40 weeksThe change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to study endpoint visit by treatment group.
Relative Percent Reduction in Mean Anterior Thigh Muscle Fat Infiltration PercentBaseline,40 weeksThe effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in mean anterior thigh muscle fat infiltration percent measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Negative values reflect an increase in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower risk for metabolic disease.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
On-treatment Time, WeeksweeksThe mean duration of treatment during study follow-up.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liraglutide 3.0 mg
Drug: Liraglutide Active Drug Other Names: * Saxenda Escalate the liraglutide (active) dose to 3.0 mg/day over a 4 week period following an initial dose of 0.6 mg/day and weekly dose escalation steps of 0.6 mg/day through subcutaneous injection. Liraglutide: Liraglutide is administered once daily by subcutaneous injections with the pen-injector, either in the abdomen, thigh or upper arm. Injections can be done at any time of day irrespective of meals. Subjects will be instructed to escalate the liraglutide dose to 3.0 mg/day over a 4 week period following an initial dose of 0.6 mg/day and weekly dose escalation steps of 0.6 mg/day.
73
Placebo
Drug: Placebo (for Liraglutide at a concentration of 6.0 mg/mL) Placebo tablet manufactured to mimic Liraglutide at a concentration of 6.0 mg/mL Other Names: * Placebo * Saline injection Escalate the Placebo dose to 3.0 mg/day over a 4 week period following an initial dose of 0.6 mg/day and weekly dose escalation steps of 0.6 mg/day through subcutaneous injection. Placebo: Placebo is administered once daily by subcutaneous injections with the pen-injector, either in the abdomen, thigh or upper arm. Injections can be done at any time of day irrespective of meals. Subjects will be instructed to escalate the placebo dose to 3.0 mg/day over a 4 week period following an initial dose of 0.6 mg/day and weekly dose escalation steps of 0.6 mg/day.
55
Total128

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1823
Overall StudyUninterpretable Outcome (Imaging)10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject015

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalLiraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo
Abdominal Adipose Tissue15.8 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
15.6 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
16.2 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
Age, Continuous50.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
49.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
50.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
Baseline kcal/day2185 kcal/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 192
2177 kcal/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 195
2196 kcal/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 189
BMI (kg/m^2)37.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
37.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
38.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
C-reactive Protein (mg/L)7.9 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
8.0 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
7.8 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)79.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
80.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
78.5 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
30 Participants18 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
98 Participants55 Participants43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Fasting Blood Glucose100 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
100.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
99.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
Fasting Insulin17.0 mIU/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
16.3 mIU/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
18.0 mIU/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
Height (m)1.6 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
1.6 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
1.6 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
Liver Fat6.9 percentage of fat
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
7.6 percentage of fat
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
6.1 percentage of fat
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
Lower Body Adipose Tissue15.1 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
14.7 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
15.6 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (pg/mL)61.1 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.1
59.6 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.1
63.2 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.7
Number of Participants with Hyperlipidemia31 Participants15 Participants16 Participants
Number of Participants with Hypertension50 Participants30 Participants20 Participants
Number of Participants with Prediabetes5 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
47 Participants28 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
78 Participants43 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
118 Participants67 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)128.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
130.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
125.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Total Adipose tissue40.2 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
39.6 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
40.9 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
Total Body Lean Tissue21.5 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
21.6 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
21.5 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Triglycerides (mg/dL)113.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.1
109.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 49.7
118.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.6
Visceral Adipose Tissue4.5 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
4.5 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
4.5 Liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Waist Circumference (cm)105.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
105.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
104.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Weight (kg)101.5 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
101.0 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
102.3 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 920 / 93
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 9234 / 93
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 920 / 93

Outcome results

Primary

Relative Percent Reduction in Visceral Adipose Tissue Mass Measured by MRI

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in visceral adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint as a percent of the baseline. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed study endpoint assessment (interpretable MRI at baseline and at study end).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Visceral Adipose Tissue Mass Measured by MRI12.49 percentage of reduction in VAT
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Visceral Adipose Tissue Mass Measured by MRI1.63 percentage of reduction in VAT
Secondary

Absolute Change in CRP

The change in Markers of inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline to study end point by treatment group. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits. This is a blood based test for which lower values are associated with less inflammation and lower risk for cardiovascular events.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Change in CRP-2.18 mg/LStandard Deviation 3.37
PlaceboAbsolute Change in CRP-0.64 mg/LStandard Deviation 6.23
Secondary

Absolute Change in Fasting Blood Glucose

The change in fasting blood glucose from baseline to study end point by treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline,40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Change in Fasting Blood Glucose-6.49 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.41
PlaceboAbsolute Change in Fasting Blood Glucose-0.22 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.93
Secondary

Absolute Change in HOMA-IR

The absolute change in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) from baseline to study end point by treatment group measures insulin resistance. Levels above 1.9 signal early insulin resistance, while levels above 2.9 signal significant insulin resistance. There will be optimal insulin sensitivity if HOMA-IR is less than 1. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Change in HOMA-IR-0.15 Molar unitsStandard Deviation 3.15
PlaceboAbsolute Change in HOMA-IR-0.69 Molar unitsStandard Deviation 5.24
Secondary

Absolute Change in Insulin

The absolute change in insulin from baseline to study end point by treatment group. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Change in Insulin0.75 mIU/LStandard Deviation 9.67
PlaceboAbsolute Change in Insulin-1.48 mIU/LStandard Deviation 12.26
Secondary

Absolute Change in Nt-proBNP

The change in N-terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptides (Nt-proBNP) from baseline to study end point by treatment group. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits. NT-proBNP is a blood based biomarker. Lower levels are associated with lower risk for heart failure and cardiovascular events.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Change in Nt-proBNP-8.10 pg/mLStandard Deviation 48.82
PlaceboAbsolute Change in Nt-proBNP1.44 pg/mLStandard Deviation 41.04
Secondary

Absolute Change in Triglyceride/HDL-C Ratio

The change in triglyceride/HDL-C ratio from baseline to study end point by treatment group. Collection was impacted by COVID-19 and changes to study visits. Lower ratio of triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol is associated with less insulin resistance and lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Change in Triglyceride/HDL-C Ratio-0.02 ratioStandard Deviation 0.83
PlaceboAbsolute Change in Triglyceride/HDL-C Ratio-0.16 ratioStandard Deviation 0.69
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue1.52 LitersStandard Deviation 1.31
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue0.15 LitersStandard Deviation 1.24
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Body Weight

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in body weight after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Body Weight6.75 KilogramsStandard Deviation 5.35
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Body Weight1.3 KilogramsStandard Deviation 4.79
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Liver Fat Percent

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in liver (hepatic) fat percentage measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Negative values reflect an increase in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images are reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Liver Fat Percent2.35 percentage of liver fatStandard Deviation 5.35
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Liver Fat Percent-0.01 percentage of liver fatStandard Deviation 3.24
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Lower Body Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in lower body subcutaneous adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Lower Body Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue1.51 LitersStandard Deviation 1.34
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Lower Body Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue0.19 LitersStandard Deviation 1.19
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Mean Anterior Thigh Muscle Fat Infiltration Percent

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in mean anterior thigh muscle fat infiltration percent measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Negative values reflect an increase in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower risk for metabolic disease

Time frame: Baseline,40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images are reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Mean Anterior Thigh Muscle Fat Infiltration Percent0.23 percentage of fat infiltrationStandard Deviation 0.49
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Mean Anterior Thigh Muscle Fat Infiltration Percent0.01 percentage of fat infiltrationStandard Deviation 0.58
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Total Body Adipose Tissue

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in total body adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Total Body Adipose Tissue3.76 LitersStandard Deviation 2.87
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Total Body Adipose Tissue0.42 LitersStandard Deviation 2.92
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Total Body Lean Volume

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in total body lean volume (fat-free mass) measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images are reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Total Body Lean Volume0.54 LitersStandard Deviation 0.88
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Total Body Lean Volume0.17 LitersStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Total Thigh Muscle Volume

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in total thigh muscle volume measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images are reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Total Thigh Muscle Volume0.35 LitersStandard Deviation 0.35
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Total Thigh Muscle Volume0.06 LitersStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Visceral Adipose Tissue Volume

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in visceral adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Visceral Adipose Tissue Volume0.53 LitersStandard Deviation 0.43
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Visceral Adipose Tissue Volume0.10 LitersStandard Deviation 0.53
Secondary

Absolute Reduction in Waist Circumference

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in waist circumference after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAbsolute Reduction in Waist Circumference7.4 cmStandard Deviation 6.8
PlaceboAbsolute Reduction in Waist Circumference4.6 cmStandard Deviation 6.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure

The change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to study endpoint visit by treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure-5.84 mmHgStandard Deviation 17.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure-0.02 mmHgStandard Deviation 16.01
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

The change in heart rate/pulse from baseline to study endpoint visit by treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange From Baseline in Heart Rate4.84 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 12.95
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart Rate2.67 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 11.39
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Fat/Fat-free Mass Ratio

The effect on absolute change from baseline in total fat/fat-free mass ratio measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. This is a ratio of fat to lean mass and it is believed that lower values (less fat relative to lean mass) is better.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange From Baseline in Total Fat/Fat-free Mass Ratio-7.23 ratioStandard Deviation 7.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Fat/Fat-free Mass Ratio0.01 ratioStandard Deviation 7.83
Secondary

Change From Baseline in VAT/SAT Ratio

The effect on absolute reduction from baseline in Visceral adipose tissue/subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT/SAT) ratio measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. This is the ratio of visceral adipose tissue to subcutaneous adipose tissue and it is thought that lower values (relatively less visceral adipose tissue) are better.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange From Baseline in VAT/SAT Ratio0.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in VAT/SAT Ratio0 ratioStandard Deviation 0.02
Secondary

Relative Percent Change in C-reactive Protein

The relative percent change in biomarker of inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Negative values reflect a decrease. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. This is a blood based test for which lower values are associated with less inflammation and lower risk for cardiovascular events.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Change in C-reactive Protein-19.91 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.75
PlaceboRelative Percent Change in C-reactive Protein19.02 percent changeStandard Deviation 76.13
Secondary

Relative Percent Change in Fasting Blood Glucose

The relative percent change in fasting blood glucose from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Negative values reflect a reduction. This is a blood based biomarker for diabetes in which normal levels are desirable (70-100 mg/dL).

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Change in Fasting Blood Glucose-5.62 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.77
PlaceboRelative Percent Change in Fasting Blood Glucose0.83 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.31
Secondary

Relative Percent Change in HOMA-IR

The relative percent change in HOMA-IR from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Positive values reflect an increase. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. The relative percent change in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) from baseline to study end point by treatment group measures insulin resistance. Levels above 1.9 signal early insulin resistance, while levels above 2.9 signal significant insulin resistance. There will be optimal insulin sensitivity if HOMA-IR is less than 1.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Change in HOMA-IR15.35 percent changeStandard Deviation 71.44
PlaceboRelative Percent Change in HOMA-IR11.85 percent changeStandard Deviation 69
Secondary

Relative Percent Change in Insulin

The relative percent change in insulin from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Positive values reflect an increase. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. This is a blood based biomarker in which lower fasting levels are desirable.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Change in Insulin20.58 percent changeStandard Deviation 70.69
PlaceboRelative Percent Change in Insulin7.73 percent changeStandard Deviation 58.09
Secondary

Relative Percent Change in Nt-proBNP

The relative percent change in N-terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptides (Nt-proBNP) from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Negative values reflect a decrease. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. NT-proBNP is a blood based biomarker. Lower levels are associated with lower risk for heart failure and cardiovascular events.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Change in Nt-proBNP12.10 percent changeStandard Deviation 78.5
PlaceboRelative Percent Change in Nt-proBNP20.47 percent changeStandard Deviation 79.42
Secondary

Relative Percent Change in Triglyceride/HDL-C Ratio

The relative percent change in triglyceride/HDL-C ratio from baseline to study end point as a percent of baseline by treatment group. Negative values reflect a decrease. Collection was impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and limitations to in person study visits, limiting complete collection of data for this measure. Lower ratio of triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol is associated with less insulin resistance and lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Complete case analysis was done. Those who completed baseline and endpoint study visits and had results, were only analyzed and reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Change in Triglyceride/HDL-C Ratio-2.10 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.23
PlaceboRelative Percent Change in Triglyceride/HDL-C Ratio-2.18 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.97
Secondary

Relative Percent Reduction in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue9.87 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.23
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue0.77 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.4
Secondary

Relative Percent Reduction in Body Weight

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in body weight after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Body Weight6.59 percent changeStandard Deviation 4.8
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Body Weight1.19 percent changeStandard Deviation 4.68
Secondary

Relative Percent Reduction in Liver Fat Percent

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in liver (hepatic) fat percentage measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Negative values reflect an increase in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Liver Fat Percent12.37 percent changeStandard Deviation 61.43
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Liver Fat Percent-20.63 percent changeStandard Deviation 104.92
Secondary

Relative Percent Reduction in Lower Body Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in lower body subcutaneous adipose tissue mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Lower Body Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue9.95 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.61
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Lower Body Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue1.29 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.57
Secondary

Relative Percent Reduction in Mean Anterior Thigh Muscle Fat Infiltration Percent

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in mean anterior thigh muscle fat infiltration percent measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Negative values reflect an increase in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower risk for metabolic disease.

Time frame: Baseline,40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images are reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Mean Anterior Thigh Muscle Fat Infiltration Percent2.81 percent changeStandard Deviation 6.51
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Mean Anterior Thigh Muscle Fat Infiltration Percent-0.29 percent changeStandard Deviation 6.96
Secondary

Relative Percent Reduction in Total Body Adipose Tissue

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in total body adipose tissue (fat) mass measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Total Body Adipose Tissue9.59 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.15
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Total Body Adipose Tissue0.95 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.8
Secondary

Relative Percent Reduction in Total Body Lean Volume

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in total body lean volume (fat-free mass) measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images are reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Total Body Lean Volume2.47 percent changeStandard Deviation 4.04
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Total Body Lean Volume0.90 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.66
Secondary

Relative Percent Reduction in Total Thigh Muscle Volume

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in total thigh muscle volume measured by MRI after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images are reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Total Thigh Muscle Volume3.48 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.55
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Total Thigh Muscle Volume0.68 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.72
Secondary

Relative Percent Reduction in Waist Circumference

The effect on relative percent reduction from baseline in waist circumference after 40 weeks on treatment versus placebo. Positive numbers reflect the reduction in the value from baseline to study endpoint. Reduction in this variable is believed to be associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Time frame: Baseline, 40 weeks

Population: Those who completed baseline and endpoint MRI with interpretable images.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgRelative Percent Reduction in Waist Circumference6.90 percent changeStandard Deviation 6.43
PlaceboRelative Percent Reduction in Waist Circumference4.16 percent changeStandard Deviation 6.06
Other Pre-specified

On-treatment Time, Weeks

The mean duration of treatment during study follow-up.

Time frame: weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgOn-treatment Time, Weeks36.2 weeksStandard Deviation 8.6
PlaceboOn-treatment Time, Weeks36.1 weeksStandard Deviation 8.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026