Skip to content

Release of Nociceptin From Granulocytes in Sepsis

Does the Release Profile of Nociceptin From Immunocytes Differ in Healthy Volunteers and Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03037281
Enrollment
14
Registered
2017-01-31
Start date
2016-04-07
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2021-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis, Sepsis Syndrome, Septic Shock, Severe Sepsis

Brief summary

Nociceptin is a protein found in the body, with a number of functions in the central nervous system, blood vessels and the gut. There is evidence that it may have a role in controlling the immune response to infection, and may act as a link between the brain and immune system. In infection, or after surgery, there is an increase in nociceptin, and subjects greater elevations of nociceptin have a poorer outcome. There is evidence that cells of the immune system may produce nociceptin, although it is not yet known which cells are capable of producing it, and what switches on production. This study aims to determine 1. Which cells of the immune system can produce nociceptin 2. If there is a difference in the ability to produce nociceptin between healthy volunteers and patients with severe infections

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSeptic

30mls of blood will be sampled by venepuncture, or sampled from indwelling lines (in the case of septic patients on intensive care). Blood will be sampled using standard techniques, and transferred to EDTA containing blood bottles, and undergo processing immediately.

Sponsors

The Royal College of Anaesthetists
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospitals, Leicester
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Leicester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* For septic patients; 1. Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study, or if lacking capacity, a next of kin or advocate is willing and able to give assent for participation in the study. Must be able to read and understand English. 2. Male or Female, aged 18 years or above. 3. Diagnosed with sepsis and admitted to the intensive care unit. 4. Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements. 5. Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study. Healthy Volunteers; 1. Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. Must be able to read and understand English. 2. Male or Female, aged 18 years or above and be 3. In good health. 4. Have had no course of medication, whether prescribed or over-the-counter, in the four weeks before first study dose and no individual doses in the final two weeks other than mild analgesia, vitamins and mineral supplements or, for females, oral contraceptives 5. Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements. 6. Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Conditions which may make phlebotomy hazardous to the participant (such as significant bleeding disorders or anaemia, or allergy), or to the investigator (blood viral infection). 2\. Any significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study. 3\. Participants who have participated in another research study involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistDay 1Measure of N/OFQ presence in granulocytes and associated supernatant

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality In-hospital, at 30 Days30 daysAll cause mortality at 30 days
Time to ICU Discharge (or Death if on ICU)Time to ICU discharge (or death if on ICU)
Granulocyte CountDay 1Count of the number of neutrophils in the original sample
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-2) ScoreDay 1The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-2) score for the patient. APACHE 2 is an international standard,12 variable score from 0-71 reflecting disease severity in the critically unwell during the first 24 hours of illness. The score is a combined measure of illness severity (acute physiology), and background chronic health factors. Increased score represents increased predicted mortality. Variables recorded include AaDO2 or PaO2 (depending on FiO2), temperature, mean arterial pressure, blood pH, heart rate, respiratory rate, serum sodium, serum potassium, creatinine, hematocrit, white blood cell count, Glasgow Coma Scale Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985). APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine. 13 (10): 818-29
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) ScoreDay 1The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for the patient, a score predictive of mortality in sepsis for intensive care patients based on respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological function (each scored 0-4, with a maximum overall score of 24). The worst (most deranged) physiological values for the first 24 hours are used. A higher score predicts increased mortality. The mortality breakdown for each sofa score range is - SOFA 0-6 (\<10% mortality), 7-9 (15-20%), 10-12 (40-50%), 13-14 (50 - 60%), 15 (\> 80%), 16 to 24 (\> 90%)
Time to Death or DischargeNumber of days between admission and death or discharge from hospitalTime to death or discharge (days)

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Septic
Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of sepsis. For the purposes of this study, patients must have a diagnosis of sepsis; SIRS (2 of pulse \>90, WCC, BP, Oxygen(Dellinger et al., 2013)) with microbiological evidence of infection (positive blood culture, urine dipstick, compatible history or examination, radiographic evidence) Septic: 30mls of blood will be sampled by venepuncture, or sampled from indwelling lines (in the case of septic patients on intensive care). Blood will be sampled using standard techniques, and transferred to EDTA containing blood bottles, and undergo processing immediately.
6
Healthy Volunteers
Healthy volunteers will be approached within the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, and provided with the PIS, with consent taken by one of the investigating team. Septic: 30mls of blood will be sampled by venepuncture, or sampled from indwelling lines (in the case of septic patients on intensive care). Blood will be sampled using standard techniques, and transferred to EDTA containing blood bottles, and undergo processing immediately.
8
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealthy VolunteersTotalSeptic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants13 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Continuous34.5 years52 years75.5 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
8 participants14 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 60 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP Antagonist

Measure of N/OFQ presence in granulocytes and associated supernatant

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Biosensor cells

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SepticProportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistEosinophils34.25907426 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 26.36477836
SepticProportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistNeutrophils25.73232323 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 25.95276607
Septic (+NOP Antagonist SB612111)Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistEosinophils5.882352941 mean % responsive biosensor cells
Septic (+NOP Antagonist SB612111)Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistNeutrophils8.712121212 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 0.535686955
Septic (N/OFQ Control)Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistEosinophils44.17193917 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 30.09734468
Septic (N/OFQ Control)Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistNeutrophils48.66792929 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 37.86453531
Healthy VolunteersProportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistEosinophils25.13095238 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 31.52494693
Healthy VolunteersProportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistNeutrophils32.34442641 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 22.5667298
Healthy Volunteers (+NOP Antagonist SB612111)Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistEosinophils17.86976912 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 14.33561565
Healthy Volunteers (+NOP Antagonist SB612111)Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistNeutrophils12.87518038 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 20.00326171
Healthy Volunteers (N/OFQ Control)Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistEosinophils39.97303622 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 32.13672569
Healthy Volunteers (N/OFQ Control)Proportion of Responsive Biosensor Cells Responding to Granulocyte Addition in the Presence and Absence of NOP AntagonistNeutrophils17.06777597 mean % responsive biosensor cellsStandard Deviation 15.88672067
Secondary

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-2) Score

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-2) score for the patient. APACHE 2 is an international standard,12 variable score from 0-71 reflecting disease severity in the critically unwell during the first 24 hours of illness. The score is a combined measure of illness severity (acute physiology), and background chronic health factors. Increased score represents increased predicted mortality. Variables recorded include AaDO2 or PaO2 (depending on FiO2), temperature, mean arterial pressure, blood pH, heart rate, respiratory rate, serum sodium, serum potassium, creatinine, hematocrit, white blood cell count, Glasgow Coma Scale Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985). APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine. 13 (10): 818-29

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
SepticAcute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-2) Score19.8 score on a scale
Secondary

Granulocyte Count

Count of the number of neutrophils in the original sample

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
SepticGranulocyte CountNeutrophils5.07 x10^7 cells ml-1
SepticGranulocyte CountEosinophils0.98 x10^7 cells ml-1
Septic (+NOP Antagonist SB612111)Granulocyte CountNeutrophils2.05 x10^7 cells ml-1
Septic (+NOP Antagonist SB612111)Granulocyte CountEosinophils1.61 x10^7 cells ml-1
Secondary

Mortality In-hospital, at 30 Days

All cause mortality at 30 days

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SepticMortality In-hospital, at 30 Days3 Participants
Septic (+NOP Antagonist SB612111)Mortality In-hospital, at 30 Days0 Participants
Secondary

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for the patient, a score predictive of mortality in sepsis for intensive care patients based on respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological function (each scored 0-4, with a maximum overall score of 24). The worst (most deranged) physiological values for the first 24 hours are used. A higher score predicts increased mortality. The mortality breakdown for each sofa score range is - SOFA 0-6 (\<10% mortality), 7-9 (15-20%), 10-12 (40-50%), 13-14 (50 - 60%), 15 (\> 80%), 16 to 24 (\> 90%)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
SepticSequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score9.33 score on a scale
Secondary

Time to Death or Discharge

Time to death or discharge (days)

Time frame: Number of days between admission and death or discharge from hospital

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SepticTime to Death or Discharge17.5 days
Secondary

Time to ICU Discharge (or Death if on ICU)

Time frame: Time to ICU discharge (or death if on ICU)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SepticTime to ICU Discharge (or Death if on ICU)7.5 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026