Skip to content

Outcomes of Meniscus Root Repair Using a Transtibial Pullout Technique

Multi-Center Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Meniscus Root Repair Using a Transtibial Pullout Technique

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03037242
Enrollment
55
Registered
2017-01-31
Start date
2017-05-01
Completion date
2027-02-28
Last updated
2026-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meniscus Tear

Brief summary

The results of this study will optimize the care for patients with a meniscus root tear. Surgeons will be able to determine if MRR (meniscus root repair) with transtibial pullout technique is an effective treatment and will identify potential risk factors for poor clinical outcomes. In addition, investigators will determine if MRR is successful in delaying the radiographic progression of arthritis in the involved compartment.

Detailed description

The loss of attachment at the root of the meniscus impairs the ability to maintain hoop strain when the tibiofemoral joint is loaded. This loss of hoop strain is responsible for the increased pressure on the articular cartilage. This new awareness has prompted surgeons to consider surgical repair for treatment of meniscal root avulsions. Despite this recent focus on results of surgical repair, prospective studies are lacking, and the optimal surgical indications and technique have not been optimized.

Interventions

PROCEDURETranstibial pullout technique

Evaluating radographs

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Meniscus root avulsion tear (defined as meniscus posterior horn root avulsion or full thickness tear within 9 mm of the root attachment) 2. Age 18-65 3. Ligament injury with concomitant reconstruction is acceptable 4. Malalignment with corrective osteotomy is acceptable

Exclusion criteria

1. Subchondral collapse on pre-op MRI 2. Extrusion greater than 3 mm 3. Intra-op Outerbridge grade 3 or greater chondromalacia 4. Intra-op poor quality meniscus tissue 5. Mal-alignment greater than 5 degrees without corrective osteotomy 6. Obesity with BMI over 40 7. Kellgren Lawrence \> grade 2 8. Worker's compensation status

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Tegner activity scorebaseline, 2 yearsTegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The patient is asked to select the level of participation that best describes their current level of activity and that before injury. The score varies from 0-10. A score of 0 represents sick leave or disability pension because of knee problems, whereas a score of 10 corresponds to participation in national and international elite competitive sports \>6 score can only be achieved if the person participates in recreational or competitive sport.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026