Skip to content

Intravenous Iron in Patients With Systolic Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency to Improve Morbidity & Mortality

Ferric Carboxymaltose Assessment of Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With IRon Deficiency and Chronic Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03036462
Acronym
FAIR-HF2
Enrollment
1105
Registered
2017-01-30
Start date
2017-03-07
Completion date
2024-05-02
Last updated
2025-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Iron Deficiency, Systolic Heart Failure

Keywords

intravenous iron, systolic heart failure, iron deficiency, morbidity, mortality

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intravenous iron supplementation using ferric carboxymaltosis (FCM) extends the time-to-first-event of heart failure hospitalisations and cardiovascular (CV) death and reduces hospitalisation and mortality in patients with iron deficiency and heart failure.

Detailed description

The clinical trial is designed as an international, prospective, multi-centre, double-blind, parallel group, randomised, controlled, interventional trial to investigate whether a long-term therapy with i.v. iron (ferric carboxymaltosis) compared to placebo can extend the time-to-first-event of heart failure hospitalisations and cardiovascular (CV) death (in the full population and in the population of patients with TSAT\<20%) and reduce the rate of recurrent events of heart failure hospitalisations. I.v. iron administration in the form of ferric carboxymaltosis (FCM) will be carried out according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). Bolus administration (1000 mg) will be followed by an optional administration of 500-1000 mg within the first 4 weeks (up to a total of 2000 mg which is in-label) according to approved dosing rules, followed by administration of 500 mg FCM at every 4 months, except when haemoglobin is \> 16.0 g/dL or ferritin is \> 800 µg/L. In the verum group, all patients will receive a saline administration, when no iron is indicated at the time of the visit and according to the values listed above. Patients originally assigned to the placebo group will receive a saline administration at all visits. In the control group i.v. NaCl at a volume according to the dosing rules for FCM at all visits will be administered in a double-blind manner.

Interventions

DRUGIron

i.v. iron administration

DRUGSaline

i.v. NaCl administration

Sponsors

Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK)
CollaboratorOTHER
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with chronic HFrEF (CHF) of at least 3 months duration and a history of documented LVEF\<45%. 2. Confirmed presence of ID (ferritin \< 100 ng/mL or ferritin 100 - 299 ng/mL with TSAT \< 20 %) 3. Serum haemoglobin of 9.5 - 14.0 g/dL 4. At time of screening considered re-stabilised and planned for discharge within next 24 h (NYHA 2 or 3), or stable ambulatory with a HF hospitalisation in the past 12 months (NYHA 2-4), or stable ambulatory with BNP \> 100 pg/mL or NT-proBNP \> 300 pg/mL or MR-proANP \> 120 pmol/L (NYHA 2-4) 5. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Hypersensitivity to the active substance, to FCM or any of its excipients 2. Known serious hypersensitivity to other parenteral iron products 3. Anaemia not attributed to iron deficiency, e.g. other microcytic anaemia 4. Evidence of iron overload or disturbances in the utilisation of iron 5. History of severe asthma with known FEV1 \<50% 6. Acute bacterial infection 7. Presence of a deficiency for vitamin B12 and/or serum folate (if present, this needs to be corrected first) 8. Use of renal replacement therapy 9. Treatment with an erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA), any i.v. iron and/or a blood transfusion in the previous 6 weeks prior to randomisation. 10. More than 500 meters in the initial 6-minutes walking-test

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-to-first event of CV death or HF hospitalisationThe whole follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Show that treatment of patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency (ID) with i.v. iron (Ferric Carboxymaltose, FCM) versus placebo (i.v. NaCl) can extend the time-to-first-event of heart failure hospitalisations and cardiovascular (CV) death. Type I error rate control across the three primary endpoints will be ensured by using the Hochberg procedure.
Rate of total (first and recurrent) events of hospitalisations for heart failure (HF)The wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Show that treatment of patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency (ID) with i.v. iron (Ferric Carboxymaltose, FCM) versus placebo (i.v. NaCl) reduces the rate of recurrent events of heart failure hospitalisations.
Time-to-first event of CV death or HF hospitalisation in patients with TSAT <20%During the wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Show that treatment of patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency (ID) with i.v. iron (Ferric Carboxymaltose, FCM) versus placebo (i.v. NaCl) can extend the time-to-first-event of heart failure hospitalisations and cardiovascular (CV) death in the population of patients with TSAT\<20%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of wellbeing (questionnaire)The wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Changes in PGA of wellbeing during follow-up
Changes in renal parameters (laboratory parameters)The wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Changes in renal parameters from baseline to end of follow-up, assessing creatinine levels
Changes in cardiovascular parameters (laboratory parameters)The wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Changes in cardiovascular parameters from baseline to end of follow-up, assessing natriuretic peptide levels
Changes in 6-minute walk-test (nomogram)The wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Changes in 6-minute walk-test during follow-up
Changes in metabolic parameters (laboratory parameters)The wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Changes in metabolic parameters from baseline to end of follow-up, assessing aspartate or alanine transaminase levels
Key Safety Endpoint: cardiovascular mortality36 months of follow-upcardiovascular mortality during 36 months of follow-up
Key Safety Endpoint: All-cause mortality36 months of follow-upAll-cause mortality during 36 months of follow-up
Changes in inflammatory parameters (laboratory parameters)The wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Changes in inflammatory parameters from baseline to end of follow-up, assessing C-reactive protein levels
Changes in NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class (scale)The wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Changes in NYHA functional class during follow-up
Changes in EQ-5D (questionnaire)The wohle follow-up period. We aim for a minimum average follow-up of >2 years. We aim for a minimum follow-up of 6 months for all patients, but not less than 3 months.Changes EQ-5D during follow-up

Countries

Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026