Skip to content

Simplifying Survivorship Care Planning

Simplifying Survivorship Care Planning; Comparing the Efficacy and Patient-Centeredness of Three Care Delivery Models

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03035773
Acronym
SSCP
Enrollment
378
Registered
2017-01-30
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2024-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

Oncology, Survivorship

Brief summary

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify an SCP process that is patient-centered, effective in promoting appropriate survivorship care and can be successfully implemented for patients with different types of cancer who are being treated in a broad range of clinical settings. There is a need for research related to SCP that prioritizes outcomes that are most highly valued by patients, caregivers and clinical stakeholders.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately 1.6 million people are diagnosed with cancer and the relative 5-year survival rate across all cancer types approaches 70%. As of 2014, there were almost 15 million Americans living with a history of cancer. Cancer survivors face a variety of health care needs, including surveillance for recurrence, treatment for long-term and late effects of cancer and its treatment, general primary and preventive care, management of any comorbidities, encouragement of healthy lifestyle behaviors, and attention to psychosocial issues. In 2005, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report 'From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition' highlighted the challenges that cancer survivors face as they transition from acute treatment. The completion of acute cancer treatment is a critical juncture at which patients are in need of better support and communication to ensure optimal health and quality of life outcomes as they transition to long-term survivorship. Cancer survivors face substantial deficiencies in the quality of care that they receive, including both underuse of recommended care and overuse of services that are not recommended for routine follow-up. The 2005 IOM report called for all patients completing acute treatment to be provided with a survivorship care plan (SCP) that summarizes treatments received and outlines future healthcare priorities in order to facilitate effective management of health care between survivors and their oncology and primary care providers. STUDY PROCEDURES: The primary aim of this trial is to assess whether there is a difference among three SCP models of varying levels of resource intensity and patients' receipt of recommended health services in the months following completion of acute treatment. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to measure whether the provision of the SCP to the survivor and primary care provider (PCP) is associated with survivors' receipt of cancer follow-up care as outlined on their SCP (primary outcome). Avoidance of non-recommended care, receipt of recommended primary and preventive care, and patient-reported outcome measures will serve as secondary endpoints. Participants in the RCT will have been treated for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer. This RCT will be conducted in four oncology clinics in two medical systems. The investigators will enroll survivors of Stage I-III breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer who are completing treatment and transitioning to long-term survivorship, and use a stratified randomization to assign participants to one of three study conditions (Arms A, B or C). This study will focus specifically on the period following completion of acute treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy); patients receiving long-term adjuvant endocrine/antibody therapies will also be eligible. The proposed trial will be conducted at Johns Hopkins Medical Institution (JHMI) and Peninsula Regional Medical Center (PRMC). JHMI is a large, academic medical center in an urban setting with distinct treatment programs based on disease site. At JHMI, the investigators will recruit from the Breast Cancer Program, the Genitourinary Cancer Program (prostate cancer), and Gastrointestinal Cancer Program (colorectal cancer). These programs operate across disciplines (e.g., medical, radiation, and surgical oncology) but separately from each other, enabling evaluation of 3 separate clinical settings within JHMI. In addition, the trial will include the PRMC Richard A. Henson Cancer Institute, a community cancer program located in the rural area of Maryland's eastern shore. At PRMC there is a single general oncology practice. The four programs differ in the extent to which survivorship care planning is already a part of routine care. As yet, none of the clinics in this study has a consistent format for the delivery of SCP universally at the completion of acute treatment. The study design (cancer types, clinical systems and SCP models) is intended to enable the development of real-world best practices for the implementation of SCPs and assess whether these are consistent or vary across a wide range of clinical contexts and survivor characteristics. Each participant will be followed for 18 months, with the number of visits dependent on the randomization arm (described below). The investigators will abstract 18 months of follow-up data for enrolled patients from medical records, as well as from patient reports of health service use; data will be collected at months 6, 12, and 18. The investigators will obtain and abstract medical records guided by the information in the summary document (see Health Services Use Summary included as a supplemental study document) and from the patient using provided tracking tools of providers they have seen, tests they have undergone, etc. (see Tip Sheet in supplemental study documents). Patient-reported outcomes will be collected at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months primarily via a REDCap form, with telephone or in-person data collection as a back-up when needed.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCare Plan Only

Patient participants randomized to Arm A will be sent a copy of the SCP within 3 months of completion of treatment and a copy will be added to their medical record. A copy of the SCP will also be sent to the PCP on record. The SCP will be completed by a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. The SCP will be accompanied by a cover letter that will be signed by a member of the clinical team.

BEHAVIORALCare Plan During a Visit

Patient participants randomized to Arm B will receive a copy of the SCP during an in-person 'stethoscope free' visit with a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. A copy of the SCP will be added to the medical record and a copy will be sent to the primary care provider on record. The visit will be scheduled after consent is signed and will occur between 1 and 3 months after completion of treatment. The visit will focus on review of the SCP content and offer an opportunity for patients to ask questions about any aspect of the plan or associated treatment and survivorship issues.

BEHAVIORALCare Plan During a Visit with an Additional Visit

Participants randomized to Arm C will receive a copy of the SCP during an in-person 'stethoscope free' visit with a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. A copy of the SCP will be added to the medical record and a copy will be sent to the primary care provider. The visit will be scheduled after consent is signed and will occur between 1-3 months after completion of treatment. The initial visit will focus on review of the SCP content and offer an opportunity for patients to ask questions about any aspect of the plan or associated treatment and survivorship issues. Patients will also receive a follow up survivorship visit 7-10 months after the end of treatment that will focus on a review of the SCP and offer the opportunity to ask about any persistent or emerging issues.

Sponsors

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 21 years or older; * Diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer (stages I-III); * Treated with intent to cure * People who are on long-term (\>1 year) chronic treatment are eligible; * No evidence of disease; * Able to complete the study data collection in English; * Had their cancer care primarily managed by either JHMI or PRMC, with JHMI or PRMC primarily responsible for the patients' survivorship care; and * Has private insurance, or covered by Medicare or Medicaid.

Exclusion criteria

* Younger than 21 years of age; * Diagnosed with in situ or metastatic breast, prostate or colorectal cancer (i.e. Stage 0 or IV); * Not treated with intent to cure; * Did not have cancer care primarily managed within one of the 4 participating clinics, or JHMI or PRMC is not primarily responsible for the patients' survivorship care; and * Does not have health insurance at screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Compliant With Follow-up Care Visits18 MonthsThe primary outcome classifies patients as compliant or non-compliant based on whether they were compliant on all visits, tests/procedures, and non-oral medication recommendations included in their care plans.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Received Tests and Procedures Recommended on Their Survivorship Care Plan18 MonthsThese data are generated through electronic medical record review. This outcome is operationalized as a dichotomous variable (received recommended tests and procedures: yes/no).
Number of Participants Who Received Cancer-related Tests Consistent With Overuse18 MonthsThis analysis compared potential overuse of surveillance tests between cancer types (breast, prostate and colorectal). This outcome will be operationalized as a dichotomous variable (did not receive inappropriate care: yes/no). The outcome relates to participants who received care not specified on their care plan and on a guideline predetermined list of not recommended surveillance. This was determined through a physician chart review.
Number of Participants Who Received an Annual Physical Exam18 MonthsThis secondary outcome classifies participants as having had an annual physical exam based on medical record review. This outcome was operationalized as a dichotomous variable (received recommended primary care: yes/no). Participants were included in this analysis if they had a primary care visit recommended on their survivorship care plan.
Patient-reported Outcomes: Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC)18 MonthsThe outcome is a sum score of a 5-item scale with a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 20 with a higher score indicating greater worry (worse outcome).
Patient-reported Outcomes: Follow-up Care Use Among Survivors (FOCUS)-Information Needs Module18 MonthsQuestionnaire asking about informational needs on 12 topics. Responses for each question can be yes/no/not sure. Reported the total number of health needs responded to as yes. Outcome is a sum of reported needs. Score range from 0-12 with a higher score reflecting more informational needs.
Patient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)18 MonthsPLANS is a cancer survivorship questionnaire with 2 items specifically related to survivorship care planning. These items are 'I feel prepared for what to expect over the next year' (score range 1-4 with 4 being a more positive score) and 'There is a well-coordinated plan for my cancer care' (score range 1-10 with 1 being Not at all confident and 10 being Extremely confident.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ARM A - Care Plan Only
SCP document delivered to the patient & Primary Care Provider Care Plan Only: Patient participants randomized to Arm A will be sent a copy of the SCP within 3 months of completion of treatment and a copy will be added to their medical record. A copy of the SCP will also be sent to the PCP on record. The SCP will be completed by a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. The SCP will be accompanied by a cover letter that will be signed by a member of the clinical team.
126
ARM B - Care Plan During a Visit
SCP document provided to the patient in an in-person survivorship visit and copy sent to PCP Care Plan During a Visit: Patient participants randomized to Arm B will receive a copy of the SCP during an in-person 'stethoscope free' visit with a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. A copy of the SCP will be added to the medical record and a copy will be sent to the primary care provider on record. The visit will be scheduled after consent is signed and will occur between 1 and 3 months after completion of treatment. The visit will focus on review of the SCP content and offer an opportunity for patients to ask questions about any aspect of the plan or associated treatment and survivorship issues.
125
ARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional Visit
SCP document provided to the patient in an in-person survivorship visit with an additional follow-up visit and copy of the document sent to PCP Care Plan During a Visit with an Additional Visit: Participants randomized to Arm C will receive a copy of the SCP during an in-person 'stethoscope free' visit with a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. A copy of the SCP will be added to the medical record and a copy will be sent to the primary care provider. The visit will be scheduled after consent is signed and will occur between 1-3 months after completion of treatment. The initial visit will focus on review of the SCP content and offer an opportunity for patients to ask questions about any aspect of the plan or associated treatment and survivorship issues. Patients will also receive a follow up survivorship visit 7-10 months after the end of treatment that will focus on a review of the SCP and offer the opportunity to ask about any persistent or emerging issues.
127
Total378

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicARM A - Care Plan OnlyTotalARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional VisitARM B - Care Plan During a Visit
Age, Continuous63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants13 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
120 Participants365 Participants123 Participants122 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
24 Participants75 Participants23 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
97 Participants292 Participants98 Participants97 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
126 Participants378 Participants127 Participants125 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants192 Participants64 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants186 Participants63 Participants59 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1260 / 1250 / 127
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1260 / 1250 / 127
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1260 / 1250 / 127

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Compliant With Follow-up Care Visits

The primary outcome classifies patients as compliant or non-compliant based on whether they were compliant on all visits, tests/procedures, and non-oral medication recommendations included in their care plans.

Time frame: 18 Months

Population: The primary analysis was by intention to treat. To be included, participants had to have received an SCP and have data from 18 months of follow-up.~Four patients (3 from Arm A and 1 from ARM C) were not included in the primary outcome analysis because there were no recommendations listed in their care plans.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ARM A - Care Plan OnlyNumber of Participants Compliant With Follow-up Care Visits47 Participants
ARM B - Care Plan During a VisitNumber of Participants Compliant With Follow-up Care Visits53 Participants
ARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional VisitNumber of Participants Compliant With Follow-up Care Visits44 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Received an Annual Physical Exam

This secondary outcome classifies participants as having had an annual physical exam based on medical record review. This outcome was operationalized as a dichotomous variable (received recommended primary care: yes/no). Participants were included in this analysis if they had a primary care visit recommended on their survivorship care plan.

Time frame: 18 Months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ARM A - Care Plan OnlyNumber of Participants Who Received an Annual Physical Exam48 Participants
ARM B - Care Plan During a VisitNumber of Participants Who Received an Annual Physical Exam40 Participants
ARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional VisitNumber of Participants Who Received an Annual Physical Exam43 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Received Cancer-related Tests Consistent With Overuse

This analysis compared potential overuse of surveillance tests between cancer types (breast, prostate and colorectal). This outcome will be operationalized as a dichotomous variable (did not receive inappropriate care: yes/no). The outcome relates to participants who received care not specified on their care plan and on a guideline predetermined list of not recommended surveillance. This was determined through a physician chart review.

Time frame: 18 Months

Population: Only participants with a history of breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer were analyzed. The protocol specified that this analysis would be by cancer type, not study arm as surveillance tests analyzed were not specified on survivorship care plans.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ARM A - Care Plan OnlyNumber of Participants Who Received Cancer-related Tests Consistent With Overuse22 Participants
ARM B - Care Plan During a VisitNumber of Participants Who Received Cancer-related Tests Consistent With Overuse0 Participants
ARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional VisitNumber of Participants Who Received Cancer-related Tests Consistent With Overuse1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Received Tests and Procedures Recommended on Their Survivorship Care Plan

These data are generated through electronic medical record review. This outcome is operationalized as a dichotomous variable (received recommended tests and procedures: yes/no).

Time frame: 18 Months

Population: Only participants who had any tests or procedures recommended on their personalized survivorship care plan were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ARM A - Care Plan OnlyNumber of Participants Who Received Tests and Procedures Recommended on Their Survivorship Care Plan82 Participants
ARM B - Care Plan During a VisitNumber of Participants Who Received Tests and Procedures Recommended on Their Survivorship Care Plan78 Participants
ARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional VisitNumber of Participants Who Received Tests and Procedures Recommended on Their Survivorship Care Plan73 Participants
Secondary

Patient-reported Outcomes: Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC)

The outcome is a sum score of a 5-item scale with a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 20 with a higher score indicating greater worry (worse outcome).

Time frame: 18 Months

Population: Participants who completed Patient Reported Outcomes data at 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARM A - Care Plan OnlyPatient-reported Outcomes: Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC)11.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
ARM B - Care Plan During a VisitPatient-reported Outcomes: Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC)11.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
ARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional VisitPatient-reported Outcomes: Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC)11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Secondary

Patient-reported Outcomes: Follow-up Care Use Among Survivors (FOCUS)-Information Needs Module

Questionnaire asking about informational needs on 12 topics. Responses for each question can be yes/no/not sure. Reported the total number of health needs responded to as yes. Outcome is a sum of reported needs. Score range from 0-12 with a higher score reflecting more informational needs.

Time frame: 18 Months

Population: Analysis is of the participants who completed Patient Reported Outcomes data collection at 18 month timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARM A - Care Plan OnlyPatient-reported Outcomes: Follow-up Care Use Among Survivors (FOCUS)-Information Needs Module3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
ARM B - Care Plan During a VisitPatient-reported Outcomes: Follow-up Care Use Among Survivors (FOCUS)-Information Needs Module3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
ARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional VisitPatient-reported Outcomes: Follow-up Care Use Among Survivors (FOCUS)-Information Needs Module3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Secondary

Patient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)

PLANS is a cancer survivorship questionnaire with 2 items specifically related to survivorship care planning. These items are 'I feel prepared for what to expect over the next year' (score range 1-4 with 4 being a more positive score) and 'There is a well-coordinated plan for my cancer care' (score range 1-10 with 1 being Not at all confident and 10 being Extremely confident.

Time frame: 18 Months

Population: Analysis includes participants who completed the PLANS data at 18 months post baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARM A - Care Plan OnlyPatient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)Feel prepared for what to expect in the coming year3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ARM A - Care Plan OnlyPatient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)There is a well-coordinated plan for your cancer care7.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
ARM B - Care Plan During a VisitPatient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)Feel prepared for what to expect in the coming year3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ARM B - Care Plan During a VisitPatient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)There is a well-coordinated plan for your cancer care7.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
ARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional VisitPatient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)Feel prepared for what to expect in the coming year3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ARM C - Care Plan During a Visit With an Additional VisitPatient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)There is a well-coordinated plan for your cancer care7.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026