Skip to content

Effects of Intra-Operative Ropivaciane Epidural Injection on Post-Operative Outcomes Following Elective Lumbar Fusion

Effects of Intra-Operative Ropivaciane Epidural Injection on Post-Operative Outcomes Following Elective Lumbar Fusion

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03035656
Enrollment
228
Registered
2017-01-30
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2022-03-01
Last updated
2019-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

Pain, analgesic, spinal fusion

Brief summary

The following is a double blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial to test the hypothesis that a single epidural injection of Ropivaciane® intra operatively will:1) Single intra-operative epidural injection of Ropivaciane® will result in decreased postoperative pain and opioid use in both minimally invasive (MIS) and open lumbar fusion patients; 2) Decreased postoperative pain will lead to improved clinical outcomes; and 3) Elucidate if there are differences in pain management between MIS and open surgical procedures. The proposed study will add novel information to current knowledge by 1) exploring of the effects of intra-operative single epidural injection analgesic on patients receiving MIS compared to open surgery, and 2) investigate potential immediate and short-term functional improvements gained from intra-operative single injection of Ropivaciane®.

Detailed description

This double blinded, randomized clinical trial will test hypotheses by administering a single epidural injection prior to wound closure of either Ropivaciane® or saline.All pre-surgical activities and anesthesia will proceed as usual, with the addition of a single epidural injection immediately prior to wound closure 2 levels, or 10cm above the operated spinal level. Experimental groups will receive 0.2% Ropivaciane® (10 ml; dose shown to be effective without transient weakness), 9 and the control group will receive 0.9% saline solution (10 ml). Accurate placement into the space will be verified by the injection of contrast medium (iohexol, 180 mgl/ml) under fluoroscopic guidance. Epidural solutions will be prepared prior to surgery by pharmacy and coded; surgeons will administer according to the patient's code maintaining the double-blind procedure. It is important to note that treatment as usual differs between open and MIS cohorts. The question of interest is whether the addition of the epidural analgesic to current practices for each surgery type results in increased positive outcomes, whether this is due to synergistic effects or not. Following operative treatment, Foley Urinary catheter will be removed 24 hours post-operatively, unless otherwise clinically indicated.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine

Administration of Ropivaciane via epidural injection intra-operatively

OTHERSaline

Administration of saline via epidural injection intra-operatively

Sponsors

Horizon Health Network
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Randomization of arms are conducted by the pharmacy department, and drug or saline preparation are prepared by the pharmacy department.

Intervention model description

Patients are randomized into either the experimental arm (administration of Ropivaciane) or the control arm (administration of saline).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Consenting participants undergoing elective 1-2 level lumbar fusion through the Canada East Spine Centre

Exclusion criteria

* History of severe respiratory, renal or hepatic disease * Previous spine surgery * Known allergy to local anaesthesia * Those who experience dural tear during operative procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in PainAdministered 6 weeks pre-operatively, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours post-operatively, 6 months post operatively, and 12 months post operativelyBack and leg pain measured using the validated Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for back and leg pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in DisabilityAdministered 6 weeks pre-operatively, 6 and 12 months post-operativelyMeasurement of disability attributed to back problem using the validated Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Change in General HealthAdministered 6 weeks pre-operatively, 6 and 12 months post-operativelyMeasurement of overall general health as measured by the validated Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12)
Change in Medication UseInvestigated 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours post-operatively.Medication used to control pain post-operatively as given by a qualified health professional while the patient is in hospital.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in AmbulationInvestigated 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours post-operatively.The patient's ability to walk following surgery as measured using Ortho-Care Step Watch Activity Monitors (SAM) which will be attached to the patient's ankle during their stay in hospital.
Adverse EventsThe total number of adverse events will be measured at the time of patient discharge, between 48 hours and 120 hours following surgical interventionAdverse Events (AEs) will be measured using the validated Spine Adverse

Contacts

Primary ContactErin E Bigney, BA MA
cescresearch@gmail.com506 648 6028
Backup ContactEden A Richardson, BA
Eden.Richardson@Horizonnb.ca506 648 6116

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026