Skip to content

Effectiveness of a Brief Psychological Mindfulness Based Intervention for the Treatment of Depression in Primary Care

Effectiveness of a Brief Psychological Mindfulness Based Intervention for the Treatment of Depression in Primary Care: Face-to-face Application, Treatment as Usual and Application Through ICTs

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03034343
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-01-27
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2020-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Mindfulness, Internet program, Depression, Cost-effectiveness

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess and compare a mindfulness low-intensity (4 weeks) psychological intervention for the treatment of depression in Primary Care between different groups: a mindfulness intervention applied face to face in group format, a control group that will receive treatment as usual (TAU) consisting of medical treatment and the same mindfulness intervention applied by Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). The principal hypothesis is that face to face intervention will be more effective than TAU

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to assess and compare a mindfulness low-intensity (4 weeks) psychological intervention for the treatment of depression in Primary Care between different groups: 1) a face-to-face mindfulness intervention in group format (10-12 people/group), 2) a control group which will received primary care TAU (usual medical treatment) and 3) the same mindfulness intervention applied by Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) (Internet-based program). All participants in the two psychological intervention groups will also receive usual medical treatment managed by their general practitioner. Each group will be composed of 40 participants with a total sample of 120. The principal hypothesis is that face to face intervention will be more effective than TAU. Secondary hypothesis, are: 1) The online computerized program will be more effective than TAU; 2) The differences between face-to-face and online format will be analyzed. Finally, a qualitative study will be conducted in order to analyze the feasibility, acceptance, barriers and causes of drop-outs and success, expectations, experiences and attitudes that could be obstacles or facilitators in the interventions, both in patients and in health professionals. This study will allow us to understand the experiences of depressed patients with these interventions and their differences.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMindfulness

Sponsors

Research Unit in Primary Care of Aragon (Spain)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universitat Jaume I
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be adult * Willingness to participate in the study and signing informed consent * Ability to understand and write Spanish. * DSM-5 diagnose of Major Depression or Dysthymia, mild or moderate depression expressed as score lower than 14 in the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) * Duration of depressive symptoms 2 months or more * To have and to handle the computer and internet

Exclusion criteria

* Any diagnose of disease that may affect central nervous system (brain pathology, traumatic brain injury, dementia, etc.), * Other psychiatric diagnoses or acute psychiatric illness (substance dependence or abuse, history of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, eating disorders, etc.), except for anxious pathology or personality disorders * Any medical, infectious or degenerative disease that may affect mood, presence of delusional ideas or hallucinations consistent or not with mood, and suicide risk

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Beck Depression Inventory-IIBaseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Sociodemographic data Gender, age, marital status, education, occupation, economical levelBaseline
Health Survey 12 (SF-12)Baseline
EuroQol (EQ-5D). Health related quality of lifeBaseline
Five Facets and factors of mindfulness (FFMQ)Baseline
Pemberton Happiness Index (PHI)Baseline
Patient Health Questionnaire-9Baseline
Positive and negative affect (PANAS)Baseline

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)BaselineThis inventory includes the number of times health services have been used.Collect the sick leave, the number of hospital admissions, the number of times that the person attends an emergency service, number of times that is attended by a healthcare professional and finally collects the medication. There is no maximum or minimum score, it simply provides information.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026