Skip to content

Gentrix™ Versus Biological or Prosthetic Mesh

Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Separation of Components Repair With Retrorectus Gentrix™ Surgical Matrix Versus Biological or Prosthetic Mesh for Open Ventral Hernia Repair

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03034213
Enrollment
17
Registered
2017-01-27
Start date
2017-10-06
Completion date
2021-06-16
Last updated
2021-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventral Incisional Hernia

Keywords

mesh

Brief summary

The hypothesis for this study is complex incisional hernia repair using the separation of components technique reinforced with retrorectus placement of Gentrix™ Surgical Matrix will lead to fewer incisional hernia recurrences and fewer wound complications compared to the same incisional hernia repair techniques reinforced with other prosthetic or biologically-derived mesh.

Detailed description

Biological and prosthetic mesh products are extensively used in hernia repairs. However, they also have their limitations. Potential complications associated with prosthetic mesh for hernia repairs include: adverse reactions to the mesh, mesh erosion, stricture formation, adhesions resulting in bowel obstruction, enterocutaneous fistulas, injuries to nearby organs, nerves or blood vessels, infection, chronic pain and hernia recurrence. Potential complications associated with biological mesh include: adverse inflammatory response, laxity, eventration, and recurrent herniation. This study is a two-arm, randomized, controlled trial comparing separation of components repair with retrorectus Gentrix™ Surgical Matrix versus biological or prosthetic mesh for open ventral hernia repair.

Interventions

DEVICEGentrix™ Surgical Matrix (Treatment)

Gentrix™ Surgical Matrix will be placed in the retrorectus space. The anterior midline fascia will be closed with long-acting absorbable suture either with a running or interrupted manner as per the surgeon's discretion.

DEVICEPermacol, Parietex, Progrip, Strattice Perforated, or Surgimend (Control)

A biological or prosthetic mesh (Permacol, Parietex, Progrip, Strattice Perforated, or Surgimend) will be placed in the retrorectus space. The anterior midline fascia will be closed with long-acting absorbable suture either with a running or interrupted manner as per the surgeon's discretion.

Sponsors

Integra LifeSciences Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of South Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female patients ≥ 18 years old. * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I, II, III or IV. * Able to provide informed consent in English or Spanish. * Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study. * Body Mass Index (BMI) =\< 45. * Incisional hernia from a midline incision ≥ 4 cm in greatest diameter, or any recurrent incisional hernia.

Exclusion criteria

* Any other type of ventral hernia, such as umbilical, epigastric or Spigelian hernia. * Pregnant, breastfeeding, or unwilling to practice birth control during participation in the study, if applicable. * Allergy or hypersensitivity to materials in porcine-based study products, biological or prosthetic meshes, or personal preference. * Contraindications to general anesthesia. * Patient undergoing any emergency surgery prior to treatment. * Severe comorbid conditions likely to limit survival to less than 3 years in the opinion of the Investigator. * Have abdominal loss of domain such that the operation would be impractical or would adversely affect respiratory or cardiovascular function to an unacceptable degree in the opinion of the Investigator. * Inability to close the fascia primarily with abdominal wall mobilization or component separation; confirmed intra-operatively. * History of malignancy within the past 5 years except for non-melanoma skin cancer. * Known active malignancy present and/or had chemotherapy 12 weeks prior to screening or planned chemotherapy within 12 weeks of treatment with exception of basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or prostate cancer in situ. * Cirrhosis with or without ascites. * Received high dose steroids (\>/=100mg of prednisone) within the past 6 weeks of screening. * Uncontrolled diabetes (i.e. known HbA1C value \> 7% within the prior 6 weeks of the Screening Visit). * History of drug addiction (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or the subject's ability to complete the required follow up. * Serious or active medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol. * Suspected presence of enterocutaneous fistula. * Planned use of external VAC dressing intra-operatively. * Suspected bowel obstruction (partial or intermittent), strangulation, peritonitis, or perforation. * Active necrotizing fasciitis or any other known active local or systemic infection. * Subject report of participation in an investigational drug or device study that would impact the safety or scientific integrity of this study (in the opinion of the Investigator and with the approval of the Sponsor) within the past 6 weeks prior to treatment in this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of incisional hernia recurrence2 years from study incisional hernia repair

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of wound complications90 days from study incisional hernia repairComplications of interest: surgical site infections, seroma formation, and wound dehiscence or skin separation
Incidence of enterocutaneous fistula formation2 years from study incisional hernia repair
Mean Carolinas Comfort Scale score2 years from study incisional hernia repairPatient-centered outcome
Mean Visual Analog Scale score2 years from study incisional hernia repairPatient-centered outcome
Mean mesh deployment timeduration of surgery (incisional hernia repair)Defined as the time mesh preparation starts to time mesh placement ends
Time to incisional hernia recurrence2 years from study incisional hernia repair
Mean total cost of hospitalization for primary admissionduration of hospitalization for incisional hernia repairDefined as from surgery to hospital discharge
Mean total cost of surgery for primary admissionduration of surgery (incisional hernia repair)Defined as from preoperative preparation to anesthesia discharge
Mean total cost of readmissions2 years from study incisional hernia repairDefined as any hospital readmissions related to ventral hernia complications or recurrence
Mean total cost of narcotic usage for primary admissionduration of hospitalization for incisional hernia repairDefined as narcotic use from surgery to hospital discharge
Mean procedure timeduration of surgery (incisional hernia repair)Defined as time of incision to time of closure

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026