Skip to content

Testing Tele-Savvy, an On-line Psychoeducation Program for Dementia Family Caregivers

Testing Tele-Savvy, an On-line Psychoeducation Program for Dementia Family Caregivers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03033875
Enrollment
261
Registered
2017-01-27
Start date
2017-05-18
Completion date
2020-12-04
Last updated
2022-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, Dementia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the psychoeducational program Tele-Savvy. Tele-Savvy is an internet based, group education program developed from an in person program called Savvy Caregiver. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Tele-Savvy group (receiving only the Tele-Savvy education) or the Healthy Living Education Program (receiving healthy lifestyle education and then Tele-Savvy education 6 months later) or a usual care group (receiving Tele-Savvy education 6 months later). Each program takes 43 days to complete.

Detailed description

This study addresses the reliance on family members to provide virtually all community-based care for 5.3 million persons living with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, a population that will likely triple in the next 35 years. Unless researchers soon find a way to prevent and cure dementing illnesses like Alzheimer's, the country will continue to face an urgent need to find ways to sustain and bolster the capacity of these family caregivers to manage the multiple daily care challenges they face and to preserve their well-being while doing so. Without family caregivers, the burden of care could well overwhelm the formal components of our care system. A number of psychoeducation programs for caregivers have been effective in relieving distress, increasing self-efficacy, managing caregiving challenges, and enabling caregivers to sustain care over longer periods of time. However, many Alzheimer's caregivers cannot take part in these programs because virtually all such programs require caregivers to arrange care for the care recipient while the caregivers attend the programs. These are obstacles in rural or remote areas where transportation issues further restrict caregivers' already limited access to caregiver programs, but they are no less a problem in inner cities and suburbs. These obstacles highlight a substantial challenge to our ability to rely on caregivers as a continuing care resource for persons living with Alzheimer's disease: there is a need for theory-driven psychoeducation programs that can be made readily available to caregivers who may not be able to attend in-person programs. This is a randomized trial to test a program designed to meet this critical need. This study will test Tele-Savvy, an internet-based program based on the widely disseminated, in-person Savvy Caregiver psychoeducation program. Delivered in scheduled videoconferences and independently viewed on-line video lessons, Tele-Savvy aims to develop/enhance caregivers' skills and caregiving mastery, reduce adverse effects of caregiving, and improve the quality of the lives of caregivers and care recipients. Caregivers will be randomly assigned either to immediate Tele-Savvy participation groups or to attention control or usual care groups that are invited to participate in Tele-Savvy six months after baseline data collection. Each program takes 43 days to complete. In those 43 days, participants will be asked to take part in a video conference once per week (60-90 minutes) and view daily video lessons (7-15 minutes). The study includes 5 interviews over the course of the 12 month study; the interviews at baseline and months 3 and 6 assess the study outcome measures. These interviews will discuss participant's experience as a caregiver. All interviews will be limited to 60 minutes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTele-Savvy

The Tele-Savvy program engages groups of six dementia family caregivers in a program that extends over 43 days. The program begins with a scheduled 75-minute group videoconference led by facilitators; similar group videoconferences then take place weekly for six weeks. In between the video-conferences, caregivers will receive daily emails with links to 5-15 minute on-line video lessons that can be watched on their own schedule as often as they wish. The videoconferences allow caregivers to report enactment of learned and self-developed management strategy behaviors into their own caregiving and allow them to raise questions. Each daily video presents a teaching point linked to the overall curriculum. The lesson is carried forward by brief, scripted talks by experts or is enacted in vignettes in which a fictional family caring for a father living with Alzheimer's demonstrates effective caregiving techniques linked to the day's teaching points.

BEHAVIORALHealthy Living Education Program

The Healthy Living Education Program contains video and text materials on exercise, diet, and healthy living. Participants will be asked to log into the Canvas site daily over the course of six weeks to view the videos. Each participant will also receive 7 weekly brief scripted phone or video calls from a project facilitator to inquire about participants' use of the materials. Additionally, all participants will convene weekly for a video conference centered on the application of healthy living strategies. Facilitators will greet and check in with each of the caregivers, coach and debrief caregivers on the homework, answer questions and/or respond to feedback about the week's material, review key points and concepts from the week's video sessions and introduce new material, report on any activities that caregivers may have implemented based on the materials, and provide homework assignments.

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio to the Tele-Savvy intervention, Healthy Living intervention, or usual care condition. Participants in the Healthy Living and usual care arms can take part i the Tele-Savvy intervention after a delay of 6 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Informal caregivers (family/friends) of persons living with Alzheimer's disease or another dementia * Participants must be providing at least 4 hours per day unpaid assistance, on average, for a person in the early-middle stage of illness (Clinical Dementia Rating of greater than or equal to 1 by home ADC) who is community-dwelling and for whom there is no established plan for institutionalization in the next six months * Caregiver may or may not reside with their care recipient, but care recipients must live in the community and not in an assisted living facility, nursing home, or another institutional setting * Must have access to a computer or a mobile device with adequate internet connection, microphone, and speakers (to be able to participate in teleconferences) and be able to use email * Able to read, speak and understand English

Exclusion criteria

* The participant must not be involved in another caregiver training study and must not have participated in in-person Savvy Caregiver Program or Tele-Savvy previously * Uncorrectable vision or hearing deficits that might impede participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The ZBI is a 22 item scale. Each item on the interview is a statement which the caregiver is asked to endorse using a 5-point scale. Response options range from 0 (Never) to 4 (Nearly Always). Total scores range from 0 (low burden) to 88 (high burden)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The STAI State (STAI-S) is a 20-item 4-point Likert scale commonly used measure of state anxiety. Respondents report the intensity of their anxiety at that moment on a 4-point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much so. Total scores range from 20 to 80 and higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The CESD-R is a 20 item Likert scale scored 0-3 with somatic and psychological subscales. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The RMBPC is a 24-item instrument that assesses behaviors in persons with dementia and caregiver responses to them. Caregiver reactions to behaviors are scored as 0 = not at all upsetting to 4 = extremely upsetting. Total caregiver reaction scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating greater feelings of being upset by behaviors of those with dementia that they are providing care for.
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The PSS is 14-item Likert-type questionnaire. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = never and 4 = very often. Total scores range from 0 to 56 and certain items are reverse scored so that higher total scores reflect higher perceived stress.
Pearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The Caregiving Competence Subscale of the Pearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence instrument has 4 items that are responded to on a 4-point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Total scores for this subscale range from 4 to 16 and higher scores indicate greater feelings of competence with caregiving.
Pearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The Management of Situation Subscale of the Pearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence instrument has 4 items that are responded to on a 4-point Likert scale where 1 = never and 4 = very often. Total scores for this subscale range from 4 to 16 and higher scores indicate greater management of caregiving situations.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participant enrollment began May 18, 2017 and all study follow up was completed by December 4, 2020. Data collection to assess the outcome measures for this study occurred through the interview at month 6. Study activities continued through month 12 while participants in the Attention Control and Usual Care groups had the opportunity to have the Tele-Savvy intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tele-Savvy Group
Informal caregivers of persons living with Alzheimer's disease randomized to participate in the Tele-Savvy program immediately.
96
Attention Control Group
Informal caregivers of persons living with Alzheimer's disease randomized to participate in the Healthy Living Education Program. Persons in this group were able to participate in the Tele-Savvy intervention after a delay of 6 months.
111
Usual Care Group
Informal caregivers of persons living with Alzheimer's disease randomized to continue to receive care through whatever arrangement has been in place. Persons in this group were able to participate in the Tele-Savvy intervention after a delay of 6 months.
54
Total261

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyOther14158
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject594

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTele-Savvy GroupTotalUsual Care GroupAttention Control Group
Age, Continuous66.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Age of person cared for75.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
74.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
92 Participants250 Participants54 Participants104 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants11 Participants0 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caregiver race
African American/Black
15 Participants57 Participants15 Participants27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caregiver race
Asian
1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caregiver race
No answer
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caregiver race
Other
2 Participants7 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caregiver race
White
78 Participants192 Participants39 Participants75 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
96 Participants261 Participants54 Participants111 Participants
Relation to person cared for
Non-spouse
27 Participants89 Participants19 Participants43 Participants
Relation to person cared for
Spouse
69 Participants172 Participants35 Participants68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
72 Participants184 Participants39 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants77 Participants15 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 960 / 1110 / 54
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 960 / 1110 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 960 / 1110 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) Score

The CESD-R is a 20 item Likert scale scored 0-3 with somatic and psychological subscales. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes participants completing the indicated study visit, who also had valid data for this assessment. One questionnaire had missing or skipped items resulting in one participant being removed from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-Savvy GroupCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreMonth 310.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.23
Tele-Savvy GroupCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreBaseline13.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.98
Tele-Savvy GroupCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreMonth 610.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.16
Attention Control GroupCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreMonth 310.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.18
Attention Control GroupCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreBaseline12.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.09
Attention Control GroupCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreMonth 611.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.08
Usual Care GroupCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreBaseline11.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.25
Usual Care GroupCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreMonth 612.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.28
Usual Care GroupCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) ScoreMonth 312.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Primary

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State Score

The STAI State (STAI-S) is a 20-item 4-point Likert scale commonly used measure of state anxiety. Respondents report the intensity of their anxiety at that moment on a 4-point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much so. Total scores range from 20 to 80 and higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes participants completing the indicated study visit, who also had valid data for this assessment. One questionnaire had missing or skipped items resulting in one participant being removed from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-Savvy GroupState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreMonth 332.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.31
Tele-Savvy GroupState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreBaseline35.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.96
Tele-Savvy GroupState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreMonth 631.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.97
Attention Control GroupState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreMonth 332.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Attention Control GroupState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreBaseline34.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.13
Attention Control GroupState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreMonth 634.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.83
Usual Care GroupState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreBaseline33.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.61
Usual Care GroupState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreMonth 635.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.93
Usual Care GroupState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScoreMonth 335.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.15
Primary

Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) Score

The ZBI is a 22 item scale. Each item on the interview is a statement which the caregiver is asked to endorse using a 5-point scale. Response options range from 0 (Never) to 4 (Nearly Always). Total scores range from 0 (low burden) to 88 (high burden)

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes participants completing the indicated study visit, who also had valid data for this assessment. Some questionnaires had missing or skipped items resulting in removing those participants from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-Savvy GroupZarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreMonth 335.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.03
Tele-Savvy GroupZarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreBaseline37.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.77
Tele-Savvy GroupZarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreMonth 635.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.63
Attention Control GroupZarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreMonth 336.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.49
Attention Control GroupZarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreBaseline35.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.66
Attention Control GroupZarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreMonth 635.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.96
Usual Care GroupZarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreBaseline35.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.99
Usual Care GroupZarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreMonth 637.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.31
Usual Care GroupZarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) ScoreMonth 337.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Secondary

Pearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale Score

The Caregiving Competence Subscale of the Pearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence instrument has 4 items that are responded to on a 4-point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Total scores for this subscale range from 4 to 16 and higher scores indicate greater feelings of competence with caregiving.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes participants completing the indicated study visit, who also had valid data for this assessment. One questionnaire had missing or skipped items resulting in one participant being removed from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-Savvy GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreMonth 313.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Tele-Savvy GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreBaseline12.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Tele-Savvy GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreMonth 613.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Attention Control GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreMonth 312.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Attention Control GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreBaseline12.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Attention Control GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreMonth 612.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Usual Care GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreBaseline12.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
Usual Care GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreMonth 612.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Usual Care GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Caregiving Competence Subscale ScoreMonth 311.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Secondary

Pearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale Score

The Management of Situation Subscale of the Pearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence instrument has 4 items that are responded to on a 4-point Likert scale where 1 = never and 4 = very often. Total scores for this subscale range from 4 to 16 and higher scores indicate greater management of caregiving situations.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes participants completing the indicated study visit, who also had valid data for this assessment. One questionnaire had missing or skipped items resulting in one participant being removed from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-Savvy GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreMonth 312.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
Tele-Savvy GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreBaseline11.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Tele-Savvy GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreMonth 611.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Attention Control GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreMonth 311.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Attention Control GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreBaseline11.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Attention Control GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreMonth 611.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Usual Care GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreBaseline11.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Usual Care GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreMonth 611.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Usual Care GroupPearlin Mastery, Loss, and Competence - Management of Situation Subscale ScoreMonth 311.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Secondary

Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score

The PSS is 14-item Likert-type questionnaire. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = never and 4 = very often. Total scores range from 0 to 56 and certain items are reverse scored so that higher total scores reflect higher perceived stress.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes participants completing the indicated study visit, who also had valid data for this assessment. Some questionnaires had missing or skipped items resulting in removing those participants from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-Savvy GroupPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreMonth 320.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.93
Tele-Savvy GroupPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreBaseline23.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.93
Tele-Savvy GroupPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreMonth 620.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Attention Control GroupPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreMonth 321.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.63
Attention Control GroupPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreBaseline22.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.21
Attention Control GroupPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreMonth 622.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Usual Care GroupPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreBaseline21.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.71
Usual Care GroupPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreMonth 623.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.36
Usual Care GroupPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) ScoreMonth 323.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.74
Secondary

Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction Score

The RMBPC is a 24-item instrument that assesses behaviors in persons with dementia and caregiver responses to them. Caregiver reactions to behaviors are scored as 0 = not at all upsetting to 4 = extremely upsetting. Total caregiver reaction scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating greater feelings of being upset by behaviors of those with dementia that they are providing care for.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: This analysis includes participants completing the indicated study visit, who also had valid data for this assessment. Some questionnaires had missing or skipped items resulting in removing those participants from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-Savvy GroupRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 310.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Tele-Savvy GroupRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreBaseline13.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.78
Tele-Savvy GroupRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 611.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.26
Attention Control GroupRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 311.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.01
Attention Control GroupRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreBaseline12.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.89
Attention Control GroupRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 612.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.82
Usual Care GroupRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreBaseline13.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Usual Care GroupRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 615.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.96
Usual Care GroupRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 314.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.33

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026