Skip to content

ICSI Outcome of Ejaculated Versus Extracted Testicular Spermatozoa

ICSI Outcome of Ejaculated Versus Extracted Testicular Spermatozoa in Cryptozoospermic or Severe Oligozoospermic Men

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03033563
Enrollment
430
Registered
2017-01-27
Start date
2012-01-01
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2017-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

Brief summary

The study is retrospective to compare ICSI outcome of patients with cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia after use of ejaculated versus extracted testicular sperms in different cycles for the same patient.

Detailed description

The study was carried out on couples who underwent ICSI in period 2012-2014 for male factor infertility.Patients with semen showing cryptozoospermia were candidates for inclusion in this study. First cycle was done as ICSI with priority to ejaculated sperm; testicular sperm was used if no motile sperm was available. For failed cases a second cycle was repeated using either testicular sperm or ejaculated sperm. Keywords:Cryptozoospermia, ejaculated spermatozoa, testicular spermatozoa, ICSI.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntracytoplasmic sperm injection

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Sponsors

Adam International Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Couples seeking ICSI.

Exclusion criteria

* Couples not seeking ICSI.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomethree yearsPregnancy rate.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026