Skip to content

Reducing the Rate and Duration of Re-ADMISsions Among Patients With Unipolar Disorder and Bipolar Disorder Using Smartphone-based Monitoring and Treatment - The RADMIS Trials

Reducing the Rate and Duration of Re-ADMISsions Among Patients With Unipolar Disorder and Bipolar Disorder Using Smartphone-based Monitoring and Treatment - The RADMIS Trials

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03033420
Acronym
RADMIS
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-01-26
Start date
2017-05-15
Completion date
2021-05-01
Last updated
2022-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Affective Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Unipolar Depression

Keywords

Unipolar disorder, Bipolar disorder, Randomized controlled trial, Smartphone, Re-admission, CBT

Brief summary

Unipolar and bipolar disorder combined account for nearly half of all morbidity and mortality due to mental and substance use disorders, and burden society with the highest health care costs of all psychiatric and neurological disorders. Among these, costs due to psychiatric hospitalization is a major burden. Smartphones comprise an innovative and unique platform for monitoring and treatment of depression and mania. The RADMIS trials use a randomized controlled single-blind parallel-group design. Patients with unipolar or bipolar disorder discharged from psychiatric hospitals in The Capital Region of Denmark are invited to participate. Patients are at discharge from the psychiatric hospitals randomized, separately according to psychiatric diagnosis (thus, the RADMIS trial consists of two separate trials according to diagnosis, bipolar disorder or unipolar disorder), to: 1) a smartphone-based monitoring system including a) an integrated feedback loop between patients and clinicians and b) context-aware CBT modules (intervention group) or 2) treatment-as-usual (control group) for a 6-months trial period. The trial is started in March 2017. The outcomes are 1) differences in the number and duration of re-admissions between the intervention group and the control group (primary), 2) differences in severity of depressive and manic symptoms (manic symptoms only for patients with bipolar disorder); differences in psychosocial functioning; and differences in number of affective episodes between the intervention group and the control group (secondary), and 3) differences in perceived stress, quality of life, self-rated depressive symptoms, self-rated manic symptoms (only for patients with bipolar disorder), recovery, empowerment, adherence to medication, well-being, ruminations, worrying, and satisfaction between the intervention group and the control group (tertiary).

Detailed description

Background Unipolar and bipolar disorder combined account for nearly half of all morbidity and mortality due to mental and substance use disorders, and burden society with the highest health care costs of all psychiatric and neurological disorders. Among these, costs due to psychiatric hospitalization are a major burden. Smartphones comprise an innovative and unique platform for monitoring and treatment of depression and mania. No prior trial has investigated whether the use of a smartphone-based system can prevent re-admission among patients discharged from hospital. Methods The RADMIS trials use a randomized controlled single-blind parallel-group design. Patients with unipolar disorder and patients with bipolar disorder are invited to participate in each their trial when discharged from psychiatric hospitals in The Capital Region of Denmark following an affective episode and randomized to either 1) a smartphone-based monitoring system including a) an integrated feedback loop between patients and clinicians and b) context-aware CBT modules (intervention group) or 2) standard treatment (control group) for a 6-months trial period. The trial is started in March 2017. The outcomes are 1) differences in the number and duration of re-admissions between the intervention group and the control group (primary), 2) differences in severity of depressive and manic symptoms (manic symptoms only for patients with bipolar disorder); differences in psychosocial functioning; and differences in number of affective episodes between the intervention group and the control group (secondary), and 3) differences in perceived stress, quality of life, self-rated depressive symptoms, self-rated manic symptoms (only for patients with bipolar disorder), recovery, empowerment, adherence to medication, well-being, ruminations, worrying, and satisfaction between the intervention group and the control group (tertiary). Analysis Recruitment is ongoing. Discussion If the smartphone-based monitoring system is proved effective in reducing the rate and duration of re-admissions there will be basis for using a system of this kind in the treatment of unipolar and bipolar disorder in general and in a larger scale.

Interventions

DEVICEA smartphone-based monitoring system including a) an integrated feedback loop between patients and clinicians and b) context-aware CBT modules

A smartphone-based monitoring system including a) an integrated feedback loop between patients and clinicians and b) context-aware CBT modules

Sponsors

Technical University of Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Psychiatric Centre Rigshospitalet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unipolar disorder or bipolar disorder diagnoses according to ICD-10 * Patients who are discharged from a psychiatric hospital in The Capital Region of Denmark following an affective episode (depression or mania)

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * A lack of Danish language skills

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of re-admissions6 months trial periodDifferences in the number of re-admissions between the intervention group and the control group. Data will be collected from Danish registers.
Duration of re-admissions6 months trial periodDifferences in the duration of re-admissions between the intervention group and the control group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Severity of depressive symptoms6 months trial periodDifferences in the severity of depressive (The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) symptoms between the intervention group and the control group.
Severity of manic symptoms6 months trial periodDifferences in the severity of manic (The Young Mania Rating Scale) symptoms between the intervention group and the control group.
Psychosocial functioning6 months trial periodDifferences in psychosocial functioning (The Psychosocial Functioning Assessment Short Test - FAST) between the intervention group and the control group.
Number of affective episodes6 months trial periodDifferences in the number of affective episodes between the intervention group and the control group.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to medication6 months trial periodDifferences in adherence to medication (The Medicine Adherence Rating Scale) between the intervention group and the control group.
Well-being6 months trial periodDifferences in well-being according (The WHO (five) well-being index) between the intervention group and the control group.
Perceived stress6 months trial periodDifferences in perceived stress (The Cohen's Perceived stress scale) between the intervention group and the control group.
Worrying6 months trial periodDifferences in worrying (The Penn State Worry Questionnaire) between the intervention group and the control group.
Satisfaction6 months trial periodDifferences in satisfaction (The Verona Satisfaction Scale-Affective Disorder) between the intervention group and the control group.
Rumination6 months trial periodDifferences in rumination (The Rumination Response Scale) between the intervention group and the control group.
Quality of life6 months trial periodDifferences in quality of life (The WHO Quality of Life-BREF) between the intervention group and the control group.
Self-rated manic symptoms6 months trial periodDifferences in self-rated manic symptoms (The Altman Self Rating scale for Mania) between the intervention group and the control group.
Self-rated depressive symptoms6 months trial periodDifferences in self-rated depressive symptoms (The Becks Depressive Inventory) between the intervention group and the control group.
Recovery6 months trial periodDifferences in recovery (The Recovery Assessment Scale) between the intervention group and the control group.
Empowerment6 months trial periodDifferences in empowerment (Rogers empowerment scale) between the intervention group and the control group.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026