Calcium Silicate Versus Calcium Hydroxide in Two-step Indirect Pulp Treatment

Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of Calcium Silicate Versus Calcium Hydroxide in Two-step Indirect Pulp Treatment: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03032978

Enrollment

Registered

2017-01-26

Start date

2018-04-20

Completion date

2019-05-15

Last updated

2020-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep Caries

Brief summary

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of Calcium silicate versus Calcium hydroxide in two-step indirect pulp treatment: Randomized clinical trial

Interventions

OTHERCalcium hydroxide

Pulp capping material

OTHERCalcium silicate

Pulp capping material

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 50 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18-50 years. * Males or females. * Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients younger than 19 years old or older than 50 years old. * Disabilities. * Systemic diseases or severe medically compromised. * Lack of compliance.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Pain: VAS	6 month	post operative pain after 6 month from material application will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS)with score from 0 to 10 in which 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026