Skip to content

Detecting Neonatal Hypoglycemia Using Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)

Detecting Neonatal Hypoglycemia Using Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03032523
Enrollment
21
Registered
2017-01-26
Start date
2016-10-01
Completion date
2018-04-01
Last updated
2019-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neonatal Hypoglycemia

Brief summary

Hypoglycemia is the most common metabolic problem faced after birth. The investigators will be studying the utility of using a continuous glucose monitoring(CGM) system to more closely monitor low blood sugars in newborns. The investigators will evaluate the number of hypoglycemic events detected using CGM and compare it to those detected using current standard of care screening methods.

Detailed description

A CGM will be subcutaneously inserted by trained staff on a healthy area of skin and will be calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Blood glucose measurements will be taken using a blinded study glucometer to calibrate the device. Calibration by trained study staff will take place about every 12 hours. Sensor insertion sites will be monitored for infection throughout the course of the study by nursing and clinical staff or by trained study staff on an as needed basis. At the conclusion of the study, the CGM will be removed and assessed for signs of infection. Study duration will be up to 7 days while the patient is admitted to the hospital. Participants will be randomized into 2 groups. The control group will have a blinded CGM in place for the duration of the study. The remote monitoring group will be blinded to clinical staff. This group will have a CGM connected to an iPod that sends continuous glucose data to the study phone and will be monitored 24/7 by study staff. If a blood sugar level of \<46 mg/dl is detected, the infant will first be evaluated for positioning that could be causing a falsely low value. If the infant is re-positioned and CGM continues to show a blood sugar level of \<46 mg/dl, study staff will prompt the nurse taking care of the patient to obtain a capillary glucose value to verify the low blood sugar and treat it as deemed appropriate by the clinical team. The investigators will evaluate the number of hypoglycemic events that occur in the blinded CGM group versus the number that occur in the remote monitoring group to assess if the CGM is able to more sensitively detect low blood sugars in infants than current hospital standard of care measures.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTStandard of care glucose test

If the CGM in the remote monitoring group detects a blood sugar less than 46mg/dl, a confirmatory standard of care glucose test will be performed to confirm the low blood sugar.

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 7 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Infants who are at least 34 weeks gestation that are born to mothers with gestational or pre-gestational diabetes and are admitted to LPCH are eligible for the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Infants \<2,000 grams will be excluded from the study. Infants will also be excluded if they have an anomaly of the skin or subcutaneous tissue that would prevent proper adhesion, placement, and function of the sensor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensor-detected Hypoglycemiaup to 8 daysReported values in the table represent the cumulative number of hypoglycemic events detected by the sensor that were not detected by the hospital standard of care measures across all participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity of the CGM to Detect Hypoglycemia.up to 7 daysTrue positive rate.
Specificity of CGM to Detect Hypoglycemic Eventsup to 7 daysTrue negative rate

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Mothers attending obstetrics clinics at Stanford University were approached if they met inclusion criteria. 119 mothers were approached, 66 declined to participate, 23 were lost to follow up after initially discussing the study, 6 were unable to participate because research staff were not available at the time of birth, and 3 were ineligible.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Remote Monitoring CGM Group
Participants wear a CGM that is blinded at bedside (to participant and clinical staff) but remotely monitored by study staff. If a blood sugar less than 46 mg/dl occurs, the study staff receive a notification and ask the clinical staff to perform a confirmation standard of care glucose test. Standard of care glucose test: If the CGM in the remote monitoring group detects a blood sugar less than 45 mg/dL, a confirmatory standard of care glucose test will be performed to confirm the low blood sugar.
15
Blinded CGM Group
Participants wear a blinded CGM during the study period. Values are blinded to study staff, participant, and clinical staff.
6
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalRemote Monitoring CGM GroupBlinded CGM Group
Age, Customized
24-48 hours of life
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Less than 24 hours of life
20 Participants14 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
5 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
10 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants15 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants10 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants5 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 150 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Sensor-detected Hypoglycemia

Reported values in the table represent the cumulative number of hypoglycemic events detected by the sensor that were not detected by the hospital standard of care measures across all participants.

Time frame: up to 8 days

Population: Participants in the remote monitoring group were eligible for analysis. 3 were excluded from the remote monitoring group for the analysis. Blinded CGM participants did not have a verification glucose check, thus sensor-detected hypoglycemia was not verified, and thus were not reported in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Remote Monitoring CGM GroupSensor-detected HypoglycemiaHypo Events Detected by Sensor (not SOC)5 events
Remote Monitoring CGM GroupSensor-detected HypoglycemiaHypo Events Detected by SOC and not sensor1 events
Secondary

Sensitivity of the CGM to Detect Hypoglycemia.

True positive rate.

Time frame: up to 7 days

Population: Participants in the Remote Monitoring CGM Group were analyzed. 3 were excluded from the remote monitoring group for the analysis. Those in the blinded group were unable to be analyzed because the CGM was blinded and did not prompt a BG check.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Remote Monitoring CGM GroupSensitivity of the CGM to Detect Hypoglycemia.86 % of true hypoglycemic events
Secondary

Specificity of CGM to Detect Hypoglycemic Events

True negative rate

Time frame: up to 7 days

Population: 12 participants had sensor data for analysis. 3 were excluded from the remote monitoring group for the analysis. Blinded CGM participants did not have a verification glucose check, thus specificity could not be calculated on these participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Remote Monitoring CGM GroupSpecificity of CGM to Detect Hypoglycemic Events91 % of true negative events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026