Skip to content

Clinical Study of Cefiderocol (S-649266) for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-negative Pathogens

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Clinical Study of S-649266 Compared With Meropenem for the Treatment of Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia, or Healthcare-associated Bacterial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-negative Pathogens

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03032380
Acronym
APEKS-NP
Enrollment
300
Registered
2017-01-26
Start date
2017-10-24
Completion date
2019-04-01
Last updated
2020-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP), Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

Keywords

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), S-649266, linezolid, meropenem, Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), nosocomial pneumonia, Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), Gram-negative pathogens, pneumonia, cefiderocol

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare all-cause mortality at Day 14 in participants receiving cefiderocol with participants receiving the comparator, meropenem, in adults with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP) caused by Gram-negative pathogens.

Interventions

2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function)

DRUGMeropenem

2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to 14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function)

DRUGLinezolid

600 mg of linezolid administered intravenously over 30 minutes to 2 hours, every 12 hours.

Sponsors

Shionogi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent * Subjects who have provided written informed consent or their informed consent has been provided by a legally authorized representative * Subjects who meet the clinical diagnosis criteria for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP) * All subjects must fulfill at least 1 of the following clinical criteria at screening: 1. New onset or worsening of pulmonary symptoms or signs, such as cough, dyspnea, tachypnea (eg, respiratory rate \> 25 breaths/minute), expectorated sputum production, or requirement for mechanical ventilation 2. Hypoxemia (eg, a partial pressure of oxygen \[PaO2\] \< 60 mm Hg while the subject is breathing room air, as determined by arterial blood gas \[ABG\], or worsening of the ratio of the PaO2 to the fraction of inspired oxygen \[PaO2/FiO2\]) 3. Need for acute changes in the ventilator support system to enhance oxygenation, as determined by worsening oxygenation (ABG or PaO2/FiO2) or needed changes in the amount of positive end-expiratory pressure 4. New onset of or increase in (quantity or characteristics) suctioned respiratory secretions, demonstrating evidence of inflammation and absence of contamination * All subjects must have at least 1 of the following signs: 1. Documented fever (ie, core body temperature \[tympanic, rectal, esophageal\] ≥ 38°C \[100.4°F\], oral temperature ≥ 37.5°C, or axillary temperature ≥ 37°C) 2. Hypothermia (ie, core body temperature \[tympanic, rectal, esophageal\] ≤ 35°C \[95.0°F\], oral temperature ≤ 35.5°C and axillary temperature ≤ 36°C) 3. Leukocytosis with a total peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 10,000 cells/mm³ 4. Leukopenia with total peripheral WBC count ≤ 4500 cells/mm³ 5. Greater than 15% immature neutrophils (bands) noted on peripheral blood smear * All subjects must have a chest radiograph during screening showing the presence of new or progressive infiltrate(s) suggestive of bacterial pneumonia. A computed tomography (CT) scan in the same time window showing the same findings could also be acceptable * All subjects must have a suspected Gram-negative infection involving the lower respiratory tract

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who have known or suspected community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), atypical pneumonia, viral pneumonia, or chemical pneumonia (including aspiration of gastric contents, inhalation injury) * Other exclusions based on the prescribing information of meropenem or linezolid, prior antibiotic usage, age, and pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 14From first dose of study drug to Day 14The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to Day 14. The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population included all randomized participants who met either of the following criteria: * Evidence of Gram-negative infection of the lower respiratory tract based on a culture, Gram-stain, or other diagnostic test * Evidence of a lower respiratory tract infection but culture or other diagnostic tests did not provide a microbiologic diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of CureTest of cure (7 days after the end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Early Assessment (EA)Early assessment (Day 3-4 after the start of treatment)Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT)End of treatment (Day 7 to 14)Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU)Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator at follow-up as either Sustained Clinical Cure, Relapse, or Indeterminate. Sustained Clinical Cure: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Early AssessmentEarly Assessment, Days 3 to 4Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Early Assessment was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)Test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)Lower respiratory tract specimens (eg, sputum, endotracheal aspiration \[ETA\], endobronchial culture specimens collected by bronchoalveolar lavage \[BAL\], or protected specimen brush \[PSB\], lung biopsy tissue, pleural effusions, etc) were sent to the local microbiology laboratory for isolation and identification of pathogens. Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at TOC was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-upFollow-up (14 days after the end of treatment, Days 21 to 28)Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Follow-up was determined by the sponsor as either Sustained Eradication, Persistence, Recurrence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Sustained eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy) after TOC. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed to be eradication.
All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 28From first dose of study drug to Day 28The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first dose of study drug up to Day 28.
All-cause Mortality Rate at the End of StudyFrom first dose of study drug through end of study (28 days after end of treatment, up to 42 days)The all-cause mortality rate during both the treatment and follow-up period (up to the end of study \[EOS\] visit) was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to EOS. If a participant discontinued from the study before EOS and survival information was not available, then the survival status for this endpoint for the participant was considered unknown.
Total Hospitalization TimeFrom first dose of study drug to test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and to follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)The length of hospital stay attributable to the study-qualifying infection.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsFrom first dose of study drug through the end of study, up to 42 days.The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded by the investigator according to the following definitions: * Mild: A finding or symptom is minor and does not interfere with usual daily activities. * Moderate: The event causes discomfort and interferes with usual daily activity or affects clinical status. * Severe: The event causes an interruption of the participant's usual daily activities or has a clinically significant effect. The relationship of each AE to the study treatment was determined by the investigator based on whether the AE could be reasonably explained as having been caused by the study drug (treatment related AE \[TRAE\]). An SAE is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: * Death * Life-threatening condition * Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for treatment * Persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Other medically important condition
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at End of TreatmentEnd of treatment, Day 7 to 14Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at End of Treatment was determined by the sponsor as either: Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Latvia, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study population included participants with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP) caused by Gram-negative bacteria.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either cefiderocol or meropenem. Randomization was performed by the stratified randomization method using infection diagnosis (HABP, VABP, and HCABP) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (≤ 15 and ≥ 16) as allocation factors.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cefiderocol
Participants received 2 g cefiderocol administered intravenously every 8 hours for 7 to 14 days and 600 mg linezolid administered intravenously every 12 hours for at least 5 days.
148
Meropenem
Participants received 2 g meropenem administered intravenously every 8 hours for 7 to 14 days and 600 mg linezolid administered intravenously every 12 hours for at least 5 days.
150
Total298

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyDeath3934
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10
Overall StudyOther - Miscellaneous01
Overall StudyRecovery01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCefiderocolMeropenem
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
<= 15
153 Participants75 Participants78 Participants
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
16 - 19
58 Participants32 Participants26 Participants
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score
>= 20
87 Participants41 Participants46 Participants
Age, Continuous65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
65.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
Age, Customized
< 65 years
123 Participants65 Participants58 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
175 Participants83 Participants92 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis
HABP
121 Participants60 Participants61 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis
HCABP
52 Participants28 Participants24 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis
VABP
125 Participants60 Participants65 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
279 Participants140 Participants139 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
88 Participants44 Participants44 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
202 Participants102 Participants100 Participants
Region
Asia-Pacific
87 Participants43 Participants44 Participants
Region
Europe
199 Participants99 Participants100 Participants
Region
North America
12 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Region
South America
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
93 Participants47 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
205 Participants101 Participants104 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
39 / 14835 / 150
other
Total, other adverse events
119 / 148123 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
54 / 14845 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 14

The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to Day 14. The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population included all randomized participants who met either of the following criteria: * Evidence of Gram-negative infection of the lower respiratory tract based on a culture, Gram-stain, or other diagnostic test * Evidence of a lower respiratory tract infection but culture or other diagnostic tests did not provide a microbiologic diagnosis

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to Day 14

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population; participants with known survival status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality Rate at Day 1412.4 percentage of participants
MeropenemAll-cause Mortality Rate at Day 1411.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-6.6, 8.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 28

The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first dose of study drug up to Day 28.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to Day 28

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population; participants with known survival status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality Rate at Day 2821.0 percentage of participants
MeropenemAll-cause Mortality Rate at Day 2820.5 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-8.7, 9.8]
Secondary

All-cause Mortality Rate at the End of Study

The all-cause mortality rate during both the treatment and follow-up period (up to the end of study \[EOS\] visit) was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to EOS. If a participant discontinued from the study before EOS and survival information was not available, then the survival status for this endpoint for the participant was considered unknown.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (28 days after end of treatment, up to 42 days)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population; participants with known survival status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolAll-cause Mortality Rate at the End of Study26.8 percentage of participants
MeropenemAll-cause Mortality Rate at the End of Study23.3 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-6.3, 13.4]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded by the investigator according to the following definitions: * Mild: A finding or symptom is minor and does not interfere with usual daily activities. * Moderate: The event causes discomfort and interferes with usual daily activity or affects clinical status. * Severe: The event causes an interruption of the participant's usual daily activities or has a clinically significant effect. The relationship of each AE to the study treatment was determined by the investigator based on whether the AE could be reasonably explained as having been caused by the study drug (treatment related AE \[TRAE\]). An SAE is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: * Death * Life-threatening condition * Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for treatment * Persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Other medically important condition

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through the end of study, up to 42 days.

Population: The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsModerate adverse events41 Participants
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSerious adverse events54 Participants
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsMild adverse events33 Participants
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious adverse events3 Participants
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug12 Participants
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSevere adverse events56 Participants
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTRAE leading to discontinuation of study drug2 Participants
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAny adverse event130 Participants
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAdverse events leading to death39 Participants
CefiderocolNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events14 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAdverse events leading to death35 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAny adverse event129 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsMild adverse events37 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsModerate adverse events47 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSevere adverse events45 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events17 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsSerious adverse events45 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug14 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTRAE leading to discontinuation of study drug2 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious adverse events5 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Early Assessment (EA)

Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: Early assessment (Day 3-4 after the start of treatment)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Early Assessment (EA)82.8 percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Early Assessment (EA)83.0 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-8.8, 8.2]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT)

Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: End of treatment (Day 7 to 14)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT)77.2 percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT)81.0 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-12.8, 5.1]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure

Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

Time frame: Test of cure (7 days after the end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure64.8 percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure66.7 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-12.5, 8.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Early Assessment

Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Early Assessment was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

Time frame: Early Assessment, Days 3 to 4

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population; participants with non-missing Baseline pathogens

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Early Assessment41.9 percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Early Assessment53.5 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-24.4, -0.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at End of Treatment

Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at End of Treatment was determined by the sponsor as either: Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

Population: Modified Intent to-Treat Population; participants with non-missing Baseline pathogens

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at End of Treatment63.7 percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at End of Treatment66.9 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-15.5, 7.9]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)

Lower respiratory tract specimens (eg, sputum, endotracheal aspiration \[ETA\], endobronchial culture specimens collected by bronchoalveolar lavage \[BAL\], or protected specimen brush \[PSB\], lung biopsy tissue, pleural effusions, etc) were sent to the local microbiology laboratory for isolation and identification of pathogens. Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at TOC was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.

Time frame: Test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population; participants with non-missing Baseline pathogen data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)47.6 percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)48.0 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-13.5, 10.7]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU)

Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator at follow-up as either Sustained Clinical Cure, Relapse, or Indeterminate. Sustained Clinical Cure: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

Time frame: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU)57.9 percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU)57.8 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-10.9, 10.8]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up

Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Follow-up was determined by the sponsor as either Sustained Eradication, Persistence, Recurrence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen. Sustained eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy) after TOC. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed to be eradication.

Time frame: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment, Days 21 to 28)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population; participants with non-missing Baseline pathogens

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CefiderocolPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up43.5 percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up38.6 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-7.9, 15.8]
Secondary

Total Hospitalization Time

The length of hospital stay attributable to the study-qualifying infection.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and to follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CefiderocolTotal Hospitalization TimeTest of Cure11.54 daysStandard Deviation 7.81
CefiderocolTotal Hospitalization TimeFollow-up13.49 daysStandard Deviation 10.06
MeropenemTotal Hospitalization TimeTest of Cure11.47 daysStandard Deviation 7.32
MeropenemTotal Hospitalization TimeFollow-up12.98 daysStandard Deviation 9.59
Comparison: Comparison of Hospitalization time at test of curep-value: 0.9382t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of hospitalization time at follow-upp-value: 0.6552t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026