Early Allograft Dysfunction, Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Liver Transplant
Conditions
Keywords
Liver Transplant, Ischemia-reperfusion injury, Early allograft dysfunction
Brief summary
The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Reparixin treatment (2.772 mg/kg body weight/hour intravenous continuous infusion for 7 days) based on incidence of early allograft dysfunction within the first 7 days after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and overall indicators of allograft dysfunction in the early postoperative period (within 14 days after the OLT).
Detailed description
The study is a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, randomized pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Reparixin for prevention of early allograft dysfunction in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. All the patients who participated in the study received standard immunosuppressive therapy in accordance with the Russian Transplant Society Guidelines for liver transplantation (2013). The study was planned to be conducted at 5-8 transplantation sites in Russia and Belarus. Recruitment was competitive among the study sites so that patients were screened and if eligible, randomized consecutively until the randomization was stopped.
Interventions
DRUGReparixin
Reparixin was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days (Day 0 to Day 6) (168 hours). Reparixin was provided as 33 mg/ml concentrated solution to be diluted for i.v. infusion, packaged into 250 mL clear glass vials. To give a final concentration of 11 mg/mL, the content of a vial (250 ml) was diluted with 500 ml of 0.9% sterile saline to a total volume of 750 ml. The dosing solution was placed in a 1000 ml sterile empty Infusion Bag. Dosing solutions were to be used within 72 h from preparation, unless more restrictive rules. Reparixin infusion started approximately 60-90 minutes before the anticipated time of OLT. Infusion interruption was allowed for no more than 60 min. All patients received standard immunosuppressive therapy in accordance with the Russian Transplant Society Guidelines for liver transplantation. Patients and allograft survival were monitored up to 1 year after OLT.
OTHERControl
The patients who were randomized in the control group, did not receive any study therapy. The patients of both groups received the standard immunosuppressive therapy with Tacrolimus only or together with mycophenolates, or a combination of Tacrolimus/Cyclosporine with mycophenolates and/or glucocorticosteroids. The patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and impaired renal function could receive a combination of drugs that includes everolimus. Basiliximab in association with methylprednisolone was used for the induction of immunosuppression.
Sponsors
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Male and female patients aged 18 years and older needing a whole organ OLT, listed on the waiting list for liver transplantation. 2. Severity score of the initial condition of the patient (hepatocellular dysfunction) according to the scales of Child-Turcotte-Pugh ≥ 7 points or MELD 15-40 points (or both). 3. The possibility of insertion of a central catheter for infusion of the study drug. 4. Signed Patient Informed Consent Form. 5. Ability to comply with all the requirements of the protocol. 6. Consent to use adequate contraception means throughout the study. The adequate contraception methods include use of condom with spermicide.
Exclusion criteria
Patients with any of the following conditions shall not be included in the study: 1. Split-liver transplantation or transplantation from a living donor. 2. Re-transplantation or multivisceral transplantation. 3. The presence of extrahepatic tumor foci or sepsis. 4. Gastrointestinal bleeding caused by portal hypertension within 3 months prior to screening. 5. BMI less than 18.5 or more than 40 kg/m2. 6. HIV infection. 7. Significant cardiovascular disease at the present time or within 6 months prior to screening, including: class III or IV chronic heart failure (the New York Heart Association), myocardial infarction, unstable angina, hemodynamically significant cardiac arrhythmias, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, uncontrolled arterial hypertension. 8. Preoperative renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate estimated with the Cockcroft-Gault formula ≤ 45 mL/min). 9. Significant, in the opinion of the Investigator, drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to screening. 10. Hypersensitivity to: 1. ibuprofen or to more than one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), 2. more than one medication belonging to the class of sulfonamides, such as sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfasalazine, nimesulide or celecoxib; hypersensitivity to sulphanilamide antibiotics alone (e.g. sulfamethoxazole) does not qualify for exclusion. 11. Pregnant or lactating women, or women planning a pregnancy during the clinical study, fertile women not using adequate contraception methods. 12. Participation in another clinical study currently or within 30 days prior to screening, use of any investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to screening. 13. The patient's and his/her relatives' failure to understand the need for lifelong immunosuppressive therapy, as well as the risk and difficulty of the pending operation and the subsequent dynamic treatment. 14. Inability to read or write; unwillingness to understand and comply with the procedures of the study protocol; failure to comply with the treatment, which, in opinion of the Investigator, may affect the results of the study or the patient's safety and prevent the patient from further participation in the study; any other associated medical or serious mental conditions that make the patient unsuitable for participation in the clinical study, limit the validity of informed consent or may affect the patient's ability to participate in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of EAD (Early Allograft Dysfunction) Within 7 Days After OLT (PP Population) | within 7 day after the OLT | Assessment of the frequency of early allograft disfunction (EAD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) (Day 7 of Week 1) among patients who received Reparixin and patients in the control group. EAD was defined according to standard criteria as maximum Alanine Transferase (ALT) or Aspartate Transferase (AST) levels on days 1-7 of \>2000 U/L, day 7 Bilirubin level ≥10 mg/dl, or a day 7 International Normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.6. Taking into account that 5 out of 22 patients in the Reparixin group experienced EAD during the first stage of the study, according to the Protocol and the DMC conclusion, it was decided on the early termination of the study. |
| Incidence of EAD (Early Allograft Dysfunction) Within 7 Days After OLT (mITT Population) | within 7 day after the OLT | Assessment of the frequency of early allograft disfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) (Day 7 of Week 1) among patients who received Reparixin and patients in the control group. EAD was defined according to standard criteria as maximum Alanine Transferase (ALT) or Aspartate Transferase (AST) levels on days 1-7 of \>2000 U/L, day 7 Bilirubin level ≥10 mg/dl, or a day 7 International Normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.6. Please note that taking into account that 5 out of 22 patients in the Reparixin group experienced EAD during the first stage of the study, according to the Protocol and the DMC conclusion, it was decided on the early termination of the study. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Indicators of the Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period - Extracorporeal Detoxification | Within 14 days after OLT | Cumulative incidence of extracorporeal detoxification as an indicator of liver allograft dysfunction in early postoperative period within 2 weeks after OLT is reported. Extracorporeal liver support describes all measures of extracorporeal blood treatments, which are aimed at supporting any functions of the liver in order to reduce the number of failing organs as a consequence of liver failure. The ultimate goal of extracorporeal liver support is to prolong the survival time of patients with liver failure by preventing progression of secondary organ failure. |
| Frequency of Identification of Laboratory Examination Values | within 3 day after the OLT | The frequency of identification of laboratory examination values corresponding to early allograft dysfunction within 3 days after the operation (Day 4 of the study drug administration) |
| Number of Patients With Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs, by the Degree of Steatosis | Within 14 days after OLT | Incidence of early allograft dysfunction in case of transplantation of donor organs differing by the degree of steatosis was reported. The investigators evaluated organ suitability for transplantation relying on histopathologic findings from biopsy. In this clinical setting, grafts with macrovesicular steatosis degree \>50% were considered as non-suitable for transplantation. Steatosis or fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterised by hepatic lipid accumulation. Nominal data for the MITT are reported. |
| Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia) | Within 14 days after OLT | Number of patients with EAD in case of transplantation of donor organs by the time of allograft removal from the donor and up to its reperfusion after engraftment (duration of cold ischemia) was assessed. Cold ischemia time during procurement is defined as the time after clamping of aorta until excision of the organ, which can last some hours. Prolonged cold ischemia time is an independent risk factor for the development of delayed function and primary nonfunction of the allograft. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, cold ischemia time is believed to affect graft function by contributing to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Nominal data for the MITT are reported. |
| Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia | Within 14 days after OLT | The number of EAD patients in case of transplantation of donor organs differing by the time of allograft removal from the donor and up to its reperfusion after engraftment (duration of warm ischemia) was assessed. In surgery, warm ischemia is the time a tissue, organ, or body part remains at body temperature after its blood supply has been reduced or cut off but before it is cooled or reconnected to a blood supply. In the transplant setting, this term is used to describe two physiologically distinct periods of ischaemia: (1) Ischemia during implantation, from removal of the organ from ice until reperfusion, and (2) Ischemia during organ retrieval, from the time of cross clamping (or of asystole in non-heart-beating donors), until cold perfusion is commenced. Nominal data for the MITT are reported. |
| Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors | Within 14 days after OLT | The number of patients with early allograft dysfunction in transplantation from donors having additional adverse factors like infectious complication, death of the brain, hypotension, etc. was reported. The correlation between EAD and additional adverse factors are showed. Nominal data for the MITT are reported. |
| Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | Within 14 days after OLT | The number of patients with allograft dysfunction in transplantation with regard to the interval between the diagnosis of brain death and removal of the liver graft from a donor (in the case of a brain-dead donor). This interval can last hours. Nominal data for the mITT are reported. |
| Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology | Within 14 days after OLT | The number of patients with EAD in transplant recipients with liver diseases of different etiology (viral, alcoholic, autoimmune, etc.) was assessed. |
| Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases of Different Etiology and With Different Baseline Characteristics | Within 14 days after OLT | The incidence of early allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients with liver diseases of different etiology and with different baseline characteristics. Herein the intent is reporting the number/percentage of subjects with EAD within 14 days after OLT, without distinction for disease etiology and baseline characteristics. |
| Number of Patients With/Without Primary Allograft Nonfunction Within 7 Days After OLT | Within 7 days after OLT | The number of patients in which: a) the primary allograft nonfunction within 7 day after the OLT was determined and not determined, and the number of patients in which 2)Appropriate data was not available in each of the two arms are reported. |
| Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients (Creatinine Clearance, ClCr) | Within 14 days after OLT | The incidence of early allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients with different baseline characteristics. Herein Creatinine clearance at screening Day - 1 (mL/min). Creatinine clearance (CrCl) is the volume of blood plasma cleared of creatinine per unit time. It is a rapid and cost-effective method for the measurement of renal function. the normal range of CrCl is 110 to 150mL/min in males and 100 to 130mL/min in females. Serum creatinine level for men with normal kidney function is approximately 0.6 to 1.2mg/dL and between 0.5 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Creatine levels above the normal range indicate renal dysfunction. |
| Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index | Within 14 days after OLT | The incidence of early allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients with different score in scales of end-stage liver disease. The MELD score estimates a patient's chances of surviving their disease during the next three months. Practically, MELD is a reliable measure of mortality risk in patients with end-stage liver disease. It is used as a disease severity index to determine prognosis and help prioritize patients for organ allocation by estimating 3-month mortality risk. The MELD score ranges from 6 to 40 and is based on results from several lab tests. The higher the number, the more likely the subject is to receive a liver from a deceased donor when an organ becomes available. MELD Score= 11.2 x In INR + 9.57 x In Creatinine (mg/dL) + 3.78 (if the patient had dialysis at least twice in the past week, the value for serum creatinine needs to be adjusted to 4.0) x In Bilirubine (mg/dL) + 6.43 |
| Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients Via Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score (CTP) | Within 14 days after OLT | The incidence of early allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients with different allograft dysfunction based on CTP. This score assesses the severity of the disease, the risk of lethal outcome (during surgeries) and the prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. The CTP scoring system incorporates five parameters: serum bilirubin, serum albumin, prothrombin time, ascites, and grade of encephalopathy. Each of them can score between 1 and 3. Based on the sum of the points from these five parameters, the patient is categorized into one of three CTP classes/grades: A, B, or C. Score: • 5-6 points - Grade A (least severe liver disease) * 7-9 points - Grade B (moderately severe liver disease) * 10-15 points - Grade C (most severe liver disease) |
| Time to Liver Function Normalization of Liver Function Parameters | Within 1 Year after OLT | Time to normalization of liver function parameters (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin levels, gamma-glutamyltransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, etc.) after the OLT was assessed. Please note the upper limit of IC is not available due to insufficient number of participants with events. |
| Patient Survival Within 1 Year After OLT | within 1 year after OLT | Patient survival within 1 year after OLT was assessed. Please note the data are not available due to insufficient number of participants with events. |
| Mortality Within 1 Year After the OLT | Within 1 Year after OLT | Number of deaths within 1 year after the OLT was assessed. |
| The Incidence of Hyperacute, Acute and Chronic Liver Allograft Rejection . | Within 1 Year after OLT | Hyperacute or acute transplant rejection were determined by biopsy; chronic transplant rejection was defined by histological evaluation in both treatment groups. |
| Summary of Adverse Events up to 1 Year After the OLT | up to 1 year after the OLT | An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. |
| The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics | Within 14 days after OLT | The number of EAD patients in transplant recipients with liver diseases detected, and with different baseline characteristics was assessed. Herein HBV and HCV viral load at screening visit are reported. |
| Number of Patients With/Without Overall Indicators of Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period | Within 14 days after OLT | The number of patients in which: a) the primary allograft dysfunction within 14 day after the OLT was determined and not determined, and the number of patients in which 2)Appropriate data was not available in each of the two arms are reported. The term early allograft dysfunction (EAD) identifies liver transplant (LT) allografts with initial poor function and portends poor allograft and patient survival. |
Countries
Belarus, Russia
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Patients admitted to the transplant center immediately before OLT surgery who signed the Patient Informed Consent Form underwent screening procedures (Day -1). Screening can be carried out within 24 hours before planned surgery. The results at screening were considered as baseline values. During the screening physical examination, patients fulfilling all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Reparixin - mITT Patients in the group of the study therapy received Reparixin at dose of 2.772 mg/kg/hour for 7 days (168 hours). The prepared solution of Reparixin 11 mg/ml was administered as a continuous infusion into a central vein using an automatic infusion pump that provides a constant rate of infusion.
Reparixin infusion started 60-90 minutes before OLT. Infusion interruption was allowed for no more than 60 minutes.
All patients of the study received standard immunosuppressive therapy in accordance with the Russian Transplant Society Guidelines for liver transplantation.
Reparixin: Reparixin was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days (Day 0 to Day 6) (168 hours). Infusion of the study drug started approximately 60-90 minutes before the anticipated time of OLT (Orthotopic liver transplantation).The status of patients and allograft survival was monitored up to 1 year after OLT. | 22 |
| Standard Care Procedures - mITT The patients, who were randomized in the control group, did not receive any study therapy. All patients of the study received standard immunosuppressive therapy in accordance with the Russian Transplant Society Guidelines for liver transplantation.
Standard care procedures: The patients, who were randomized in the control group, did not receive any study therapy. The patients of both groups received the standard immunosuppressive therapy with Tacrolimus only or together with mycophenolates, or a combination of Tacrolimus/Cyclosporine with mycophenolates and/or glucocorticosteroids. The patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and impaired renal function could receive a combination of drugs that includes everolimus. Basiliximab in association with methylprednisolone was used for the induction of immunosuppression. | 16 |
| Total | 38 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 3 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Cancel the operation | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Death | 3 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol entry criteria not met | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Reparixin - mITT | Standard Care Procedures - mITT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 20 Participants | 16 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 55.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 | 46.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 | 50.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 21 Participants | 16 Participants | 37 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other - Mongoloid | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belarus | 4 participants | 2 participants | 6 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 18 participants | 14 participants | 32 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 18 Participants | 11 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 22 | 1 / 16 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 20 / 22 | 13 / 16 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 16 / 22 | 5 / 16 |
Outcome results
Primary
Incidence of EAD (Early Allograft Dysfunction) Within 7 Days After OLT (mITT Population)
Assessment of the frequency of early allograft disfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) (Day 7 of Week 1) among patients who received Reparixin and patients in the control group. EAD was defined according to standard criteria as maximum Alanine Transferase (ALT) or Aspartate Transferase (AST) levels on days 1-7 of \>2000 U/L, day 7 Bilirubin level ≥10 mg/dl, or a day 7 International Normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.6. Please note that taking into account that 5 out of 22 patients in the Reparixin group experienced EAD during the first stage of the study, according to the Protocol and the DMC conclusion, it was decided on the early termination of the study.
Time frame: within 7 day after the OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (MITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Incidence of EAD (Early Allograft Dysfunction) Within 7 Days After OLT (mITT Population) | 22.7 percentage of participants with EAD |
| Control - PP | Incidence of EAD (Early Allograft Dysfunction) Within 7 Days After OLT (mITT Population) | 18.8 percentage of participants with EAD |
p-value: 0.7Fisher Exact
Primary
Incidence of EAD (Early Allograft Dysfunction) Within 7 Days After OLT (PP Population)
Assessment of the frequency of early allograft disfunction (EAD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) (Day 7 of Week 1) among patients who received Reparixin and patients in the control group. EAD was defined according to standard criteria as maximum Alanine Transferase (ALT) or Aspartate Transferase (AST) levels on days 1-7 of \>2000 U/L, day 7 Bilirubin level ≥10 mg/dl, or a day 7 International Normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.6. Taking into account that 5 out of 22 patients in the Reparixin group experienced EAD during the first stage of the study, according to the Protocol and the DMC conclusion, it was decided on the early termination of the study.
Time frame: within 7 day after the OLT
Population: Per protocol population (PP) includes all patients who have received at least 70% of the dose of the study drug, with data sufficient for the primary efficacy analysis, and who are considered compliant. Patients are considered compliant in case of absence of any major protocol violations during the study. In the group of the study therapy the patients who received not less than 70% of the study drug dose will be considered compliant.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Incidence of EAD (Early Allograft Dysfunction) Within 7 Days After OLT (PP Population) | 29.4 percentage of participants with EAD |
| Control - PP | Incidence of EAD (Early Allograft Dysfunction) Within 7 Days After OLT (PP Population) | 18.8 percentage of participants with EAD |
p-value: 0.688Fisher Exact
Secondary
Frequency of Identification of Laboratory Examination Values
The frequency of identification of laboratory examination values corresponding to early allograft dysfunction within 3 days after the operation (Day 4 of the study drug administration)
Time frame: within 3 day after the OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Frequency of Identification of Laboratory Examination Values | AST and ALT > 2000 U/L | 0 Participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Frequency of Identification of Laboratory Examination Values | ALT> 2000 U/L | 1 Participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Frequency of Identification of Laboratory Examination Values | AST> 2000 U/L | 0 Participants |
| Control - PP | Frequency of Identification of Laboratory Examination Values | ALT> 2000 U/L | 0 Participants |
| Control - PP | Frequency of Identification of Laboratory Examination Values | AST> 2000 U/L | 0 Participants |
| Control - PP | Frequency of Identification of Laboratory Examination Values | AST and ALT > 2000 U/L | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases of Different Etiology and With Different Baseline Characteristics
The incidence of early allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients with liver diseases of different etiology and with different baseline characteristics. Herein the intent is reporting the number/percentage of subjects with EAD within 14 days after OLT, without distinction for disease etiology and baseline characteristics.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases of Different Etiology and With Different Baseline Characteristics | 5 Participants |
| Control - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases of Different Etiology and With Different Baseline Characteristics | 3 Participants |
Secondary
Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients (Creatinine Clearance, ClCr)
The incidence of early allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients with different baseline characteristics. Herein Creatinine clearance at screening Day - 1 (mL/min). Creatinine clearance (CrCl) is the volume of blood plasma cleared of creatinine per unit time. It is a rapid and cost-effective method for the measurement of renal function. the normal range of CrCl is 110 to 150mL/min in males and 100 to 130mL/min in females. Serum creatinine level for men with normal kidney function is approximately 0.6 to 1.2mg/dL and between 0.5 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Creatine levels above the normal range indicate renal dysfunction.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients (Creatinine Clearance, ClCr) | 81.6 ml/min | Standard Deviation 30.1 |
| Control - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients (Creatinine Clearance, ClCr) | 73.5 ml/min | Standard Deviation 20 |
Secondary
Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index
The incidence of early allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients with different score in scales of end-stage liver disease. The MELD score estimates a patient's chances of surviving their disease during the next three months. Practically, MELD is a reliable measure of mortality risk in patients with end-stage liver disease. It is used as a disease severity index to determine prognosis and help prioritize patients for organ allocation by estimating 3-month mortality risk. The MELD score ranges from 6 to 40 and is based on results from several lab tests. The higher the number, the more likely the subject is to receive a liver from a deceased donor when an organ becomes available. MELD Score= 11.2 x In INR + 9.57 x In Creatinine (mg/dL) + 3.78 (if the patient had dialysis at least twice in the past week, the value for serum creatinine needs to be adjusted to 4.0) x In Bilirubine (mg/dL) + 6.43
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index | < 9 - 1.9% mortality | 0 recipients with liver disease via MELD |
| Reparixin - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index | 10 - 19 - 6.0% mortality | 5 recipients with liver disease via MELD |
| Reparixin - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index | 20 - 29 - 19.6% mortality | 0 recipients with liver disease via MELD |
| Reparixin - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index | 30 - 39 - 52.6% mortality | 0 recipients with liver disease via MELD |
| Control - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index | 30 - 39 - 52.6% mortality | 0 recipients with liver disease via MELD |
| Control - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index | < 9 - 1.9% mortality | 0 recipients with liver disease via MELD |
| Control - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index | 20 - 29 - 19.6% mortality | 1 recipients with liver disease via MELD |
| Control - PP | Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Transplant Recipients - Severity of Recipient's Liver Disease Through MELD Index | 10 - 19 - 6.0% mortality | 2 recipients with liver disease via MELD |
Secondary
Mortality Within 1 Year After the OLT
Number of deaths within 1 year after the OLT was assessed.
Time frame: Within 1 Year after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Mortality Within 1 Year After the OLT | 4 Participants |
| Control - PP | Mortality Within 1 Year After the OLT | 1 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia
The number of EAD patients in case of transplantation of donor organs differing by the time of allograft removal from the donor and up to its reperfusion after engraftment (duration of warm ischemia) was assessed. In surgery, warm ischemia is the time a tissue, organ, or body part remains at body temperature after its blood supply has been reduced or cut off but before it is cooled or reconnected to a blood supply. In the transplant setting, this term is used to describe two physiologically distinct periods of ischaemia: (1) Ischemia during implantation, from removal of the organ from ice until reperfusion, and (2) Ischemia during organ retrieval, from the time of cross clamping (or of asystole in non-heart-beating donors), until cold perfusion is commenced. Nominal data for the MITT are reported.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug. While 3 patients in the SoC are reported to develop EAD, data regarding the duration of warm ischemia are available for only 2 patients in the SoC arm.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia | patients who had a duration of warm ischemia < 30 minutes | 1 number of participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia | patients who had a duration of warm ischemia of 30 - 45 minutes | 3 number of participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia | patients who had a duration of warm ischemia of 46 - 60 minutes | 0 number of participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia | patients who had a duration of warm ischemia > 60 minutes | 0 number of participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia | patients who had a duration of warm ischemia > 60 minutes | 0 number of participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia | patients who had a duration of warm ischemia < 30 minutes | 0 number of participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia | patients who had a duration of warm ischemia of 46 - 60 minutes | 1 number of participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Duration (in Min) of Warm Ischemia | patients who had a duration of warm ischemia of 30 - 45 minutes | 1 number of participants |
p-value: 0.701Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary
Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia)
Number of patients with EAD in case of transplantation of donor organs by the time of allograft removal from the donor and up to its reperfusion after engraftment (duration of cold ischemia) was assessed. Cold ischemia time during procurement is defined as the time after clamping of aorta until excision of the organ, which can last some hours. Prolonged cold ischemia time is an independent risk factor for the development of delayed function and primary nonfunction of the allograft. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, cold ischemia time is believed to affect graft function by contributing to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Nominal data for the MITT are reported.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia) | patients who had a duration of cold ischemia < 5 hours | 0 number of participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia) | patients who had a duration of cold ischemia of 5-6 hours | 0 number of participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia) | patients who had a duration of cold ischemia of 6-7 hours | 4 number of participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia) | patients who had a duration of cold ischemia of more than 7 hours | 1 number of participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia) | patients who had a duration of cold ischemia of more than 7 hours | 0 number of participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia) | patients who had a duration of cold ischemia < 5 hours | 1 number of participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia) | patients who had a duration of cold ischemia of 6-7 hours | 1 number of participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs Differing by the Time (in Hours) of Allograft Removal From the Donor and up to Its Reperfusion (Duration of Cold Ischemia) | patients who had a duration of cold ischemia of 5-6 hours | 1 number of participants |
p-value: 0.843Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary
Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors
The number of patients with early allograft dysfunction in transplantation from donors having additional adverse factors like infectious complication, death of the brain, hypotension, etc. was reported. The correlation between EAD and additional adverse factors are showed. Nominal data for the MITT are reported.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors | Infectious complications -yes | 0 patients with additional adverse fact |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors | Hypotension - yes | 0 patients with additional adverse fact |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors | Death of the brain -yes | 5 patients with additional adverse fact |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors | Other - yes | 0 patients with additional adverse fact |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors | Death of the brain -yes | 3 patients with additional adverse fact |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors | Infectious complications -yes | 0 patients with additional adverse fact |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors | Other - yes | 0 patients with additional adverse fact |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation From Donors Having Additional Adverse Factors | Hypotension - yes | 0 patients with additional adverse fact |
Secondary
Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor
The number of patients with allograft dysfunction in transplantation with regard to the interval between the diagnosis of brain death and removal of the liver graft from a donor (in the case of a brain-dead donor). This interval can last hours. Nominal data for the mITT are reported.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | less than 2 hours | 1 participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | 2,3 hours | 0 participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | 3,4 hours | 1 participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | 4,6 hours | 2 participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | 6,8 hours | 0 participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | more than 8 hours | 1 participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | 6,8 hours | 0 participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | less than 2 hours | 0 participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | 4,6 hours | 0 participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | 2,3 hours | 1 participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | more than 8 hours | 1 participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplantation With Regard to the Interval (in Hours) Between the Diagnosis of Brain Death and Removal of the Liver Graft From a Donor | 3,4 hours | 1 participants |
Secondary
Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients Via Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score (CTP)
The incidence of early allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients with different allograft dysfunction based on CTP. This score assesses the severity of the disease, the risk of lethal outcome (during surgeries) and the prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. The CTP scoring system incorporates five parameters: serum bilirubin, serum albumin, prothrombin time, ascites, and grade of encephalopathy. Each of them can score between 1 and 3. Based on the sum of the points from these five parameters, the patient is categorized into one of three CTP classes/grades: A, B, or C. Score: • 5-6 points - Grade A (least severe liver disease) * 7-9 points - Grade B (moderately severe liver disease) * 10-15 points - Grade C (most severe liver disease)
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients Via Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score (CTP) | 5-6 points Grade А (least severe liver disease) | 0 participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients Via Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score (CTP) | 7-9 points Grade В (moderately severe liver disease) | 4 participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients Via Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score (CTP) | 10-15 points Grade С (most severe liver disease) | 1 participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients Via Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score (CTP) | 5-6 points Grade А (least severe liver disease) | 0 participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients Via Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score (CTP) | 7-9 points Grade В (moderately severe liver disease) | 1 participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients Via Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score (CTP) | 10-15 points Grade С (most severe liver disease) | 2 participants |
Secondary
Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology
The number of patients with EAD in transplant recipients with liver diseases of different etiology (viral, alcoholic, autoimmune, etc.) was assessed.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology | recipients with Viral disease etiology - yes | 2 participants with liver diseases |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology | recipients with Alcoholic disease etiology - yes | 1 participants with liver diseases |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology | recipients with Autoimmune disease etiology - yes | 1 participants with liver diseases |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology | recipients with other disease etiology - Cirrhosis HCV + HCC in segment VII or Cryptogenic or toxic | 1 participants with liver diseases |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology | recipients with other disease etiology - Cirrhosis HCV + HCC in segment VII or Cryptogenic or toxic | 0 participants with liver diseases |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology | recipients with Viral disease etiology - yes | 3 participants with liver diseases |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology | recipients with Autoimmune disease etiology - yes | 0 participants with liver diseases |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Each of the Different Liver Disease Etiology | recipients with Alcoholic disease etiology - yes | 0 participants with liver diseases |
Secondary
Number of Patients With Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs, by the Degree of Steatosis
Incidence of early allograft dysfunction in case of transplantation of donor organs differing by the degree of steatosis was reported. The investigators evaluated organ suitability for transplantation relying on histopathologic findings from biopsy. In this clinical setting, grafts with macrovesicular steatosis degree \>50% were considered as non-suitable for transplantation. Steatosis or fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterised by hepatic lipid accumulation. Nominal data for the MITT are reported.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs, by the Degree of Steatosis | participants with allograft steatosis within 30 - 50 % | 0 Subjects with EAD |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs, by the Degree of Steatosis | participants with allograft steatosis within 0 - 10 % | 0 Subjects with EAD |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs, by the Degree of Steatosis | participants with allograft steatosis within 10 - 30 % | 5 Subjects with EAD |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs, by the Degree of Steatosis | participants with allograft steatosis within 0 - 10 % | 2 Subjects with EAD |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs, by the Degree of Steatosis | participants with allograft steatosis within 10 - 30 % | 1 Subjects with EAD |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) in Case of Transplantation of Donor Organs, by the Degree of Steatosis | participants with allograft steatosis within 30 - 50 % | 0 Subjects with EAD |
p-value: 0.574Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary
Number of Patients With/Without Overall Indicators of Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period
The number of patients in which: a) the primary allograft dysfunction within 14 day after the OLT was determined and not determined, and the number of patients in which 2)Appropriate data was not available in each of the two arms are reported. The term early allograft dysfunction (EAD) identifies liver transplant (LT) allografts with initial poor function and portends poor allograft and patient survival.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Overall Indicators of Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period | yes | 5 participants with allograft dysfunction |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Overall Indicators of Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period | no | 14 participants with allograft dysfunction |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Overall Indicators of Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period | No data | 3 participants with allograft dysfunction |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Overall Indicators of Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period | yes | 3 participants with allograft dysfunction |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Overall Indicators of Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period | no | 13 participants with allograft dysfunction |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Overall Indicators of Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period | No data | 0 participants with allograft dysfunction |
p-value: 0.308Fisher Exact
Secondary
Number of Patients With/Without Primary Allograft Nonfunction Within 7 Days After OLT
The number of patients in which: a) the primary allograft nonfunction within 7 day after the OLT was determined and not determined, and the number of patients in which 2)Appropriate data was not available in each of the two arms are reported.
Time frame: Within 7 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Primary Allograft Nonfunction Within 7 Days After OLT | No data | 5 Participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Primary Allograft Nonfunction Within 7 Days After OLT | Primary nonfunction - No | 17 Participants |
| Reparixin - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Primary Allograft Nonfunction Within 7 Days After OLT | Primary nonfunction - yes | 0 Participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Primary Allograft Nonfunction Within 7 Days After OLT | Primary nonfunction - No | 12 Participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Primary Allograft Nonfunction Within 7 Days After OLT | Primary nonfunction - yes | 0 Participants |
| Control - PP | Number of Patients With/Without Primary Allograft Nonfunction Within 7 Days After OLT | No data | 4 Participants |
p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Secondary
Overall Indicators of the Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period - Extracorporeal Detoxification
Cumulative incidence of extracorporeal detoxification as an indicator of liver allograft dysfunction in early postoperative period within 2 weeks after OLT is reported. Extracorporeal liver support describes all measures of extracorporeal blood treatments, which are aimed at supporting any functions of the liver in order to reduce the number of failing organs as a consequence of liver failure. The ultimate goal of extracorporeal liver support is to prolong the survival time of patients with liver failure by preventing progression of secondary organ failure.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Overall Indicators of the Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period - Extracorporeal Detoxification | 0 Participants |
| Control - PP | Overall Indicators of the Allograft Dysfunction During the Early Postoperative Period - Extracorporeal Detoxification | 0 Participants |
p-value: 0.601Fisher Exact
Secondary
Patient Survival Within 1 Year After OLT
Patient survival within 1 year after OLT was assessed. Please note the data are not available due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Time frame: within 1 year after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug. Please note data are not available due to insufficient number of participants with events.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Patient Survival Within 1 Year After OLT | NA days |
| Control - PP | Patient Survival Within 1 Year After OLT | NA days |
p-value: 0.416Log Rank
Secondary
Summary of Adverse Events up to 1 Year After the OLT
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product.
Time frame: up to 1 year after the OLT
Population: SAF= Set of patients called the Safety population; patients are grouped for analysis according to the treatment they actually received, as opposed to the treatment they were allocated to receive at randomization.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Summary of Adverse Events up to 1 Year After the OLT | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one AE | 20 participants with AE |
| Reparixin - PP | Summary of Adverse Events up to 1 Year After the OLT | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one AE leading to discontinuation of study drug | 3 participants with AE |
| Reparixin - PP | Summary of Adverse Events up to 1 Year After the OLT | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one serious AE | 16 participants with AE |
| Control - PP | Summary of Adverse Events up to 1 Year After the OLT | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one AE | 13 participants with AE |
| Control - PP | Summary of Adverse Events up to 1 Year After the OLT | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one AE leading to discontinuation of study drug | 0 participants with AE |
| Control - PP | Summary of Adverse Events up to 1 Year After the OLT | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one serious AE | 5 participants with AE |
Secondary
The Incidence of Hyperacute, Acute and Chronic Liver Allograft Rejection .
Hyperacute or acute transplant rejection were determined by biopsy; chronic transplant rejection was defined by histological evaluation in both treatment groups.
Time frame: Within 1 Year after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | The Incidence of Hyperacute, Acute and Chronic Liver Allograft Rejection . | hyperacute | 0 participants |
| Reparixin - PP | The Incidence of Hyperacute, Acute and Chronic Liver Allograft Rejection . | acute | 0 participants |
| Reparixin - PP | The Incidence of Hyperacute, Acute and Chronic Liver Allograft Rejection . | chronic | 0 participants |
| Control - PP | The Incidence of Hyperacute, Acute and Chronic Liver Allograft Rejection . | hyperacute | 0 participants |
| Control - PP | The Incidence of Hyperacute, Acute and Chronic Liver Allograft Rejection . | acute | 0 participants |
| Control - PP | The Incidence of Hyperacute, Acute and Chronic Liver Allograft Rejection . | chronic | 0 participants |
Secondary
The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics
The number of EAD patients in transplant recipients with liver diseases detected, and with different baseline characteristics was assessed. Herein HBV and HCV viral load at screening visit are reported.
Time frame: Within 14 days after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics | HCV virus loading - detected | 1 participants with viral load |
| Reparixin - PP | The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics | HBV virus loading - not detected | 3 participants with viral load |
| Reparixin - PP | The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics | HCV virus loading - not detected | 2 participants with viral load |
| Reparixin - PP | The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics | HBV virus loading - detected | 0 participants with viral load |
| Control - PP | The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics | HCV virus loading - not detected | 2 participants with viral load |
| Control - PP | The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics | HBV virus loading - not detected | 2 participants with viral load |
| Control - PP | The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics | HCV virus loading - detected | 1 participants with viral load |
| Control - PP | The Number of Patients With EAD in Transplant Recipients With Liver Diseases (HBV and HCV Virus) and With Different Baseline Characteristics | HBV virus loading - detected | 0 participants with viral load |
Secondary
Time to Liver Function Normalization of Liver Function Parameters
Time to normalization of liver function parameters (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin levels, gamma-glutamyltransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, etc.) after the OLT was assessed. Please note the upper limit of IC is not available due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Time frame: Within 1 Year after OLT
Population: Modified population of patients who received treatment (mITT = modified intent-to-treat) corresponds to all patients who received any dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Reparixin - PP | Time to Liver Function Normalization of Liver Function Parameters | 87 hours |
| Control - PP | Time to Liver Function Normalization of Liver Function Parameters | NA hours |