Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of V120083 in Subjects With Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee

A Phase 2a, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled and Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study Evaluating the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of V120083 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03028870
Enrollment
291
Registered
2017-01-23
Start date
2017-03-14
Completion date
2017-11-21
Last updated
2019-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteo Arthritis Knee

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Pain, Osteoarthritis Knee

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of V120083 twice daily compared to placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic pain due to OA of the knee.

Interventions

DRUGV120083

Capsules

DRUGNaproxen

Capsules

DRUGPlacebo

Capsules to match V120083 and/or naproxen

Sponsors

Shionogi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Purdue Pharma LP
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria Include: 1. Males and females ≥ 40 and ≤ 80 years of age with moderate to severe chronic OA pain of the knee (lasting several hours daily) as their predominant pain condition for at least 6 months prior to screening 2. Diagnostic criteria for primary pain condition (American College of Rheumatology \[ACR\] clinical and radiographic criteria): * At least 1 of the following in addition to knee pain: age \> 50, morning stiffness \< 30 minutes, crepitus on active motion, and * Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 2 or 3 radiographic evidence at the screening visit as determined by a local radiologist or rheumatologist. If a radiograph is not available, one must be taken and the diagnostic criteria must be confirmed before randomization. 3. Subjects whose OA pain of the index knee is not adequately treated prior to the screening visit: * Subjects must have a self-reported average pain intensity rating of moderate or severe on a verbal rating scale (ie, none, mild, moderate, and severe) over the 7 days prior to the screening visit 4. The subjects must have average pain over the last 24 hours scores ≥ 4 and ≤ 9 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) for the index knee on ≥ 3 consecutive days during the pain assessment period and come in for randomization within 96 hours after the latest qualifying pain score entry 5. Subjects who are willing and able to stop taking any/all analgesic medications, including over-the-counter pain medications, opioids, marijuana, and topical analgesics for OA pain for the duration of the study, with the exception of study-specific rescue medication. Key

Exclusion criteria

Include: 1. Subjects with radiographic evidence of OA with K-L grade 0,1 or 4 2. Subjects with chronic pain conditions other than OA of the knee as their predominant pain condition, including gout, pseudogout, psoriatic arthritis, active Lyme disease, rheumatoid arthritis or any other inflammatory arthritis, fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain conditions, bursitis, or acute injury or signs of active infection in the target pain area 3. Subjects scheduled for surgical interventions of the disease site or any other major surgery during the study conduct period 4. Subjects with a history of a prior joint replacement of the index knee 5. Subjects who have had arthroscopy on either knee or hip within 6 months of entering the study, or open surgery on either knee or hip within 12 months of entering the study 6. Subjects with a history of significant trauma to a knee, hip or shoulder within the previous year 7. Subjects who have significant pain, other than or more than knee pain, including significant hip, back pain, that may confound the analgesic efficacy assessments of this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4Week 4At week 4, subjects were asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-Diary4 WeeksSubjects were asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain Subscale4 WeeksThe pain subscale consisted of 5 items: walking; stair climbing; nocturnal; at rest; weight bearing. The score for each item ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). The pain subscale score was obtained by adding the responses to the 5 items which could range from 0 to 20.
Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness Subscale4 WeeksThe stiffness subscale consisted of 2 items; morning stiffness and stiffness occurring later in the day. The score for each item ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) and the stiffness subscale score was obtained by adding the responses to the 2 items which could range from 0 - 8.
Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function Subscale4 WeeksThe physical function subscale consisted of 17 items: descending stairs; ascending stairs; rising from sitting; standing; bending to floor; walking on flat surface; getting into or out of car; going shopping; putting on socks; rising from bed; taking off socks; lying in bed; sitting; getting into or out of the bathtub; getting on or off the toilet; heavy domestic duties; light domestic duties. The score for each item ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) and the physical function subscale score was obtained by adding the responses to the 17 items which could range from 0 to 68.
Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total Score4 WeeksThe total score of the WOMAC consisted of 24 items (5 items from the pain subscale, 2 items from the stiffness subscale, and 17 items from the physical function subscale). The total score was obtained by adding the scores from these 3 subscales and could range from 0 to 96.
Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)4 WeeksThe mBPI-SF consists of 6 questions and is a self-administered questionnaire used to assess the severity of pain, and the interference of pain on daily functions. Subjects rated their severity of pain / interference of pain on a 0 (no pain / does not interfere) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine / completely interferes) numerical rating scale (NRS) The total score is the sum of all parts of the 6 questions and the total score range is 0 - 110.
Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale Score4 WeeksThe mBPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire. The pain severity subscale of the mBPI-SF consists of 4 questions which ask the subjects to rate their severity of pain on a 0 to 10 NRS for worst pain, least pain, average pain, and current pain. The severity of pain was computed as the mean of questions 1-4. The mean severity of pain scores could range from 0 to 10.
Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale Score4 WeeksThe mBPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire. The pain interference subscale of the mBPI-SF consists of Question 6 which has 7 parts, all of which ask the subjects to rate the impact/interference of their pain on various functions, ie, general activity, mood, walking, normal work, relations with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a 0 to 10 NRS where 0 = does not interfere and 10 = completely interferes. The mean interference of pain scores could range from 0 to 10.
Weekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeeks 1, 2 and 4Subjects were asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component Summary4 WeeksThe SF-36 is a generic health survey with 36 items that measure functional health and well-being from the subject's perspective. The survey is summarized into 8 dimensions/scales: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). The Physical Component Summary is derived from 4 of the 8 health dimensions (aggregate of PF, RP, BP, and GH scales). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. A higher score indicates a better health state.
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component Summary4 WeeksThe SF-36 is a generic health survey with 36 items that measure functional health and well-being from the subject's perspective. The survey is summarized into 8 dimensions/scales: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). The Mental Component Summary is derived from 4 of the 8 health dimensions,(aggregate of VT, SF, RE, and MH scales). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. A higher score indicates a better health state.
European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health Status4 WeeksEQ-5D-5L is a standardized generic measure of health status for clinical and economic appraisal based on a descriptive system that defines health in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. It includes a visual analogue scale (VAS) with scores ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)4 WeeksThe PGIC is an ordinal scale which assesses the change in overall status relative to the start of the study. The scale has only 1 item, which measures global change of overall status by the subject on a 7-point scale (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse), where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The number of subjects responding very much improved and much improved was summarized by treatment group.
Supplemental Analgesic Medication UseUp to 28 daysThe average daily number of tablets of supplemental pain medication used during the double-blind period was summarized by treatment group.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Baseline up to 4 WeeksSuicidality was monitored throughout the study using the C-SSRS. The C-SSRS involves a series of probing questions to inquire about possible suicidal thinking and behavior. The composite endpoints (Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal Behavior, Suicidal Ideation or Behavior) included subjects who experienced any one of the events at least once during treatment.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) ScoreWeek 4Safety assessment to evaluate the impact of V120083 on mood (anxiety \[HADS-A\] and depression \[HADS-D\]). The score for each subscale ranges from 0 (no anxiety or depression) to 21, with a score of 11 or higher indicating the probable presence of the mood disorder.
Responder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4Week 4A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the baseline average pain over the last 24 hours score to the week 4 pain score from the mBPI-SF pain severity subscale. Responders were defined as having \> 0 % reduction; non-responders were defined as having ≤ 0% reduction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First subject first visit: 14-Mar-2017; last subject last visit: 21-Nov-2017. Thirty-one investigative centers in the United States participated in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
V120083 30 mg
V120083 30 mg taken orally twice daily
74
V120083 60 mg
V120083 60 mg taken orally twice daily
67
Naproxen
Naproxen 500 mg taken orally twice daily
76
Placebo
To match V120083 and/or naproxen taken orally twice daily
74
Total291

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdministrative55124
Overall StudyAdverse Event7433
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy3000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1112

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicV120083 30 mgV120083 60 mgNaproxenPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.66
60.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.62
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.94
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.79
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
19 Participants18 Participants14 Participants19 Participants70 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
51 Participants48 Participants61 Participants54 Participants214 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants42 Participants49 Participants46 Participants183 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants25 Participants27 Participants28 Participants108 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 740 / 670 / 760 / 74
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 7420 / 6717 / 7611 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 741 / 671 / 760 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

Daily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4

At week 4, subjects were asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: The full analysis population (FAP) (N = 291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgDaily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4Week 44.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
V120083 30 mgDaily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4Baseline5.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
V120083 60 mgDaily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4Week 44.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
V120083 60 mgDaily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4Baseline5.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
NaproxenDaily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4Baseline6.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
NaproxenDaily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4Week 43.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
PlaceboDaily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4Week 44.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboDaily Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Score at Week 4Baseline5.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Secondary

Average Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-Diary

Subjects were asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgAverage Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-DiaryBaseline6.104 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1851
V120083 30 mgAverage Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-DiaryWeek 46.366 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
V120083 60 mgAverage Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-DiaryWeek 47.269 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2627
V120083 60 mgAverage Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-DiaryBaseline6.737 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2076
NaproxenAverage Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-DiaryBaseline6.590 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2223
NaproxenAverage Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-DiaryWeek 46.000 score on a scale
PlaceboAverage Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-DiaryBaseline6.481 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2587
PlaceboAverage Daily Pain Right Now Score Collected by e-DiaryWeek 45.833 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7318
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score

Safety assessment to evaluate the impact of V120083 on mood (anxiety \[HADS-A\] and depression \[HADS-D\]). The score for each subscale ranges from 0 (no anxiety or depression) to 21, with a score of 11 or higher indicating the probable presence of the mood disorder.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: The safety population (N = 291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) ScoreWeek 4 change from baseline - HADS-A-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
V120083 30 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) ScoreWeek 4 change from baseline - HADS-D0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
V120083 60 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) ScoreWeek 4 change from baseline - HADS-D0.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
V120083 60 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) ScoreWeek 4 change from baseline - HADS-A-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
NaproxenChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) ScoreWeek 4 change from baseline - HADS-A-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
NaproxenChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) ScoreWeek 4 change from baseline - HADS-D-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) ScoreWeek 4 change from baseline - HADS-A-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) ScoreWeek 4 change from baseline - HADS-D-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health Status

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized generic measure of health status for clinical and economic appraisal based on a descriptive system that defines health in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. It includes a visual analogue scale (VAS) with scores ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgEuropean Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health StatusBaseline VAS Score73.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.04
V120083 30 mgEuropean Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health StatusWeek 4 VAS Score77.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.17
V120083 60 mgEuropean Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health StatusWeek 4 VAS Score77.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.42
V120083 60 mgEuropean Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health StatusBaseline VAS Score72.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.94
NaproxenEuropean Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health StatusBaseline VAS Score75.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.88
NaproxenEuropean Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health StatusWeek 4 VAS Score83.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
PlaceboEuropean Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health StatusBaseline VAS Score74.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.79
PlaceboEuropean Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) to Measure Health StatusWeek 4 VAS Score81.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Secondary

Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component Summary

The SF-36 is a generic health survey with 36 items that measure functional health and well-being from the subject's perspective. The survey is summarized into 8 dimensions/scales: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). The Mental Component Summary is derived from 4 of the 8 health dimensions,(aggregate of VT, SF, RE, and MH scales). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. A higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component SummaryBaseline59.248 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9688
V120083 30 mgMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component SummaryWeek 459.596 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9615
V120083 60 mgMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component SummaryWeek 459.560 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.0785
V120083 60 mgMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component SummaryBaseline59.766 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1498
NaproxenMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component SummaryBaseline60.450 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8714
NaproxenMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component SummaryWeek 460.921 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7819
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component SummaryBaseline59.450 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.0132
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Mental Component SummaryWeek 460.948 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8835
Secondary

Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component Summary

The SF-36 is a generic health survey with 36 items that measure functional health and well-being from the subject's perspective. The survey is summarized into 8 dimensions/scales: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). The Physical Component Summary is derived from 4 of the 8 health dimensions (aggregate of PF, RP, BP, and GH scales). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. A higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component SummaryBaseline31.689 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9696
V120083 30 mgMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component SummaryWeek 435.515 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3008
V120083 60 mgMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component SummaryWeek 436.277 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3584
V120083 60 mgMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component SummaryBaseline31.629 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9146
NaproxenMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component SummaryWeek 439.372 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2486
NaproxenMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component SummaryBaseline32.348 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.0737
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component SummaryWeek 437.826 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.144
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component SummaryBaseline33.762 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.0315
Secondary

Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale Score

The mBPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire. The pain interference subscale of the mBPI-SF consists of Question 6 which has 7 parts, all of which ask the subjects to rate the impact/interference of their pain on various functions, ie, general activity, mood, walking, normal work, relations with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a 0 to 10 NRS where 0 = does not interfere and 10 = completely interferes. The mean interference of pain scores could range from 0 to 10.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale ScoreBaseline4.618 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2717
V120083 30 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale ScoreWeek 42.847 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2925
V120083 60 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale ScoreWeek 42.679 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2961
V120083 60 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale ScoreBaseline4.348 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2573
NaproxenModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale ScoreBaseline4.718 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2186
NaproxenModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale ScoreWeek 42.070 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2377
PlaceboModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale ScoreBaseline4.278 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2721
PlaceboModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Interference Subscale ScoreWeek 42.634 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3049
Secondary

Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale Score

The mBPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire. The pain severity subscale of the mBPI-SF consists of 4 questions which ask the subjects to rate their severity of pain on a 0 to 10 NRS for worst pain, least pain, average pain, and current pain. The severity of pain was computed as the mean of questions 1-4. The mean severity of pain scores could range from 0 to 10.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale ScoreBaseline5.784 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2068
V120083 30 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale ScoreWeek 44.139 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.284
V120083 60 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale ScoreBaseline5.739 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1935
V120083 60 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale ScoreWeek 44.135 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2771
NaproxenModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale ScoreBaseline5.747 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1525
NaproxenModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale ScoreWeek 43.510 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2543
PlaceboModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale ScoreWeek 44.308 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) Pain Severity Subscale ScoreBaseline5.801 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1978
Secondary

Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)

The mBPI-SF consists of 6 questions and is a self-administered questionnaire used to assess the severity of pain, and the interference of pain on daily functions. Subjects rated their severity of pain / interference of pain on a 0 (no pain / does not interfere) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine / completely interferes) numerical rating scale (NRS) The total score is the sum of all parts of the 6 questions and the total score range is 0 - 110.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N = 291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)Baseline55.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.49
V120083 30 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)Week 436.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.97
V120083 60 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)Week 435.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.03
V120083 60 mgModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)Baseline53.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
NaproxenModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)Baseline56.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
NaproxenModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)Week 428.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.51
PlaceboModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)Baseline53.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.5
PlaceboModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-SF) - Total Score (All Parts of 6 Questions)Week 435.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.14
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)

Suicidality was monitored throughout the study using the C-SSRS. The C-SSRS involves a series of probing questions to inquire about possible suicidal thinking and behavior. The composite endpoints (Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal Behavior, Suicidal Ideation or Behavior) included subjects who experienced any one of the events at least once during treatment.

Time frame: Baseline up to 4 Weeks

Population: The safety population (N = 291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
V120083 30 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation or behavior0 Participants
V120083 30 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior0 Participants
V120083 30 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation0 Participants
V120083 30 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Self-injurious behavior without suicidal intent0 Participants
V120083 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior0 Participants
V120083 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation0 Participants
V120083 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation or behavior0 Participants
V120083 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Self-injurious behavior without suicidal intent0 Participants
NaproxenNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation0 Participants
NaproxenNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Self-injurious behavior without suicidal intent0 Participants
NaproxenNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation or behavior0 Participants
NaproxenNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal behavior0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Self-injurious behavior without suicidal intent0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Score (C-SSRS)Suicidal ideation or behavior0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The PGIC is an ordinal scale which assesses the change in overall status relative to the start of the study. The scale has only 1 item, which measures global change of overall status by the subject on a 7-point scale (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse), where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The number of subjects responding very much improved and much improved was summarized by treatment group.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
V120083 30 mgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Total Subjects Completing PGIC72 Participants
V120083 30 mgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Subjects Responding 'Very Much' / 'Much' Improved25 Participants
V120083 60 mgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Subjects Responding 'Very Much' / 'Much' Improved27 Participants
V120083 60 mgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Total Subjects Completing PGIC65 Participants
NaproxenPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Total Subjects Completing PGIC76 Participants
NaproxenPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Subjects Responding 'Very Much' / 'Much' Improved38 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Total Subjects Completing PGIC72 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Subjects Responding 'Very Much' / 'Much' Improved18 Participants
Secondary

Responder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4

A subject's response to treatment was defined as the percentage reduction from the baseline average pain over the last 24 hours score to the week 4 pain score from the mBPI-SF pain severity subscale. Responders were defined as having \> 0 % reduction; non-responders were defined as having ≤ 0% reduction.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
V120083 30 mgResponder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4Responder - Yes46 Participants
V120083 30 mgResponder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4Responder - No28 Participants
V120083 60 mgResponder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4Responder - No25 Participants
V120083 60 mgResponder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4Responder - Yes42 Participants
NaproxenResponder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4Responder - Yes57 Participants
NaproxenResponder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4Responder - No19 Participants
PlaceboResponder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4Responder - Yes42 Participants
PlaceboResponder to Treatment (Calculated as the Percentage Reduction of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours) at Week 4Responder - No32 Participants
Secondary

Supplemental Analgesic Medication Use

The average daily number of tablets of supplemental pain medication used during the double-blind period was summarized by treatment group.

Time frame: Up to 28 days

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgSupplemental Analgesic Medication Use0.779 Supplemental Analgesic TabletsStandard Error 0.1471
V120083 60 mgSupplemental Analgesic Medication Use0.686 Supplemental Analgesic TabletsStandard Error 0.1187
NaproxenSupplemental Analgesic Medication Use0.378 Supplemental Analgesic TabletsStandard Error 0.0712
PlaceboSupplemental Analgesic Medication Use0.670 Supplemental Analgesic TabletsStandard Error 0.1205
Secondary

Weekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity Subscale

Subjects were asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2 and 4

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 4 change from baseline-1.959 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2553
V120083 30 mgWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 1 change from baseline-0.920 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1721
V120083 30 mgWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 2 change from baseline-1.653 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2087
V120083 30 mgWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleBaseline6.242 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.153
V120083 60 mgWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 2 change from baseline-1.336 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1998
V120083 60 mgWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleBaseline6.431 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1408
V120083 60 mgWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 1 change from baseline-0.860 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1405
V120083 60 mgWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 4 change from baseline-1.803 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2957
NaproxenWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleBaseline6.469 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1426
NaproxenWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 1 change from baseline-1.655 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1789
NaproxenWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 2 change from baseline-2.255 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2443
NaproxenWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 4 change from baseline-2.741 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2898
PlaceboWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleBaseline6.543 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1497
PlaceboWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 4 change from baseline-1.952 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2667
PlaceboWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 1 change from baseline-0.977 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1569
PlaceboWeekly Change From Baseline Score of Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours From the mBPI-SF Pain Severity SubscaleWeek 2 change from baseline-1.593 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1979
Secondary

Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain Subscale

The pain subscale consisted of 5 items: walking; stair climbing; nocturnal; at rest; weight bearing. The score for each item ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). The pain subscale score was obtained by adding the responses to the 5 items which could range from 0 to 20.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain SubscaleWeek 47.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
V120083 30 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain SubscaleBaseline10.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
V120083 60 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain SubscaleWeek 47.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
V120083 60 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain SubscaleBaseline9.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
NaproxenWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain SubscaleWeek 45.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
NaproxenWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain SubscaleBaseline9.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
PlaceboWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain SubscaleWeek 46.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
PlaceboWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Pain SubscaleBaseline10.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Secondary

Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function Subscale

The physical function subscale consisted of 17 items: descending stairs; ascending stairs; rising from sitting; standing; bending to floor; walking on flat surface; getting into or out of car; going shopping; putting on socks; rising from bed; taking off socks; lying in bed; sitting; getting into or out of the bathtub; getting on or off the toilet; heavy domestic duties; light domestic duties. The score for each item ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) and the physical function subscale score was obtained by adding the responses to the 17 items which could range from 0 to 68.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function SubscaleBaseline34.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
V120083 30 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function SubscaleWeek 425.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.73
V120083 60 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function SubscaleWeek 425.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.79
V120083 60 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function SubscaleBaseline34.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.13
NaproxenWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function SubscaleWeek 418.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.46
NaproxenWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function SubscaleBaseline33.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.19
PlaceboWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function SubscaleWeek 423.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.64
PlaceboWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Physical Function SubscaleBaseline35.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
Secondary

Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness Subscale

The stiffness subscale consisted of 2 items; morning stiffness and stiffness occurring later in the day. The score for each item ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) and the stiffness subscale score was obtained by adding the responses to the 2 items which could range from 0 - 8.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness SubscaleBaseline4.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
V120083 30 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness SubscaleWeek 43.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
V120083 60 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness SubscaleWeek 43.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
V120083 60 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness SubscaleBaseline4.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
NaproxenWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness SubscaleBaseline4.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
NaproxenWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness SubscaleWeek 42.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
PlaceboWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness SubscaleBaseline4.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Stiffness SubscaleWeek 43.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total Score

The total score of the WOMAC consisted of 24 items (5 items from the pain subscale, 2 items from the stiffness subscale, and 17 items from the physical function subscale). The total score was obtained by adding the scores from these 3 subscales and could range from 0 to 96.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: The FAP (N=291) was the group of subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of the double-blind study drug, and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V120083 30 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total ScoreBaseline49.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.67
V120083 30 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total ScoreWeek 435.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.35
V120083 60 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total ScoreWeek 435.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.45
V120083 60 mgWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total ScoreBaseline48.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.54
NaproxenWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total ScoreWeek 426.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.99
NaproxenWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total ScoreBaseline47.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.55
PlaceboWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total ScoreBaseline49.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.65
PlaceboWestern Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Total ScoreWeek 433.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.25

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026