Skip to content

Long Term Special Drug Use Investigation of Mepolizumab

Nucala® Subcutaneous Injection Special Drug Use Investigation (Long-Term)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03028480
Enrollment
1061
Registered
2017-01-23
Start date
2017-01-11
Completion date
2023-11-22
Last updated
2024-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Exacerbation, Mepolizumab, NUCALA

Brief summary

This study is a special drug use investigation program of NUCALA (a brand name for Mepolizumab) administered subcutaneously (SC). In this study the information regarding the safety and effectiveness of long term use of NUCALA after subcutaneous injection will be collected from Asthma subjects in daily clinical practice. The observation period per subject will be 52 weeks from the initiation of NUCALA treatment with follow-up investigation for 2 years after the observation period. NUCALA is a registered trademark of the GlaxoSmithKline \[GSK\] group of companies

Interventions

DRUGNUCALA Injection

Single dose of NUCALA SC will be administered. Dose unit, daily dose frequency, date of administration will be at the investigator discretion.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects receiving NUCALA for the first time for treatment of bronchial asthma (a refractory asthma whose symptoms are inadequately controlled despite receiving standard asthma medications)

Exclusion criteria

* No

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Whose Data Entered on Electronic Data Capture (EDC) SystemUp to 14 days from the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1)The number of participants whose data was entered in the EDC system up to 14 days from the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1) has been presented.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)Up to 3 yearsADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in man for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function. Percentage of participants with ADR were calculated as the number of participants having a particular ADR divided by total number of participants on NUCALA treatment\*100. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Number of Participants Showing Response to the TreatmentUp to 1 yearThe number of participants who showed response to the bronchial asthma treatment has been presented.
Number of Participants Excluded From Analysis Due to Exacerbation of AsthmaUp to 1 yearThe number of participants excluded from analysis due to exacerbation of asthma has been presented.
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR)Up to 3 yearsADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in man for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function.
Percentage of Participants With Occurrences of Safety Specifications and Priority Investigation MattersUp to 3 yearsSafety specifications and priority investigation matters included hypersensitivity reaction including anaphylaxis, infections, and malignant tumor. The percentage of participants with occurrences of safety specifications and priority investigation matters have been reported. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response Rate Assessed by Global Assessment of EffectivenessUp to 1 yearResponse rate is the percentage of participants assessed as effective based on the course of subjective symptoms and clinical symptoms. Response rate was calculated as number of participants showing response to the NUCALA treatment divided by total number of participants on treatment\*100. Percentage values are rounded-off. Response rate and corresponding 95% confidence interval were reported.
Rate of Exacerbation of Asthma52 weeks before the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1) and at Week 52 post-treatmentAsthma exacerbation was defined as new or increased asthma symptoms (wheezing, coughing, dyspnea, chest tightness, and/or nighttime awakenings due to these symptoms) that resulted in hospitalization, emergency room visit and usage of systemic steroids. Exacerbation rate was defined as number of asthma exacerbations divided by total person-year (52 weeks were converted to 1 year). Data for exacerbations requiring hospitalization, emergency room visit, and use of systemic corticosteroid have been presented.
Total Score of Asthma Control Test (ACT) at Indicated Time PointsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52 after the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1)The ACT is a validated self-completed questionnaire utilizing 5 questions to assess asthma control on a 5-point categorical scale ranging from 1 (not controlled at all) to 5 (completely controlled) with higher scores indicating better control. Total ACT score is calculated as the sum of the scores from the 5 questions and can range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating better control. An ACT total score of 5 to 19 suggests that the participant's asthma is unlikely to be well controlled, whilst a score of 20 to 25 suggests that the participant's asthma is likely to be well controlled. Baseline was defined as within 8 weeks prior to initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1).
Mean Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Indicated Time PointsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52 after the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1)Peak Expiratory Flow is a person's maximum speed of expiration. PEF was measured using an electronic peak expiratory flow device (ePEF) at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 12, 24, and 54 after the initiation of NUCALA treatment. Baseline was defined as within 8 weeks prior to initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This non-interventional study aims to collect and assess information regarding the safety and effectiveness of long-term use of NUCALA in asthma participants in daily clinical practice.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1061 participants were enrolled in the study (Enrolled Set included participants registered within the enrollment period specified in the protocol).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants With Bronchial Asthma
Participants receiving NUCALA for the first time for treatment of bronchial asthma (a refractory asthma whose symptoms were inadequately controlled despite receiving standard asthma medications) in clinical practice were enrolled in this study. No study treatment was administered during conduct of this study.
1,027
Total1,027

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyCase report forms were not collected21
Overall StudyDid not use the drug1
Overall StudyNo revisit after the first prescription date2
Overall StudyViolation of the enrollment deadline10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants With Bronchial Asthma
Age, Continuous62.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1027 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
641 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
386 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 1,027
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 1,027
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 1,027

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Excluded From Analysis Due to Exacerbation of Asthma

The number of participants excluded from analysis due to exacerbation of asthma has been presented.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: Enrolled Set included participants registered within the enrollment period.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaNumber of Participants Excluded From Analysis Due to Exacerbation of Asthma16 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Showing Response to the Treatment

The number of participants who showed response to the bronchial asthma treatment has been presented.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: Effectiveness Analysis Set consisted of the participants included in safety analysis, participants that do not fall under the participants excluded from efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaNumber of Participants Showing Response to the Treatment866 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Whose Data Entered on Electronic Data Capture (EDC) System

The number of participants whose data was entered in the EDC system up to 14 days from the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1) has been presented.

Time frame: Up to 14 days from the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1)

Population: Enrolled Set included participants registered within the enrollment period specified in the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaNumber of Participants Whose Data Entered on Electronic Data Capture (EDC) System1040 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR)

ADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in man for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: Safety Analysis Set consisted of the participants fixed in the case report form. It included participants that do not fall under the safety analysis exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaNumber of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR)42 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)

ADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in man for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function. Percentage of participants with ADR were calculated as the number of participants having a particular ADR divided by total number of participants on NUCALA treatment\*100. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: Safety Analysis Set consisted of the participants fixed in the case report form (CRF). It included participants that do not fall under the safety analysis exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaPercentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)4.1 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Occurrences of Safety Specifications and Priority Investigation Matters

Safety specifications and priority investigation matters included hypersensitivity reaction including anaphylaxis, infections, and malignant tumor. The percentage of participants with occurrences of safety specifications and priority investigation matters have been reported. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: Safety Analysis Set consisted of the participants fixed in the case report form. It included participants that do not fall under the safety analysis exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaPercentage of Participants With Occurrences of Safety Specifications and Priority Investigation MattersHypersensitivity reaction including anaphylaxis1.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaPercentage of Participants With Occurrences of Safety Specifications and Priority Investigation MattersInfections0.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaPercentage of Participants With Occurrences of Safety Specifications and Priority Investigation MattersMalignant tumor0.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Indicated Time Points

Peak Expiratory Flow is a person's maximum speed of expiration. PEF was measured using an electronic peak expiratory flow device (ePEF) at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 12, 24, and 54 after the initiation of NUCALA treatment. Baseline was defined as within 8 weeks prior to initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52 after the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1)

Population: Effectiveness Analysis Set consisted of the participants included in safety analysis, participants that do not fall under the participants excluded from efficacy analysis. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaMean Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Indicated Time PointsBaseline304.4 Liters/minuteStandard Deviation 146.8
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaMean Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Indicated Time Points12 weeks after the initiation of NUCALA treatment333.7 Liters/minuteStandard Deviation 150.5
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaMean Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Indicated Time Points24 weeks after the initiation of NUCALA treatment334.2 Liters/minuteStandard Deviation 138.7
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaMean Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Indicated Time Points52 weeks after the initiation of NUCALA treatment358.9 Liters/minuteStandard Deviation 129.8
Secondary

Rate of Exacerbation of Asthma

Asthma exacerbation was defined as new or increased asthma symptoms (wheezing, coughing, dyspnea, chest tightness, and/or nighttime awakenings due to these symptoms) that resulted in hospitalization, emergency room visit and usage of systemic steroids. Exacerbation rate was defined as number of asthma exacerbations divided by total person-year (52 weeks were converted to 1 year). Data for exacerbations requiring hospitalization, emergency room visit, and use of systemic corticosteroid have been presented.

Time frame: 52 weeks before the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1) and at Week 52 post-treatment

Population: Effectiveness Analysis Set consisted of the participants included in safety analysis, participants that do not fall under the participants excluded from efficacy analysis. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaRate of Exacerbation of AsthmaExacerbations requiring hospitalization: 52 weeks before the initiation of NUCALA treatment0.4 Asthma exacerbations per person-year
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaRate of Exacerbation of AsthmaExacerbations requiring hospitalization: at Week 52 post-treatment0.1 Asthma exacerbations per person-year
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaRate of Exacerbation of AsthmaExacerbations requiring emergency room visits: 52 weeks before the initiation of NUCALA treatment0.9 Asthma exacerbations per person-year
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaRate of Exacerbation of AsthmaExacerbations requiring emergency room visits: at Week 52 post-treatment0.2 Asthma exacerbations per person-year
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaRate of Exacerbation of AsthmaExacerbations requiring use of systemic corticosteroid:52weeks before initiation of NUCALA treatment3.2 Asthma exacerbations per person-year
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaRate of Exacerbation of AsthmaExacerbations requiring the use of systemic corticosteroid: at Week 52 post-treatment0.7 Asthma exacerbations per person-year
Secondary

Response Rate Assessed by Global Assessment of Effectiveness

Response rate is the percentage of participants assessed as effective based on the course of subjective symptoms and clinical symptoms. Response rate was calculated as number of participants showing response to the NUCALA treatment divided by total number of participants on treatment\*100. Percentage values are rounded-off. Response rate and corresponding 95% confidence interval were reported.

Time frame: Up to 1 year

Population: Effectiveness Analysis Set consisted of the participants included in safety analysis, participants that do not fall under the participants excluded from efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaResponse Rate Assessed by Global Assessment of Effectiveness90.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Total Score of Asthma Control Test (ACT) at Indicated Time Points

The ACT is a validated self-completed questionnaire utilizing 5 questions to assess asthma control on a 5-point categorical scale ranging from 1 (not controlled at all) to 5 (completely controlled) with higher scores indicating better control. Total ACT score is calculated as the sum of the scores from the 5 questions and can range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating better control. An ACT total score of 5 to 19 suggests that the participant's asthma is unlikely to be well controlled, whilst a score of 20 to 25 suggests that the participant's asthma is likely to be well controlled. Baseline was defined as within 8 weeks prior to initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52 after the initiation of NUCALA treatment (Day 1)

Population: Effectiveness Analysis Set consisted of the participants included in safety analysis, participants that do not fall under the participants excluded from efficacy analysis. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaTotal Score of Asthma Control Test (ACT) at Indicated Time PointsBaseline16.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaTotal Score of Asthma Control Test (ACT) at Indicated Time Points12 weeks after the initiation of NUCALA treatment20.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaTotal Score of Asthma Control Test (ACT) at Indicated Time Points24 weeks after the initiation of NUCALA treatment20.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Participants With Bronchial AsthmaTotal Score of Asthma Control Test (ACT) at Indicated Time Points52 weeks after the initiation of NUCALA treatment21.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026