Skip to content

Evaluation of a Postural Rehabilitation Program Based on Sensory-motor Control in Men With Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy

Evaluation of a Postural Rehabilitation Program Based on Sensory-motor Control in Men With Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03027986
Acronym
PROTOMEN
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-01-23
Start date
2017-10-02
Completion date
2019-10-14
Last updated
2026-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence

Brief summary

Urinary incontinence (UI) is defined by the International Continence Society as "any involuntary loss of urine complained by the patient". The anatomical and histological specificities of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) give them a key role in the control of urination but also in the control of postural stability. These activities are involuntary automatisms and the mechanisms that lead to post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence are not only due to the loss of voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor muscles. The mechanisms that lead to UI are more complex and may involve the loss of efficacy of all deep muscle stabilizing lumbo-pelvic region. Rehabilitation of pelvic floor muscles is recommended in the treatment of urinary incontinence after prostatectomy (Grade A), but there is a lack of evidence to define the best treatment regimen for PFM rehabilitation. Two kinds of PFM rehabilitation are are commonly practiced by specialized physiotherapists. * The first one is made in individual box, in supine position. By analytic contractions of the PFM, (exercises of Kegel type) +/- associated with an instrumental biofeedback. This method used voluntary contractions of MPP. * The second is realized in various positions following a gravity progression, in individual and /or common room. This technique aims to restore a stabilization of the entire lumbo-pelvic region by postural recruitment involving synergistic contractions of the PFM. These trials propose to compare these two rehabilitation programs on populations with postoperative follow-up of more than 12 months. We chose to objectify the urine leaks with the pad test (weighing of the protections urinary over a period of 3 times 24h) which will be our main evaluation criterion. The home test pad of 3 times in 24 hours has been used by numerous studies and its reproducibility and reliability are established. Urinary incontinence is a recognized factor of sedentary lifestyle, fatigue, impaired mental health and decreased of physical fitness. We therefore wish to observe these parameters for each of our two randomized groups

Interventions

BEHAVIORALpostural rehabilitation program

This program is based on sensory-motor control

Sponsors

University Hospital, Rouen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 78 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Gender: Male * Between the age of 18 and 78 years * Patient who underwent prostatectomy more than 12 months ago but less than 10 years * 3x24h pad test over or equivalent to 10 grs * Persistent urinary incontinence beyond 12 month following prostatectomy * Patient affiliated to social security * Patient who submitted non-opposition for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who underwent prostatectomy or other visceral surgery less than one year ago * Patient who underwent surgical treatment of urinary incontinence * Patient with urinary incontinence less than 10g * Surgery considered within two years of inclusion * Radio, hormone, or chemotherapy cured or in progress * Anticholinergic treatment less than 3 months ago * Patient with neurological or bladder disorders potentially involved in incontinence disorders * Vestibular or psychiatric pathology making limitations to carry out all the examinations provided for in the protocol * Patient unable to complete the planned 15 visits to physiotherapist * Patient participating in another clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference from baseline in urine leakage6 monthsurine leakage will be measured using pad test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference from baseline in The Berg balance scale test6 monthsThe Berg balance scale test evaluating the quality of static and dynamic motor control.
Difference from baseline in quality of life6 monthsquality of life is based on EORTC QLQ C30

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBenoît STEENSTRUP

University Hospital, Rouen

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026