Skip to content

iFR Pressure Wires in Assessment of the Provisional Side-branch Intervention Strategy for Bifurcation Lesions

Physiological and Clinical Assessment of the Provisional Side-branch Intervention Strategy for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Using iFR Pressure Wires

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03027830
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-01-23
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2017-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Keywords

Provisional side-branch intervention strategy, iFR, Pilot study

Brief summary

Even in the era of drug-eluting stents, bifurcation lesions remain one of the most challenging lesion subsets in coronary intervention practice. This study was performed to evaluate the functional outcomes of pressure wires (IFR)-guided jailed side-branch intervention strategy.

Detailed description

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements require minimal and constant microvascular resistance which is routinely achieved by intravenous adenosine infusion. Adenosine-induced hyperemia establishes an optimal vascular environment for FFR measurement. However, breathlessness and chest tightness are common adverse events during adenosine infusion and severe asthma occurs occasionally. The Introduction of an adenosine-independent index (instantaneous wave-free ratio \[iFR\]) into clinical practice offered easier and hyperemia-free method for lesion assessment. Physiological changes and clinical evaluation of iFR warrants further research. Therefore, the investigators conducted this study to evaluate the functional aspects of iFR-guided provisional jailed side-branch intervention strategy and compare clinical endpoints to conventional non-iFR-guided operations.

Interventions

DEVICEiFR pressure-wire

The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) as an adenosine-independent index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as the ratio between the distal trans-stenotic pressure and the proximal coronary pressure during a specific diastolic wave-free period

DEVICEConventional

Other diagnostic devices (including FFR and angiography)

Sponsors

Nova-Med Medical Research Association
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with acute coronary syndrome * Jailed side-branch of a vessel size \> 2 mm * Vessel length \> 40 mm * Lesion length \< 10 mm by visual estimation

Exclusion criteria

* Significant stenosis in the left main coronary artery or the main branch proximal to the stented segment * Totally occluded bifurcation lesions * Primary myocardial disease * Serum creatinine level of ≥ 2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physiological evaluation of iFR-guided intervention6-monthiFR changes after drug-eluting balloon (DEB) inflation of the jailed side branch.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure time30-day
Fluoroscopy time30-day
In-hospital heart failure class30-day
length of hospital stay6-month
Post-PCI angina6-monthComparison of the incidence of angina after performing PCI in both the iFR and conventional groups
Ejection fraction at 6 months' post operation6-month
The amount of dye injection for angiography30-day
6-month heart failure class6-month

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026