Skip to content

Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Reduce Burn Wound Progression

Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Reduce Burn Wound Progression

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03027596
Acronym
RIC in burns
Enrollment
140
Registered
2017-01-23
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2017-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burns

Brief summary

Burned skin areas, which were initially vital, can be irreversibly damaged by wound progression. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of ischemic conditioning to reduce secondary wound progression.

Interventions

PROCEDURERemote ischemic conditioning

Sponsors

BG Trauma Center Tuebingen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to understand the study information and the consent to sign * Thermal injury (burn / scalding) with a clinical evaluated depth of at least 2a (superficial partial) * At least one of the following sites must not have skin lesions : Upper arm right and left * hospital admission within 6 hours after trauma has taken place

Exclusion criteria

* Participation in another experimental study * Pregnancy (women are subjected to a pregnancy test (urine) * Contraindication for the use of the tourniquet, for example Lymph drainage disorders after axillary lymphadenectomy or Irradiation of the axilla * Non-compliant patients who are, e.g. Intubated * Pure 3rd degree burns (full thickness) or charring * Thermal injuries older than 6 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of burn depthday 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 7, 11,18,21, 90,180Clinical assessment of burn depth

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in skin's relative amount of hemoglobinday 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 7, 11,18,21, 90,180relative amount of hemoglobin (Arbitrary Units)
Change in skin's blood flowday 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 7, 11,18,21, 90,180blood flow (Arbitrary Units)
Change in skin's oxygen saturationday 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 7, 11,18,21, 90,180oxygen saturation (%)
Change in skin elasticityday 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 7, 11,18,21, 90,180, 360objective measurement of the skin elasticity
Differences in scare development between the study groupsday 90, 180, 360Assessment with the Vancouver scare scale

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactJens Rothenberger, M.D.
jens.rothenberger@gmail.com+4970716063898
Backup ContactManuel Held, M.D., Priv.-Doz.
mheld@bgu-tuebingen.de+4970716060

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026