A ComPrehensive, ObservationaL Registry of Heart FaiLure With Mid-range and Preserved EjectiON Fraction

Heart Failure

About 50% of all patients suffering from HF exhibit a reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 40%), termed HFrEF. The others may be classified into HF with midrange EF (HFmrEF, EF = 40-50%) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, EF ≥ 50%). Up to now, there are no large scale studies evaluating patients with HFmrEF and/or HFpEF in Turkey. Scarce data are available in the middle-east populations in general and Turkish patients in particular, who have different etiology, ethnic, cultural backgrounds and risk factors from those patients in the West. The aim of this study was to study Turkish patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, and define their clinical characteristics and the signs and symptoms of heart failure, echocardiographic findings and medications at admission. With this national study, we will evaluate how recommendations of most recent European guidelines regarding pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are adopted in clinical practice. We will also evaluate the prevalence of the clinical profiles of patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, according to the definitions proposed by the European Society of Cardiology, and to investigate their appropriateness in characterizing patients with different clinical presentations and needs. Assessed outcomes included the causes of decompensation, use of medications, care quality indicators.

Purpose: To describe the demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic characteristics and management of outpatients heart failure (HF) with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) followed by a representative setting of cardiology centres. Background: About 50% of all patients suffering from HF exhibit a reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 40%), termed HFrEF. The others may be classified into HF with midrange EF (HFmrEF, EF = 40-50%) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, EF ≥ 50%). Presentation and pathophysiology of HFmrEF and HFpEF is heterogeneous and its management remains a challenge since evidence of therapeutic benefits on outcome is scarce. Up to now, there are no large scale studies evaluating patients with HFmrEF and/or HFpEF in Turkey. Objective: Several studies have been conducted in western countries differentiating features of epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes among patients with preserved and reduced EF. Scarce data are available in the middle-east populations in general and Turkish patients in particular, who have different etiology, ethnic, cultural backgrounds and risk factors from those patients in the West. The aim of this study was to study Turkish patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, and define their clinical characteristics and the signs and symptoms of heart failure, echocardiographic findings and medications at admission. With this national study, we will evaluate how recommendations of most recent European guidelines regarding pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are adopted in clinical practice. We will also evaluate the prevalence of the clinical profiles of patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, according to the definitions proposed by the European Society of Cardiology, and to investigate their appropriateness in characterizing patients with different clinical presentations and needs. Methods: We have designed a prospective, multicentre, national, observational study to characterize HFmrEF and HFpEF. Patients presented to cardiology outpatient clinics with signs and/or symptoms of HFmrEF and HFpEF will be screened. The eligibility criteria included patients older than 18 years with signs and/or symptoms of HF, admitted to public or private hospitals. Assessed outcomes included the causes of decompensation, use of medications, care quality indicators. Data: Clinical data, including the medical history, cardiovascular risk factors, and associate comorbidities, will be collected. The symptoms of patients will be graded according to NYHA classification. Blood samples will be collected for analysis of NT-pro-BNP and /or BNP, and complete laboratory investigations will performed as well. A 12-lead surface ECG will be recorded at 25 mm/s speed. Interpretation will be performed by a skilled investigator, and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) will considered according to Sokolow index. Diastolic function parameters will be measured as follows: peak early diastolic filling (E) and late diastolic filling (A) velocities, E/A ratio, E deceleration time, early diastolic septal mitral annular velocity (e') (averaged from three cardiac cycles), and E/e' as an index of LV filling pressure. Left atrial volume index was calculated from apical four-and two-chamber views, using area - length formula. Diastolic dysfunction will be classified into four grades according to 2009 ASE guidelines. Conclusion: A ComPrehensive, ObservationaL Registry of Heart FaiLure With Mid-range and Preserved EjectiON Fraction (APOLLON) study aims to characterize baseline characteristics of patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF in Turkey.

Turkey (Türkiye)