Skip to content

Efficacy of Different Versions of the Best Possible Self Intervention

Efficacy of Different Versions of the Best Possible Self Intervention: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03024853
Enrollment
112
Registered
2017-01-19
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2018-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General Population

Keywords

Best Possible Self, Positive Intervention, Optimism

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy of several variations of an already validated Positive Psychology Intervention (PPI) called Best Possible Self, using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in general population. Participants are randomly assigned to one of 4 conditions: BPS PAST condition, BPS PRESENT condition, BPS FUTURE condition, and CONTROL condition (daily activities).

Detailed description

Intervention lasts 7 days. Participants come to the laboratory the first day, they fill up assessment questionnaires and practice the assigned exercise. Then, they practice the assigned exercise for 6 more days at home. The main hypothesis is that all three experimental conditions will enhance wellbeing comparing to the control condition.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBPS PAST
BEHAVIORALBPS PRESENT
BEHAVIORALBPS FUTURE
BEHAVIORALCONTROL

Sponsors

University of Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must be 18 years old or older. * Participants must be willing to participate in the study. * Participants must have computer with Internet access and e-mail address.

Exclusion criteria

* To suffer from moderated or severe depression as established by a score of 20 or more in the Beck Inventory of Depression (BDI-II; Beck, 1996).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS; Watson, Clark & Tellegen, 1988; Sandín et al., 1999) from baseline to post-inChange from pre-intervention to post-intervention (1 week) and follow-up (1 month, 3 months).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSES; Chen, Gully & Eden, 2001)Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (1 week) and follow-up (1 month, 3 months).
Life Orientation Test (LOT-R; Otero, Luengo, Romero Gómez & Castro, 1998; Scheier, Carver & Bridges, 1994).Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (1 week) and follow-up (1 month, 3 months).
Fordyce Happiness Scale (Fordyce, 1988)Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (1 week) and follow-up (1 month, 3 months).
Temporal Satisfaction with Life Scale (TSWLS; Pavot, Diener & Suh, 1998)Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention (1 week) and follow-up (1 month, 3 months).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-Concordant Motivation (SCM; Sheldon & Elliot, 1999)Day 1This scale measures the intrinsic motivation of participants' when practicing the assigned activity.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026