Skip to content

Continuous Suturing Versus Interrupted Clips for Brachiocephalic AV Fistula Creation

A Prospective Randomized Single Blinded Study of Continuous Suturing Versus Interrupted Clips for Brachiocephalic AV Fistula Creation

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03024372
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-01-18
Start date
2017-12-31
Completion date
2024-08-31
Last updated
2018-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arteriovenous Fistula

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate a promising strategy to improve maturation and patency rates following creation of AV fistulas and assess whether an anastomosis performed with Anastoclips (interrupted, nonpenetrating) would produce better maturation and/or patency than one performed with conventional suturing techniques.

Detailed description

This will be a single blind (patient and dialysis center), prospective, randomized trial conducted at a single center. The study intervention will be randomization between conventional sutured anastomosis (Control group) and use of Anastoclips (Treatment group), which provide an interrupted closure without intimal penetration.

Interventions

DEVICEAV Fistula creation with sutures

End-to-side anastomosis (of AV fistula) is to be constructed using sutures. The incision is to be irrigated and closed using Vicryl, Biosyn and skin glue.

DEVICEAV Fistula creation with clips

End-to-side anastomosis (of AV fistula) is to be constructed using clips. The incision is to be irrigated and closed using Vicryl, Biosyn and skin glue.

Sponsors

University of South Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Requiring brachiocephalic fistula judged to be best option for access after vein mapping (Surgeons will be required to do 10 cases using Anastoclips prior to enrolling) * Able to provide informed consent in English or Spanish * Age 18 years or greater * With estimated life expectancy of 2 years or more * Able to comply with study procedures including all scheduled follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide informed consent in English or Spanish * Age \< 18 years * With pacemaker, IACD, or other permanent obstructive device on that side (a temporary tunneled dialysis catheter is not an exclusion) * Unable (or in surgeon's judgment a poor risk) to comply with study procedures and follow-up visits * With estimated life expectancy of less than 2 years * Females must be either: * Of non-childbearing potential, which is defined as post-menopausal (at least 12 months without menses prior to Treatment Day) or documented surgically sterile or post hysterectomy (at least 1 month prior to Treatment Day) * Or, of childbearing potential, in which case must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Treatment Day

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to loss of primary patencyone year post surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to assumed maturationone year post surgeryin patients not on dialysis
Time to functional maturationone year post surgeryin patients on dialysis
Time to loss of secondary patencyone year post surgery
Time to loss of assisted primary patencyone year post surgery
Rate of functional maturationone year post surgeryin patients on dialysis
Rate of assumed maturationone year post surgeryin patients not on dialysis
Rate of interventionfive years post surgeryto maintain patency
Operative costduration of surgery
Overall costtime of surgery to time of hospital discharge (can range from 1 day to 1 week or more)Overall cost of surgery itself defined as from surgery to point of hospital discharge, anticipated to be in days
Time to loss of primary patency5 years post surgery
Rate of complications30 days post surgerythrombosis/thrombectomy, stenosis, skin erosion, limb swelling, steal syndrome, bleeding and hematoma formation at surgical site, surgical-site-related infection, access-related infection, rupture, revision

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026