Skip to content

Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide and Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate in Stabile COPD Patients

A 24-week Treatment, Randomised, Parallel-group, Double Blinded, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate Compared With Individual Components and Placebo and Aclidinium Bromide Compared With Placebo When Administered to Patients With Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03022097
Acronym
AVANT
Enrollment
1625
Registered
2017-01-16
Start date
2017-02-02
Completion date
2022-04-14
Last updated
2025-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD

Brief summary

This is a multiple dose, randomised, parallel, double blind, double dummy, multicentre and multinational Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of Aclidinium bromide/Formoterol fumarate compared with individual components and placebo and Aclidinium bromide compared with Placebo when administered to patients with stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Interventions

DRUGAclidinium bromide/formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination

Inhaled Aclidinium bromide/formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination, twice per day via Genuair

Inhaled Aclidinium bromide 400 μg, twice per day via Genuair

DRUGFormoterol Fumarate

Inhaled Formoterol Fumarate 12 μg, twice per day via Turbuhaler

DRUGPlacebo

Inhaled dose-matched placebo, twice per day via Genuair or via Turbuhaler

Sponsors

Parexel
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 130 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Adult male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients aged ≥40 * 2\. Patients with a diagnosis of COPD prior to Visit 1 (screening) * 3\. Patients with moderate to severe stable COPD (Stage II or Stage III) at Visit 1: post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥30% and \< 80% and post-bronchodilator FEV1/Forced vital capacity (FVC) \< 70% * 4\. Current or former smokers with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack-years * 5\. Patients able to perform repeatable pulmonary function testing for FEV1 according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) 2005 criteria at Visit 1(screening) * 6\. Patients who understand the study procedures and are willing to participate in the study as indicated by signing the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of the study (applies to AstraZeneca staff and/or site staff) or patients employed by or relatives of the employees of the site or sponsor. * 2\. Previous enrolment or randomisation in the present study * 3\. History or current diagnosis of asthma * 4\. Any respiratory tract infection (including the upper respiratory tract) or COPD exacerbation (including the mild COPD exacerbation) within 6 weeks prior to screening or during the run-in period * 5\. Patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation (an emergency room visit for longer than 24 hours will be considered a hospitalization) within 3 months prior to screening and during the run-in period * 6\. Clinically significant respiratory conditions other than COPD * 7\. Patients who in the Investigator's opinion may need to start a pulmonary rehabilitation program during the study and/or patients who started/finished it within 3 months prior to screening * 8\. Use of long-term oxygen therapy (≥15 hours/day) * 9\. Patient who does not maintain regular day/night, waking/sleeping cycles including night shift workers * 10\. Clinically significant cardiovascular conditions * 11\. Patients with Type I or uncontrolled Type II diabetes, uncontrolled hypo-or hyperthyroidism, hypokalaemia, or hyperadrenergic state, uncontrolled or untreated hypertension * 12\. Patients with QT corrected interval (QTc) using Fridericia formula (QTcF) (QTc=QT/ Duration in milliseconds between two R peaks of two consecutive QRS complexes (RR1/3) \>470 msec as indicated in the centralised reading report assessed at Screening (Visit 1) * 13\. Patients with clinically significant abnormalities in the clinical laboratory tests, ECG parameters (other than QTcF) or in the physical examination at Visit 1 (screening) * 14\. Patients with abnormal liver function tests defined as Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or total bilirubin ≥ 2.5 times upper limit of normal ranges at screening * 15\. Patient with known non-controlled history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus and/or active hepatitis * 16\. Patient with a history of hypersensitivity reaction to inhaled anticholinergic drugs, sympathomimetic amines, inhaled medication or any component thereof * 17\. Patient with known narrow-angle glaucoma, symptomatic bladder neck obstruction, acute urinary retention, or patients with symptomatic non-stable prostatic hypertrophy * 18\. History of malignancy of any organ system (including lung cancer), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years other than basal or squamous cell skin cancer * 19\. Any other serious or uncontrolled physical or mental dysfunction * 20\. Patients with a history (within 2 years prior to Visit 1 (screening) of drug and/or alcohol abuse that may prevent study compliance based on the Investigator judgment * 21\. Patients unlikely to be cooperative or cannot comply with the study procedures * 22\. Patients treated with any investigational drug within 30 days (or 6 half-lives, whichever is longer) prior to screening * 23\. Patients who intended to use any concomitant medication not permitted by this protocol or who had not undergone the required washout period for a particular prohibited medication * 24\. Patients unable to give consent, or patients of consenting age but under guardianship, or vulnerable patients * 25\. Any other conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, might have indicated the patient to be unsuitable for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)Week 24, 1-hour morning post-doseChange from baseline in 1-hour morning post-dose FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg compared to Aclidinium bromide at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the average of the two FEV1 values measure prior to the administration of the first dose of the IP at randomisation visit. If one of the two values was missing, the available one was used as baseline. If both values were missing, the screening pre-bronchodilator value was used. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.
Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol FumarateWeek 24, morning pre-dose (trough)Change from baseline in morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg compared to Formoterol fumarate 12 μg at Week 24. Morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 was defined as the average of the two FEV1 values at morning pre-dose of IP at Week 24. If one value was missing, the remaining was used as the trough value. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.
Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium BromideWeek 24, morning pre-dose (trough)Change from baseline in morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg compared to placebo at Week 24. Morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 was defined as the average of the two FEV1 values at morning pre-dose of IP at Week 24. If one value was missing, the remaining was used as the trough value. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1Week 24, peakChange from baseline in peak FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg compared to placebo at week 24. Peak FEV1 was the highest value recorded at Week 24 after morning IP intake. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.
Improvements Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal ScoreWeek 24Improvements TDI focal score of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg and Aclidinium bromide 400μg compared to placebo at week 24. Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) measures severity of breathlessness in symptomatic patients. An impairment severity score is assigned for three components: functional impairment; magnitude of task and magnitude of effort. Focal scores is derived as the sum of individual component scores. TDI focal score ranges from -9 to +9, with negative values indicating a worsening in dyspnoea, 0 showing no change from baseline and positive values associated with a post-baseline improvement. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.
Change From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreWeek 24Change from baseline in SGRQ total score of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg and Aclidinium bromide 400μg compared to placebo at week 24. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life and perceived well-being. It is composed of 50 items split into 17 parts, from which 3 dimension scores on Symptoms, Activity and Impact are derived. A total score utilising responses to all items can also be derived to assess the overall impact of COPD on quality of life. SGRQ dimension and total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse possible health status. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Countries

China, India, Philippines, Taiwan, Vietnam

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 81 study centers in 5 countries China(50), India (15), Philippines (8), Taiwan (3) and Vietnam (5) between 02 February 2017 and 14 April 2022

Pre-assignment details

Subjects fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria at the time of the Screening entered into a run-in period of 14 ± 3 days to assess their disease stability before randomization. Participants who met the inclusion and none of the exclusion were considered for enrolment into the study. All study assessments were performed as per the schedule of assessments. A total of 1625 participants (consented) and undergone washout period and 1066 were randomised to treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AB/FF 400/12 μg
Aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate fixed dose combination 400/12 μg
263
AB 400 μg
Aclidinium bromide AB 400 μg
266
FF 12 μg
Formoterol 12 μg
264
Placebo
Placebo
269
Total1,062

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event3413
Overall StudyDue to COVID-19 pandemic0100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy0033
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0011
Overall StudyOther4164
Overall StudyProgressive Disease2052
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11131521

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFF 12 μgAB/FF 400/12 μgPlaceboAB 400 μgTotal
Age, Continuous65.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
65.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
64.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
65.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
65.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Baseline FEV11.169 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.413
1.182 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.415
1.184 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.399
1.178 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.381
1.178 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.402
Country
China
187 Participants186 Participants188 Participants186 Participants747 Participants
Country
India
35 Participants35 Participants37 Participants37 Participants144 Participants
Country
Philippines
29 Participants29 Participants30 Participants30 Participants118 Participants
Country
Taiwan
4 Participants3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Country
Vietnam
9 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants39 Participants
Post-bronchodilator FEV1 at screening1.366 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.447
1.356 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.42
1.385 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.408
1.363 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.39
1.367 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.416
Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 at screening1.199 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.415
1.187 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.404
1.212 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.383
1.192 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.385
1.197 Litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.396
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Chinese
187 Participants186 Participants188 Participants186 Participants747 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Filipino
29 Participants29 Participants30 Participants30 Participants118 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indian
35 Participants35 Participants37 Participants37 Participants144 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Taiwanese
4 Participants3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Vietnamese
9 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
264 Participants263 Participants269 Participants266 Participants1062 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
13 Participants7 Participants13 Participants12 Participants45 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
251 Participants256 Participants256 Participants254 Participants1017 Participants
Smoking status
Current smoker
86 Participants84 Participants85 Participants85 Participants340 Participants
Smoking status
Former smoker
178 Participants179 Participants184 Participants181 Participants722 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2630 / 2661 / 2642 / 269
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 26344 / 26654 / 26455 / 269
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 26321 / 26626 / 26421 / 269

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

Change from baseline in 1-hour morning post-dose FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg compared to Aclidinium bromide at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the average of the two FEV1 values measure prior to the administration of the first dose of the IP at randomisation visit. If one of the two values was missing, the available one was used as baseline. If both values were missing, the screening pre-bronchodilator value was used. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Time frame: Week 24, 1-hour morning post-dose

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: All randomised participants who took at least one dose of IP and have a baseline FEV1 measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AB/FF 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)0.248 LitresStandard Error 0.013
AB 400 μgChange From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)0.156 LitresStandard Error 0.013
FF 12 μgChange From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)0.138 LitresStandard Error 0.013
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 1-hour Morning Post Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)-0.050 LitresStandard Error 0.013
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.06, 0.124]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide

Change from baseline in morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg compared to placebo at Week 24. Morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 was defined as the average of the two FEV1 values at morning pre-dose of IP at Week 24. If one value was missing, the remaining was used as the trough value. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Time frame: Week 24, morning pre-dose (trough)

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: All randomised participants who took at least one dose of IP and have a baseline FEV1 measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AB/FF 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide0.081 LitresStandard Error 0.014
AB 400 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide0.050 LitresStandard Error 0.014
FF 12 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide-0.004 LitresStandard Error 0.014
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide-0.084 LitresStandard Error 0.014
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.103, 0.166]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate

Change from baseline in morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg compared to Formoterol fumarate 12 μg at Week 24. Morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 was defined as the average of the two FEV1 values at morning pre-dose of IP at Week 24. If one value was missing, the remaining was used as the trough value. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Time frame: Week 24, morning pre-dose (trough)

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: All randomised participants who took at least one dose of IP and have a baseline FEV1 measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AB/FF 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate0.081 LitresStandard Error 0.014
AB 400 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate0.050 LitresStandard Error 0.014
FF 12 μgChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate-0.004 LitresStandard Error 0.014
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) FEV1 for Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate-0.084 LitresStandard Error 0.014
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.053, 0.117]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Peak FEV1

Change from baseline in peak FEV1 of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg compared to placebo at week 24. Peak FEV1 was the highest value recorded at Week 24 after morning IP intake. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Time frame: Week 24, peak

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: All randomised participants who took at least one dose of IP and have a baseline FEV1 measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AB/FF 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in Peak FEV10.324 LitresStandard Error 0.013
AB 400 μgChange From Baseline in Peak FEV10.225 LitresStandard Error 0.013
FF 12 μgChange From Baseline in Peak FEV10.191 LitresStandard Error 0.014
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peak FEV10.008 LitresStandard Error 0.014
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.184, 0.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score

Change from baseline in SGRQ total score of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg and Aclidinium bromide 400μg compared to placebo at week 24. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life and perceived well-being. It is composed of 50 items split into 17 parts, from which 3 dimension scores on Symptoms, Activity and Impact are derived. A total score utilising responses to all items can also be derived to assess the overall impact of COPD on quality of life. SGRQ dimension and total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse possible health status. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: All randomised participants who took at least one dose of IP and have a baseline FEV1 measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AB/FF 400/12 μgChange From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-8.7 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
AB 400 μgChange From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-7.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
FF 12 μgChange From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-7.2 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score-4.7 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
p-value: 0.03195% CI: [-5.5, -0.3]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-6.7, -1.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Improvements Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score

Improvements TDI focal score of Aclidinium bromide 400 μg/Formoterol fumarate 12 μg and Aclidinium bromide 400μg compared to placebo at week 24. Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) measures severity of breathlessness in symptomatic patients. An impairment severity score is assigned for three components: functional impairment; magnitude of task and magnitude of effort. Focal scores is derived as the sum of individual component scores. TDI focal score ranges from -9 to +9, with negative values indicating a worsening in dyspnoea, 0 showing no change from baseline and positive values associated with a post-baseline improvement. Estimand is based on the while on-treatment approach, where treatment estimates are analysed while subjects are taking IP.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: All randomised participants who took at least one dose of IP and have a baseline FEV1 measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AB/FF 400/12 μgImprovements Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
AB 400 μgImprovements Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
FF 12 μgImprovements Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score2.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboImprovements Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [0.2, 1.3]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.13295% CI: [-0.1, 1]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026