Skip to content

Comparison of TrIfecta and Perimount Magna Ease

Prospective Randomized Comparison of TrIfecta and Perimount Magna Ease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03021356
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-01-13
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2017-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Xenograft Hemodynamics

Brief summary

The hemodynamic performance of two supraannular aortic xenografts (Trifecta, St. Jude Medical and Perimount Magna Ease, Edwards Lifescience) will be compared using rest- and stress echocardiography in a randomized prospective study. Furthermore, the prostheses' influence on postoperative outcome will be compared using spiroergometry, quality of life questionnaire and heart failure biomarkers.

Interventions

DEVICEAortic xenograft

After randomization, the aortic xenograft is implanted in the standard fashion

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Kerckhoff Klinik
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between 18 and 75 years * Elective aortic valve replacement in patients with predominant aortic stenosis * including concomitant CABG and/or atrial fibrillation ablation and/or supracoronary aortic replacement * Informed consent including willingness for stress echocardiography, spiroergometry and quality of life examination after 6 months. * Native German speakers (quality of life questionnaire in German language)

Exclusion criteria

* Isolated aortic regurgitation * Concomitant aortic regurgitation \> 2° * Endocarditis * LVEF \<40% * Concomitant other valve surgery * s/p valve surgery * Contraindication for stress echocardiography

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Transprosthetic pressure gradient at stress exercise echocardiographyEcho at follow up stress echo (at 10 months)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Transprosthetic pressure gradient at discharge echoEcho at discharge (usually postoperative day 5 to 7)
Left ventricular mass regression calculated by echocardiography (gram)Echo at discharge and at follow up (usually at postoperative day 5 to 7 and at 10 months)
Quality of life using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire1 to 5 days before surgery and at follow up (10 months)
BNP plasma level1 to 5 days before surgery and at follow up (10 months)

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026