Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide Versus Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Insulin

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide Versus Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Insulin. A 52-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial (PIONEER 8 - Insulin add-on)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03021187
Acronym
PIONEER 8
Enrollment
731
Registered
2017-01-13
Start date
2017-02-02
Completion date
2018-08-22
Last updated
2020-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted globally. The aim of the trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide versus placebo in subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus treated with insulin. All subjects should continue their pre-trial insulin therapy (basal, basal-bolus or premixed regimen including combinations of soluble insulins) throughout the trial. Subjects treated with metformin in addition to insulin treatment must continue their metformin treatment throughout the entire trial.

Interventions

DRUGsemaglutide

Oral semaglutide administered once-daily for 52 weeks as an add-on to the subjects' pre-trial insulin treatment

DRUGplacebo

Oral semaglutide placebo administered once-daily for 52 weeks as an add-on to the subjects' pre-trial insulin treatment

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial. - Male or female, age above or equal to 18 years at the time of signing informed consent. For Japan only: Male or female, age above or equal to 20 years at the time of signing informed consent. - Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus 90 days or more prior to the day of screening. - HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) of 7.0-9.5% (53-80 mmol/mol) (both inclusive). - Stable treatment with one of the following insulin regimens (minimum 10 IU/day) 90 or more days prior to the day of screening. Maximum 20% change in total daily dose is acceptable: (1) Basal insulin alone or (2) Basal and bolus insulin in any combination or (3) Premixed insulin including combinations of soluble insulins

Exclusion criteria

- Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method (adequate contraceptive measure as required by local regulation or practice). For Greece only: adequate contraceptive measures are defined as combined hormonal contraception (containing oestrogen and progesterone), which suppress ovulation (oral, intravaginal, percutaneous), progesterone-only hormonal contraception which suppress ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable), intrauterine device, hormone-releasing intrauterine system, bilateral tubal occlusion, partner with vasectomy, sexual abstinence. For Japan only: Adequate contraceptive measures are abstinence (not having sex), diaphragm, condom (by the partner), intrauterine device, sponge, spermicide or oral contraceptives. For Canada only: adequate contraceptive measures are defined as combined hormonal contraception (containing oestrogen and progesterone), which suppress ovulation (oral, intravaginal, percutaneous), progesterone-only hormonal contraception which suppress ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable), intrauterine device, hormone-releasing intrauterine system, bilateral tubal occlusion, partner with vasectomy, sexual abstinence - Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol. - Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 (MEN 2) or Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma (MTC). - History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic). - History of major surgical procedures involving the stomach and potentially affecting absorption of trial product (e.g. subtotal and total gastrectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass surgery). - Any of the following: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or hospitalisation for unstable angina or transient ischaemic attack within the past 180 days prior to the day of screening and randomisation. - Classified as being in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV. - Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation known on the day of screening. - Renal impairment defined as estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 as per Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EPI). - Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before the day of screening. An exception is short-term change of insulin treatment for acute illness for a total of 14 days or less. - Known hypoglycaemic unawareness according to Clarke's questionnaire. - Proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy requiring acute treatment. Verified by fundus photography or dilated fundoscopy performed within 90 days prior to randomisation. - History or presence of malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years (except basal and squamous cell skin cancer and carcinoma in situ). - Subjects with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) more than 2.5 x upper normal limit (UNL).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1c (Week 26)Week 0, week 26Change from baseline (week 0) in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated at week 26. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any. The endpoint was also analysed based on data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period started at the date of the first dose of trial product and includes the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any, and excludes the period after premature trial discontinuation, if any.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1c (Week 52)Week 0, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c to week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Body Weight (kg) (Week 52)Week 0, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight to week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG to week 26 and week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) mean 7-point profile to week 26 and week 52. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point profile was defined as the area under the profile, calculated using the trapezoidal method, divided by the measurement time. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All MealsWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in SMPG mean postprandial increment over all meals to week 26 and week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Body Weight (Percentage)Week 0, week 26, week 52Relative change from baseline (week 0) in body weight (%) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52.The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Body Mass IndexWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. BMI was calculated based on body weight and height based on the formula: BMI kg/m\^2 = body weight (kg)/(Height (m) x Height (m)). Data based on in-trial observation period is presented. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Waist CircumferenceWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52.The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline in total cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline at week 26 and week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline in LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline at week 26 and week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Triglycerides - Ratio to BaselineWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in triglycerides (mmol/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Total Daily Insulin DoseWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline in total daily insulin dose to week 26 and week 52 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Participants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 26, week 52Number of particpants achieving HbA1c \< 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) target, at week 26 and week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Participants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 26, week 52Number of participants achieving HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) according to American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) target, at week 26 and week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 26, week 52Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 5% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 26, week 52Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 10% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiatiion of of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in Body Weight (Week 26)Week 0, week 26Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 26. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any. The endpoint was also evaluated based on data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period. It started at the date of first dose of trial product and excluded the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Participants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 26, week 52Participants who achieved HbA1c reduction more than or equal to 1% of their baseline HbA1c and weight loss of more than or equal to 3% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Time to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeeks 0-52Presented results are the number of participants who had taken additional anti-diabetic medication anytime during the periods, from week 0 to week 26 and week 0 to week 52. Additional anti-diabetic medication was defined as use of new anti-diabetic medication for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation (week 0) and before (planned) end-of-treatment (week 52), and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before (planned) end-of-treatment. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Time to Rescue MedicationWeeks 0-52Presented results are the number of participants who had taken rescue medication anytime during the periods, from week 0 to week 26 and week 0 to week 52. Rescue medication was defined as use of new anti-diabetic medication as add-on to trial product and used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation (week 1) and before last day on trial product, and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before last day on trial product. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period, which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation.
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Exposure to Trial ProductWeeks 0-57Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded from week 0 to week 57 (52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period). Adverse events (AEs) with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeeks 0-57Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during week 0 to week 57 (52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a subject was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Participants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeeks 0-57Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during week 0 to week 57 (52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a subject was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Change in Amylase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in amylase (units/litre (U/L)) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Lipase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in lipase (units/litre (U/L)) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication
Change in Pulse RateWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse rate was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52 Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in SBP and DBPWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52 Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in ECG EvaluationWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Change from baseline results are presented as shift in findings (normal; abnormal and not clinically significant (NCS); abnormal and clinically significant (CS)) from week 0 to week 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Change in Physical ExaminationWeek -2, week 52Participants with physical examination findings, normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS at baseline (weeks -2) and weeks 52 presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Results are presented for the following examinations: 1) Cardiovascular system; 2) Central and peripheral nervous system; 3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth; 4) General appearance; 5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; 6) Lymph node palpation; 7) Musculoskeletal system; 8) Respiratory system; 9) Skin; 10) Thyroid gland.
Change in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -2, week 52Participants with eye examination (fundoscopy) findings, normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS at baseline (week -2) and week 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Semaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeeks 0-52This outcome measure is only applicable for the oral semaglutide treatment arms (3 mg, 7 mg and 14 mg). Semaglutide plasma concentrations were measured at week 4, 14, 26, 38 and 52. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 0, week 26, week 52SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period.
Change in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 DomainsWeek 0, week 26, week 52The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL-Lite-CT) is designed to assess the impact of changes in weight on patients' quality of life within the context of clinical trials. The items of the IWQOL-Lite-CT pertain to physical functioning (physical, physical function and pain/discomfort) and psychosocial domains and all items employ a 5-point graded response scale (never, rarely, sometimes, usually, always; or not at all true, a little true, moderately true, mostly true, completely true). All IWQOL-Lite-CT composite scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better levels of functioning. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Change in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Week 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - status version (DTSQs) was evaluated at week 26 and week 52. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for DTSQs items 1, 4 -8. For items 2 and 3 a higher score indicates a higher patient perceived experience of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia, respectively. Thus, lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being none of the time unacceptably high (item 2) or low (item 3). The domain score of total treatment satisfaction (total treatment satisfaction score) was computed by adding the six items scores 1, 4-8. The score has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 36. A higher treatment satisfaction score indicates a higher level of treatment satisfaction.
Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 26, week 52Participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % without severe or blood glucose (BG) confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia and without weight gain (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode with plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Countries

Canada, France, Greece, India, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Puerto Rico, Russia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 111 sites in 9 countries: Canada (7), France (10), Greece (6), India (9), Japan (18), Mexico (2), Poland (4), Russian Federation (5) and United States (48). Following sites were approved by the IRB/IEC but didn't randomise subjects: France (2), India (1), Japan (1) and United States (3).

Pre-assignment details

Data presented in participant flow is based on the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
Participants were to take oral semaglutide 3 mg tablets once-daily from week 0 to week 52.
184
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
Participants were to take oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 52: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 4 to week 52.
182
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
Participants were to take oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 52: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4, 7 mg from week 4 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 8 to week 52.
181
Placebo
Participants were to take oral semaglutide placebo tablets once-daily for a period of 52 weeks.
184
Total731

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath0030
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10314
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0625

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOral Semaglutide 3 mgOral Semaglutide 7 mgOral Semaglutide 14 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
HbA1c8.2 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
8.2 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
8.2 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
8.2 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
8.2 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
66 Participants66 Participants66 Participants65 Participants263 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
15 Participants10 Participants11 Participants13 Participants49 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants24 Participants30 Participants25 Participants97 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non hispanic or Latino
154 Participants148 Participants143 Participants150 Participants595 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not applicable
12 Participants10 Participants8 Participants8 Participants39 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
89 Participants95 Participants94 Participants98 Participants376 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
82 Participants79 Participants96 Participants79 Participants336 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
102 Participants103 Participants85 Participants105 Participants395 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1840 / 1813 / 1810 / 184
other
Total, other adverse events
77 / 18486 / 181100 / 18173 / 184
serious
Total, serious adverse events
25 / 18419 / 18112 / 18117 / 184

Outcome results

Primary

Change in HbA1c (Week 26)

Change from baseline (week 0) in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated at week 26. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any. The endpoint was also analysed based on data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period started at the date of the first dose of trial product and includes the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any, and excludes the period after premature trial discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = full analysis set (FAS) which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)In-trial-0.5 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-0.6 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-1.1 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)In-trial-1.0 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)In-trial-1.3 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-1.4 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange in HbA1c (Week 26)In-trial-0.1 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange in HbA1c (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-0.1 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.8
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, strata, interaction strata and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c value as covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.7, -0.3]Pattern mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, strata, interaction strata and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c value as covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.1, -0.7]Pattern mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, strata, interaction strata and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c value as covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.4, -1]Pattern mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment, region, strata and interaction strata as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.7, -0.4]MMRM
Comparison: The analysis was based on a MMRM that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment, region, strata and the interaction strata as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.2, -0.8]MMRM
Comparison: The analysis was based on a MMRM that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment, region, strata and the interaction strata as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.6, -1.2]MMRM
Secondary

Change in Amylase - Ratio to Baseline

Change from baseline (week 0) in amylase (units/litre (U/L)) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Amylase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.08 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.4
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Amylase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.07 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.6
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Amylase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.11 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.5
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Amylase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.12 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Amylase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.14 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Amylase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.17 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.6
PlaceboChange in Amylase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.01 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6
PlaceboChange in Amylase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.99 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.5
Secondary

Change in Body Mass Index

Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. BMI was calculated based on body weight and height based on the formula: BMI kg/m\^2 = body weight (kg)/(Height (m) x Height (m)). Data based on in-trial observation period is presented. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 26-0.5 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.1
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 52-0.3 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.4
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 52-0.8 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 26-1.0 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 26-1.4 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 52-1.4 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 26-0.2 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 520.2 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (kg) (Week 52)

Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight to week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Weight (kg) (Week 52)-0.9 KgStandard Deviation 3.9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Weight (kg) (Week 52)-2.2 KgStandard Deviation 5.2
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Weight (kg) (Week 52)-3.8 KgStandard Deviation 5.8
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (kg) (Week 52)0.5 KgStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (Percentage)

Relative change from baseline (week 0) in body weight (%) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52.The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Weight (Percentage)Week 26-1.73 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.34
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Weight (Percentage)Week 52-1.18 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.17
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Weight (Percentage)Week 52-2.54 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.77
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Weight (Percentage)Week 26-3.11 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.66
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Weight (Percentage)Week 52-4.42 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 6.07
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Weight (Percentage)Week 26-4.30 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.57
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (Percentage)Week 520.65 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.72
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (Percentage)Week 26-0.47 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.02
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (Week 26)

Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 26. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any. The endpoint was also evaluated based on data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period. It started at the date of first dose of trial product and excluded the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Weight (Week 26)In trial-1.4 KgStandard Deviation 3.1
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Weight (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-1.5 KgStandard Deviation 3.1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Weight (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-3.0 KgStandard Deviation 3.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Weight (Week 26)In trial-2.6 KgStandard Deviation 5.2
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Weight (Week 26)In trial-3.7 KgStandard Deviation 4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Weight (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-3.9 KgStandard Deviation 3.6
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (Week 26)In trial-0.5 KgStandard Deviation 2.5
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-0.5 KgStandard Deviation 2.4
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, strata, interaction strata and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline body weight value as covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: 0.039295% CI: [-1.8, 0]Pattern mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, strata, interaction strata and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline body weight value as covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-3, -1]Pattern mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, strata, interaction strata and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline body weight value as covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.2, -2.3]Pattern mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment, region, strata and interaction strata as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: 0.011195% CI: [-1.6, -0.2]MMRM
Comparison: The analysis was based on a MMRM that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment, region, strata and the interaction strata as categorical fixed effects and the baseline body weight value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.2, -1.8]MMRM
Comparison: The analysis was based on a MMRM that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment, region, strata and the interaction strata as categorical fixed effects and the baseline body weight value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.4, -3]MMRM
Secondary

Change in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)

Change from baseline (week 0) in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - status version (DTSQs) was evaluated at week 26 and week 52. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for DTSQs items 1, 4 -8. For items 2 and 3 a higher score indicates a higher patient perceived experience of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia, respectively. Thus, lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being none of the time unacceptably high (item 2) or low (item 3). The domain score of total treatment satisfaction (total treatment satisfaction score) was computed by adding the six items scores 1, 4-8. The score has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 36. A higher treatment satisfaction score indicates a higher level of treatment satisfaction.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars: wk 520.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars: wk 52-0.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Recommending treatment to others: wk 520.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Total treatment satisfaction: wk 262.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.38
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Convenience of treatment: wk 260.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Recommending treatment to others: wk 260.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with understading of diabetes: wk 260.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with treatment: wk 260.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Convenience of treatment: wk 520.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Total treatmemt satisfaction: wk 522.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.02
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars: wk 260.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction to continue present treatment: wk 520.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Flexibility of treatment: wk 260.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with understading of diabetes: wk 520.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars: wk 26-0.62 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with treatment: wk 520.53 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Flexibility of treatment: wk 520.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction to continue present treatment: wk 260.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Flexibility of treatment: wk 520.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with understading of diabetes: wk 260.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Recommending treatment to others: wk 520.63 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with understading of diabetes: wk 520.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars: wk 52-1.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Recommending treatment to others: wk 260.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars: wk 26-0.06 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Total treatment satisfaction: wk 263.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.36
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars: wk 52-0.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with treatment: wk 520.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Convenience of treatment: wk 260.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with treatment: wk 260.59 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction to continue present treatment: wk 520.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Convenience of treatment: wk 520.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars: wk 26-1.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Flexibility of treatment: wk 260.37 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction to continue present treatment: wk 260.57 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Total treatmemt satisfaction: wk 522.99 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars: wk 26-1.29 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with treatment: wk 260.63 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with treatment: wk 520.78 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars: wk 52-1.34 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars: wk 260.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars: wk 52-0.06 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Convenience of treatment: wk 260.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Convenience of treatment: wk 520.44 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Flexibility of treatment: wk 260.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Flexibility of treatment: wk 520.46 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with understading of diabetes: wk 260.27 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with understading of diabetes: wk 520.34 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Recommending treatment to others: wk 260.53 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Recommending treatment to others: wk 520.65 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction to continue present treatment: wk 260.58 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction to continue present treatment: wk 520.65 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Total treatment satisfaction: wk 262.90 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.95
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Total treatmemt satisfaction: wk 523.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.78
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Flexibility of treatment: wk 520.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Flexibility of treatment: wk 260.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with treatment: wk 260.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction to continue present treatment: wk 260.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Convenience of treatment: wk 520.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Convenience of treatment: wk 260.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Total treatmemt satisfaction: wk 520.67 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.92
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction to continue present treatment: wk 520.03 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars: wk 52-0.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars: wk 26-0.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with treatment: wk 520.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Total treatment satisfaction: wk 260.76 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.52
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars: wk 52-0.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Recommending treatment to others: wk 260.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with understading of diabetes: wk 520.03 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Satisfaction with understading of diabetes: wk 260.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars: wk 26-0.28 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
PlaceboChange in DTSQs: Individual Items and Treatment Satisfaction Score (6 of the 8 Items Summed)Recommending treatment to others: wk 52-0.01 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Secondary

Change in ECG Evaluation

Change from baseline (week 0) in electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Change from baseline results are presented as shift in findings (normal; abnormal and not clinically significant (NCS); abnormal and clinically significant (CS)) from week 0 to week 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)10 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Normal (week 52)95 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Normal (week 26)101 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Normal (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Normal (Week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Abnormal CS (Week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Abnormal CS (Week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Abnormal NCS (Week 52)50 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Normal (Week 52)13 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Normal (week 26)22 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Abnormal NCS (Week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 52)2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 52)14 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)42 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Normal (week 26)98 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)12 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Normal (week 26)17 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Abnormal NCS (Week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Normal (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Normal (week 52)91 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 52)15 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 52)2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Normal (Week 52)17 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Abnormal NCS (Week 52)40 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Abnormal CS (Week 52)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Normal (Week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Abnormal CS (Week 52)4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Normal (week 52)85 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 52)20 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Normal (week 26)16 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Abnormal NCS (Week 52)2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 52)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Normal (Week 52)19 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Normal (week 26)90 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Abnormal NCS (Week 52)42 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Abnormal CS (Week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)17 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Normal (week 26)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Abnormal CS (Week 52)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Normal (Week 52)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)1 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Normal (week 26)1 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Normal (Week 52)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Abnormal NCS (Week 52)47 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Normal (week 52)84 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Normal (week 26)19 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Normal (week 26)93 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)12 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 52)17 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Abnormal CS (Week 52)1 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Abnormal CS (Week 52)1 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 52)1 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS to Abnormal NCS (Week 52)1 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS to Normal (Week 52)21 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to Abnormal NCS (week 26)51 Participants
Secondary

Change in Eye Examination Category

Participants with eye examination (fundoscopy) findings, normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS at baseline (week -2) and week 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week -2, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Normal79 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Abnormal CS23 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Abnormal NCS76 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Normal89 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Abnormal CS23 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Abnormal CS19 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Normal83 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Abnormal NCS76 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Abnormal NCS67 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Abnormal NCS65 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Abnormal CS22 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Normal85 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Abnormal NCS64 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Normal104 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Normal102 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Abnormal CS13 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Normal99 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Abnormal NCS63 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Normal102 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Abnormal CS14 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Abnormal NCS51 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Abnormal CS14 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Abnormal CS14 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Abnormal NCS54 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Abnormal NCS64 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Normal99 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Abnormal NCS64 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Abnormal CS18 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Normal92 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Abnormal NCS52 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Abnormal CS18 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Normal99 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Abnormal CS18 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Normal97 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Abnormal NCS51 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Abnormal CS15 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Abnormal CS25 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Abnormal NCS53 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Normal108 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Normal90 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week 52)Normal88 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Abnormal CS21 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Abnormal CS26 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week 52)Abnormal NCS50 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Abnormal NCS58 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Normal106 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryLeft eye (week -2)Abnormal NCS55 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryRight eye (week -2)Abnormal CS20 Participants
Secondary

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG to week 26 and week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 26-0.45 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.35
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 52-0.81 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.21
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 52-1.12 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.91
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 26-1.14 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.08
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 26-1.36 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.72
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 52-1.60 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.65
PlaceboChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 260.51 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.84
PlaceboChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 52-0.09 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.97
Secondary

Change in HbA1c (Week 52)

Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c to week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 52)-0.6 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 52)-0.9 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 52)-1.2 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange in HbA1c (Week 52)-0.2 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Change in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline

Change from baseline (week 0) in HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.00 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.5
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.01 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.4
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.98 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.4
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.98 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.98 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.01 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.3
PlaceboChange in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.01 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13
PlaceboChange in HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.00 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.9
Secondary

Change in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains

The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL-Lite-CT) is designed to assess the impact of changes in weight on patients' quality of life within the context of clinical trials. The items of the IWQOL-Lite-CT pertain to physical functioning (physical, physical function and pain/discomfort) and psychosocial domains and all items employ a 5-point graded response scale (never, rarely, sometimes, usually, always; or not at all true, a little true, moderately true, mostly true, completely true). All IWQOL-Lite-CT composite scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better levels of functioning. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains5) IWQOL-Lite-CT Total (Week 26)1.74 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.37
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains4) Pain/discomfort (Week 26)3.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.52
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains3) Physical function(Week 26)1.88 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.64
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains1) Psychosocial (Week 26)1.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.89
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains3) Physical function(Week 52)3.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.79
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains5) IWQOL-Lite-CT Total (Week 52)2.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains1) Psychosocial (Week 52)1.96 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.89
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains4) Pain/discomfort (Week 52)2.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.48
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains2) Physical (Week 26)2.29 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains2) Physical (Week 52)3.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.81
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains5) IWQOL-Lite-CT Total (Week 26)-0.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.47
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains1) Psychosocial (Week 52)-0.92 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains5) IWQOL-Lite-CT Total (Week 52)-0.79 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.47
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains3) Physical function(Week 26)-0.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.28
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains4) Pain/discomfort (Week 26)-1.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.22
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains3) Physical function(Week 52)-0.59 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.85
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains2) Physical (Week 52)-0.53 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains1) Psychosocial (Week 26)-0.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.58
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains2) Physical (Week 26)-0.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains4) Pain/discomfort (Week 52)-0.37 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.88
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains2) Physical (Week 52)2.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.33
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains5) IWQOL-Lite-CT Total (Week 52)4.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.82
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains1) Psychosocial (Week 26)4.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.24
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains1) Psychosocial (Week 52)5.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.89
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains2) Physical (Week 26)2.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.66
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains5) IWQOL-Lite-CT Total (Week 26)3.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.19
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains3) Physical function(Week 26)2.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.94
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains3) Physical function(Week 52)2.59 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.02
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains4) Pain/discomfort (Week 26)1.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.86
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains4) Pain/discomfort (Week 52)2.28 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.12
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains2) Physical (Week 52)-1.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.36
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains2) Physical (Week 26)-1.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.28
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains5) IWQOL-Lite-CT Total (Week 52)-0.73 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains4) Pain/discomfort (Week 26)-1.85 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.51
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains1) Psychosocial (Week 52)-0.46 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.46
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains1) Psychosocial (Week 26)-0.49 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.62
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains5) IWQOL-Lite-CT Total (Week 26)-0.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains3) Physical function(Week 26)-1.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.12
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains4) Pain/discomfort (Week 52)-1.88 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.48
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite-CT: Total Score and Scores From the 4 Domains3) Physical function(Week 52)-0.98 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.33
Secondary

Change in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline

Change from baseline in LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline at week 26 and week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.98 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.1
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.97 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.96 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.4
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.93 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.2
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.93 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.95 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.6
PlaceboChange in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.03 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.9
PlaceboChange in LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.00 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.3
Secondary

Change in Lipase - Ratio to Baseline

Change from baseline (week 0) in lipase (units/litre (U/L)) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Lipase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.14 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Lipase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.09 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57.5
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Lipase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.25 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 59.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Lipase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.34 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 59.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Lipase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.35 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 65.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Lipase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.35 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.6
PlaceboChange in Lipase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.99 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.1
PlaceboChange in Lipase - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.99 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 53.3
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination

Participants with physical examination findings, normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS at baseline (weeks -2) and weeks 52 presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Results are presented for the following examinations: 1) Cardiovascular system; 2) Central and peripheral nervous system; 3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth; 4) General appearance; 5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; 6) Lymph node palpation; 7) Musculoskeletal system; 8) Respiratory system; 9) Skin; 10) Thyroid gland.

Time frame: Week -2, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Normal163 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Normal166 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Abnormal NCS17 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Abnormal NCS20 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Abnormal NCS9 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Abnormal NCS7 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Abnormal NCS25 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Normal152 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Normal159 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Normal160 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Normal173 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Abnormal NCS25 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Abnormal NCS11 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Normal149 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Normal151 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Normal172 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Abnormal NCS27 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Abnormal NCS23 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Normal171 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Normal166 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Normal157 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Normal177 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Normal158 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Normal156 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Normal168 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Normal173 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Normal184 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Abnormal NCS15 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Normal182 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Abnormal NCS11 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Abnormal NCS13 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Abnormal NCS18 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Normal161 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Abnormal NCS26 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Abnormal NCS13 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Abnormal NCS8 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Normal181 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Normal170 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Abnormal NCS4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Normal177 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Normal170 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Normal150 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Abnormal NCS10 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Normal160 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Abnormal NCS20 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Abnormal NCS9 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Normal176 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Normal175 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Normal158 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Abnormal NCS6 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Abnormal NCS26 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Normal164 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Abnormal NCS6 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Abnormal NCS12 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Normal144 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Abnormal NCS15 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Normal162 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Normal165 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Abnormal NCS18 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Abnormal NCS28 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Normal148 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Normal166 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Abnormal NCS21 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Normal153 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Normal173 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Normal157 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Abnormal NCS8 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Abnormal NCS6 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Normal164 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Abnormal NCS24 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Abnormal NCS6 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Normal164 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Normal157 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Abnormal NCS24 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Normal145 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Abnormal NCS24 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Normal158 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Abnormal NCS21 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Normal147 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Abnormal NCS22 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Normal177 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Abnormal NCS4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Normal166 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Abnormal NCS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Normal160 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Abnormal NCS21 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Normal153 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Abnormal NCS17 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Normal172 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Abnormal NCS7 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Normal165 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Abnormal NCS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Normal181 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Normal170 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Normal169 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Abnormal NCS9 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Normal170 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Normal159 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Abnormal NCS8 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Normal180 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Normal159 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Abnormal NCS22 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Normal151 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Abnormal NCS18 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Normal176 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Normal168 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Abnormal NCS5 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Normal173 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week 52)Normal166 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Abnormal NCS14 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Abnormal NCS5 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (week -2)Normal178 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Abnormal NCS21 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Normal162 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week 52)Normal152 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Abnormal NCS12 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Abnormal NCS21 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Abnormal NCS22 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination4) General appearance (week -2)Normal162 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Normal170 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week -2)Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Normal166 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Normal155 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week 52)Normal171 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week 52)Normal160 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Abnormal NCS18 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Abnormal NCS4 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth (week -2)Normal180 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination1) Cardiovascular system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination9) Skin (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Abnormal NCS18 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Normal177 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week 52)Normal155 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Normal164 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week 52)Abnormal NCS6 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Abnormal NCS8 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Abnormal NCS9 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination10) Thyroid gland (week -2)Abnormal NCS5 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week 52)Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination7) Musculoskeletal system (week -2)Normal175 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Abnormal NCS21 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Normal184 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week 52)Normal172 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination2) Central and peripheral nervous system (week -2)Normal163 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination8) Respiratory system (week -2)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination6) Lymph node palpation (week -2)Normal184 Participants
Secondary

Change in Pulse Rate

Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse rate was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52 Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 261 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 9
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 52-0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 521 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 262 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 263 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 10
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 522 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 10
PlaceboChange in Pulse RateWeek 26-0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboChange in Pulse RateWeek 520 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 9
Secondary

Change in SBP and DBP

Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52 Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SBP and DBPSBP: Week 26-1 mmHgStandard Deviation 12
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SBP and DBPSBP: Week 52-1 mmHgStandard Deviation 12
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SBP and DBPDBP: Week 26-0 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SBP and DBPDBP: Week 52-1 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SBP and DBPDBP: Week 52-2 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SBP and DBPDBP: Week 26-1 mmHgStandard Deviation 10
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SBP and DBPSBP: Week 52-3 mmHgStandard Deviation 16
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SBP and DBPSBP: Week 26-3 mmHgStandard Deviation 17
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SBP and DBPDBP: Week 26-1 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SBP and DBPDBP: Week 52-2 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SBP and DBPSBP: Week 52-6 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SBP and DBPSBP: Week 26-5 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboChange in SBP and DBPSBP: Week 520 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboChange in SBP and DBPSBP: Week 261 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboChange in SBP and DBPDBP: Week 52-0 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboChange in SBP and DBPDBP: Week 260 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
Secondary

Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point Profile

Change from baseline (week 0) in self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) mean 7-point profile to week 26 and week 52. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point profile was defined as the area under the profile, calculated using the trapezoidal method, divided by the measurement time. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 26-1.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 52-1.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 52-1.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 26-1.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 26-2.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 52-2.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 26-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.7
PlaceboChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 52-0.9 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Change in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)

SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)8) Mental health (Week 52)-0.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.69
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)6) Social functioning (Week 52)0.11 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.73
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)2) Role Physical (Week 52)0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.46
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)8) Mental health (Week 26)-1.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.29
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)7) Role emotional (Week 26)-0.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)1) Physical functioning (Week 26)0.53 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.58
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)7) Role emotional (Week 52)0.77 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.61
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)1) Physical functioning (Week 52)0.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.27
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)10) Mental component summary (Week 26)-1.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)3) Bodily Pain (Week 26)-0.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)3) Bodily Pain (Week 52)-0.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.78
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)9) Physical component summary (Week 52)0.26 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.78
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)4) General Health (Week 26)1.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.75
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)10) Mental component summary (Week 52)-0.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.45
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)4) General Health (Week 52)0.92 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.27
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)2) Role Physical (Week 26)-0.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.64
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)9) Physical component summary (Week 26)0.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)5) Vitality (Week 26)-0.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.73
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)5) Vitality (Week 52)-0.53 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.24
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)6) Social functioning (Week 26)-0.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.86
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)8) Mental health (Week 52)-0.74 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.91
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)6) Social functioning (Week 26)0.34 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.65
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)10) Mental component summary (Week 26)-0.55 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.91
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)8) Mental health (Week 26)-0.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.58
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)3) Bodily Pain (Week 52)0.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)6) Social functioning (Week 52)-0.61 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.09
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)1) Physical functioning (Week 26)0.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.61
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)10) Mental component summary (Week 52)-0.89 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.66
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)5) Vitality (Week 52)-1.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.68
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)7) Role emotional (Week 26)0.62 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.94
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)4) General Health (Week 26)0.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.23
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)7) Role emotional (Week 52)-0.34 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.58
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)5) Vitality (Week 26)-1.27 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)2) Role Physical (Week 52)-0.76 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.88
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)9) Physical component summary (Week 26)0.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.27
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)2) Role Physical (Week 26)-0.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.45
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)4) General Health (Week 52)0.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)3) Bodily Pain (Week 26)1.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.98
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)1) Physical functioning (Week 52)-0.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.69
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)9) Physical component summary (Week 52)0.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.24
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)7) Role emotional (Week 26)0.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.78
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)1) Physical functioning (Week 26)-0.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.75
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)1) Physical functioning (Week 52)-0.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.55
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)2) Role Physical (Week 26)0.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.81
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)2) Role Physical (Week 52)-0.87 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.97
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)3) Bodily Pain (Week 26)-0.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.76
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)3) Bodily Pain (Week 52)-0.21 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.22
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)4) General Health (Week 26)1.26 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.11
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)4) General Health (Week 52)1.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.04
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)5) Vitality (Week 26)0.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.01
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)5) Vitality (Week 52)0.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)6) Social functioning (Week 26)-0.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.25
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)6) Social functioning (Week 52)0.03 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.73
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)7) Role emotional (Week 52)0.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.91
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)8) Mental health (Week 26)0.99 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)8) Mental health (Week 52)0.89 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.39
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)9) Physical component summary (Week 26)-0.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.81
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)9) Physical component summary (Week 52)-0.36 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.09
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)10) Mental component summary (Week 26)0.49 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.72
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)10) Mental component summary (Week 52)0.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.57
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)5) Vitality (Week 52)-1.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.12
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)5) Vitality (Week 26)-1.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.18
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)10) Mental component summary (Week 26)-2.16 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.45
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)8) Mental health (Week 52)-1.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)4) General Health (Week 52)-1.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.95
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)4) General Health (Week 26)-0.36 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.35
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)1) Physical functioning (Week 52)-0.77 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.31
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)9) Physical component summary (Week 26)-0.05 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.07
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)3) Bodily Pain (Week 52)-0.64 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.23
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)3) Bodily Pain (Week 26)-0.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.88
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)1) Physical functioning (Week 26)-0.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.25
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)9) Physical component summary (Week 52)-0.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.54
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)2) Role Physical (Week 52)-0.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.28
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)7) Role emotional (Week 26)-1.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.08
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)2) Role Physical (Week 26)-0.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.19
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)7) Role emotional (Week 52)-2.78 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.81
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)6) Social functioning (Week 52)-1.74 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)6) Social functioning (Week 26)-1.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.03
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)10) Mental component summary (Week 52)-2.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
PlaceboChange in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)8) Mental health (Week 26)-2.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.57
Secondary

Change in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals

Change from baseline (week 0) in SMPG mean postprandial increment over all meals to week 26 and week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All MealsWeek 26-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All MealsWeek 52-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All MealsWeek 52-0.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All MealsWeek 26-0.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.6
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All MealsWeek 26-1.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All MealsWeek 52-0.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboChange in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All MealsWeek 26-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.8
PlaceboChange in SMPG Mean Postprandial Increment Over All MealsWeek 52-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Change in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline

Change from baseline in total cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline at week 26 and week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.98 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.99 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.5
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.97 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.95 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.95 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.3
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.95 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.1
PlaceboChange in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 261.03 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.4
PlaceboChange in Total Cholesterol - Ratio to BaselineWeek 521.00 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.6
Secondary

Change in Total Daily Insulin Dose

Change from baseline in total daily insulin dose to week 26 and week 52 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Total Daily Insulin DoseWeek 26-5 Units/dayStandard Deviation 22
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Total Daily Insulin DoseWeek 521 Units/dayStandard Deviation 26
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Total Daily Insulin DoseWeek 52-8 Units/dayStandard Deviation 64
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Total Daily Insulin DoseWeek 26-9 Units/dayStandard Deviation 21
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Total Daily Insulin DoseWeek 26-8 Units/dayStandard Deviation 19
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Total Daily Insulin DoseWeek 52-5 Units/dayStandard Deviation 19
PlaceboChange in Total Daily Insulin DoseWeek 26-2 Units/dayStandard Deviation 15
PlaceboChange in Total Daily Insulin DoseWeek 528 Units/dayStandard Deviation 24
Secondary

Change in Triglycerides - Ratio to Baseline

Change from baseline (week 0) in triglycerides (mmol/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Triglycerides - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.97 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.5
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Triglycerides - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.93 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Triglycerides - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.94 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Triglycerides - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.92 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Triglycerides - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.91 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Triglycerides - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.86 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43.7
PlaceboChange in Triglycerides - Ratio to BaselineWeek 260.99 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.9
PlaceboChange in Triglycerides - Ratio to BaselineWeek 520.97 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.2
Secondary

Change in Waist Circumference

Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52.The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 26-0.9 cmStandard Deviation 4.1
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 52-0.8 cmStandard Deviation 4.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 52-2.3 cmStandard Deviation 5.1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 26-2.3 cmStandard Deviation 5.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 26-3.6 cmStandard Deviation 4.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 52-4.0 cmStandard Deviation 6.8
PlaceboChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 26-0.6 cmStandard Deviation 3.6
PlaceboChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 520.3 cmStandard Deviation 4.1
Secondary

Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Exposure to Trial Product

Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded from week 0 to week 57 (52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period). Adverse events (AEs) with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Weeks 0-57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = safety analysis set (SAS) which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Exposure to Trial Product626 Events
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Exposure to Trial Product555 Events
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Exposure to Trial Product586 Events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Exposure to Trial Product464 Events
Secondary

Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during week 0 to week 57 (52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a subject was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

Time frame: Weeks 0-57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes196 Episodes
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes180 Episodes
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes147 Episodes
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes156 Episodes
Secondary

Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)

Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 10% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiatiion of of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 26No175 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 52No170 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 52No154 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes17 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 26No162 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes12 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes21 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 52No149 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 26No154 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes19 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 26No176 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes1 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 52No172 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes1 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)

Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 5% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes30 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes23 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 52No144 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 26No154 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes53 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 26No121 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 52No123 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes67 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes67 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 26No106 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 52No103 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes5 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 26No172 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 52No164 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve Body Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes9 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)

Number of participants achieving HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) according to American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) target, at week 26 and week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 26Yes24 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 26No152 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 52Yes20 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 52No153 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 26No129 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 52Yes33 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 52No136 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 26Yes45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 52Yes65 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 26No99 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 52No103 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 26Yes74 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 52No168 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 26No170 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 26Yes6 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (AACE Target) (Yes/no)Week 52Yes4 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)

Number of particpants achieving HbA1c \< 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) target, at week 26 and week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In trial observation period started at the date of randomisation and included the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Time frame: Week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 26Yes50 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 26No126 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 52Yes50 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 52No123 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 26No100 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 52Yes67 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 52No102 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 26Yes74 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 52Yes91 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 26No72 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 52No77 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 26Yes101 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 52No156 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 26No164 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 26Yes12 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve: HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)Week 52Yes16 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)

Participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % without severe or blood glucose (BG) confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia and without weight gain (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode with plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 26Yes32 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 26No144 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 52Yes27 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 52No146 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 26No127 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 52Yes43 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 52No126 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 26Yes47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 52Yes61 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 26No97 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 52No107 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 26Yes76 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 52No164 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 26No172 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 26Yes4 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)Week 52Yes8 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)

Participants who achieved HbA1c reduction more than or equal to 1% of their baseline HbA1c and weight loss of more than or equal to 3% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes28 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 26No148 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes20 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 52No153 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 26No123 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes37 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 52No132 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes51 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes64 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 26No97 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 52No104 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes76 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 52No167 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 26No169 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 26Yes7 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)Week 52Yes5 Participants
Secondary

Participants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during week 0 to week 57 (52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a subject was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

Time frame: Weeks 0-57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes52 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes48 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes54 Participants
Secondary

Semaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK Analyses

This outcome measure is only applicable for the oral semaglutide treatment arms (3 mg, 7 mg and 14 mg). Semaglutide plasma concentrations were measured at week 4, 14, 26, 38 and 52. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Weeks 0-52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 522.4 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 126
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 262.7 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 124.7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 42.9 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 111.2
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 142.9 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 106.9
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 382.5 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 123.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 147.5 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 143.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 525.8 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 160.5
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 386.9 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 139.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 267.2 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 141.4
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 42.9 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 116.4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 5211.9 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 210.4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 42.9 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 98.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 2612.6 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 203.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 3810.8 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 238.3
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgSemaglutide Plasma Concentrations for Population PK AnalysesWeek 1414.5 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 172.7
Secondary

Time to Additional Anti-diabetic Medication

Presented results are the number of participants who had taken additional anti-diabetic medication anytime during the periods, from week 0 to week 26 and week 0 to week 52. Additional anti-diabetic medication was defined as use of new anti-diabetic medication for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation (week 0) and before (planned) end-of-treatment (week 52), and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before (planned) end-of-treatment. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Weeks 0-52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeek 0-269 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeek 0-5261 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeek 0-5245 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeek 0-268 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeek 0-268 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeek 0-5244 Participants
PlaceboTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeek 0-2611 Participants
PlaceboTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeek 0-5275 Participants
Comparison: Time to initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment, strata, interaction strata, and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Withdrawal for any reason or lost to follow-up contributed to the analysis as events (initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication). Censoring time was one day before planned end of treatment.p-value: 0.062795% CI: [0.53, 1.02]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment, strata, and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Withdrawal for any reason or lost to follow-up contributed to the analysis as events (initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication). Censoring time was one day before planned end of treatment.p-value: 0.008395% CI: [0.44, 0.89]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment, strata, interaction strata, and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Withdrawal for any reason or lost to follow-up contributed to the analysis as events (initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication). Censoring time was one day before planned end of treatment.p-value: 0.001995% CI: [0.4, 0.81]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Time to Rescue Medication

Presented results are the number of participants who had taken rescue medication anytime during the periods, from week 0 to week 26 and week 0 to week 52. Rescue medication was defined as use of new anti-diabetic medication as add-on to trial product and used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation (week 1) and before last day on trial product, and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before last day on trial product. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period, which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation.

Time frame: Weeks 0-52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgTime to Rescue MedicationWeek 0-265 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgTime to Rescue MedicationWeek 0-5254 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgTime to Rescue MedicationWeek 0-5233 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgTime to Rescue MedicationWeek 0-262 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgTime to Rescue MedicationWeek 0-264 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgTime to Rescue MedicationWeek 0-5231 Participants
PlaceboTime to Rescue MedicationWeek 0-269 Participants
PlaceboTime to Rescue MedicationWeek 0-5267 Participants
Comparison: Time to initiation of rescue medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment, strata, interaction strata, and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Censoring time was one day before last day on trial product.p-value: 0.12195% CI: [0.53, 1.08]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of rescue medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment, strata, interaction strata, and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Censoring time was one day before last day on trial product.p-value: 0.000795% CI: [0.32, 0.74]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of rescue medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment, strata, interaction strata, and region as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Censoring time was one day before last day on trial product.p-value: 0.000695% CI: [0.31, 0.73]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026