Skip to content

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling-reposition to Treat Idiopathic Macular Holes

Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling-reposition Versus Peeling in Idiopathic Macular Holes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03020459
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-01-13
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2019-08-01
Last updated
2021-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Hole, Surgery

Keywords

macular holes

Brief summary

To compare the morphologic and functional outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling-reposition versus peeling in idiopathic macular holes

Detailed description

This randomized clinical trial will be performed at a single center. Eligible patients with idiopathic macular holes will be equally randomized to internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling-reposition group or ILM peeling group through computer-aided random allocation. A standard 3-port pars plana vitrectomy was performed by a single surgeon using the Constellation 23 gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, USA).After posterior vitreous detachment was achieved, peeling of the ILM was performed by an end gripping forceps with the assistance of Brilliant Blue G. In ILM peeling-reposition group, the peeled ILM flap is flatten back to peeled area with assistance of perfluoro-n-octane. In ILM peeling group, a round shape with 2.5 to 3.5 disc diameter of ILM is peeled. This is followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange. Patients are encouraged to maintain a face-down position for two weeks postoperatively in two groups. Postoperative measurements of BCVA and spectral domain optical coherence tomography(SD-OCT) are conducted at 1,3 and 6-month follow-up visits by independent masked observers. Macular light sensitivity and fixation stability are determined with microperimetry at 1,3, and 6 months of follow-up. Mf-ERG, M-score chart and VFQ-25 chart are performed 1,3, and 6 months of follow-up. Comparison of BCVA, anatomical closure were primarily performed between the two groups. Then, the morphologic changes of inner retina and the functional parameters measured from microperimetry, Mf-ERG, M-score chart, VFQ-25 chart were analyzed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREpeeling-reposition

After dying with Brilliant Blue G (BBG, Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany), a horizontal ILM strip is peeled off in inferior quadrant of macular area. Then the ILM was peeled from inferior to superior area continuously. The ILM roll was unfolded with assistance of perfluoro-n-octane (PFO). Finally, the position of the fixed ILM flap is adjusted under PFO bubble using flute needle or forceps.This was followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange using 14% perfluoropropane gas.Patients are introduced to maintain facedown position for two weeks postoperatively.

PROCEDUREpeeling

After dying with Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany), a horizontal ILM strip is peeled off in inferior quadrant of macular area. Then, the strand of ILM was peeled off radially from the foveal center to vascular arcade. In result, a round -shaped with 2.5-3.5 disc diameter ILM -peeled area was created.This was followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange using 14% perfluoropropane gas. Patients are encourage to maintain facedown position for two weeks postoperatively.

We intravitreal injected 0.1ml of Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) to dye ILM before ILM peeling.

OTHERpostoperative posture

Patients of both two groups need to keep prone position for two weeks after the operation.

DEVICEConstellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system

All surgical procedures are operated on the Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX).

Sponsors

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patients are diagnosed as macular hole by optical coherence tomography. * Age ranges from 50 to 80 years. * The patients have indication for surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Traumatic macular hole. * Combined with serious epiretinal membrane. * Combined with diabetic retinopathy, hypertensive retinopathy. * Combined with other ocular diseases, such as keratitis,uveitis,retinal vasculitis. * \- 6.0 diopters or more of spherical equivalent, 26mm or more of axial length. * History of intraocular surgery. * Presence of staphyloma. * Other ocular diseases that could influence macular microstructure or visual function Exit criteria: * For reposition group, the patients will exit the research if the peeled ILM cannot reposition successfully. * Due to adverse events, especially severe adverse events, the researchers consider withdrawal of patients based on concerns of safety and ethics; * Drop out; * The patients voluntarily withdraw the informed consent; * Serious violation of the study protocol due to the subjects or investigators' reasons; * Other reasons that the researchers believe for quitting the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)Pre-operation and 6 months after operationChange from baseline BCVA at 6 months after operation, examined with snellen chart.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Close rate of macular holes1 month after operationObserved from optical coherence tomography

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean foveal light sensitivity changePre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operationMeasured by microperimetry
Fixation stability changePre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operationMeasured by microperimetry
Morphologic changes of inner retina1,3,6 months after operationDimpling observed from optical coherence tomography
M-chart score changePre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operationM-horizontal score and M-vertical score
Visual function questionnaire-25(VFQ-25) score changePre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operationA questionnaire consisted of 25 visual function questions concerning life quality
Multifocal electroretinogram(Mf-ERG) changepre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operationAn objective measurement of retinal functions
Central retinal thickness changePre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operationMeasured by software in optical coherence tomography

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026