Skip to content

Can we Antagonize Mivacurium With Neostigmine ?

Can we Antagonize Mivacurium With Neostigmine

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03019835
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-01-13
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2017-04-22
Last updated
2017-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mivacurium, Neostigmine, Residual Paralysis

Keywords

mivacurium, neostigmine, antagonism

Brief summary

The antagonism of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) (or curares), as well as the antagonism of other drugs used in anesthesia, is a major challenge for the speciality. Residual paralysis is indeed a risk factor for post-operative morbidity and mortality and antagonization of curares at the end of the procedure is associated with a reduction in mortality . Its use should be as large as possible and its contraindications are extremely rare. The antagonism of the NMBA reduces the duration of the neuromuscular block and the complications that are associated . In this study, the investigators use mivacurium (or Mivacron) as non-depolarizing curare and neostigmine as an antagonist. Neostigmine reduces the duration of the neuromuscular block induced by mivacurium, By reducing the breakdown of acetylcholine, neostigmine induces an increase in acetylcholine in the synaptic cleft which competes for the same binding site as nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents, and reverses the neuromuscular blockade. But the use of neostigmine in current practice is not very widespread in this clinical situation. The reduction in the duration of the block is significant in comparison with a spontaneous recovery . Moreover, spontaneous recovery is not always complete and sometimes very long. Nevertheless, its action is effective and this study could support this use but also specify the duration and the quality of the return to normal of the neuromuscular transmission.

Interventions

DRUGNeostigmine (40 mcg / kg) at different time of neuromuscular block's recovery
OTHERSpontaneous recovery

just measuring the Train Of Four at 3 6 9 12 and 15 minutes and measure the Train Of Four Ratio

Sponsors

Université Libre de Bruxelles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 to 3 * Absence of neuromuscular disease, renal and hepatic insufficiency * Absence of medication that could interfere with the mediators of the neuromuscular junction

Exclusion criteria

* Bronchial asthma * Parkinson disease * BMI\> 35 * Known hypersensitivity to neostigmine or to any of the excipients of Neostigmine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in TOF ( Train Of Four) measurefor each patient, measure of Train Of Four at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 minutes

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026