Skip to content

Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study for The Safety of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With a Camera Holder Versus With a Camera Operator

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03018964
Enrollment
272
Registered
2017-01-12
Start date
2020-03-31
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2019-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic

Keywords

Single incision, Solo surgery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine safety of solo surgery in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with a camera holder comparing to a camera operator assisted SILC

Detailed description

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled study. The primary outcome based on non-inferior study design(α=0.05, power (1-β)=0.90); comparing a complications rate between Solo-SILC group and conventional cholecystectomy group (Ca-SILC). Total of 272 patients who were undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disorders will randomly assign to two groups according to a computer-generated table of random numbers Solo-SILC group using a laparoscopic camera holder (n=136) or Ca-SILC group in which a camera operator joins (n=136). . Demographics (i.e., age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, indication for operation, need for conversion to open surgery or additional port will be recorded. Outcome including pain, hernia, complication rates, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea, operator's workload will be investigated

Interventions

PROCEDURESolo surgery

Solo surgery using a camera scope holder in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

PROCEDUREoperation with a camera operator in SILC

conventional single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a scopist

Sponsors

Chungbuk National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Gyeongsang National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all patient need laparoscopic cholecystectomy (check the possibility of routine application of Solo-SILC in clinical practice)

Exclusion criteria

* Mirizzi syndrome * unstable vital sign * no compliance * no consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication rate in Solo-Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC)average 2 weeksintraoperative and immediate postoperative complications in Solo-SILC comparing with that in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conversion rateintraoperativeintraoperative conversion rate to open or additional port surgery
Incisional herniaaverage 6 monthsUmbilical incisional hernia incidence
Wound, back, and shoulder painpostoperative 6 hr, 24 hr, 2 weeks after the operationAccess the patient's pain using the visual analog scale
complications in both groupsaverage 2 weeksintraoperative and postoperative complications
number of participant with abnormal laboratory valuesaverage 2weeks after dischargepostoperative laboratory findings on visiting outpatient's clinic
Operator's workloadintraoperativeAccess a operator's workload just after solo surgery comparing to Ca-SILC group using NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) score
Postoperative adverse symptoms after SILCaverage 2weeks after dischargeDiet change, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea

Contacts

Primary ContactYoungRok Choi, M.D.
choiyoungrok@gmail.com+821093212477
Backup ContactHo-Jeong Jeong, R.N.
r1441@snubh.org+821095267743

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026