Skip to content

Dose-response, Safety and Efficacy of Oral Semaglutide Versus Placebo and Versus Liraglutide, All as Monotherapy in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Dose-response, Safety and Efficacy of Oral Semaglutide Versus Placebo and Versus Liraglutide, All as Monotherapy in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03018028
Acronym
PIONEER 9
Enrollment
243
Registered
2017-01-11
Start date
2017-01-10
Completion date
2018-08-15
Last updated
2021-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to investigate the dose-response relationship of once-daily dosing of three dose levels (3, 7 and 14 mg) of oral semaglutide versus placebo as monotherapy on glycaemic control in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Interventions

DRUGLiraglutide

Subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection once daily

DRUGPlacebo

Oral administration once daily

DRUGSemaglutide

Oral administration once daily

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial * Japanese male or female, age above or equal to 20 years at the time of signing informed consent * Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 30 days prior to day of screening * HbA1c 6.5%-9.5% (48-80 mmol/mol) (both inclusive) for subjects treated with oral antidiabetic drug as monotherapy and 7.0%-10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol) (both inclusive) for subjects treated with diet and exercise therapy alone * Treatment for at least 30 days prior to day of screening with;- stable daily dose of oral anti-diabetic drug as monotherapy (allowed oral anti-diabetic drugs are: metformin, sulphonylurea, glinide, α-glucosidase inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor) at a half-maximum approved dose or below according to Japanese labelling in addition to diet and exercise therapy. or - diet and exercise therapy alone

Exclusion criteria

* Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method. Adequate contraceptive measures are abstinence (not having sex), diaphragm, condom (by the partner), intrauterine device, sponge, spermicide or oral contraceptives * Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol * Family or personal history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2) or medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) * History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) * History of major surgical procedures involving the stomach and potentially affecting absorption of trial product (e.g. subtotal and total gastrectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass surgery) * Any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalisation for unstable angina or transient ischaemic attack within the past 180 days prior to the day of screening and randomisation * Subject presently classified as being in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV * Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation known on the day of screening * Subjects with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) above 2.5 x upper normal limit (UNL) * Renal impairment defined as estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) below 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 as per Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EPI) * Treatment with once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), once weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor or thiazolidinedione in a period of 90 days before the day of screening * Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 60 days before the day of screening. An exception is short-term insulin treatment for acute illness for a total of below or equal to 14 days * Proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy requiring acute treatment. Verified by fundus photography or dilated fundoscopy performed within 90 days prior to randomisation * History or presence of malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years (except basal and squamous cell skin cancer and in-situ carcinomas) * Initiation of anti-diabetic medication between the day of screening and the day of randomisation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1c (Week 26)Week 0, week 26Change from baseline (week 0) to week 26 in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). The endpoint was analysed based on data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication. The endpoint was also evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body Weight (kg)Week 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting plasma glucose. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profile. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point profile was defined as the area under the profile, calculated using the trapezoidal method, divided by the measurement time. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in the average of the post-prandial increments over all meals. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Body Weight (%)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Relative change (%) from baseline (week 0) in body weight (kg). Data based on on-treatment without resue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Body Mass IndexWeek 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI). BMI was calculated based on body weight and height based on the formulae: BMI kg/m\^2 = body weight (kg)/(Height (m) x Height (m)). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Waist CircumferenceWeek 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in total cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in triglycerides (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting insulin (measured as picomoles per liter \[pmol/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting C-peptide (measured as nanomoles per liter \[nmol/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting glucagon (measured as picograms per milliliter \[pg/mL\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting pro-insulin (measured as pmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting pro-insulin/insulin ratio is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in insulin resistance (measured as percentage of insulin resistance) by homeostatic model assessment index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 0, week 26 and week 52Change from baseline (week 0) in beta-cell function (measured as percentage of beta-cell function) by homeostatic model assessment index of beta-cell function is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26 and week 52Participants who achieved HbA1c \<7.0% (53 millimoles per mole \[mmol/mol\]) according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) target, at week 26 and week 52. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26 and week 52Participants who achieved HbA1c below or equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/mol), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists target (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26 and week 52Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Number of participants who achieved HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without severe or blood glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes and no weight gain (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26 and week 52Participants who achieved above or equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/mol) reduction in HbA1c and losing 3% or more of baseline body weight (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26 and week 52Participants losing 5% or more of baseline body weight (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26 and week 52Participants losing 10% or more of baseline body weight (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Time to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationWeeks 0 - 52Presented results are the number of participants who had taken additional anti-diabetic medication anytime from week 0 to week 52. 'Additional anti-diabetic medication': use of new anti-diabetic medication for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation and before (planned) end-of-treatment. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Time to Rescue MedicationWeeks 0 - 52Presented results are the number of participants who had taken rescue medication anytime from week 0 to week 52. 'Rescue medication': use of new anti-diabetic medication as add-on to trial product and used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation and before last day on trial product. Time to rescue medication was estimated based on data from on-treatment without rescue medication observation period.
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Weeks 0 - 57A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event (AE) with onset in the on-treatment observation period (time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any, and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation) assessed up to approximately 57 weeks (52 weeks treatment period + 5 weeks follow-up period).
Change in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 0, week 26, week 52Change in amylase (measured as units per liter \[U/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment observation period is presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.
Change in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 0, week 26, week 52Change in lipase (measured as U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment observation period is presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.
Change in Pulse RateWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline in pulse rate. Data based on on-treatment observation period is presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.
Change in Blood PressureWeek 0, week 26, week 52Change from baseline in blood pressure (systolic \[sBP\] and diastolic \[dBP\]). Data based on on-treatment observation period is presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.
Change in ECG EvaluationWeek 0, week 26, week 52Electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated and interpreted by the investigator and categorised as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). The number of participants who had shifted from normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS ECG results from baseline (week 0) to week 26, week 52 is presented. Data based on in-trial observation period is presented. In-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Change in Physical ExaminationBaseline (Week -8), week 26, week 52Physical examination included examination of cardiovascular system, nervous system (central and peripheral), gastrointestinal system including mouth, general appearence, head and neck (head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck), lymph node palpation, musculoskeletal system, respiratory system, skin and thyroid gland. Physical examination was performed by the investigator and categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Data based on in-trial observation period is presented. In-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Change in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8, Week 52Eye examination was performed by the investigator and categorised as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Data based on in-trial observation period is presented. In-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Anti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies (Yes/no)Week 0 - 57Number of participants with the presence or absence (yes/no) of anti-semaglutide binding antibodies in blood anytime post-baseline (week 0) and up to week 57. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on the in-trial observation period was presented. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Anti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies (Yes/no)Week 0 - 57Number of participants with the presence or absence (yes/no) of anti-semaglutide neutralising antibodies in blood anytime post-baseline (week 0) and up to week 57. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on the in-trial observation period is presented. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Anti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)Week 0 - 57Number of participants with the presence or absence (yes/no) of anti-semaglutide binding antibodies cross reacting with native GLP-1 in blood anytime post-baseline (week 0) and up to week 57. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on the in-trial observation period was presented. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Anti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)Week 0 - 57Number of participants with the presence or absence (yes/no) of anti-semaglutide neutralising antibodies cross reacting with native GLP-1 in blood anytime post-baseline (week 0) and up to week 57. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on the in-trial observation period was presented. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Anti-semaglutide Binding Antibody LevelsWeeks 0-57This outcome measure is only applicable for the oral semaglutide treatment arms (3 mg, 7 mg and 14 mg). It is based on the data from participants who were measured with anti-semaglutide antibodies anytime during post-baseline visits (weeks 0-57). Results are presented as percentage of bound radioactivity-labelled semaglutide /total added radioactivity-labelled semaglutide (%B/T). Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0 - 57Hypoglycaemic episodes defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Data based on on-treatment observation period was presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.
Participants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeeks 0 - 57Number of participants with treatment emergent severe or blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes. Hypoglycaemic episodes defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Data based on on-treatment observation period was presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.
Change in HbA1c (Week 52)Week 0, week 52Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in HbA1c. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Change in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 0, week 26, week 52SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in the sub-domain scores is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented.
Change in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 0, week 26, week 52Change in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain PCS from baseline (week 0) to week 56. SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. It consists of 2 component summary measures that further summarize 8 health domain scales. The PCS measure is derived from domain scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented.
Change in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 0, week 26, week 52Change in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain MCS from baseline (week 0) to week 56. SF- 36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The MCS measure is derived from domain scales of vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented.
Change From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 0, week 26, week 52Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL (DTR-QOL) questionnaire is a 29-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the influence of diabetes treatment on HRQoL on 4 domains on individual scale ranges: Burden on social activities and daily activities, Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment, Hypoglycemia and Satisfaction with treatment on a 7-point graded response scale. Higher item scores indicate a higher level of HRQoL for items 1-25. For items 26-29 a higher score indicates a lower level of HRQoL. The domain score is calculated from the mean score of the attribute items, and the scoring range is converted to 0 - 100. The total score, after simple addition of the item scores, is converted to 0 - 100 (best-case response = 100; worstcase response = 0). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented.
Change From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 0, week 26, week 52DTR-QOL questionnaire is a 29-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the the influence of diabetes treatment on HRQoL. DTR-QOL questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 4 domains on individual scale ranges: Burden on social activities and daily activities, Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment, Hypoglycemia and Satisfaction with treatment on a 7-point graded response scale. Higher item scores indicate a higher level of HRQoL for items 1-25. For items 26-29 a higher score indicates a lower level of HRQoL. The domain score is calculated from the mean score of the attribute items, and the scoring range is converted to 0 - 100. W26 and W52 refer to week 26 and week 52 respectively. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period was presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.
Semaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 26 and week 52Semaglutide plasma concentration is presented. Samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were drawn at any time during the visit except for the visit at week 26 where samples were taken both pre-dose and 60-90 minutes post dosing. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups, Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on on-treatment observation period was presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 16 sites in Japan. Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with either diet and exercise alone or with oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) monotherapy for at least 30 days prior to screening were enrolled in the study.

Pre-assignment details

Data presented in participant flow is based on the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
Participants received 3.0 mg of oral semaglutide tablets once daily in the morning in fasted state for 52 weeks. The oral semaglutide tablet was taken once daily in a fasting state at least 30 min before the first meal of the day with up to half a glass of water.
49
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in the morning in fasted state for 52 weeks. Participants started oral semaglutide at 3 mg and were dose escalated in 4-week increments until the final maintenance dose of 7 mg once-daily was reached (i.e. 3 mg from week 0 to week 4, 7 mg from week 4 to week 52). The oral semaglutide tablet was taken once daily in a fasting state at least 30 min before the first meal of the day with up to half a glass of water.
49
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in the morning in fasted state for 52 weeks. Participants started oral semaglutide at 3 mg and were dose escalated in 4-week increments until the final maintenance dose of 14 mg once-daily was reached (i.e. 3 mg from week 0 to week 4, 7 mg from week 4 to week 8, 14 mg from week 8 to week 52). The oral semaglutide tablet was taken once daily in a fasting state at least 30 min before the first meal of the day with up to half a glass of water.
48
Liraglutide 0.9 mg
Participants received liraglutide for 52 weeks. Liraglutide was administered once-daily as subcutaneous injection (under the skin) in the abdomen, thigh or upper arm and was taken with or without food, preferably at the same time in the morning or evening. Participants initiated liraglutide at 0.3 mg once-daily, and were dose escalated after 1 week to 0.6 mg, and then dose escalated after 1 week to the recommended maximum dose of 0.9 mg.
48
Placebo
Participants received placebo (for oral semaglutide) tablets once daily for 52 weeks. The placebo tablet was taken once daily in the morning in a fasting state at least 30 min before the first meal of the day with up to half a glass of water.
49
Total243

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject30120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOral Semaglutide 3 mgOral Semaglutide 7 mgOral Semaglutide 14 mgLiraglutide 0.9 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous58 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
60 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
61 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
59 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
59 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
59 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Baseline HbA1c8.1 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
8.3 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
8.0 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
8.3 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
8.3 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
8.2 Percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
49 Participants49 Participants48 Participants48 Participants49 Participants243 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
49 Participants49 Participants48 Participants48 Participants49 Participants243 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants13 Participants8 Participants9 Participants9 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants36 Participants40 Participants39 Participants40 Participants191 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 490 / 490 / 480 / 480 / 49
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 4921 / 4925 / 4823 / 4827 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 493 / 490 / 480 / 483 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Change in HbA1c (Week 26)

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 26 in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). The endpoint was analysed based on data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication. The endpoint was also evaluated based on data from the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = full analysis set (FAS) which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-1.1 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.8
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)In-trial observation period-1.1 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-1.7 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)In-trial observation period-1.6 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-1.7 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)In-trial observation period-1.7 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.9
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)In-trial observation period-1.4 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.1
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-1.4 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboChange in HbA1c (Week 26)On-treatment without rescue medication-0.2 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboChange in HbA1c (Week 26)In-trial observation period-0.4 Percentage point of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1
Comparison: The analysis was based on a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.4, -0.8]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Comparison: The analysis was based on a MMRM that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.7, -1.2]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Comparison: The analysis was based on a MMRM that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2, -1.4]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Comparison: The analysis was based on a MMRM that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: 0.079995% CI: [0, 0.6]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Comparison: The analysis was based on a MMRM that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: 0.394295% CI: [-0.4, 0.2]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Comparison: The analysis was based on a MMRM that assumed data to be missing at random. As dependent variables, the MMRM model included all post-baseline values collected at scheduled visits up to and including week 26. The independent effects were treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and the baseline HbA1c value as a covariate, all nested within visit, and an unstructured residual covariance matrix.p-value: 0.027295% CI: [-0.6, 0]Mixed model for repeated measurement
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.1, -0.5]Pattern Mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.5, -0.9]Pattern Mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.7, -1.1]Pattern Mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: 0.195895% CI: [-0.1, 0.5]Pattern Mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: 0.186895% CI: [-0.5, 0.1]Pattern Mixture model
Comparison: The analysis was based on a pattern mixture model using multiple imputation to handle missing week 26 data, assuming that data were missing at random within the groups used for imputation. The imputed data sets were analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate for each of the 1000 imputed complete data sets, and pooled by Rubin's rule to draw inference.p-value: 0.007795% CI: [-0.7, -0.1]Pattern Mixture model
Secondary

Anti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)

Number of participants with the presence or absence (yes/no) of anti-semaglutide binding antibodies cross reacting with native GLP-1 in blood anytime post-baseline (week 0) and up to week 57. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on the in-trial observation period was presented. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week 0 - 57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)No49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)No49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)Yes1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)No47 Participants
Secondary

Anti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies (Yes/no)

Number of participants with the presence or absence (yes/no) of anti-semaglutide binding antibodies in blood anytime post-baseline (week 0) and up to week 57. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on the in-trial observation period was presented. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week 0 - 57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies (Yes/no)Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies (Yes/no)No49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies (Yes/no)Yes1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies (Yes/no)No48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies (Yes/no)Yes1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibodies (Yes/no)No47 Participants
Secondary

Anti-semaglutide Binding Antibody Levels

This outcome measure is only applicable for the oral semaglutide treatment arms (3 mg, 7 mg and 14 mg). It is based on the data from participants who were measured with anti-semaglutide antibodies anytime during post-baseline visits (weeks 0-57). Results are presented as percentage of bound radioactivity-labelled semaglutide /total added radioactivity-labelled semaglutide (%B/T). Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Weeks 0-57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed=number of participants who were found positive for anti-semaglutide antibodies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibody LevelsWeek 81.58 %B/TStandard Deviation 0
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibody LevelsWeek 382.40 %B/TStandard Deviation 0
UnknownAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibody LevelsWeek 26 %B/T
UnknownAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibody LevelsWeek 4 %B/T
UnknownAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibody LevelsWeek 57 %B/T
UnknownAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibody LevelsWeek 52 %B/T
UnknownAnti-semaglutide Binding Antibody LevelsWeek 14 %B/T
Secondary

Anti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)

Number of participants with the presence or absence (yes/no) of anti-semaglutide neutralising antibodies cross reacting with native GLP-1 in blood anytime post-baseline (week 0) and up to week 57. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on the in-trial observation period was presented. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week 0 - 57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)No49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)No49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies Cross Reacting With Native GLP-1 (Yes/no)No48 Participants
Secondary

Anti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies (Yes/no)

Number of participants with the presence or absence (yes/no) of anti-semaglutide neutralising antibodies in blood anytime post-baseline (week 0) and up to week 57. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on the in-trial observation period is presented. The in-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week 0 - 57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies (Yes/no)Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies (Yes/no)No49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies (Yes/no)Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies (Yes/no)No49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies (Yes/no)Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgAnti-semaglutide Neutralising Antibodies (Yes/no)No48 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domains

DTR-QOL questionnaire is a 29-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the the influence of diabetes treatment on HRQoL. DTR-QOL questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 4 domains on individual scale ranges: Burden on social activities and daily activities, Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment, Hypoglycemia and Satisfaction with treatment on a 7-point graded response scale. Higher item scores indicate a higher level of HRQoL for items 1-25. For items 26-29 a higher score indicates a lower level of HRQoL. The domain score is calculated from the mean score of the attribute items, and the scoring range is converted to 0 - 100. W26 and W52 refer to week 26 and week 52 respectively. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period was presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Burden on social and daily activities5.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.31
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Burden on social and daily activities9.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.06
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment6.49 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.32
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment4.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.32
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Hypoglycemia8.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Hypoglycemia5.81 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.07
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Satisfaction with treatment8.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.39
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Satisfaction with treatment4.61 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.47
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment10.46 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.27
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Hypoglycemia1.26 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.51
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Burden on social and daily activities5.87 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.06
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment5.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.52
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Burden on social and daily activities5.49 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.19
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Satisfaction with treatment10.85 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.74
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Hypoglycemia3.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.08
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Satisfaction with treatment14.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.21
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Satisfaction with treatment17.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Satisfaction with treatment16.16 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment10.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.04
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Hypoglycemia8.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.15
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment14.68 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.01
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Burden on social and daily activities3.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.66
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Burden on social and daily activities7.90 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.55
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Hypoglycemia9.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.95
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Burden on social and daily activities7.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.73
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment13.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.99
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment7.01 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.45
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Hypoglycemia3.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.53
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Hypoglycemia4.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.94
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Satisfaction with treatment8.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.64
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Burden on social and daily activities10.11 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.38
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Satisfaction with treatment7.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment-2.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Satisfaction with treatment-5.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment1.83 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.91
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Satisfaction with treatment-3.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW26: Burden on social and daily activities6.91 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Hypoglycemia6.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsW52: Burden on social and daily activities2.90 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Hypoglycemia7.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total Score

Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL (DTR-QOL) questionnaire is a 29-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the influence of diabetes treatment on HRQoL on 4 domains on individual scale ranges: Burden on social activities and daily activities, Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment, Hypoglycemia and Satisfaction with treatment on a 7-point graded response scale. Higher item scores indicate a higher level of HRQoL for items 1-25. For items 26-29 a higher score indicates a lower level of HRQoL. The domain score is calculated from the mean score of the attribute items, and the scoring range is converted to 0 - 100. The total score, after simple addition of the item scores, is converted to 0 - 100 (best-case response = 100; worstcase response = 0). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 266.67 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.81
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 526.97 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.47
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 267.98 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.47
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 525.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.29
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 2611.22 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.99
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 528.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.09
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 527.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.09
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 269.77 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 264.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DTR-QOL: Total ScoreWeek 520.57 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.53
Secondary

Change in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)

Change in amylase (measured as units per liter \[U/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment observation period is presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.03 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.1
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.06 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.10 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.10 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.16 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.12 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.06 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.07 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.7
PlaceboChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.02 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.9
PlaceboChange in Amylase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.02 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.7
Secondary

Change in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in beta-cell function (measured as percentage of beta-cell function) by homeostatic model assessment index of beta-cell function is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.71 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.6
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.36 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.6
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.93 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.75 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.2
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.95 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.86 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.3
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.69 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.2
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.89 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.2
PlaceboChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.00 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.7
PlaceboChange in Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.89 Ratio of beta-cell functionGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.2
Secondary

Change in Blood Pressure

Change from baseline in blood pressure (systolic \[sBP\] and diastolic \[dBP\]). Data based on on-treatment observation period is presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: sBP-3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 13
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: sBP-0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: dBP-0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: dBP-1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: sBP-5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: dBP-0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: sBP-1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: dBP-2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: dBP-0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: sBP-1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: dBP1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 6
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: sBP-2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: sBP-1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 13
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: sBP1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: dBP-0 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: dBP-1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
PlaceboChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: dBP-2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 8
PlaceboChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: dBP-3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10
PlaceboChange in Blood PressureWeek 52: sBP-3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
PlaceboChange in Blood PressureWeek 26: sBP-4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11
Secondary

Change in Body Mass Index

Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI). BMI was calculated based on body weight and height based on the formulae: BMI kg/m\^2 = body weight (kg)/(Height (m) x Height (m)). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 26-0.1 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 0.7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 520.0 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 0.9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 26-0.4 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 0.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 52-0.3 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 0.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 26-0.9 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 1.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 52-1.1 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 1.5
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 520.2 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 0.7
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 260.0 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 26-0.4 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboChange in Body Mass IndexWeek 52-0.4 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (%)

Relative change (%) from baseline (week 0) in body weight (kg). Data based on on-treatment without resue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Weight (%)Week 26-0.64 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.65
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Weight (%)Week 52-0.03 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.25
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Weight (%)Week 26-1.63 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.78
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Weight (%)Week 52-1.23 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.09
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Weight (%)Week 26-3.54 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.33
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Weight (%)Week 52-4.42 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.91
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Body Weight (%)Week 520.68 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.73
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Body Weight (%)Week 260.08 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.23
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (%)Week 26-1.58 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.27
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (%)Week 52-1.42 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.47
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (kg)

Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 26-0.4 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.9
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 520.0 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.4
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 26-1.2 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 52-0.8 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 26-2.4 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 3
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 52-2.9 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 3.9
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 520.5 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 2
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 260.1 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 26-1.1 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (kg)Week 52-1.0 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

Change in ECG Evaluation

Electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated and interpreted by the investigator and categorised as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). The number of participants who had shifted from normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS ECG results from baseline (week 0) to week 26, week 52 is presented. Data based on in-trial observation period is presented. In-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 26)2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 52)2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 52)3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 52)37 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 26)3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 26)34 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 26)41 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 26)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 52)40 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 52)2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 52)2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 26)39 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 26)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 52)36 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 26)3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 52)1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 52)0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 26)38 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 52)37 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)2 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 52)2 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)2 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)3 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 26)1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)4 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 26)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)2 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 52)39 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 26)1 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 52)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)1 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)6 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)1 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to normal (week 26)39 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 26)2 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to normal (week 52)3 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to normal (week 26)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal CS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationNormal (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 52)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal CS (week 26)0 Participants
PlaceboChange in ECG EvaluationAbnormal NCS (week 0) to abnormal NCS (week 52)4 Participants
Secondary

Change in Eye Examination Category

Eye examination was performed by the investigator and categorised as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Data based on in-trial observation period is presented. In-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Week -8, Week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Normal36 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal CS6 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal CS5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Normal39 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal CS6 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal CS5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Normal39 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal NCS4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal NCS4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Normal42 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Normal36 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal NCS7 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal CS4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal CS4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Normal36 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Normal37 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal NCS4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal CS7 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal CS7 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Normal38 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal CS3 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Normal39 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Normal37 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal NCS6 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal CS5 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Normal37 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal CS3 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Normal38 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal NCS7 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Normal41 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Normal44 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Normal39 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal CS5 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Abnormal NCS5 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Left eye- Normal39 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal CS6 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek -8: Right eye- Abnormal NCS4 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Right eye- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal CS5 Participants
PlaceboChange in Eye Examination CategoryWeek 52: Left eye- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
Secondary

Change in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting C-peptide (measured as nanomoles per liter \[nmol/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.15 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.2
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.12 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.24 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.19 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.17 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.10 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.2
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.11 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.1
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.18 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.3
PlaceboChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.98 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.7
PlaceboChange in Fasting C-peptide (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.99 Ratio of C-peptideGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6
Secondary

Change in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting glucagon (measured as picograms per milliliter \[pg/mL\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.95 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.3
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.97 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.89 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.95 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.85 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.92 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.8
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.93 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.4
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.91 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.7
PlaceboChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.95 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16
PlaceboChange in Fasting Glucagon (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.96 Ratio of glucagonGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.2
Secondary

Change in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting insulin (measured as picomoles per liter \[pmol/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.19 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.9
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.07 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.27 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.16 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.10 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.04 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.2
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.06 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.9
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.14 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.1
PlaceboChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.92 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.2
PlaceboChange in Fasting Insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.93 Ratio of insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.8
Secondary

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting plasma glucose. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 26-1.62 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.74
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 52-1.13 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.82
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 26-1.60 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.74
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 52-1.60 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.22
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 26-2.37 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.84
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 52-2.29 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.62
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 52-2.28 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.09
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 26-2.48 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.76
PlaceboChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 26-0.37 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 520.33 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.31
Secondary

Change in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting pro-insulin/insulin ratio is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.59 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.78 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.54 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.67 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.2
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.49 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.56 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.6
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.69 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.3
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.55 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.3
PlaceboChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.92 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.1
PlaceboChange in Fasting Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.11 Ratio of pro-insulin/insulin ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.2
Secondary

Change in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting pro-insulin (measured as pmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.69 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 52.7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.83 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46.6
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.68 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.78 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.51 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 77.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.56 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 68.6
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.72 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.4
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.61 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49
PlaceboChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.85 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.6
PlaceboChange in Fasting Pro-insulin (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.04 Ratio of pro-insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.9
Secondary

Change in HbA1c (Week 52)

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in HbA1c. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 52)-1.0 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 52)-1.4 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 52)-1.5 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.8
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in HbA1c (Week 52)-1.3 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange in HbA1c (Week 52)0.1 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Change in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.97 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.8
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.05 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.98 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.01 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.2
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.96 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.99 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.2
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.98 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.99 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11.5
PlaceboChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.03 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11.7
PlaceboChange in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.04 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10.5
Secondary

Change in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in insulin resistance (measured as percentage of insulin resistance) by homeostatic model assessment index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.98 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.93 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.02 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 66
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.95 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.83 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 58.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.78 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 62
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.82 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 51.2
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.86 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46.3
PlaceboChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.88 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43.8
PlaceboChange in Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.97 Ratio of insulin resistanceGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.6
Secondary

Change in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.99 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.1
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.87 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.6
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.89 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.96 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.91 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.85 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.91 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.4
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.95 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.3
PlaceboChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.03 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.8
PlaceboChange in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.06 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23
Secondary

Change in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)

Change in lipase (measured as U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment observation period is presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.25 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.29 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.35 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.5
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.41 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.61 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 67.4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.47 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.9
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.60 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46.8
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.47 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 52.1
PlaceboChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 261.04 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.5
PlaceboChange in Lipase (Ratio to Baseine)Week 521.03 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.7
Secondary

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPG

Change from baseline (week 0) in the average of the post-prandial increments over all meals. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 26-0.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 52-0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 26-1.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 52-0.9 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 26-2.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 52-2.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 52-0.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 26-1.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 26-0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
PlaceboChange in Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals in SMPGWeek 52-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination

Physical examination included examination of cardiovascular system, nervous system (central and peripheral), gastrointestinal system including mouth, general appearence, head and neck (head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck), lymph node palpation, musculoskeletal system, respiratory system, skin and thyroid gland. Physical examination was performed by the investigator and categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Data based on in-trial observation period is presented. In-trial observation period - time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Baseline (Week -8), week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Normal43 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Normal42 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid - Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys - Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal43 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Normal41 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS4 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Normal42 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Normal43 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid - Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys - Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Normal49 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys - Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Normal43 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Normal43 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Normal46 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS2 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Normal45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Normal44 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal CS3 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid - Normal48 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Normal47 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Normal47 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Normal47 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Normal44 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Normal44 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Normal43 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal44 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Normal48 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Normal44 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Normal43 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Normal48 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys - Normal44 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Normal48 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Normal44 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid - Normal48 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Normal48 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Normal44 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Normal47 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Normal44 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal47 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Normal45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Normal44 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS4 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Normal46 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Normal42 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS6 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: General appearance- Normal46 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Normal48 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Normal43 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal NCS6 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: General appearance- Normal46 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Musculoskeletal- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal47 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Gastrointestinal sys - Normal48 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Gastrointestinal sys- Normal48 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Respiratory sys- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Normal45 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Abnormal NCS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Nervous system- Normal48 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Skin- Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Nervous system- Normal48 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Normal45 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Skin- Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Cardiovascular- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Normal46 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Thyroid- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal NCS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Cardiovascular- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Skin- Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Cardiovascular- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Head and neck- Normal44 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Thyroid - Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Head and neck- Normal44 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Nervous system- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 26: Lymph node- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Normal49 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Abnormal NCS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: Lymph node- Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek -8: Head and neck- Normal46 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationWeek 52: General appearance- Abnormal CS0 Participants
Secondary

Change in Pulse Rate

Change from baseline in pulse rate. Data based on on-treatment observation period is presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 261 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 521 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 262 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 9
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 523 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 7
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 262 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 524 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 10
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 522 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 9
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Pulse RateWeek 262 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 9
PlaceboChange in Pulse RateWeek 260 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 8
PlaceboChange in Pulse RateWeek 520 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 7
Secondary

Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point Profile

Change from baseline (week 0) in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profile. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point profile was defined as the area under the profile, calculated using the trapezoidal method, divided by the measurement time. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 26-2.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 52-1.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 26-2.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 52-2.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 52-3.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 26-3.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 52-2.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 26-2.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 52-0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.7
PlaceboChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 26-0.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

Change in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)

Change in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain MCS from baseline (week 0) to week 56. SF- 36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The MCS measure is derived from domain scales of vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 26-1.81 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.23
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 52-1.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.63
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 260.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.62
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 52-0.58 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.02
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 26-1.61 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.14
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 52-1.16 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 520.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.44
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 260.49 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.09
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 26-2.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.42
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 52-1.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.43
Secondary

Change in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)

Change in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain PCS from baseline (week 0) to week 56. SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. It consists of 2 component summary measures that further summarize 8 health domain scales. The PCS measure is derived from domain scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 26-1.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.56
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 52-1.28 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.03
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 26-0.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.28
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 52-0.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 260.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.49
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 520.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.05
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 520.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.42
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 26-0.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 260.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 52-0.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
Secondary

Change in SF-36: Sub-domains

SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in the sub-domain scores is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Mental Health-2.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.63
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Vitality-1.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.84
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: General Health-0.99 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.07
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Physical Functioning-0.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.63
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Vitality-2.85 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.85
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Physical Functioning-0.22 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Mental Health-1.90 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Physical-1.79 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.91
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Emotional-0.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.94
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Physical-2.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.94
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Emotional-1.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.21
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Bodily Pain-2.02 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.92
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Social Functioning-0.78 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.67
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Bodily Pain-2.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.02
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Social Functioning-0.11 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.25
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: General Health-2.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.49
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Social Functioning0.77 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.94
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Vitality-0.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.63
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: General Health0.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.29
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Emotional-0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.03
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: General Health-1.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.38
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Bodily Pain-0.16 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.78
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Vitality-0.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.83
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Mental Health-0.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.38
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Physical Functioning0.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Bodily Pain-0.89 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.93
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Mental Health0.77 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.56
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Physical0.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.84
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Social Functioning-0.58 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.92
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Physical0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.48
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Physical Functioning-0.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Emotional0.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Physical-0.86 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.69
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Physical Functioning0.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Physical Functioning-0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.42
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Physical0.05 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.31
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Bodily Pain1.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.21
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Bodily Pain0.03 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: General Health0.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.33
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: General Health-0.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Vitality-1.49 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.93
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Vitality-1.06 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.08
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Social Functioning-0.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.62
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Social Functioning0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Emotional0.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Emotional-0.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.86
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Mental Health-2.36 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.23
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Mental Health-1.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.12
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Vitality-0.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.17
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Bodily Pain0.98 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.09
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Social Functioning-0.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.12
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Bodily Pain0.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.09
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Social Functioning-0.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.53
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Physical-0.59 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.55
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Physical Functioning0.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Emotional-0.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.72
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Physical0.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.51
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Emotional-0.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.67
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Physical Functioning-0.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: General Health0.62 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.34
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Mental Health0.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.82
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Vitality-0.18 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.07
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: General Health-0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.87
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Mental Health1.71 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Emotional-1.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Vitality-1.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.55
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Bodily Pain-0.79 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Role-Physical-0.86 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Mental Health-2.17 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.81
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: General Health-0.99 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.96
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Social Functioning-1.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.52
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Bodily Pain-0.19 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.19
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Mental Health-1.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.49
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Physical Functioning-0.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: General Health-0.08 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.06
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Social Functioning-1.16 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.72
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Physical-0.58 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.99
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Role-Emotional-1.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.31
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 52: Physical Functioning-0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 26: Vitality-1.99 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.66
Secondary

Change in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in total cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.92 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.6
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.99 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.93 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.7
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.95 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10.6
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.89 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.6
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.93 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.9
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.95 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.94 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.6
PlaceboChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.00 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.3
PlaceboChange in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 521.01 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15
Secondary

Change in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in triglycerides (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.03 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.2
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.86 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.3
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.94 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.3
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.84 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.3
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.93 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.86 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.4
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.87 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.5
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.99 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.5
PlaceboChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.87 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.7
PlaceboChange in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.82 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.7
Secondary

Change in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline (week 0) in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 261.02 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.86 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.3
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.94 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.2
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.84 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.3
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.93 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.4
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.86 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.3
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.87 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.99 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.1
PlaceboChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 260.87 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.4
PlaceboChange in VLDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)Week 520.81 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.6
Secondary

Change in Waist Circumference

Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 260.5 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 3.9
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 520.2 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 4.5
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 52-1.0 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 2.8
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 26-0.6 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 2.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 52-2.7 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 4.8
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 26-1.3 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 3.8
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 260.0 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 2.7
Liraglutide 0.9 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 521.0 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 3.7
PlaceboChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 52-0.9 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 3
PlaceboChange in Waist CircumferenceWeek 26-0.5 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event (AE) with onset in the on-treatment observation period (time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any, and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation) assessed up to approximately 57 weeks (52 weeks treatment period + 5 weeks follow-up period).

Time frame: Weeks 0 - 57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = safety analysis set (SAS) which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)119 Adverse events
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)111 Adverse events
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)96 Adverse events
Liraglutide 0.9 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)116 Adverse events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)106 Adverse events
Secondary

Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Hypoglycaemic episodes defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Data based on on-treatment observation period was presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.

Time frame: Week 0 - 57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes0 Episodes
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes0 Episodes
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes0 Episodes
Liraglutide 0.9 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes2 Episodes
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes0 Episodes
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)

Participants who achieved HbA1c \<7.0% (53 millimoles per mole \[mmol/mol\]) according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) target, at week 26 and week 52. Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26Yes24 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26No19 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52Yes19 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52No19 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26Yes33 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52No14 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26No12 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52Yes29 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52No8 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26No9 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52Yes33 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26Yes35 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26Yes24 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26No21 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52No21 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52Yes20 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52No30 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 52Yes4 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26No35 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)Week 26Yes6 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)

Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Number of participants who achieved HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without severe or blood glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes and no weight gain (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52Yes12 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26No28 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26Yes15 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52No26 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26Yes26 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52No19 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26No19 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52Yes24 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52Yes28 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52No13 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26Yes30 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26No14 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26No30 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26Yes15 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52No32 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52Yes9 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52Yes4 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26No37 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 26Yes4 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)Week 52No30 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)

Participants who achieved HbA1c below or equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/mol), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists target (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26Yes13 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26No30 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52Yes11 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52No27 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26Yes24 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52No23 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26No21 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52Yes20 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52No17 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26No16 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52Yes24 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26Yes28 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26Yes16 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26No29 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52No30 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52Yes11 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52No33 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 52Yes1 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26No39 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target (Yes/No)Week 26Yes2 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%

Participants who achieved above or equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/mol) reduction in HbA1c and losing 3% or more of baseline body weight (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26Yes7 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26No36 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52Yes8 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52No30 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26Yes11 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52No36 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26No34 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52Yes7 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52No21 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26No23 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52Yes20 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26Yes21 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26Yes5 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26No40 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52No39 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52Yes2 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52No33 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 52Yes1 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26No38 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Above or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss Above or Equal to 3%Week 26Yes3 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)

Participants losing 10% or more of baseline body weight (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26No43 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52No38 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52No42 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26No45 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52No35 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26No41 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes6 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes3 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26No45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52No41 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52No34 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26No41 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes0 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)

Participants losing 5% or more of baseline body weight (Yes/No). Data based on on-treatment without rescue medication observation period is presented. The on-treatment without rescue medication observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26No42 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes1 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52No37 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52No38 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26No40 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes5 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52No24 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26No28 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes17 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes16 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26No45 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52No39 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes2 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52No32 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 52Yes2 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26No38 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Weight Loss Above or Equal to 5% (Yes/No)Week 26Yes3 Participants
Secondary

Participants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Number of participants with treatment emergent severe or blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes. Hypoglycaemic episodes defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Data based on on-treatment observation period was presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.

Time frame: Weeks 0 - 57

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = SAS which comprised all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgParticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgParticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes0 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgParticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes0 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgParticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes2 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes0 Participants
Secondary

Semaglutide Plasma Concentration

Semaglutide plasma concentration is presented. Samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were drawn at any time during the visit except for the visit at week 26 where samples were taken both pre-dose and 60-90 minutes post dosing. This endpoint is applicable only to the reporting groups, Oral semaglutide 3 mg, Oral semaglutide 7 mg and Oral semaglutide 14 mg. Data based on on-treatment observation period was presented. The on-treatment observation period - time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluding any period after premature trial product discontinuation.

Time frame: Week 26 and week 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgSemaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 26 post-dose5.3 Nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 92.9
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgSemaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 26 pre-dose3.7 Nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 96.7
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgSemaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 523.2 Nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 89.1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgSemaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 26 post-dose13.9 Nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.3
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgSemaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 26 pre-dose9.5 Nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.1
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgSemaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 529.2 Nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 96.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgSemaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 26 pre-dose20.6 Nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 92.5
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgSemaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 5220.0 Nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 148.9
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgSemaglutide Plasma ConcentrationWeek 26 post-dose30.7 Nanomoles per liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.9
Secondary

Time to Additional Anti-diabetic Medication

Presented results are the number of participants who had taken additional anti-diabetic medication anytime from week 0 to week 52. 'Additional anti-diabetic medication': use of new anti-diabetic medication for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation and before (planned) end-of-treatment. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of trial product.

Time frame: Weeks 0 - 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 263 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 528 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 526 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 263 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 524 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 261 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 260 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 524 Participants
PlaceboTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 5215 Participants
PlaceboTime to Additional Anti-diabetic MedicationUp to Week 267 Participants
Comparison: Time to initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Withdrawal for any reason or lost to follow-up contributed to the analysis as events (initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication). Censoring time was one day before planned end of treatment.p-value: 0.257995% CI: [0.29, 1.4]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Withdrawal for any reason or lost to follow-up contributed to the analysis as events (initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication). Censoring time was one day before planned end of treatment.p-value: 0.005295% CI: [0.1, 0.66]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Withdrawal for any reason or lost to follow-up contributed to the analysis as events (initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication). Censoring time was one day before planned end of treatment.p-value: 0.025995% CI: [0.11, 0.87]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Withdrawal for any reason or lost to follow-up contributed to the analysis as events (initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication). Censoring time was one day before planned end of treatment.p-value: 0.067495% CI: [0.93, 7.8]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Withdrawal for any reason or lost to follow-up contributed to the analysis as events (initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication). Censoring time was one day before planned end of treatment.p-value: 0.908795% CI: [0.32, 3.54]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Withdrawal for any reason or lost to follow-up contributed to the analysis as events (initiation of additional anti-diabetic medication). Censoring time was one day before planned end of treatment.p-value: 0.649895% CI: [0.38, 4.62]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Time to Rescue Medication

Presented results are the number of participants who had taken rescue medication anytime from week 0 to week 52. 'Rescue medication': use of new anti-diabetic medication as add-on to trial product and used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation and before last day on trial product. Time to rescue medication was estimated based on data from on-treatment without rescue medication observation period.

Time frame: Weeks 0 - 52

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed = FAS which comprised all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 262 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 3 mgTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 527 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 262 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 7 mgTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 525 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 261 Participants
Oral Semaglutide 14 mgTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 524 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 523 Participants
Liraglutide 0.9 mgTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 260 Participants
PlaceboTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 267 Participants
PlaceboTime to Rescue MedicationUp to Week 5215 Participants
Comparison: Time to initiation of rescue medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Censoring time was one day before last day on trial product.p-value: 0.021995% CI: [0.14, 0.86]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of rescue medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Censoring time was one day before last day on trial product.p-value: 0.000595% CI: [0.05, 0.44]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of rescue medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Censoring time was one day before last day on trial product.p-value: 0.009895% CI: [0.07, 0.7]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of rescue medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Censoring time was one day before last day on trial product.p-value: 0.119395% CI: [0.76, 11.46]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of rescue medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Censoring time was one day before last day on trial product.p-value: 0.714795% CI: [0.31, 5.56]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Time to initiation of rescue medication was analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and stratification factor as categorical fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Censoring time was one day before last day on trial product.p-value: 0.376595% CI: [0.44, 8.85]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026