Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Placebo Effect
Conditions
Keywords
Patient-Therapist Interaction, Non-Specific Effects, Manual Therapy, Neurodynamics, Sham
Brief summary
The mechanism responsible for improvement following manual physical therapy techniques is unknown. Previous studies have indicated both biomechanical and neurophysiologic effects which may be responsible for clinical changes observed. Yet, other studies report clinical changes following sham interventions. Through a mixed-methods design, this study aims to gain more understanding of the social and contextual factors that may be related to the improvement often observed following manual therapy techniques.
Detailed description
A convenience sample will be utilized to obtain subjects. Subjects will be given a brief questionnaire to identify possible contraindications for manual therapy treatment techniques and exclude individuals if necessary. Subjects will be randomized into one of eight groups (three variables, each with two conditions including: therapist gender match/mismatch, lab coat worn/not worn, detailed explanation/colloquial conversation about the technique) and participate in neurodynamic testing for the upper quarter via the Upper Limb Provocation Test. Subjects who are determined to be positive for one or more extremities will receive a sham thoracic spine manipulation technique. After application of the technique, previously positive limbs will be retested. Individuals who respond favorably to the sham technique upon reassessment will participate in an exit interview with open-ended questions in attempt to gain more insight into the factors which may have influenced their neurodynamic mobility improvement.
Interventions
PROCEDURESpinal Manual Therapy
Supine thoracic spine sham manipulation located between the levels of T4-7; identical procedure as an active treatment intervention but without the delivery of a high velocity low amplitude thrust
Sponsors
Shenandoah University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Upper Limb Provocation Test results with limitation greater than 60 deg of elbow extension at the time of measurement
Exclusion criteria
* History of cervical or lumbar pain requiring medical intervention within the last two years, history of upper or lower extremity paresthesia/numbness, self reported bone density disorders, previous spinal cord injury, diagnosed intervertebral disc herniation, previous diagnosis of spinal stenosis or disc pathology, current pregnancy, history of circulatory or neurological disorders, history of spine and extremity fractures or dislocations in the last two years
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Upper Limb Provocation Test (ULPT) | Baseline and Immediately Post Intervention | Subjects will lie on their back with their shoulder slightly off the edge of a treatment table. The investigator will sidebend the subjects neck away from the extremity being tested and gradually move the extremity into the following positions: scapular depression, shoulder 90 deg abduction, shoulder 90 deg external rotation, forearm supination, wrist/finger extension, and elbow extension. The investigator will assess for symptoms at each phase throughout the test. At the onset of symptoms, sensitization maneuvers will be completed to determine if the origin of the symptoms is neurodynamic in nature and not myofascial. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed