Skip to content

Edwards Cardioband System ACTIVE Pivotal Clinical Trial (ACTIVE)

Annular ReduCtion for Transcatheter Treatment of Insufficient Mitral ValvE (ACTIVE): A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial to Assess Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair With Edwards Cardioband System and GDMT vs GDMT Alone in Patients With FMR and Heart Failure

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03016975
Acronym
ACTIVE
Enrollment
12
Registered
2017-01-11
Start date
2017-06-01
Completion date
2022-09-20
Last updated
2023-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Insufficiency, Mitral Regurgitation

Keywords

Edwards Cardioband, Mitral Valve, Transcatheter, Mitral repair, Functional mitral regurgitation, Secondary mitral regurgitation, Annuloplasty

Brief summary

To establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards Cardioband System in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR).

Detailed description

The ACTIVE Trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Patients with clinically significant functional mitral regurgitation will be randomized 2:1 to receive either transcatheter mitral valve repair with the Edwards Cardioband System plus guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) or GDMT alone. Patients will be seen for follow-up visits at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and annually through 5 years.

Interventions

Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the Edwards Cardioband System

Sponsors

Edwards Lifesciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years; * Clinically Significant Functional Mitral Regurgitation (MR); * Symptomatic heart failure; * Patient hospitalized due to heart failure during 12 months prior to submission to Central Screening Committee OR elevated Brain Natriuretic Peptid (BNP); * Patient is able and willing to give informed consent and follow protocol procedures, and comply with follow-up visit compliance.

Exclusion criteria

* Primarily degenerative MR; * Mitral annular calcification that would impede implantation of device; * Other severe valve disorders requiring intervention; * Mitral valve anatomy which may preclude proper Edwards Cardioband deployment; * Life expectancy of less than twelve months; * Patient is participating in concomitant research studies of investigational products which have not reached their primary endpoint; * Unwillingness or inability to undergo follow-up investigations/visits; * Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that precludes appropriate consent and follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of MR ≤ 2+ and Hierarchical Comparison of Randomized Device and Randomized Control Groups [Cardiovascular Death, Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations, Improvement in 6 MWT Distance (in Meters) and KCCQ (Number of Points Improved)].1 yearHierarchical comparison of device and control groups (for randomized groups): MR ≤ 2+ and cardiovascular death, number of heart failure hospitalizations, improvement in 6 MWT distance (in meters) and KCCQ (number of points improved).
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAE) [Device Group Only]30 daysOverall rate of device and procedure related Major Adverse Events (MAEs) through 30 days post procedure (including death, stroke, myocardial infarction, pericardial effusion requiring drainage, left circumflex coronary artery injury requiring intervention, mitral valve reintervention, and access site and vascular complications requiring intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device Success30 daysDevice is deployed as intended and the delivery system is successfully retrieved as intended at the time of the patient's exit from the cardiac catheterization laboratory (per device analysis).
Secondary Safety Endpoints [Device Group Only]30 daysComponents will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals 1. Death 2. Stroke 3. Myocardial infarction 4. Pericardial effusion requiring drainage 5. Mitral valve reintervention 6. Access site and vascular complications requiring intervention 7. Left circumflex coronary artery injury requiring intervention 8. Need for a new permanent pacemaker
Clinical Success30 daysProcedural success with evidence of MR reduction ≤ MR2+ and without MAEs\* at 30 days (per patient analysis). \*Major adverse events (MAE) defined as death, stroke, myocardial infarction, pericardial effusion requiring drainage, left circumflex coronary artery injury requiring intervention, mitral valve reintervention and access site and vascular complications requiring intervention.
Procedural Success30 daysDevice success with evidence of MR reduction to ≤ MR2+ at discharge and without the need for a surgical or percutaneous intervention prior to hospital discharge (per patient analysis).
Secondary Endpoints Through 1 Year (Powered for Randomized Arms Only)1 yearThe following key secondary efficacy endpoints will be tested in comparison to control in a hierarchical order to preserve statistical power. 1. MR ≤ 1+ 2. NYHA Class 3. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) 4. 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) 5. SF-36v2 Health Survey (SF-36) 6. Heart Failure Hospitalizations 7. Cardiovascular mortality

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Roll-in
Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the Edwards Cardioband System plus guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT). This patient group is treated by physicians requiring additional training prior to beginning randomized cohort enrollment.
12
Experimental: Edwards Cardioband System
Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the Edwards Cardioband System plus guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT)
0
Control: No Intervention
Guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT)
0
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
At 2 Year Follow-upDeath100
At 30 Days Follow-upSubject is a Screen failure100
At 3 Year Follow-upDeath100
At 3 Year Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject100
At 4-year Follow-upExited Study for other reasons100
At 6 Months Follow-upAborted implant100
At 6 Months Follow-upDeath200
At 6 Months Follow-upRe-attempt procedure100
At 6 Months Follow-upSubject withdrawn by investigator100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRoll-inTotal
Age, Continuous71.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
71.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
NYHA Functional Class
Class 1
0 Participants0 Participants
NYHA Functional Class
Class II
5 Participants5 Participants
NYHA Functional Class
Class III
6 Participants6 Participants
NYHA Functional Class
Class IV
1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 120 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 120 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 120 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAE) [Device Group Only]

Overall rate of device and procedure related Major Adverse Events (MAEs) through 30 days post procedure (including death, stroke, myocardial infarction, pericardial effusion requiring drainage, left circumflex coronary artery injury requiring intervention, mitral valve reintervention, and access site and vascular complications requiring intervention

Time frame: 30 days

Population: No patients were randomized, therefore no data was collected in the randomized phase.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental: Edwards Cardioband SystemNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAE) [Device Group Only]0 Participants
Primary

Prevalence of MR ≤ 2+ and Hierarchical Comparison of Randomized Device and Randomized Control Groups [Cardiovascular Death, Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations, Improvement in 6 MWT Distance (in Meters) and KCCQ (Number of Points Improved)].

Hierarchical comparison of device and control groups (for randomized groups): MR ≤ 2+ and cardiovascular death, number of heart failure hospitalizations, improvement in 6 MWT distance (in meters) and KCCQ (number of points improved).

Time frame: 1 year

Population: No patients were randomized, therefore no data was collected. This parameter is meant to be analyzed in hierarchical order for the randomized arms only.

Secondary

Clinical Success

Procedural success with evidence of MR reduction ≤ MR2+ and without MAEs\* at 30 days (per patient analysis). \*Major adverse events (MAE) defined as death, stroke, myocardial infarction, pericardial effusion requiring drainage, left circumflex coronary artery injury requiring intervention, mitral valve reintervention and access site and vascular complications requiring intervention.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: No patients were randomized, therefore no data was collected in the randomized phase.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental: Edwards Cardioband SystemClinical Success7 Participants
Secondary

Device Success

Device is deployed as intended and the delivery system is successfully retrieved as intended at the time of the patient's exit from the cardiac catheterization laboratory (per device analysis).

Time frame: 30 days

Population: No patients were randomized, therefore no data was collected in the randomized phase.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental: Edwards Cardioband SystemDevice Success8 Participants
Secondary

Procedural Success

Device success with evidence of MR reduction to ≤ MR2+ at discharge and without the need for a surgical or percutaneous intervention prior to hospital discharge (per patient analysis).

Time frame: 30 days

Population: No patients were randomized, therefore no data was collected in the randomized phase.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental: Edwards Cardioband SystemProcedural Success7 Participants
Secondary

Secondary Endpoints Through 1 Year (Powered for Randomized Arms Only)

The following key secondary efficacy endpoints will be tested in comparison to control in a hierarchical order to preserve statistical power. 1. MR ≤ 1+ 2. NYHA Class 3. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) 4. 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) 5. SF-36v2 Health Survey (SF-36) 6. Heart Failure Hospitalizations 7. Cardiovascular mortality

Time frame: 1 year

Population: No patients were randomized, therefore no data was collected. The parameter is meant to be analyzed in hierarchical order for the randomized arms only.

Secondary

Secondary Safety Endpoints [Device Group Only]

Components will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals 1. Death 2. Stroke 3. Myocardial infarction 4. Pericardial effusion requiring drainage 5. Mitral valve reintervention 6. Access site and vascular complications requiring intervention 7. Left circumflex coronary artery injury requiring intervention 8. Need for a new permanent pacemaker

Time frame: 30 days

Population: No patients were randomized, therefore no data was collected

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental: Edwards Cardioband SystemSecondary Safety Endpoints [Device Group Only]0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026