Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Immunogenicity of Various Schedules of Inactivated Polio Vaccine

A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Humoral Immunogenicity of Various Schedules of Intramuscular Full Dose and Intradermal Fractional Dose of Inactivated Polio Vaccine in Infants

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03016949
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-01-11
Start date
2017-07-31
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2017-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Poliomyelitis

Brief summary

The study will evaluate the humoral immunogenicity in various schedule combinations of full dose inactivated polio vaccines (IPV) via intramuscular administration (IM) and of the fractional dose of inactivated poliovaccine (f-IPV) via intradermal administration (ID).

Detailed description

The study will be conducted in a setting where only IPV is being used for polio prevention in infant immunization schedules. The study population will include infants from Uruguay, a pioneer country in immunization programs in Latin America, where tOPV(trivalent oral polio vaccine) was used until 2012, after which the program changed to an all-IPV schedule without transition. The primary IPV immunization schedule in the country is as stand-alone vaccine at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, with a booster dose at 15 months. This setting allows the evaluation of IPV immunogenicity in a scenario where the circulation of any poliovirus is highly unlikely. Infants will receive two or three doses of full dose IPV IM or fractional dose f-IPV ID, in various schedule combinations (6 and 14 weeks; 10 and 14 weeks; 14 and 36 weeks; 6, 14 and 36 weeks; 10, 14 and 36 weeks). Immunological and safety assessments will be made after one dose, two doses and three doses. The study will be conducted in Montevideo, Uruguay and a total of 1493 infants will be randomized into 6 groups. Other vaccines comprise DTPw-HB-Hib (pentavalent combined diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-hepatitis B-Hib vaccine), Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, Rotavirus and will be administered concomitantly. Optimum immunogenicity expected from the dose/s of IPV in the post-eradication era will have to be balanced with the cost and supply constraints of IPV. This study will be critical to determine how many doses of IPV and which schedule will be recommended for the post-eradication era after the cessation of OPV (oral polio vaccine) usage globally.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIPV

Comparison of different vaccination schedules with 2 different vaccines (IPV and f-IPV) and 2 different types of administration (IM and ID)

BIOLOGICALf-IPV

Comparison of different vaccination schedules with 2 different vaccines (IPV and f-IPV) and 2 different types of administration (IM and ID)

Sponsors

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Fidec Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Weeks to 7 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Infants of 6 weeks of age (-7 to + 7 days) on date of first vaccination * Healthy, as assessed from medical history and physical examination by a study physician * Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal representatives that they have been properly informed about the study and are able to comply with planned study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Vaccinated with any poliovirus vaccine prior to inclusion * A household contact with OPV vaccination history in the past 4 weeks * HIV infection or pharmacologic immunosuppression. * Known allergy to any component of the study vaccines (phenoxyethanol, formaldehyde) * Uncontrolled coagulopathy or blood disorder contraindicating intramuscular and intradermal injections. * Acute severe febrile illness on day of vaccination deemed by the Investigator to be a contraindication for vaccination. * Not suitable for inclusion or is unlikely to comply with the protocol in the opinion of the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SeroconversionTo be assessed four weeks after the second vaccination for all groups receiving 2 doses of IPV and four weeks after the second vaccination for all groups receiving 2 doses of f-IPV.Seroconversion will be defined as a change from seronegative to seropositive (antibody titers of ≥1:8) and in infants seropositive at baseline (assumed to be from maternally-derived antibody titers), as a ≥4-fold rise in antibody titers post-vaccination, computed by assuming an exponential decay model with a half-life of 24 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SeroconversionTo be assessed four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving IPV and four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving f-IPV.
Median titersTo be assessed four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving IPV and four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving f-IPV.
SAEs (Serious Adverse Events)To be assessed throughout the complete study period, approx. 18 months.
IMEs (Important Medical Events)To be assessed throughout the complete study period, approx. 18 months.These are medically significant events that do not meet any of the SAE criteria, but require medical or surgical consultation or intervention to prevent this event from becoming a SAE.
Severe local reactionsTo be assessed throughout the complete study period, approx. 18 months.Severe local reactions can include severe pain, inflammation, induration and edema in the injection area.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026