Skip to content

Trifecta™ GT Post Market Clinical Follow-up

Trifecta™ GT (Glide Technology) Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03016169
Enrollment
358
Registered
2017-01-10
Start date
2017-03-09
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2025-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Disorder

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Trifecta™ GT (Glide Technology) valve through 5 year follow-up in a prospective, multi-center, real-world setting. This study is intended to satisfy post-market clinical follow-up requirements of CE Mark in Europe.

Detailed description

The study is a prospective multi-center evaluation of approximately 350 subjects implanted with a St. Jude Medical (SJM) Trifecta™ GT valve. It will be conducted in approximately 35 sites worldwide. Subjects will be followed for 5 years. The total duration of the study is expected to be 6 years, assuming all subjects are enrolled within 1 year of study initiation. To ensure enrollment balance across sites, no individual site can enroll more than 10% of the sample size (n=35 subjects) without prior approval from the sponsor.

Interventions

DEVICETrifecta GT (Glide Technology) Valve

Surgical aortic valve replacement with Trifecta GT Valve.

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is a candidate for surgical aortic valve replacement per current guidelines and is intended to be implanted with a St. Jude Medical Trifecta GT valve. 2. Subject is of legal age in the country where the subject is enrolled. 3. Subject must be willing and able to provide written informed consent to participate in this study. 4. Subject must be willing and able to comply with all follow-up requirements.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject undergoes a concomitant procedure of mitral or tricuspid valve replacement at the time of the Trifecta GT valve implantation surgery. 2. Subject has contraindication for cardiac surgery. 3. Subject is pregnant. Pregnancy will be assessed by the subject informing the physicians. 4. Subject has active endocarditis (subjects who have previously experienced endocarditis must have two documented negative blood culture results while off antibiotic therapy prior to the valve implantation surgery). 5. Subject has had a stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to the planned valve implantation surgery. 6. Subject is undergoing renal dialysis. 7. Subject has a history of active drug addiction, active alcohol abuse, or psychiatric hospital admission for psychosis within the prior 2 years. 8. Subject has a documented thrombus in the left atrium or left ventricle at the time of the valve implantation surgery. 9. Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30%. 10. Subject previously enrolled in the Trifecta GT PMCF study and withdrawn (a subject cannot be enrolled twice in this study). 11. Preoperative evaluation indicates other significant cardiovascular abnormalities such as aortic dissection or ventricular aneurysm. 12. Subject has a life expectancy less than 2 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation5 years post implantEstimated percentage of participants free from undergoing an additional aortic valve replacement within 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Freedom From Valve Related Mortality5 years post implantEstimated percentage of participants remaining free from a valve-related death at 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. The estimate includes subjects alive at 5 years and subjects who died for reasons unrelated to the valve at 5 years.
Freedom From Structural Valve Deterioration5 years post implantEstimated percentage of participants free from structural valve deterioration at 5 years, as using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Structural valve deterioration is any change in function of the valve resulting in an intrinsic abnormality of the valve that causes stenosis or regurgitation.
Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve Implantation Due to Structural Valve Deterioration5 years post implantEstimated percentage of participants who do not require surgery due to structural valve deterioration, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at Six Months6 MonthsLVEF is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving the heart each time it contracts.
Freedom From All-cause Mortality5 years post implantEstimated percentage of participants surviving at 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Indexed Effective Orifice Area (iEOA) at Six Months6 MonthsiEOA adjusts the EOA measurement to the patient's body size.
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Mean Gradient at Six Months6 MonthsMean Gradient measures the average pressure difference across the valve during blood flow.
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Peak Gradient at Six Months6 MonthsPeak Gradient measures the maximum pressure difference across the valve during blood flow.
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Effective Orifice Area (EOA) at Six Months6 MonthsEOA measures the functional valve opening for blood flow through the valve.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 358 subjects were enrolled across 27 investigational sites in 12 North American and European countries. The Trifecta GT PMCF study is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center clinical investigation designed to evaluate the five-year safety and performance of the Trifecta GT valve in patients indicated for aortic valve replacement.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
All subjects will receive the Trifecta GT valve Trifecta GT (Glide Technology) Valve: Surgical aortic valve replacement with Trifecta GT Valve.
358
Total358

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath54
Overall StudyDevice Explant11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4
Overall StudyOther Reasons1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject19

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment
Age, Continuous70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Hypertension291 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
140 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
218 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
54 / 358
other
Total, other adverse events
82 / 358
serious
Total, serious adverse events
206 / 358

Outcome results

Primary

Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation

Estimated percentage of participants free from undergoing an additional aortic valve replacement within 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.

Time frame: 5 years post implant

Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentFreedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation95.8 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Freedom From All-cause Mortality

Estimated percentage of participants surviving at 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.

Time frame: 5 years post implant

Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentFreedom From All-cause Mortality84.5 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Freedom From Structural Valve Deterioration

Estimated percentage of participants free from structural valve deterioration at 5 years, as using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Structural valve deterioration is any change in function of the valve resulting in an intrinsic abnormality of the valve that causes stenosis or regurgitation.

Time frame: 5 years post implant

Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentFreedom From Structural Valve Deterioration96.2 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve Implantation Due to Structural Valve Deterioration

Estimated percentage of participants who do not require surgery due to structural valve deterioration, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.

Time frame: 5 years post implant

Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentFreedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve Implantation Due to Structural Valve Deterioration98.2 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Freedom From Valve Related Mortality

Estimated percentage of participants remaining free from a valve-related death at 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. The estimate includes subjects alive at 5 years and subjects who died for reasons unrelated to the valve at 5 years.

Time frame: 5 years post implant

Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentFreedom From Valve Related Mortality95.4 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Effective Orifice Area (EOA) at Six Months

EOA measures the functional valve opening for blood flow through the valve.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with an EOA assessment at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentValve Hemodynamic Performance for Effective Orifice Area (EOA) at Six Months2.0 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.6
Other Pre-specified

Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Indexed Effective Orifice Area (iEOA) at Six Months

iEOA adjusts the EOA measurement to the patient's body size.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with an iEOA assessment at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentValve Hemodynamic Performance for Indexed Effective Orifice Area (iEOA) at Six Months1.0 cm^2/m^2Standard Deviation 0.3
Other Pre-specified

Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at Six Months

LVEF is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving the heart each time it contracts.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with an LVEF assessment at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentValve Hemodynamic Performance for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at Six Months60.4 percentageStandard Deviation 7.5
Other Pre-specified

Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Mean Gradient at Six Months

Mean Gradient measures the average pressure difference across the valve during blood flow.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with a mean gradient assessment at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentValve Hemodynamic Performance for Mean Gradient at Six Months8.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.3
Other Pre-specified

Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Peak Gradient at Six Months

Peak Gradient measures the maximum pressure difference across the valve during blood flow.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with a peak gradient assessment at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentValve Hemodynamic Performance for Peak Gradient at Six Months16.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026