Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Disorder
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Trifecta™ GT (Glide Technology) valve through 5 year follow-up in a prospective, multi-center, real-world setting. This study is intended to satisfy post-market clinical follow-up requirements of CE Mark in Europe.
Detailed description
The study is a prospective multi-center evaluation of approximately 350 subjects implanted with a St. Jude Medical (SJM) Trifecta™ GT valve. It will be conducted in approximately 35 sites worldwide. Subjects will be followed for 5 years. The total duration of the study is expected to be 6 years, assuming all subjects are enrolled within 1 year of study initiation. To ensure enrollment balance across sites, no individual site can enroll more than 10% of the sample size (n=35 subjects) without prior approval from the sponsor.
Interventions
Surgical aortic valve replacement with Trifecta GT Valve.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Subject is a candidate for surgical aortic valve replacement per current guidelines and is intended to be implanted with a St. Jude Medical Trifecta GT valve. 2. Subject is of legal age in the country where the subject is enrolled. 3. Subject must be willing and able to provide written informed consent to participate in this study. 4. Subject must be willing and able to comply with all follow-up requirements.
Exclusion criteria
1. Subject undergoes a concomitant procedure of mitral or tricuspid valve replacement at the time of the Trifecta GT valve implantation surgery. 2. Subject has contraindication for cardiac surgery. 3. Subject is pregnant. Pregnancy will be assessed by the subject informing the physicians. 4. Subject has active endocarditis (subjects who have previously experienced endocarditis must have two documented negative blood culture results while off antibiotic therapy prior to the valve implantation surgery). 5. Subject has had a stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to the planned valve implantation surgery. 6. Subject is undergoing renal dialysis. 7. Subject has a history of active drug addiction, active alcohol abuse, or psychiatric hospital admission for psychosis within the prior 2 years. 8. Subject has a documented thrombus in the left atrium or left ventricle at the time of the valve implantation surgery. 9. Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30%. 10. Subject previously enrolled in the Trifecta GT PMCF study and withdrawn (a subject cannot be enrolled twice in this study). 11. Preoperative evaluation indicates other significant cardiovascular abnormalities such as aortic dissection or ventricular aneurysm. 12. Subject has a life expectancy less than 2 years.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation | 5 years post implant | Estimated percentage of participants free from undergoing an additional aortic valve replacement within 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Freedom From Valve Related Mortality | 5 years post implant | Estimated percentage of participants remaining free from a valve-related death at 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. The estimate includes subjects alive at 5 years and subjects who died for reasons unrelated to the valve at 5 years. |
| Freedom From Structural Valve Deterioration | 5 years post implant | Estimated percentage of participants free from structural valve deterioration at 5 years, as using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Structural valve deterioration is any change in function of the valve resulting in an intrinsic abnormality of the valve that causes stenosis or regurgitation. |
| Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve Implantation Due to Structural Valve Deterioration | 5 years post implant | Estimated percentage of participants who do not require surgery due to structural valve deterioration, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. |
| Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at Six Months | 6 Months | LVEF is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving the heart each time it contracts. |
| Freedom From All-cause Mortality | 5 years post implant | Estimated percentage of participants surviving at 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. |
| Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Indexed Effective Orifice Area (iEOA) at Six Months | 6 Months | iEOA adjusts the EOA measurement to the patient's body size. |
| Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Mean Gradient at Six Months | 6 Months | Mean Gradient measures the average pressure difference across the valve during blood flow. |
| Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Peak Gradient at Six Months | 6 Months | Peak Gradient measures the maximum pressure difference across the valve during blood flow. |
| Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Effective Orifice Area (EOA) at Six Months | 6 Months | EOA measures the functional valve opening for blood flow through the valve. |
Countries
Belgium, Canada, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 358 subjects were enrolled across 27 investigational sites in 12 North American and European countries. The Trifecta GT PMCF study is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center clinical investigation designed to evaluate the five-year safety and performance of the Trifecta GT valve in patients indicated for aortic valve replacement.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Treatment All subjects will receive the Trifecta GT valve
Trifecta GT (Glide Technology) Valve: Surgical aortic valve replacement with Trifecta GT Valve. | 358 |
| Total | 358 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 54 |
| Overall Study | Device Explant | 11 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 4 |
| Overall Study | Other Reasons | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 19 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Treatment | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 70.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 | — |
| Hypertension | 291 Participants | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 140 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 218 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 54 / 358 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 82 / 358 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 206 / 358 |
Outcome results
Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation
Estimated percentage of participants free from undergoing an additional aortic valve replacement within 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation | 95.8 percentage of participants |
Freedom From All-cause Mortality
Estimated percentage of participants surviving at 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Freedom From All-cause Mortality | 84.5 percentage of participants |
Freedom From Structural Valve Deterioration
Estimated percentage of participants free from structural valve deterioration at 5 years, as using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Structural valve deterioration is any change in function of the valve resulting in an intrinsic abnormality of the valve that causes stenosis or regurgitation.
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Freedom From Structural Valve Deterioration | 96.2 percentage of participants |
Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve Implantation Due to Structural Valve Deterioration
Estimated percentage of participants who do not require surgery due to structural valve deterioration, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Freedom From Surgical Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Valve Implantation Due to Structural Valve Deterioration | 98.2 percentage of participants |
Freedom From Valve Related Mortality
Estimated percentage of participants remaining free from a valve-related death at 5 years, using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. The estimate includes subjects alive at 5 years and subjects who died for reasons unrelated to the valve at 5 years.
Time frame: 5 years post implant
Population: Analysis population includes participants implanted with the Trifecta™ valve in the study on 10 March 2017 and continued through 05 February 2018.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Freedom From Valve Related Mortality | 95.4 percentage of participants |
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Effective Orifice Area (EOA) at Six Months
EOA measures the functional valve opening for blood flow through the valve.
Time frame: 6 Months
Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with an EOA assessment at 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Effective Orifice Area (EOA) at Six Months | 2.0 cm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Indexed Effective Orifice Area (iEOA) at Six Months
iEOA adjusts the EOA measurement to the patient's body size.
Time frame: 6 Months
Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with an iEOA assessment at 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Indexed Effective Orifice Area (iEOA) at Six Months | 1.0 cm^2/m^2 | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at Six Months
LVEF is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving the heart each time it contracts.
Time frame: 6 Months
Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with an LVEF assessment at 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at Six Months | 60.4 percentage | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Mean Gradient at Six Months
Mean Gradient measures the average pressure difference across the valve during blood flow.
Time frame: 6 Months
Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with a mean gradient assessment at 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Mean Gradient at Six Months | 8.7 mmHg | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Peak Gradient at Six Months
Peak Gradient measures the maximum pressure difference across the valve during blood flow.
Time frame: 6 Months
Population: Analysis population includes all study participants with a peak gradient assessment at 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Valve Hemodynamic Performance for Peak Gradient at Six Months | 16.6 mmHg | Standard Deviation 6.3 |