Skip to content

Magnetic Seizure Therapy vs. Electroconvulsive Therapy for Bipolar Mania

Magnetic Seizure Therapy vs. Electroconvulsive Therapy for Bipolar Mania

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03016104
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-01-10
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2022-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder, Manic

Keywords

magnetic seizure therapy, electroconvulsive therapy, bipolar mania, cognition, controlled trial

Brief summary

This trial attempts to evaluate the treatment efficacy of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) and its safety for bipolar mania. Half of the participants will receive MST, while the other half will receive electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

Detailed description

Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is likely to be an alternative options to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Widespread stimulation of cortical and subcortical regions is inevitable for ECT since the substantial impedance of the scalp and skull shuts most of the electrical stimulus away from the brain. Nevertheless, magnetic pulses are capable to focus the stimulus to a specific area of the brain because they can pass the scalp and skull without resistance. In Addition, electric current will penetrate into deeper structures, while magnetic stimulus are only capable to reach a depth of a few centimeters. As a consequence, MST are able to generate focus stimuli on superficial regions of the cortex while ECT can't, which may give MST the capability to produce comparable therapeutic benefits with the absence of apparent cognitive side effects.

Interventions

In addition to treatment as usual (TAU), participants were supposed to receive ten sessions of MST in four weeks, with three sessions per week in the first two weeks and two sessions per week in the following two weeks.

In addition to treatment as usual (TAU), participants were supposed to receive ten sessions of modified ECT in four weeks, with three sessions per week in the first two weeks and two sessions per week in the following two weeks

OTHERtreatment as usual (TAU)

Participants will engage in their inpatient treatment program as-usual.

Sponsors

Shanghai Mental Health Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. DSM-5 diagnosis of bipolar I disorder and currently in a manic episode; 2. convulsive therapy clinically indicated, such as severe psychomotor excitement or retardation, attempts of suicide, being highly aggressive, pharmacotherapy intolerance, and ineffectiveness of antipsychotics; 3. the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) score ≥ 60; 4. informed consent in written form.

Exclusion criteria

1. diagnosis of other mental disorders; 2. severe physical diseases, such as stroke, heart failure, liver failure, neoplasm, and immune deficiency; 3. present with a laboratory abnormality that could impact on efficacy of treatments or safety of participants; 4. failure to respond to an adequate trial of ECT lifetime; 5. are pregnant or intend to get pregnant during the study; 6. other conditions that investigators consider to be inappropriate to participate in this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
changes in The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)At baseline, 4-week follow-up, and 8-week follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)At baseline and 4-week follow-up
changes in motor threshold (MT)At baseline and the day after the first treatmentusing single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (sTMS)
changes in brain gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)levelsAt baseline, the day after the first treatment, and at 4-week follow-upmeasured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)
changes in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)At baseline and 4-week follow-up
changes in auditory evoked potential (AEP)At baseline and the day after the first treatmentmeasured by electroencephalogram (EEG)
changes in Novel P300At baseline and the day after the first treatmentmeasured by electroencephalogram (EEG)
changes in resting state networkAt baseline, the day after the first treatment, and at 4-week follow-upmeasured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026