Skip to content

Photobiomodulation for Plantar Fasciitis

Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation Compared to Usual Care for Plantar Fasciitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03015116
Enrollment
114
Registered
2017-01-09
Start date
2017-01-12
Completion date
2020-02-28
Last updated
2021-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plantar Fascitis

Keywords

photobiomodulation, plantar fasciitis

Brief summary

BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis, a degenerative injury of the connective tissue in the foot, results in pain-related disability in Service Members and beneficiaries and contributes to decreased physical activity and excessive healthcare costs. Even if effective, current treatment protocols may require 6-12 months of therapy to return individuals to pain-free activity. Photobiomodulation (PBM), or low level laser therapy, uses non-ionizing light to elicit biological changes in tissues resulting in beneficial therapeutic outcomes. Evidence supports use of PBM for other degenerative connective tissue conditions, such as Achilles tendinopathy and epicondylitis. Unfortunately, previous studies of PBM for treatment of plantar fasciitis lack optimized treatment parameters and therefore have been inconclusive on its clinical effectiveness. SPECIFIC AIMS: 1. Establish feasibility of and adherence to a photobiomodulation protocol in conjunction with and compared to usual care for plantar fasciitis treatment. 2. Assess the clinical effectiveness of photobiomodulation in conjunction with and compared to usual care to improve function and decrease pain and in patients. 3. Assess the difference between two photobiomodulation dose parameters in conjunction with and compared to usual care for plantar fasciitis treatment. DESIGN: The investigators will use a prospective randomized controlled trial to meet the aims of this exploratory study. METHOD: A sample of 114 military healthcare beneficiaries will be randomly assigned to either usual care, usual care plus PBM lower dose, or usual care plus PBM higher dose groups. At baseline, during the treatment protocol, and at long term (3 and 6 month) follow-up, measures of foot function and pain will be collected for analysis. The proposed methods will allow the study team to establish if PBM accelerates recovery compared to usual care, as well as determining the optimal dose for future trials comparing PBM to other, more invasive, therapies for plantar fasciitis.

Interventions

OTHERStretching

Daily foot and ankle stretching protocol

OTHERCryotherapy

Daily cryotherapy in conjunction with stretching

DEVICEPhotobiomodulation Low Power

Photobiomodulation treatment with 10W power output

DEVICEPhotobiomodulation High Power

Photobiomodulation treatment with 25W power output

Sponsors

Landstuhl Regional Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Between ages of 18 - 65 years 2. Eligible for care at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center 3. Diagnosis of PF by healthcare provider based on accepted diagnostic criteria 4. Have experienced symptoms of PF for at least 3 months 5. Able to read and understand English language for consent purposes 6. Able to commit to 6 week intervention and 3 and 6 month follow-up

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant during intervention period (Safety of PBM not established in pregnancy) 2. History of traumatic injury to symptomatic foot/feet 3. Diagnosis of calcaneal fracture 4. Have previously had corticosteroid injections, surgery, or other invasive treatment for same condition 5. Greater than 15% of calf area covered in tattoos/ink/scarring (Pigment in ink can absorb light, causing overheating of skin) 6. History of neuropathy or unable to detect changes in skin temperature (increased risk of skin warming due to inability to detect change) 7. Currently using medications associated with sensitivity to heat or light (e.g. amiodarone, chlorpromazine, doxycycline, hydrochlorothiazide, nalidixic acid, naproxen, piroxicam, tetracycline, thioridazine, voriconazole)(8) Concurrent participation in another research study addressing pain issue

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeksThe FAAM is a 29-item self-report instrument that assesses physical function in foot and ankle impairments which included plantar fasciitis cases in development. There are two subscales, Activities of Daily Living (21-item) and Sports (8-item). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (4='no difficulty at all' to 0='unable to do'); points are transformed to a percentage (100%=no dysfunction). A higher score means a better outcome.
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeksDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). This 5-item scale integrates a numeric pain rating scale with visual facial cues and word descriptors as well as 4 supplemental questions on pain interference. Each item is scores 0-10 with higher scores indicating worse pain/interference. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term3 months and 6 monthsThe FAAM is a 29-item self-report instrument that assesses physical function in foot and ankle impairments which included plantar fasciitis cases in development. There are two subscales, Activities of Daily Living (21-item) and Sports (8-item). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (4='no difficulty at all' to 0='unable to do'); points are transformed to a percentage (100%=no dysfunction). A higher score means a better outcome.
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-term3 months and 6 monthsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). This 5-item scale integrates a numeric pain rating scale with visual facial cues and word descriptors as well as 4 supplemental questions on pain interference. Each item is scores 0-10 with higher scores indicating worse pain/interference. Lower scores mean a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ankle Dorsiflexion% change from baseline to 3 weeks, % change from 3 weeks to 6 weeks, % change from baseline to 6 weeksMeasures range of motion of ankle in weight-bearing conditions; recorded as distance from great toe to wall at maximal dorsiflexion in centimeters. The percentage of change between timepoints will be calculated for each individual and then compiled per group.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care
Participants will complete 6 weeks of stretching and cryotherapy Stretching: Daily foot and ankle stretching protocol Cryotherapy: Daily cryotherapy in conjunction with stretching
38
PBM 10 Watts
Participants will complete 6 weeks of stretching and cryotherapy, plus 9 treatments of PBM (810/980 nm continuous wave, 10 Watts power) over 3 weeks Stretching: Daily foot and ankle stretching protocol Cryotherapy: Daily cryotherapy in conjunction with stretching Photobiomodulation Low Power: Photobiomodulation treatment with 10W power output
38
PBM 25 Watts
Participants will complete 6 weeks of stretching and cryotherapy, plus 9 treatments of PBM (810/980 nm continuous wave, 25 Watts power) over 3 weeks Stretching: Daily foot and ankle stretching protocol Cryotherapy: Daily cryotherapy in conjunction with stretching Photobiomodulation High Power: Photobiomodulation treatment with 25W power output
38
Total114

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up302
Overall StudyPhysician Decision010
Overall StudySubject has New Medical Status100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject310

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPBM 25 WattsPBM 10 WattsUsual Care
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
113 Participants38 Participants38 Participants37 Participants
Body Mass Index
Normal Weight (18.5 - 24.9)
14 Participants4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Body Mass Index
Obese (Greater than or Equal to 30.0)
42 Participants17 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Body Mass Index
Overweight (25-29.9)
57 Participants16 Participants23 Participants18 Participants
Body Mass Index
Underweight (Less than 18.5)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Missing Data
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type I
5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type II
14 Participants2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type III
44 Participants13 Participants17 Participants14 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type IV
29 Participants13 Participants8 Participants8 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type V
19 Participants7 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type VI
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Number of Months with Plantar Fasciitis or Plantar Heel Pain
0 to 6 Months
20 Participants8 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Number of Months with Plantar Fasciitis or Plantar Heel Pain
13 to 24 Months
19 Participants8 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Number of Months with Plantar Fasciitis or Plantar Heel Pain
7 to 12 Months
23 Participants6 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Number of Months with Plantar Fasciitis or Plantar Heel Pain
Greater than 24 months
48 Participants16 Participants18 Participants14 Participants
Number of Months with Plantar Fasciitis or Plantar Heel Pain
Missing Data
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American
19 Participants7 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Pacific Islander
9 Participants3 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
67 Participants23 Participants21 Participants23 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
13 Participants5 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
114 participants38 participants38 participants38 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants22 Participants25 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants16 Participants13 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 380 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 381 / 380 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 380 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)

Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). This 5-item scale integrates a numeric pain rating scale with visual facial cues and word descriptors as well as 4 supplemental questions on pain interference. Each item is scores 0-10 with higher scores indicating worse pain/interference. Lower scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks

Population: 7 withdrew from Usual Care group; 2 each from treatment groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Activity Interferece3.555 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 24 Hour Pain3.652 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Mood Interference2.630 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Sleep Interference1.857 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 24 Hour Pain3.634 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Mood Interference2.496 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Sleep Interference2.269 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Stress Interference2.471 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Sleep Interference1.748 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Activity Interference3.462 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Stress Interference2.345 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline 24 Hour Pain4.031 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Activity Interference3.513 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Stress Interference2.504 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Mood Interference2.092 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Mood Interference1.125 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline 24 Hour Pain4.146 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 24 Hour Pain2.948 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 24 Hour Pain2.61 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Activity Interference3.869 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Activity Interference2.696 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Activity Interferece2.244 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Sleep Interference2.548 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Sleep Interference1.986 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Sleep Interference1.476 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Mood Interference2.363 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Mood Interference1.530 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Stress Interference2.358 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Stress Interference1.433 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Stress Interference1.031 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Activity Interferece2.736 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Stress Interference1.646 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Mood Interference1.589 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Activity Interference2.777 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Activity Interference3.798 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Mood Interference1.486 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 24 Hour Pain2.943 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline 24 Hour Pain3.763 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Stress Interference2.215 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 Sleep Interference1.229 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 3 24 Hour Pain2.863 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Sleep Interference1.111 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Sleep Interference1.667 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Week 6 Stress Interference1.450 score on a scale
PBM 25 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)Baseline Mood Interference2.164 score on a scale
Primary

Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-term

Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). This 5-item scale integrates a numeric pain rating scale with visual facial cues and word descriptors as well as 4 supplemental questions on pain interference. Each item is scores 0-10 with higher scores indicating worse pain/interference. Lower scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

Population: Individuals were lost to follow up at each long term follow up time point. Participants from the UC group completed the study after the 6 week follow-up time point. No data were collected from UC care group for the 3 and 6 month time points, therefore are not included in the 3 and 6 month measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 24 Hour Pain2.449 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 24 Hour Pain2.126 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 Activity Interference2.583 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 Activity Interference2.326 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 Sleep Interference1.691 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 Sleep Interference1.541 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 Mood Interference1.770 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 Mood Interference1.614 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 Stress Interference1.174 score on a scale
Usual CareDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 Stress Interference1.391 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 Mood Interference1.157 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 24 Hour Pain1.977 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 Sleep Interference0.880 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 24 Hour Pain2.148 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 Stress Interference1.040 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 Activity Interference1.995 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 Mood Interference1.034 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 6 Activity Interference1.818 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 Stress Interference1.040 score on a scale
PBM 10 WattsDefense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Long-termMonth 3 Sleep Interference0.720 score on a scale
Primary

Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)

The FAAM is a 29-item self-report instrument that assesses physical function in foot and ankle impairments which included plantar fasciitis cases in development. There are two subscales, Activities of Daily Living (21-item) and Sports (8-item). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (4='no difficulty at all' to 0='unable to do'); points are transformed to a percentage (100%=no dysfunction). A higher score means a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks

Population: 7 withdrew from Usual Care group; 2 each from treatment groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Baseline ADL Subscale66.2 percentage of total score
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 3 ADL Subscale69.3 percentage of total score
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 6 ADL Subscale70.4 percentage of total score
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Baseline Sports Subscale46.4 percentage of total score
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 3 Sports Subscale46.6 percentage of total score
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 6 Sports Subscale53.9 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 6 Sports Subscale67.7 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Baseline ADL Subscale72.4 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Baseline Sports Subscale46.5 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 3 Sports Subscale62.4 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 3 ADL Subscale81.4 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 6 ADL Subscale82.9 percentage of total score
PBM 25 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 3 ADL Subscale78.5 percentage of total score
PBM 25 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 6 ADL Subscale82.3 percentage of total score
PBM 25 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 6 Sports Subscale65.7 percentage of total score
PBM 25 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Baseline Sports Subscale46.3 percentage of total score
PBM 25 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Baseline ADL Subscale69.9 percentage of total score
PBM 25 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Week 3 Sports Subscale62.0 percentage of total score
Primary

Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term

The FAAM is a 29-item self-report instrument that assesses physical function in foot and ankle impairments which included plantar fasciitis cases in development. There are two subscales, Activities of Daily Living (21-item) and Sports (8-item). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (4='no difficulty at all' to 0='unable to do'); points are transformed to a percentage (100%=no dysfunction). A higher score means a better outcome.

Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

Population: Individuals were lost to follow up at each long term follow up time point. Participants from the UC group completed the study after the 6 week follow-up time point. No data were collected from UC care group for the 3 and 6 month time points, therefore are not included in the 3 and 6 month measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term3 Months ADL Subscale80.3 percentage of total score
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term3 Months Sports Subscale62.4 percentage of total score
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term6 Months ADL Subscale82.0 percentage of total score
Usual CareFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term6 Months Sports Subscale65.4 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term6 Months Sports Subscale69.0 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term3 Months ADL Subscale81.5 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term6 Months ADL Subscale82.2 percentage of total score
PBM 10 WattsFoot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Long-term3 Months Sports Subscale67.6 percentage of total score
Secondary

Ankle Dorsiflexion

Measures range of motion of ankle in weight-bearing conditions; recorded as distance from great toe to wall at maximal dorsiflexion in centimeters. The percentage of change between timepoints will be calculated for each individual and then compiled per group.

Time frame: % change from baseline to 3 weeks, % change from 3 weeks to 6 weeks, % change from baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareAnkle Dorsiflexion% change week 3 to week 66.03 percentage of change over timeStandard Error 0.037
Usual CareAnkle Dorsiflexion% Change baseline to 3 weeks9.14 percentage of change over timeStandard Error 0.029
Usual CareAnkle Dorsiflexion% change baseline to week 611.6 percentage of change over timeStandard Error 0.055
PBM 10 WattsAnkle Dorsiflexion% change week 3 to week 69.02 percentage of change over timeStandard Error 0.047
PBM 10 WattsAnkle Dorsiflexion% Change baseline to 3 weeks7.16 percentage of change over timeStandard Error 0.036
PBM 10 WattsAnkle Dorsiflexion% change baseline to week 613.22 percentage of change over timeStandard Error 0.043
PBM 25 WattsAnkle Dorsiflexion% Change baseline to 3 weeks17.24 percentage of change over timeStandard Error 0.045
PBM 25 WattsAnkle Dorsiflexion% change baseline to week 619.79 percentage of change over timeStandard Error 0.045
PBM 25 WattsAnkle Dorsiflexion% change week 3 to week 63.86 percentage of change over timeStandard Error 0.023

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026