Skip to content

Increasing Donor Designation Rates in Teenagers: Effectiveness of a Driver's Education Intervention

Increasing Donor Designation Rates in Teenagers: Effectiveness of a Driver's Education Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03013816
Enrollment
611
Registered
2017-01-09
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2019-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Organ Donation Education, Organ Donor Registration

Brief summary

Four aims were pursued: (1) Evaluate the effectiveness of video messaging on adolescent donor designations in comparison to a regionally-matched historical comparison group of adolescents; (2) Compare the differential effectiveness of three commonly-used donation messaging strategies (informational, testimonial, and blended) on donor designations; (3) Examine the impact of donation messaging on changes in secondary outcomes (donation engagement, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, likelihood of donor designation, discussion with a parent) before and after video intervention; and (4) Assess the commitment of parents to follow their adolescent's donation wishes in the event of death. Our central hypotheses were that integrating donation video messaging into driver education classes would generate a higher proportion of donor designations compared to a historical comparison group and that blended video messaging (informational + testimonials) would yield a higher proportion of donor designations and more change in secondary outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOrgan Donation Education: Testimonial Messaging

The testimonial messaging video intervention will be shown

BEHAVIORALOrgan Donation Education: Informational Messaging

The informational messaging video intervention will be shown

BEHAVIORALOrgan Donation Education: Blended Messaging

The blended messaging video intervention will be shown

Sponsors

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Criteria for Classrooms: Classroom eligibility criteria included: (a) driver education conducted in English, and (b) instructor agreement not to provide or discuss donation information beyond the study video. Criteria for Adolescent Participants: Inclusion Criteria: * Enrolled in driving school class * English speaking * Adolescent assent * Parental permission to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Prior participation in a driver's education class in which organ donation education was provided * Parent permission form not signed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Organ Donation Registration6 monthsThe primary outcome was donor designation (yes-no) at time of obtaining first driver's license post-intervention. We provided the name, date of birth, last four digits of social security number, residential address, and study identification number of each adolescent to the Massachusetts DoT, which then returned to us a data file containing the donor designation status for each study identification number. For the regionally-matched historical comparison group, the DoT provided a de-identified data file of all adolescents who obtained their first driver's license in the six months prior to study enrollment at six motor vehicle offices.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Organ Donation Knowledge and Attitudes1 weekImmediately before, shortly after, and 1 week following video messaging exposure, adolescents completed a questionnaire to assess the following donation constructs: engagement (2 questions -- 1-10 scale), knowledge (3 questions -- correct/incorrect total score range 0-3), general attitude (1 question), beliefs (4 questions -- strong disagree-strongly agree scale), designation likelihood (1 question -- 1-10 scale), and willingness to communicate donation decision to a parent (1 question -- 1-10 scale). Adolescents received a $5 gift card for each survey completed.
Parental Commitment6 monthsOne week following the adolescent's exposure to the donation video, we mailed parents a brief questionnaire that included questions about their donor designation status (Yes/No), general donation attitude (1 question -- 1-10 scale), any communication with their adolescent about his/her donor designation intention (Yes/No), and likelihood of following their adolescent's wishes about donation (1 question -- 1-10 scale).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026