Skip to content

A Psychosocial Program Impact Evaluation in Jordan

Measuring the Health and Wellbeing Impacts of a Scalable Program of Psychosocial Intervention for Refugee Youth

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03012451
Enrollment
817
Registered
2017-01-06
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2021-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Health Impairment, Stress, Psychological

Keywords

Stress, Insecurity, Mental Health

Brief summary

The study aims to deliver a robust pre-post evaluation of the wellbeing impacts of an innovative, brief, and scalable psychosocial intervention, delivered to refugee youth living in urban settlements in Jordan. The study was conducted using two waves of data collection: the first featured an intervention and a matched control group, the second featured a full randomized control trial.

Detailed description

This study will provide a robust evaluation of the Mercy Corps 'Advancing Adolescents, No Lost Generation' program that targets stress alleviation in refugee youth (12-18 years) with specific measures of psychosocial stress, biological stress, and cognitive function.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAdvancing Adolescents

The Advancing Adolescents programme is a structured 8-week psychosocial intervention for adolescents in humanitarian crises, based on profound stress attunement processes. It features three elements that are widely viewed as important to support youth adjustment in contexts of complex emergencies: (i) safety: establishment of a 'safe space' within the community as a base for activities and site of protection; (ii) support: facilitation of social support and self-expression; and (iii) structured activities: access to scheduled group activities.

Sponsors

Queen Margaret University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Western Ontario, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Harvard University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Florida
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible and enrolled in Mercy Corps Advancing Adolescents program * Syrian refugee and Jordanian host-community youth residing in 4 urban centers in northern Jordan

Exclusion criteria

* Not available for study recruitment (started sessions or deferred sessions before study start date).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Psychosocial Stress (International Measure)11 weeksStress was measured using the Arabic version of the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Karmarck, & Mermelstein, 1983), validated with a Jordanian sample (Almadi, Cathers, Hamdan Mansour, & Chow, 2012). This 14-item, 5-point Likert scale measures perceived stress over the last month, with higher scores indicating greater stress. Items include, How often have you been upset because of something that happened unexpectedly? and How often have you been able to control irritations in your life? (reverse-scored) (1 = Never, 5 = Very often).
Psychosocial stress: Distress (Regional Measure)11 weeksDistress was measured with the Human Distress scale (Hamayel & Ghandour, 2014), developed for use with conflict-affected adolescents in the West Bank. The 12-item scale is a 5-point Likert scale with scores expressed as percentages on a scale of 0-100. Sample items include, To what extent have you felt worried, To what extent did you feel humiliated, and To what extent did you feel angry. Scores are presented as percentages (0-100%), with higher scores indicating greater distress.
Psychosocial Stress: Insecurity (Regional Measure)11 weeksInsecurity was measured with The Human Insecurity (HI). This tool was developed for use in the West Bank (Ziadni, Hammoudeh et al. 2011, Hamayel, Ghandour et al. 2014). The 10-item scale is a 5-point Likert scale with scores expressed as percentages on a scale of 0-100. The HI covers issues such as worries regarding inability to obtain daily life necessities, losing a source of income, fears about the future, and family safety.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prosocial Behavior: International Measure11 weeksThe Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Prosocial Score, which featured 5 items to assess prosociality was used. Items include I try to be nice to other people. I care about their feelings and I am helpful if someone is hurt, upset, or feeling sick (0 = Not true, 2 = Certainly true). Higher scores indicate greater prosociality.
Resilience: Cross-cultural Measure11 weeksResilience was measured using the CYRM-28 (Liebenberg et al., 2012; Ungar & Liebenberg, 2011), which had been translated and culturally grounded for use into Arabic. Responses ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (A lot), with higher scores indicating greater resilience.
Biological Stress: Cell-mediated Immune Function11 weeksCell-mediated immune function was measured in field settings, using systemic suppression of immune function in response to chronic stress is measured via immunoassays for Epstein Barr Virus antibodies, in conjunction with C-Reactive Protein, from dried blood spots collected from pricking the finger with a sterile disposable lancet. Three drops of blood on filter paper are dried at room temperature, then frozen until lab assay. This measure reflects compromised immune response due to psychosocial stress over the past week, and examined per individual for pre/post intervention levels.
Cognitive function11 weeksCognitive function was assessed using tablet-based cognitive skill tasks, testing hippocampal function (long term memory) and prefrontal executive function. Children play short games (1-4 min each) during which they press the tablet in response to geometric shapes. Responses during game play are recorded and used to measure cognitive function.
Biological Stress: Cortisol11 weeksCortisol was obtained from immunoassays of scalp hair cortisol that provide useful measures of the altered activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Scalp hair is collected non-invasively (\ 100 strands, 0.5 cm area). This measure indicates chronic stress over the last month, and examined per individual for pre/post intervention levels. These analyses are being undertaken by Professor van Uum at Western Ontario University.
Mental Health Difficulties: Regional Measure11 weeksMental health was assessed using the 21-item Arab Youth Mental Health questionnaire (Mahfoud et al., 2011; Mahkoul et al., 2011). This measure includes questions such as, During the last week I was upset, During the last week I was bored and hated my life, and During the last week, I was having a lot of headaches, stomach-aches, and nausea (1 = Rarely, 3 = Always). Higher scores indicate more symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Mental Health Difficulties: International Measure11 weeksThe Arabic version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), a brief screening tool for psychiatric difficulties (Alyahri & Goodman, 2006) was used. The 20 items include emotional, conduct, and hyperactivity symptom scores (range 0-40). We summed score of the Arabic version of the SDQ subscales relating to hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, conduct problems, and peer problems (Alyahri & Goodman, 2006).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Posttraumatic stress symptoms11 weeksThe Arabic version of the Child Revised Impact of Events Scale (CRIES-8, 4-point scale) was implemented to assess posttraumatic stress symptoms. Analysis will be on dimensional scores, noting that CRIES \>17 points is predictive of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (http://www.childrenandwar.org).
Genetic markers of trauma and/or stress11 weeksGenetic and epigenetic analyses in DNA will be undertaken from cheek swab samples to investigate the biological signatures of altered expressions of trauma and/or psychosocial stress. Whole-genome amplification of the extracted DNA will be used to generate maximum genetic data from the samples.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026