Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of K-877 in Adult Patients With Fasting High Triglyceride Levels and Mild or Moderate Renal Impairment

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double--Blind, 12-Week Study With a 40-Week, Active-Controlled, Open-Label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of K-877 in Adult Patients With Fasting Triglyceride Levels ≥500 mg/dL and <2000 mg/dL and Mild or Moderate Renal Impairment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03011450
Enrollment
471
Registered
2017-01-05
Start date
2016-11-26
Completion date
2019-07-05
Last updated
2022-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of K-877 in adult patients With Fasting High Triglyceride Levels ≥500 mg/dL and \<2000 mg/dL and Mild or Moderate Renal Impairment.

Interventions

DRUGK-877
DRUGFenofibrate

Sponsors

Kowa Research Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able to understand and willing to comply with all study requirements and procedures throughout the duration of the study and give written informed consent; 2. Aged ≥18 years; 3. Patients receiving moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy must meet one of the following criteria¹ unless they have any exceptional conditions (see inclusion criterion 4): 1. Aged ≥21 years with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (history of acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction, stable or unstable angina, coronary or other arterial revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack \[TIA\] presumed to be of atherosclerotic origin, or peripheral arterial disease or revascularization), on a high-intensity statin (or moderate-intensity statin if not a candidate for high-intensity statin due to safety concerns); 2. Aged ≥21 years with a history of LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, which is not due to secondary modifiable causes, on a high-intensity statin (or moderate-intensity statin if not a candidate for high-intensity statin due to safety concerns); 3. Aged 40 to 75 years, inclusive, without clinical ASCVD but with diabetes and a history of LDL-C of 70 to 189 mg/dL, inclusive, on a moderate- or high-intensity statin; or 4. Aged 40 to 75 years, inclusive, without clinical ASCVD or diabetes, with a history of LDL-C of 70 to 189 mg/dL, inclusive, with estimated 10-year risk for ASCVD of ≥7.5% by the Pooled Cohort Equation on a moderate- or high-intensity statin; 4. Patients currently on a low-intensity statin or not on a statin, must meet one of the following criteria; 1. Patient does not meet any criteria for moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy listed above (see inclusion criteria, 3.a. through 3.d.); 2. Patient does meet one or more criteria for moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy listed above (see inclusion criteria 3.a. through 3.d.); but the patient is not a candidate for moderate or high-intensity statin due to safety concerns, or due to partial or complete statin intolerance; or 3. Patient does meet one or more criteria for moderate- or high intensity statin therapy listed above (see inclusion criteria 3.b. through 3.d., except for 3.a.); but the patient is not a candidate for moderate or high intensity statin for primary prevention after considering individual risk evaluation (e.g. current LDL C ≤70mg/dL) and patient preference; 5. Fasting TG levels ≥500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L) and \<2000 mg/dL (22.60 mmol/L) based on the mean of Visit 2 (Week -2) and Visit 3 (Week -1). * Mild to moderate renal impairment eGFR \>= 30mL/min/1.73 and \< 90 mL/min/1.73 at Visit 1

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who will require lipid-altering treatments other than study drugs (K-877 or fenofibrate), statins, ezetimibe, or PCSK9 inhibitors during the course of the study. These include bile acid sequestrants, non-study fibrates, niacin (\>100 mg/day), omega-3 fatty acids (\>1000 mg/day), or any supplements used to alter lipid metabolism including, but not limited to, red rice yeast supplements, garlic supplements, soy isoflavone supplements, sterol/stanol products, or policosanols; 2. Body mass index (BMI) \>45 kg/m2 at Visit 1 (Week -8 or Week -6); 3. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus; 4. Patients with newly diagnosed (within 3 months prior to Visit 2 \[Week -2\]) or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), defined as hemoglobin A1c \>9.5% at Visit 1 (Week -8 or Week -6);

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change in Fasting TG From Baseline to Week 1212 Weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-HDL-C12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Remnant Cholesterol12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HDL-C12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FFAs12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A212 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B4812 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B10012 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C212 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C312 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo E12 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FGF2112 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in hsCRP12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)12 WeeksTwo lipoprotein subclasses, HDL3 and HDL2a, were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)12 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)12 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)12 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)12 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)12 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)12 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)12 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)12 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)12 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)12 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction HDL Cholesterol (Total)12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C12 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B12 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A112 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C212 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting TG52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Remnant Cholesterol52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HDL-C52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A152 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-HDL-C52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in TC52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in LDL-C52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in FFAs52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A252 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B4852 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B10052 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C252 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C352 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo E52 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in FGF2152 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in hsCRP52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)52 WeeksTwo lipoprotein subclasses, HDL3 and HDL2a, were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)52 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)52 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)52 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)52 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)52 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)52 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)52 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A112 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)52 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Cholesterol)52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C52 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B52 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A152 Weeks
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C252 Weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)52 Weeks

Countries

Belarus, Bulgaria, Czechia, Georgia, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Eligible patients entered a 4- to 6-week lifestyle stabilization period. The stabilization period was followed by a 2-week TG qualifying period, and patient eligibility was assessed based on the mean TG value from these 2 visits. If the patient's mean TG level during the TG qualifying period was ≥450 mg/dL (5.09 mmol/L) and \<500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L), an additional TG measurement was taken 1 week later at Visit 3.1. The mean of all 3 TG measurements was used to determine eligibility for the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
K-877
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
311
Placebo/Fenofibrate
Patients randomized to receive placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg BID in the 12-week Efficacy Period initiated fenofibrate dosing at 48 mg once daily at Visit 7 (Week 12). Starting from Visit 8 (Week 16), Investigators were allowed to adjust fenofibrate dosing (to 145 mg once daily) at their discretion according to the local standard of care.
159
Total470

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicK-877Placebo/FenofibrateTotal
Age, Customized
<65 years
220 Participants119 Participants339 Participants
Age, Customized
≥65 years
91 Participants40 Participants131 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
299 Participants151 Participants450 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported/unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
302 Participants157 Participants459 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
94 Participants40 Participants134 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
217 Participants119 Participants336 Participants
Triglycerides793.44 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 390.102
759.36 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 395.359
781.45 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 391.511

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 3110 / 1593 / 2921 / 154
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3110 / 1592 / 2928 / 154
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 3113 / 15925 / 2925 / 154

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Fasting TG From Baseline to Week 12

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change in Fasting TG From Baseline to Week 12-58.89 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change in Fasting TG From Baseline to Week 12-22.94 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FGF21

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FGF21277.97 pg/mL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in FGF2112.15 pg/mL
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in hsCRP

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in hsCRP-0.201 mg/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in hsCRP-0.100 mg/L
p-value: 0.4589Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B0.219 Ratio
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B0.026 Ratio
p-value: <0.0001non-parametric Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)0.22 µmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)0.00 µmol/L
p-value: 0.2879Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)-0.21 µmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)-0.23 µmol/L
p-value: 0.9786Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)1.54 µmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)0.16 µmol/L
p-value: 0.0075Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)-17.06 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)-2.74 nmol/L
p-value: 0.0742Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)54.52 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)0.00 nmol/L
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)83.88 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)12.43 nmol/L
p-value: 0.2707Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)

Two types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)-12.62 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)-3.75 nmol/L
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)-41.27 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)-9.13 nmol/L
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)0.46 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)0.07 nmol/L
p-value: 0.5107Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in FGF21

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in FGF21371.80 pg/mL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in FGF21194.40 pg/mL
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in hsCRP

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in hsCRP-0.100 mg/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in hsCRP-0.225 mg/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B0.210 Ratio
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B0.150 Ratio
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)0.20 umol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)0.30 umol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)-0.20 umol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)-0.40 umol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)1.80 umol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)1.40 umol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)-12.00 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)-6.00 nmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)53.00 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)8.00 nmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)59.00 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)97.00 nmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)

Two types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)-13.00 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)-8.60 nmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)-41.95 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)-26.90 nmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

Population: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)-0.15 nmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)0.00 nmol/L
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A1

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A14.05 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A10.00 Percent change
p-value: 0.0156Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A2

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A219.34 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A20.00 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B0.57 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B-1.67 Percent change
p-value: 0.538Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B100

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B1002.05 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B100-2.33 Percent change
p-value: 0.1165Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B48

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B48-36.64 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B4819.91 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C2

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C2-4.70 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C20.00 Percent change
p-value: 0.0142Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C3

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C3-41.97 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C3-3.10 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo E

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo E-29.09 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo E-5.98 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FFAs

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FFAs-25.25 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FFAs-5.51 Percent change
p-value: 0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HDL-C

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HDL-C23.50 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HDL-C7.33 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))2.67 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))0.14 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)-10.65 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)0.91 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)

Two lipoprotein subclasses, HDL3 and HDL2a, were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)-2.13 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)-0.53 Percent change
p-value: 0.1651Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)-0.22 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)2.42 Percent change
p-value: 0.2486Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)17.52 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)3.21 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)44.20 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)4.81 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)53.94 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)4.24 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)48.44 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)1.89 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)23.79 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)-0.80 Percent change
p-value: 0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)-5.73 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)0.71 Percent change
p-value: 0.2763Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)-30.48 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)-2.89 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)-35.08 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)-0.74 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)-23.39 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)0.89 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)-23.23 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)0.07 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)-36.45 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)-5.95 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)-6.07 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)4.16 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C31.49 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C2.30 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A1

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A1-1.68 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A1-1.25 Percent change
p-value: 0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C2

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C2-27.76 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C2-0.47 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C-32.36 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C-9.02 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C-32.36 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C-9.02 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C-66.21 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C-26.81 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction HDL Cholesterol (Total)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction HDL Cholesterol (Total)5.51 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction HDL Cholesterol (Total)-2.20 Percent Change
p-value: 0.0209Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)5.96 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)-1.60 Percent change
p-value: 0.0009Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)-1.19 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)-0.14 Percent Change
p-value: 0.0502Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)17.58 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)4.97 Percent change
p-value: 0.0018Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)1.02 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)0.00 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)-54.86 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)-15.24 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)

Two types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)-42.76 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)-5.59 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)

Two types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)-55.19 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)-16.20 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)-5.02 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)-2.26 Percent change
p-value: 0.0241Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-HDL-C

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-HDL-C-20.98 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-HDL-C-3.43 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Remnant Cholesterol

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Remnant Cholesterol-55.51 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Remnant Cholesterol-13.29 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol-14.55 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol-2.05 Percent change
p-value: <0.0001Hodges-Lehmann method
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A1

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A13.29 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A12.56 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A2

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A215.92 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A28.33 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B-1.73 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B0.00 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B100

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B100-1.32 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B100-0.87 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B48

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B48-19.43 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B48-15.19 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C2

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C2-9.56 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C20.00 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C3

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C3-42.80 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C3-26.25 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo E

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo E-30.82 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo E-30.00 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting TG

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting TG-59.96 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting TG-49.55 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in FFAs

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in FFAs-21.61 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in FFAs-21.41 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HDL-C

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HDL-C18.78 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HDL-C15.59 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))2.69 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))1.54 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)-11.67 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)-5.62 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)

Two lipoprotein subclasses, HDL3 and HDL2a, were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)-4.62 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)-3.71 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)0.69 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)3.54 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)17.33 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)15.87 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)46.51 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)25.53 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)61.36 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)33.66 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)45.61 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)27.29 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)18.50 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)19.64 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)-6.92 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)1.17 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)-25.63 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)-24.80 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)-37.26 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)-24.22 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)-26.81 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)-17.41 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)-25.03 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)-13.31 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)-36.60 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)-22.03 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)-12.96 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)-2.31 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in LDL-C

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in LDL-C31.90 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in LDL-C22.96 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A1

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A1-3.56 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A1-2.94 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C2

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C2-27.81 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C2-13.17 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C-36.49 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C-27.67 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C-31.53 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C-23.70 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C-66.38 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C-56.61 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Cholesterol)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Cholesterol)2.90 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Cholesterol)-1.19 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)4.96 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)0.00 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)-1.14 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)-1.15 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)14.43 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)12.79 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)1.03 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)0.51 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)-55.03 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)-42.76 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)

Two types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)-40.10 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)-28.98 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)

Two types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)-54.30 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)-41.55 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)-7.15 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)-5.46 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-HDL-C

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-HDL-C-21.80 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-HDL-C-14.22 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Remnant Cholesterol

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Remnant Cholesterol-58.39 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Remnant Cholesterol-43.31 Percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in TC

Time frame: 52 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
K-877Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in TC-15.28 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in TC-8.64 Percent change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026