Skip to content

Effects of Agonists of Glucagon Like Peptide - 1 Receptors (GLP-1R) on Arterial Stiffness, Endothelial Glycocalyx and Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Effects of Agonists of Glucagon Like Peptide - 1 Receptors (GLP-1R) on Arterial Stiffness, Endothelial Glycocalyx and Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03010683
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-01-05
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Arterial stiffness, Endothelial glycocalyx, Coronary flow reserve

Brief summary

Arterial stiffness is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Moreover, the integrity of endothelial glycocalyx plays a vital role in vascular permeability, inflammation and elasticity. Agonists of Glucagon like peptide - 1 receptors (GLP-1R) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This category includes exenatide and liraglutide. These drugs lower glucose levels by inhibiting the secretion of glucagon, promoting the release of insulin in response to hyperglycemia, slowing gastric emptying, and augmenting satiety. Clinical studies have shown that GLP-1R agonists have beneficial effects on cardiovascular function in both diabetic patients and healthy subjects. The purpose of this study is to investigate in patients with T2DM without coronary artery disease (CAD), patients with T2DM and CAD and obese patients with abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), changes in arterial stiffness, endothelial glycocalyx thickness and coronary reserve flow (CFR) after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.

Detailed description

The investigators will study three groups matched for age and sex: 30 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) without coronary artery disease (CAD), 30 patients with T2DM and CAD and 30 obese patients (BMI \>30 Kg/m²) with abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). It will be a randomized study with metformin or GLP-1R agonist treatment for 1 year. All subjects will receive for 1 year: (a) GLP-1R agonist or (b) metformin. At 0, 3, 6 and 12 months, where 0 is the starting point of treatment, blood samples will be collected. At 0, 3, 6 and 12 months the investigators will measure: 1. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV, m/sec) using tonometry by Complior (SP ALAM) and augmentation index (AI, %) by the method of arteriography (Arteriograph, TensioMed) 2. Perfused boundary region (PBR, micrometers) of the sublingual arterial microvessels (ranged from 5-25 micrometers) using Sideview Darkfield imaging (Microscan, Glycocheck). Increased PBR is considered an accurate non invasive index of reduced endothelial glucocalyx thickness. 3. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) in the left anterior descending artery after infusion of adenosine using Doppler echocardiography. 4. Determination of the following parameters in blood: glucose, insulin, free fatty acids, triglycerides, glycerol, C reactive protein (CRP), transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b), Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 (LP-LPA2), tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), interleukins 6 and 10 (IL6 and IL10), propeptide of type I procollagen (PIP), propeptide of procollagen type III (PIIINP), matrix metallopeptidases 9 and 2 (MMP), macrophage-colony stimulating factor (MCSF), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and galectin-3.

Interventions

DRUGLiraglutide

Stimulation of Glucagon like peptide-1 receptor by liraglutide (Victoza) 1.8mg once daily as a subcutaneous injection

DRUGMetformin

Antidiabetic drug-biguanide class (Glucophage) 1000mg twice daily per os

Sponsors

University of Athens
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) without coronary artery disease (CAD) * Patients with T2DM and CAD. * Obese patients (BMI \>30 Kg/m²) with abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

Exclusion criteria

* valvular heart disease * congestive heart failure * peripheral vascular disease * liver or kidney failure * history of alcohol or drug abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthsDifferences in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV, m/sec) using tonometry at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.
Differences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.Differences in augmentation index (AI, %) using oscillometry at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.
Differences in Coronary Flow Reserve at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.Differences in coronary flow reserve (CFR) using Doppler echocardiography at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.
Differences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.Differences in endothelial glycocalyx thickness as assessed by perfused boundary region (PBR, micrometers) of the sublingual arterial microvessels at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R. High PBR values represent reduced glycocalyx thickness.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Endothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.Association of endothelial glycocalyx thickness as assessed by perfused boundary region (PBR, micrometers) of the sublingual arterial microvessels with pulse wave velocity (PWV, m/sec) at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.
Endothelial Glycocalyx and Coronary Flow Reserve.Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.Association of endothelial glycocalyx thickness as assessed by perfused boundary region (PBR, micrometers) of the sublingual arterial microvessels with coronary flow reserve (CFR) using Doppler echocardiography at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.

Countries

Greece

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liraglutide
Stimulation of glucagon like peptide-1 receptor by liraglutide (Victoza) 1.8 mg once daily as a subcutaneous injection
30
Metformin
Antidiabetic drug - biguanide class (Glucophage) 1000 mg twice daily per os
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLiraglutideMetforminTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants20 Participants40 Participants
Pulse Wave Velocity11.8 m/s
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
11.2 m/s
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
11.5 m/s
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Greeks
30 participants30 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants20 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Differences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.

Differences in augmentation index (AI, %) using oscillometry at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
LiraglutideDifferences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline18 percentage of the central pulse pressure
LiraglutideDifferences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.3 months15.8 percentage of the central pulse pressure
LiraglutideDifferences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.6 months13 percentage of the central pulse pressure
LiraglutideDifferences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.12 months13.9 percentage of the central pulse pressure
MetforminDifferences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.12 months15.3 percentage of the central pulse pressure
MetforminDifferences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline14 percentage of the central pulse pressure
MetforminDifferences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.6 months15 percentage of the central pulse pressure
MetforminDifferences in Augmentation Index at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.3 months13.6 percentage of the central pulse pressure
Primary

Differences in Coronary Flow Reserve at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.

Differences in coronary flow reserve (CFR) using Doppler echocardiography at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

Population: The investigators did not measure coronary flow reserve (CFR).

Primary

Differences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.

Differences in endothelial glycocalyx thickness as assessed by perfused boundary region (PBR, micrometers) of the sublingual arterial microvessels at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R. High PBR values represent reduced glycocalyx thickness.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideDifferences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline2.1 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.29
LiraglutideDifferences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.3 months2.07 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.3
LiraglutideDifferences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.6 months2.5 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.2
LiraglutideDifferences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.12 months2.04 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.2
MetforminDifferences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.12 months2.10 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.3
MetforminDifferences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline2.13 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.3
MetforminDifferences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.6 months2.13 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.3
MetforminDifferences in Endothelial Glycocalyx Thickness at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.3 months2.15 micrometersStandard Deviation 0.3
Primary

Differences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.

Differences in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV, m/sec) using tonometry at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideDifferences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline11.8 m/sStandard Deviation 2.5
LiraglutideDifferences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.3 months11.6 m/sStandard Deviation 2.8
LiraglutideDifferences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.6 months10.3 m/sStandard Deviation 3.3
LiraglutideDifferences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.12 months10.5 m/sStandard Deviation 1.9
MetforminDifferences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.12 months10.8 m/sStandard Deviation 2
MetforminDifferences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.Baseline11.2 m/sStandard Deviation 3
MetforminDifferences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.6 months11 m/sStandard Deviation 3
MetforminDifferences in Pulse Wave Velocity at Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 Months After Treatment With Metformin or Agonist GLP-1R.3 months11.5 m/sStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Endothelial Glycocalyx and Coronary Flow Reserve.

Association of endothelial glycocalyx thickness as assessed by perfused boundary region (PBR, micrometers) of the sublingual arterial microvessels with coronary flow reserve (CFR) using Doppler echocardiography at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

Population: The investigators did not estimate the association between endothelial glycocalyx thickness and coronary flow reserve (CFR) because they did not measure the CFR.

Secondary

Endothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.

Association of endothelial glycocalyx thickness as assessed by perfused boundary region (PBR, micrometers) of the sublingual arterial microvessels with pulse wave velocity (PWV, m/sec) at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with metformin or agonist GLP-1R.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LiraglutideEndothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.3 months0.36 Pearson correlation coefficient (r)
LiraglutideEndothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.Baseline0.39 Pearson correlation coefficient (r)
LiraglutideEndothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.6 months0.32 Pearson correlation coefficient (r)
LiraglutideEndothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.12 months0.44 Pearson correlation coefficient (r)
MetforminEndothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.12 months0.37 Pearson correlation coefficient (r)
MetforminEndothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.Baseline0.35 Pearson correlation coefficient (r)
MetforminEndothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.3 months0.32 Pearson correlation coefficient (r)
MetforminEndothelial Glycocalyx and Pulse Wave Velocity.6 months0.29 Pearson correlation coefficient (r)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026