Skip to content

Open Versus Laparoscopic Left-sided Hepatectomy Trial

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Versus Laparoscopic Left-sided Hepatectomy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03010085
Acronym
OLLEH
Enrollment
122
Registered
2017-01-04
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2017-01-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasm, Liver

Brief summary

Open versus Laparoscopic Left-sided Hepatectomy (OLLEH) trial Multi-institutional, prospective and randomized trial in patients undergoing left sided hepatectomy through laparoscopic versus open procedure. Primary endpoint: Functional recovery Secondary endpoint: Hospital duration, estimated blood loss, operation time, resection margin status, postoperative complication, mortality, liver function laboratory test, re-admission, quality of life, cosmesis, cost effectiveness

Detailed description

Laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy is widely performed for the treatment of various hepatic neoplasms. Many studies have reported that laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy is safe and effective compared with open conventional left-sided hemihepatectomy. However, prospective study is rare and there is no randomized controlled trial. The surgeons who are affiliated at a medical center in capital area of Korea launched the Open versus Laparoscopic Left-sided Hepatectomy (OLLEH) trial to verify the surgical outcome of laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy. Laparoscopic surgery has benefits that less wound and less pain. The hypothesis of the study is 'The laparoscopic left-sided hemihepatectomy is better than open surgery from functional recovery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpen left-sided hepatectomy

Open left-sided hepatectomy Laparotomy (upper midline, inverted 'L', or Benz incision) Mobilization of the liver Glissonian approach or individual isolation technique Left lateral sectionectomy or left hemihepatectomy

PROCEDURELaparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy

Trocar insertion Mobilization of the liver Glissonian approach or individual isolation technique Left lateral sectionectomy or left hemihepatectomy

Sponsors

Korea Cancer Center Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Boramae Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Eulji University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Gyeongsang National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Jeju National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Catholic University of Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Soonchunhyang University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Inje University
CollaboratorOTHER
Pusan National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
DongGuk University
CollaboratorOTHER
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Chonnam National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hallym University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient who underwent open or laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy for benign or malignant neoplasm of the liver 2. Child-Pugh A without portal hypertension * No portosystemic shunt * No splenomegaly * Platelet count \>100,000/ul 3. Age 18 to 80 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status: 0 or 1 5. American society of anesthesiology class: I or II 6. Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Additional intervention to the liver (Radio Frequent Ablation, Percutaneous Ethanol. Injection Therapy or others) 2. Combined hepatectomy 3. Bile duct reconstruction 4. Intrahepatic duct stone 5. Upper abdominal laparotomy history 6. Previous hepatectomy 7. Combined operation for extrahepatic disease 8. Vulnerable population (mental retardation, pregnancy) 9. Patient who participated in other clinical trial within 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Checklist of functional recovery (Questionnaire, liver function test of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase)up to 30 daysChecklist of functional recovery 1. (Questionnaire) Do you want intravenous analgesics for postoperative pain ? (Yes, No) 2. (Questionnaire) Do you have trouble to ambulate by oneself ? (Yes, No) 3. (Questionnaire) Do you have trouble to digest solid meal ? (Yes, No) 4. (Questionnaire) Do you want intravenous fluid to subside your thirsty ? (Yes, No) 5. (Liver function test) Are serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase increasing ? (Yes, No) * Daily check the five item above until every item is 'No' * If all of the items are 'No', the patient is regarded as a functionally recovered state.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortalityup to 30 daysDeath within 30 days after surgery
Readmission rateup to 30 daysReadmission
Hospital durationup to 30 daysHospital duration after surgery
Blood lossup to 30 daysEstimated blood loss on anesthesiology sheet
Postoperative complicationup to 30 daysDischarge summary
Resection margin statusup to 30 daysAccording to the pathology report
Liver function testup to 30 daysBilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio (INR), Albumin
Quality of lifeup to 30 daysquestionnaire
Operation timeup to 30 daysSkin incision to wound closure

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactSeung Duk Lee, MD
mmcleemed@gmail.com+82-31-920-1709
Backup ContactYunsung Seo, MS
73872@ncc.re.kr+82-31-920-0745

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026