Skip to content

Feasibility Study: fMRI Evaluation of Auricular PENFS for Fibromyalgia

Feasibility Study: fMRI Evaluation of Auricular PENFS for Fibromyalgia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03008837
Acronym
fMRI
Enrollment
27
Registered
2017-01-04
Start date
2017-06-01
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2020-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Brief summary

Given recent increasing opioid-related deaths and evidence showing against the use of opioids for non-malignant chronic pain, there is growing need for non-narcotic pain management. Fibromyalgia is a difficult to treat chronic pain condition that is often treated with opioids despite existing evidence. The prevalence of fibromyalgia is increased among Veterans returning from the gulf war and is already a significant burden in senior Veterans who may have suffered with chronic pain for decades already. Many treatment options for fibromyalgia carry intolerable side effects. PENFS (percutaneous electrical neural field stimulation) is a FDA-approved, non-pharmacologic therapy that is currently utilized within the military and VA system, but sufficient evidence regarding its outcomes and neural mechanisms have not been adequately investigated. An understanding of its neural underpinnings and analgesic effects could lead to 1) improvements in pain management and quality of life, 2) cost-savings and 3) development of new techniques to address pain.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain syndrome that consists of chronic widespread pain, decreased physical function, fatigue, psychoemotional/sleep disturbances, and various somatic complaints, affecting anywhere from 5-10 million Americans, with \ 1,500 Veterans carrying a diagnosis of fibromyalgia seen per year at the Atlanta VAMC alone. It is estimated that fibromyalgia costs the American population over $20 billion/year in lost wages and disability. Initial therapies often include complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies, which are generally considered safe, although their efficacy has not been thoroughly evaluated for fibromyalgia. Thus, non-pharmacologic alternatives require more rigorous scientific investigation for the treatment of fibromyalgia. There is evidence to support the use of percutaneous electrical neural stimulation (PENS) in the treatment of pain conditions, which may have increased effects relative to acupuncture based on systematic reviews. While fMRI data for acupuncture and fibromyalgia exists, no such data exists for PENS treatment. An evolved form of PENS, percutaneous electrical neural field stimulation (PENFS) of the auricle is already used in the military and VA systems for the treatment of chronic pain, but evidence regarding its mechanisms and effects is lacking. Stimulation of the vagus nerve, which has auricular branches, has been previously studied for pain relief in fibromyalgia. However, application of PENS-type stimulation to the auricle has not been previously studied with fMRI, and this type of therapy may lead to neural changes worthy of further exploration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of using fMRI as a biomarker for the neural substrates of pain and functional changes following PENFS treatments. HYPOTHESIS: PENFS will result in decreased functional connectivity between the insula and default mode network as evaluated by fMRI, which will correlate to more significant improvements in pain and function relative to standard therapy for fibromyalgia. METHODS: Subjects who meet study criteria will receive baseline assessments including resting state fMRI, collection of biobehavioural information such as cognitive and psychological assessments on standardized forms, eating, sleeping and drinking habits, Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS), arm curl, 30-s chair stand, and pain interference scores. Subjects will be stratified based on age and gender and then divided into standard therapy control (medication management and physical therapy) or PENFS (series of 4, weekly) treatments and assessed for fMRI changes 2 weeks after the final treatment. Pain and function will also be assessed at the 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks following the final treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Auricular PENFS has not been studied with fMRI. Stimulation of the auricle may produce neural changes that differ from traditional therapies. Understanding the underlying neural mechanisms of auricular PENFS could assist in developing targeted treatments for fibromyalgia and chronic pain. Further, if PENFS can significantly improve pain relief and function over standard therapies, it could decrease the need for opioid analgesics and their associated risks, which is a primary objective of the VA Opioid Safety Initiative. The present investigation will not only serve to elucidate neural changes with PENFS, but could be directly applicable to our Veterans suffering from fibromyalgia by providing evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of this already clinically-employed non-pharmacologic treatment (or lack thereof), and result in evidence-based implementation and potential cost savings to the VA system.

Interventions

DEVICEMilitary Field Stimulator

The Military Field Stimulator (MFS/Neuro-Stim System), a percutaneous electrical neural field stimulation (PENFS) device evolved from PENS, is currently employed by the United States (US) military and used in the VA (contract number V797D-50453). There is some evidence based on a small trial of 20 postoperative patients that suggests PENS may have greater benefit than acupuncture for acute pain.

OTHERStandard Therapy

Standard therapy for fibromyalgia will include physical therapy, medication management through the Anesthesiology Pain Clinic, and referral to a pain psychologist.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Percutaneous electrical neural field stimulator (PENFS) using the military field stimulator, a device that uses small needles inserted in the ear (like auricular acupuncture), which are connected by electrodes to a battery pack that is attached externally using adhesive to the back of the ear. The stimulator is meant to stimulate branches of the cranial nerves via the ear.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must be male and female Veterans age 20-60 with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia as diagnosed by a clinician, by chart review, and by the most recent American College of Rheumatology 2010 criteria for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia. 70,71 * Subjects must self-report consistent, daily pain (greater than 5 on the VAS) \>90 days. * Subjects must have intact skin free of infection at the site of implantation. * Subjects must be willing to participate and understand the consent. * Subjects must be right-handed in order to provide consistency in brain structure and function.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects must not be currently pregnant, since effects of fMRI and electrical current on the developing fetus are not well-known. * Subjects must not have an implanted electrical device such as a vagal stimulator, pacemaker, or spinal pain pump, which are not compatible with MRI. * Subjects must not have a history of seizures or neurologic condition that may alter the structure of the brain. * Subjects must not have a history of drug abuse or severe, uncontrolled psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation. * Subjects must not have psoriasis vulgaris or other skin conditions that may increase the risk of infection at the implantation site. * Subjects must not have severe anxiety, claustrophobia, or other conditions that may prevent their ability to lie at rest in an MRI scanner. This will be determined after discussion with the patient regarding their own perceived ability to lie at rest in an MRI scanner without the use of additional sedating medications. * Subjects must not introduce new medications or treatments for fibromyalgia symptoms during the course of the study to prevent confounding results. * Subjects must not have a concurrent autoimmune or inflammatory disease that causes pain such as systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease or rheumatoid arthritis, since this could decrease the effect of treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
fcMRI as a Biomarker to Investigate Functionally Correlated Neural Substrates of Pain in Patients Undergoing PENFSbaseline and 2 weeks post-treatment2 weeks following the final treatment, subjects in the PENFS group were be evaluated for changes in functional connectivity between the right posterior insula seed and other areas of the DMN as evaluated by fcMRI relative to standard treatment controls, using whole brain analysis. The measurement is increase/decrease of signal in a given region, thresholded at p \<0.05, summarized into a value representing 'size of region of increase' or 'size of region of decrease' after subjects scans were combined/mapped onto a standard MNI brain. Only clusters of over 40 voxels were included, and the size of the region is reported in voxel size. The averaged brains for baseline fcMRI was subtracted from post-treatment for each group, and then these averaged differences were subtracted from each other. While other areas of the brain met threshold criteria in the analysis, only areas belonging to the DMN are reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) From Baseline2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-upFor fibromyalgia patients, pain will be assessed in the PENFS group relative to standard treatment controls, as indicated by analgesic Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) at 2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-up. This is a validated pain measure that includes a 0-10 scale where 0 means no pain and 10 means greatest pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate worse reported pain outcomes.
Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-upPain interference scores were measured using supplemental questions on the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). Participants were asked to evaluate on a scale of 0-10 the level to which pain interfered with their activity, sleep, mood, and stress, with 10 being the worst interference, and 0 being no interference.
Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Left Arm)2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-upObjective tests for functional improvement will be performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks follow-up and include 30 sec chair stand tests. The total number of full bicep curls (left arm) participants could perform using were measured over a 30-second period at each visit.
Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Right Arm)2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-upObjective tests for functional improvement will be performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks follow-up and include 30 sec chair stand tests. The total number of full bicep curls (right arm) participants could perform using were measured over a 30-second period at each visit.
Change in Sit-to Stand Test From Baseline2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-upObjective tests for functional improvement will be performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks follow-up and include 30 sec chair stand tests. The total number of full sit-to-stands participants could perform were measured over a 30-second period at each visit.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

27 veterans were initially consented. However, 6 of these veterans either could not begin the study within the study period, moved out of state, or received implanted MRI-incompatible devices that excluded them from the study following the initial consent, but prior to randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PENFS
Veterans with fibromyalgia who meet study criteria and are randomized to the experimental group will receive standard therapy in addition to percutaneous electrical neural field stimulation (PENFS), which involves placement of small electrodes through a similar process to ear acupuncture to the ear. These electrodes are attached to a battery pack that is taped behind the ear and worn for 5-day intervals. The intention of this FDA-approved device is to relieve pain, though data on its effectiveness is still limited. Device placement (series of 4, weekly) will be performed by an Anesthesiology Pain Clinic provider. fMRI evaluation of neural changes, assessment of function and quality of life improvements will be performed at the beginning and end of the study.
12
Standard Therapy
Veterans with fibromyalgia who meet study criteria and are randomized to standard therapy will receive physical therapy, medication management through the Anesthesiology Pain Clinic, and referral to a pain psychologist. fMRI evaluation of neural changes, assessment of function and quality of life improvements will be performed at the beginning and end of the study. Standard Therapy: Standard therapy for fibromyalgia will include physical therapy, medication management through the Anesthesiology Pain Clinic, and referral to a pain psychologist.
9
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPENFSStandard TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous50 years48.56 years49.35 years
DVPRS (Pain)6.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84
8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.77
7.41 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 120 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

fcMRI as a Biomarker to Investigate Functionally Correlated Neural Substrates of Pain in Patients Undergoing PENFS

2 weeks following the final treatment, subjects in the PENFS group were be evaluated for changes in functional connectivity between the right posterior insula seed and other areas of the DMN as evaluated by fcMRI relative to standard treatment controls, using whole brain analysis. The measurement is increase/decrease of signal in a given region, thresholded at p \<0.05, summarized into a value representing 'size of region of increase' or 'size of region of decrease' after subjects scans were combined/mapped onto a standard MNI brain. Only clusters of over 40 voxels were included, and the size of the region is reported in voxel size. The averaged brains for baseline fcMRI was subtracted from post-treatment for each group, and then these averaged differences were subtracted from each other. While other areas of the brain met threshold criteria in the analysis, only areas belonging to the DMN are reported.

Time frame: baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment

Population: Using a right posterior insula seed for seed-based whole-brain analysis in AFNI, a difference of the differences was measured. Clusters greater than 40 voxels in size with p\<0.05 (set in AFNI) found in the default mode network (DMN) are included in the outcome table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PENFS (Post-pre)fcMRI as a Biomarker to Investigate Functionally Correlated Neural Substrates of Pain in Patients Undergoing PENFSAnterior cingulate (L)0 Cluster size (voxels)
PENFS (Post-pre)fcMRI as a Biomarker to Investigate Functionally Correlated Neural Substrates of Pain in Patients Undergoing PENFSInferior parietal lobule (R)0 Cluster size (voxels)
PENFS (Post-pre)fcMRI as a Biomarker to Investigate Functionally Correlated Neural Substrates of Pain in Patients Undergoing PENFSPosterior cingulate cortex (L)0 Cluster size (voxels)
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)fcMRI as a Biomarker to Investigate Functionally Correlated Neural Substrates of Pain in Patients Undergoing PENFSAnterior cingulate (L)0 Cluster size (voxels)
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)fcMRI as a Biomarker to Investigate Functionally Correlated Neural Substrates of Pain in Patients Undergoing PENFSInferior parietal lobule (R)0 Cluster size (voxels)
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)fcMRI as a Biomarker to Investigate Functionally Correlated Neural Substrates of Pain in Patients Undergoing PENFSPosterior cingulate cortex (L)61 Cluster size (voxels)
Comparison: PENFS (post-pre) - Standard Therapy (post-pre)p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) From Baseline

For fibromyalgia patients, pain will be assessed in the PENFS group relative to standard treatment controls, as indicated by analgesic Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) at 2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-up. This is a validated pain measure that includes a 0-10 scale where 0 means no pain and 10 means greatest pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate worse reported pain outcomes.

Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-up

Population: Not all individuals presented for all follow-up visits, but all participants included in the analysis were present for baseline assessments, pre- and post- imaging studies, and at least one follow-up visit. Missing data was not imputed and not used for analysis in order to avoid distortions related to imputation in the small sample size.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) From Baseline2 weeks-0.9 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) From Baseline6 weeks-1.1 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) From Baseline12 weeks-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) From Baseline2 weeks-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) From Baseline6 weeks-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) From Baseline12 weeks-0.1 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Left Arm)

Objective tests for functional improvement will be performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks follow-up and include 30 sec chair stand tests. The total number of full bicep curls (left arm) participants could perform using were measured over a 30-second period at each visit.

Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-up

Population: Not all individuals presented for all follow-up visits, but all participants included in the analysis were present for baseline assessments, pre- and post- imaging studies, and at least one follow-up visit. Missing data was not imputed and not used for analysis in order to avoid distortions related to imputation in the small sample size.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Left Arm)2 weeks4.6 bicep curls
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Left Arm)6 weeks6.1 bicep curls
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Left Arm)12 weeks5.8 bicep curls
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Left Arm)2 weeks1.7 bicep curls
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Left Arm)6 weeks-1.8 bicep curls
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Left Arm)12 weeks0 bicep curls
Secondary

Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Right Arm)

Objective tests for functional improvement will be performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks follow-up and include 30 sec chair stand tests. The total number of full bicep curls (right arm) participants could perform using were measured over a 30-second period at each visit.

Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-up

Population: Not all individuals presented for all follow-up visits, but all participants included in the analysis were present for baseline assessments, pre- and post- imaging studies, and at least one follow-up visit. Missing data was not imputed and not used for analysis in order to avoid distortions related to imputation in the small sample size.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Right Arm)2 weeks4.2 bicep curls
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Right Arm)6 weeks6 bicep curls
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Right Arm)12 weeks4.6 bicep curls
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Right Arm)2 weeks0.7 bicep curls
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Right Arm)6 weeks0.8 bicep curls
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Number of Bicep Curls From Baseline (Right Arm)12 weeks0.2 bicep curls
Secondary

Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline

Pain interference scores were measured using supplemental questions on the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). Participants were asked to evaluate on a scale of 0-10 the level to which pain interfered with their activity, sleep, mood, and stress, with 10 being the worst interference, and 0 being no interference.

Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-up

Population: Not all individuals presented for all follow-up visits, but all participants included in the analysis were present for baseline assessments, pre- and post- imaging studies, and at least one follow-up visit. Missing data was not imputed and not used for analysis in order to avoid distortions related to imputation in the small sample size.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline2 weeks - Activity-1.2 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline2 weeks - Sleep-1.6 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline2 weeks - Mood-1 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline2 weeks - Stress-1.4 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline6 weeks - Activity-1.2 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline6 weeks - Sleep-1.6 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline6 weeks - Mood-1.4 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline6 weeks - Stress-1.8 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline12 weeks - Activity-1.6 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline12 weeks - Sleep-1.7 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline12 weeks - Mood-2.1 score on a scale
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline12 weeks - Stress-1.9 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline12 weeks - Mood1.8 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline2 weeks - Activity0.9 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline6 weeks - Mood1.8 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline2 weeks - Sleep-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline12 weeks - Sleep2.2 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline2 weeks - Mood-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline6 weeks - Stress1.7 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline2 weeks - Stress0 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline12 weeks - Stress1.8 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline6 weeks - Activity1.2 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline12 weeks - Activity1 score on a scale
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Pain Interference With Activity, Sleep, Mood, and Stress From Baseline6 weeks - Sleep1.8 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Sit-to Stand Test From Baseline

Objective tests for functional improvement will be performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks follow-up and include 30 sec chair stand tests. The total number of full sit-to-stands participants could perform were measured over a 30-second period at each visit.

Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-up

Population: Not all individuals presented for all follow-up visits, but all participants included in the analysis were present for baseline assessments, pre- and post- imaging studies, and at least one follow-up visit. Missing data was not imputed and not used for analysis in order to avoid distortions related to imputation in the small sample size.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Sit-to Stand Test From Baseline2 weeks2.7 sit-to-stands
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Sit-to Stand Test From Baseline6 weeks3.1 sit-to-stands
PENFS (Post-pre)Change in Sit-to Stand Test From Baseline12 weeks1.7 sit-to-stands
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Sit-to Stand Test From Baseline2 weeks0.3 sit-to-stands
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Sit-to Stand Test From Baseline6 weeks0.3 sit-to-stands
Standard Therapy Control (Post-pre)Change in Sit-to Stand Test From Baseline12 weeks1.4 sit-to-stands

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026