Skip to content

Norwegian Study of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Norwegian Randomized Study of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (NO PERS-AF)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03008811
Acronym
NO PERS-AF
Enrollment
101
Registered
2017-01-02
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2021-05-31
Last updated
2021-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation

Brief summary

This study will compare efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a contact force sensing catheter for treatment of patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation.

Detailed description

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with either the second generation cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance™) or a radiofrequency ablation technique with an irrigated ablation catheter (TactiCath™ Quartz) . A total of 128 patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomized for either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation treatment. With both techniques, pulmonary vein isolation will be performed and confirmed by a circular mapping catheter. The primary endpoint is freedom of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months.Treatment success will be evaluated by using 12-lead electrocardiography and 7-day Holter recording.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter.

Device: Arctic Front Advance™ cardiac cryoablation catheter system.

PROCEDUREPulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation.

Device: TactiCath™ Quartz irrigated ablation catheter (St. Jude Medical) with aid of 3-D mapping system (EnSite Precision, St. Jude Medical).

Sponsors

St. Olavs Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital of North Norway
CollaboratorOTHER
Haukeland University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients plan to undergo pulmonary vein isolation as the first procedure for symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (\>7 days) and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (\> 12 months, but ≤ 3 years) who are refractory to at least one class I or class III antiarrhythmic drug and required at least one electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion. * Subject is at least 18 and ≤ 75 years old. * Subject is able and willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (\< 7days) or persistent atrial fibrillation with duration \> 3 years. * Subject has any previous left atrial ablation procedure or surgery, including pulmonary vein isolation. * Subject has presence of an intracavitary thrombus. * Subject has uncontrolled heart failure. * Subject has severe valvular disease. * Subject has the left atrial diameter \> 60 mm confirmed by echocardiography. * Subject has contraindications to systemic anticoagulation with heparin or oral anticoagulants. * Subject has known cryoglobulinaemia. * Subject has severe renal dysfunction. * Subject who is or may potentially be pregnant. * Subject has unstable angina pectoris. * Subject has history of previous myocardial infarction or percutaneous intervention during the last three months. * Subject has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with detected pulmonary hypertension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The freedom of any atrial arrhythmias at 12 months.12 monthsThe primary endpoint is freedom of any atrial arrhythmias at 12 months (at least one episode of atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia with a duration \> 30 seconds documented by 7-day Holter ECG, or any other printed ECG recording).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure duration12 monthsProcedure duration documented
Fluoroscopy time12 monthsFluoroscopy time documented
Ablation time12 monthsAblation time documented
Quality of life - Short Form (SF-36) Heath Survey12 months.Short Form (SF-36) Heath Survey filled in by patients.
The burden of atrial fibrillation12 months.Total duration of atrial fibrillation recorded by 7-day Holter.
Admittance to hospital or emergency services due to symptoms caused by documented atrial arrhythmias.12 months.Hospitalization after the procedre
The occurrence of documented left atrial tachycardia and typical or atypical atrial flutter.12 months.Atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter recorded by all types of ECG
Symptoms related to atrial fibrillation.12 months.Symptoms related to atrial fibrillation documented
Serious adverse events.12 months.Serious adverse events documented
Quality of life affected by atrial fibrillation.12 months.The Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire will be filled in by patients.

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026