Bone Graft; Complications
Conditions
Brief summary
Studying the comparative effectiveness of socket preservation using autogenous bone graft versus MPM for implant insertion.
Detailed description
To assess bone quality, stability of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets of mandibular anterior and premorals augmented by MPM (Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix) versus autogenous bone graft (gold standard), at different follow-up periods (0, 3, 6, 9 months).
Interventions
OTHERMPM(Mineralized plasmatic matrix).
Preparation of sticky bone graft by addition of growth factors obtained from patient's vebous blood.
Socket preservation using autogenous bone graft for preservation of bone width and height for future implant insertion.
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Medically free patients. 2. Patients with mandibular anterior and premolar hopeless teeth indicated for extraction. 3. Evaluated bone height on X.Ray to be (0-4 mm buccal bone dehiscence). 4. Age between 18 and 40 years. 5. Both sexes. 6. Patients physically able to tolerate surgical and restorative procedures. Good oral hygiene. 7. Highly motivated patients.
Exclusion criteria
1. Smokers. 2. Pregnant or lactating females. 3. Presence of any pathosis in the pre-implant site. 4. Presence of Para functional habits. 5. History of oral radiotherapy. 6. History of prolonged steroids use 7. Psychological disorders.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Patient Satisfaction regarding function, to be measured using patient questionnaire. | 3 Months. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparative histomorphometric analysis, to be measured using a digital software called (leica QWin 500) and unit of measurements are to be (Pixels). | 3 Months. |
Outcome results
None listed