Skip to content

Interstitial Cystitis: Examination of the Central Autonomic Network

Interstitial Cystitis: Examination of the Central Autonomic Network

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03008382
Acronym
ICECAN
Enrollment
72
Registered
2017-01-02
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
2022-03-16
Last updated
2025-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome, Myofascial Pelvic Pain

Keywords

Interstitial Cystitis, Pelvic Pain

Brief summary

This proposal aims to move the science of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) from simple associations towards an investigation of cause and effect relationships. The investigators will determine whether the striking changes in autonomic nervous system responsiveness (ANS-R) contribute meaningfully to the pathogenesis of CPP.

Detailed description

This multi-site trial will recruit 2 groups of female subjects ages 18-80 years, evenly distributed across decades (10 or 20 per decade as appropriate): Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and Healthy Controls (HC). The chronic pelvic pain group will be split into 2 sub groups where some participants will receive metopropol then placebo while the other participants in this interventional group will receive placebo then metoprolol. This proposal aims to move the science of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) from simple associations towards an investigation of cause and effect relationships. We will determine whether the striking changes in ANS-R contribute meaningfully to the pathogenesis of CPP through 3 aims: 1. Careful longitudinal repeated measures in individual subjects to determine if ANS-R changes precede clinical changes; 2. Assessing the impact of an intervention designed to change ANS-R on the clinical course of CPP; 3. Evaluating changes in brain connectivity between the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the periaqueductal gray (PAG) associated with changes in ANS-R and improved disease status. Subjects will be pre-screened in person or on the phone. An in-person pre-screen takes place in the MCW Neurology Research Rooms at Froedtert Hospital. If the subject is able to participate, subject will sign the informed consent form before completing a baseline evaluation. The baseline evaluation occurs either following consent or at another date convenient for them. Subjects must complete all baseline activities within 2 weeks, or before their Week 4/Visit 2. The baseline evaluation is comprised of a general examination, a set of questionnaires, background history documenting date of diagnosis, medications tried, duration of each treatment and dosing, surgeries and therapeutic and exploratory procedures performed. A pelvic examination will be performed with CPP subjects patients only. Active Change in Posture (ACP) is administered to the subject. Subjects will complete the uroflow (urine) measurement and Valsalva maneuver in the MCW Neurology Research Rooms with a member of the research team present. Observational Substudy: This substudy is identical to the above with the exception of not taking a beta-blocker or placebo and is only 12 weeks long instead of 24. This is strictly an observational study to monitor subjects who have been diagnosed with IC or MPP. If the screening information shows that the subject meets the requirements, then they will be able to start. If the screening information shows that they cannot be in the research, the research doctor will discuss other options with them and/or refer them back to their regular doctor. If the subject is able to participate, they will complete 3 regular on-site long-visits at weeks 0, 4, and 12. The first long-visit (baseline evaluation) may occur either today following consent or at another date convenient for them. The baseline evaluation comprises a general and pelvic examination (no speculum), psychological questionnaires and a background history questionnaire. Weekly Home Checks will occur for 24 weeks (or 12 weeks if in observational sub-study) following consent. Once each a week, subjects will complete a 24-hour heart rate (HR) recording and the ACP recording using the eMotion Faros 360° portable EKG device. A member of the research team will contact the subject each week while they complete the weekly questionnaires and ACP recording. This will ensure compliance and will give the subject the opportunity to ask any questions.The researcher will remain on the phone or via Skype to monitor the subject while the ACP recording is completed from home just prior to the subject's bedtime. The HR recording will be uploaded to MCW's secure server at the subject's next hospital visit. Throughout the study, subjects flare activity will be monitored via phone calls and recording flares in the EMA application on the smartphone. This will be a Daily Flare Question in the EMA which is a set alarmed time to sound as a reminder for the duration of the subject's participation. The following weeks after each site visit and the night before visit 5, subjects will repeat complete the 24-hr HR recording to ensure comparability of the HRV recording at home to the one performed at the matching on-site visit., Subjects will also complete the 24-h voiding diary, a set of questions using the ICECAN mobile App installed on a pre-loaded smartphone and questionnaires. Deidentified 24-hour HRV and ACP recordings will be sent to Ohio State University for analysis. Follow-up Visits: Weeks 4, 12, 16, 24, Visits 2-5 (weeks 4 and 12 (Visits 2 and 3) for the observational substudy) Subjects will arrive to MCW Neurology Research Rooms to repeat the following: review of comorbidities, tender points exam, questionnaires, ACP and DNIC tests. Subjects will complete the Valsalva maneuver in the MCW Neurology Research Rooms with a member of the research team present. Chronic Pelvic Pain patients subjects will complete a repeat pelvic examination at Weeks 12 and 24. CPP aparticipants will be randomized to receive 8 weeks of either placebo (a pill with no active agent), or metoprolol (a pill that reduces the impact of the brain's fight or flight circuits). Metoprolol is in the class of beta-blockers commonly used for mild blood pressure control, and also commonly used for migraine. Subjects will be administered 8 weeks of metoprolol or placebo starting at their Week 4 Visit. Subjects will complete a 4-week washout period (Week 12-16) and will be administered 8 weeks of crossover (Weeks 16-24). Blood will be drawn (\ 50 mL, a little more than 3 tablespoons) at each in-person visit at weeks 0, 4, 12, 16, and 24 for chronic pelvic pain subjects (healthy control only at Baseline and Final visits; 2 draws total). A portion of the blood plasma/serum will be sent to the University of Pittsburgh for additional related analysis. The sample will be labeled by a number and will not contain any information that can be used to directly identify subject. This portion of the study is critical to gather new information about pelvic pain, which is very poorly understood and we highly encourage subjects to participate in this portion of the study; however, it is optional. Healthy Controls: 60 healthy control subjects will also complete this study in 24 weeks that include 4 long site visits and 6 weekly home check visits. During this first long visit they will complete a general exam and physician evaluation, DNIC, ACP, Valsalva maneuver, and questionnaires. Subjects will complete a 24-hour HR recording from home once a week for 6 weeks total.

Interventions

Metoprolol is a beta-blocker commonly used for mild blood pressure control, and also commonly used for migraine. Subjects with IC/BPS or MPP will start metoprolol at 25 mg once daily and increase to the goal dose of 25 mg 2/day after one week and continue for 8 weeks total.

DRUGPlacebo Oral Tablet

Subjects with IC/BPS or MPP will start placebo distributed in a double-blind manner. Subjects will take placebo once daily and increase to the goal dose of 25 mg 2/day after one week and continue for 8 weeks total.

OTHERNo intervention- observational sub-study

Participants did not receive placebo or metoprolol during the entire duration of the study.

Sponsors

Endeavor Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Case Western Reserve University
CollaboratorOTHER
Virginia Commonwealth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Participants and investigator did not know if they were randomized to intervention or placebo first for Chronic pelvic pain group

Intervention model description

Participants with Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS) and/or Myofascial Pelvic Pain (MPP) will be randomized to take 8 weeks of Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet or Placebo Oral Tablet, followed by a 4-Week washout period, and then 8 weeks of Placebo or Metoprolol.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged between 18 and 80 years old * Healthy controls; Patients diagnosed with Interstitial cystitis/Painful bladder syndrome (IC/BPS) or Myofascial pelvic pain (MPP) * IC/BPS - ≥3 months chronic pelvic pain, pressure or discomfort perceived to be related to the urinary bladder accompanied by at least one other urinary symptom like persistent urge to void or frequency. Confusable diseases as the cause of the symptoms must be excluded, particularly recurrent UTI * MPP - ≥3 months of non-cyclic continuous pelvic pain unrelated to bladder state and a minimum of 2 of 5 examined pelvic floor TPs scoring at least 4 out of 10 on a numeric rating scale using 2 kg pressure applied with the index finger * Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Known nervous system conditions including but not limited to diabetic neuropathy, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, strokes, seizures, etc. * Baseline heart rate \< 50 bpm; blood pressure ≥ 140/80 mmHg at rest or uncontrolled hypertension; or hypertension requiring more than two drugs for control * Pregnant, attempting to become pregnant , or breast-feeding * Unevaluated hematuria or infection at the time of enrollment * Pelvic or bladder neoplasm or infection * Severe asthma, inflammatory arthritis, connective tissue or auto-immune disorders * Evidence of unstable medical disorder such as kidney (rising creatinine or end-stage renal failure) or liver impairment (rising AST or ALT, or end-stage with coagulopathy); poorly controlled significant cardiovascular (CHF), respiratory, endocrine (diabetes - A1c \> 9 - or untreated thyroid dysfunction) or uncontrolled psychiatric illness (such as untreated depression, psychosis, etc.) * Treatment with a drug or medical device within the previous 30 days that has not received regulatory approval * Use of hormones (except insulin, thyroid replacement or oral contraceptives). Hormone replacement therapy is acceptable * Current, ongoing drug or alcohol abuse * Current use of 150 mg or more of narcotics or morphine equivalent (or inconsistent dosages or frequency - varying by \> 50 mg morphine equivalent per day) * Previous augmentation cystoplasty, cystectomy, cytolysis, or neurectomy. Pelvic surgery in the last 6 months. * Any major surgical intervention with general anesthesia in the last 90 days. Current use of anticholinergic medications. * Current use of beta-blocker(s). * Unwillingness to take a beta blocker and placebo, or planned use of beta-blocker(s) other than study medication. * Previous allergic or serious reaction to beta-blockers. Initiation of neural stimulator in the last 30 days. * Any on-going or pending medical, health or disability related litigation, or current pursuit of disability. * Any condition that in the judgment of the investigator and the internal advisory panel would interfere with the patient's ability to provide informed consent, comply with study instructions, place the patient at increased risk, or which would clearly confound the interpretation of the study results (specific reason will be documented). * Current participation in another clinical trial that interferes with ICECAN policies and procedures . * Investigators, study staff and their immediate families. * Inability to speak, read, and understand English. * Allergy to adhesives. * Initiation of any new treatment class in the last 30 days, or intent to initiate a new class of treatment in the study. Treatment classes include: 1. Pelvic injection 2. Pelvic floor therapy 3. Agents with specific FDA approval for IC/BPS or MPP (e.g., Elmiron) 4. Anticonvulsants 5. Tricyclic agents 6. Intravesical therapy or Botox 7. Bladder hydrodistention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeeks 4, 12 and 24The total GUPI score is calculated from the sum of the 3 scores from the subscales. There is no uniformity in the ranges of scores for the individual questions. The 3 subscales are: pain, urinary, and quality of life. The total score range can go from 0-45. The higher the score indicates more female urinary symptoms. Scores were calculated for each participant at weeks 4 (baseline), 12 (post-first intervention) and 24 (post-second intervention) of their participation in the study.
Average Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeeks 4, 12 and 24The average score comes from the Pain Experience, the first domain, of the MPI. Domain 1 includes five scales designed to measure important dimensions of the chronic pain experience including; 1) perceived interference of pain in vocational, social/recreational, and family/marital functioning, 2) support or concern from spouse or significant other, 3) pain severity, 4) perceived life control, and 5) affective distress. Higher scores indicate more impactful effects of the pain experience in daily life. Responses from individual questions range from 0-6. 0 indicated no pain/no interference/no change. 6 indicates very intense pain/extreme interference/extreme change. The final total score range is 0-6 with 0 being absent pain and 6 being the worst pain rating. A lower score is better. Scores were calculated for each participant at weeks 4 (baseline), 12 (post-first intervention) and 24 (post-second intervention) of their participation in the study.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation Between the Change in Autonomic Nervous System Responsiveness (ANS-R) and the Change in the Connectivity Between Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) and Periaqueductal Gray (PAG)24 WeeksA linear model with connectivity at 24 weeks as outcome, connectivity at baseline as a covariate and change in ANS-R, demographics such as age and group and the interactions of group with other covariate.
Assessing Central Autonomic Network Connectivity in Subjects With Chronic Pelvic PainBaseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeksThis exploratory aim for the sub-studyused functional MRI brain imaging to examine the evolution of the connectivity of the main autonomic processing nucleus, the periaqueductal gray region, with other cortical brain regions

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was modified to report data for participants with IC/BPS and MPP as a single combined chronic pelvic pain group. Please review the pre-assignment details sections to view how participants are being presented in for this group.

Pre-assignment details

Participants enrolled into the Chronic Pain Group were randomized into 2 sequences or were enrolled into the observational study group: Metopropol then Placebo, Placebo then Metopropol OR Observational Participants. The participant flow and baseline characteristics sections for the Chronic Pain Group are presented per sequence.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Metoprolol Then Placebo
Participants will be randomized to take 8 weeks of Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet followed by a 4-Week washout period, and then 8 weeks of Placebo.
23
Placebo Then Metoprolol
Participants will be randomized to take 8 weeks of Placebo followed by a 4-Week washout period, and then 8 weeks of Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet.
22
Healthy Control
Healthy female subjects ages 18-80 with various demographic background who do not have any exclusionary diagnostic or symptomatic criteria will be recruited. Subjects will never receive any randomization or drug treatment during the entire duration of the study.
23
Observational Participants
Participants who meet the study eligibility criteria but were not randomized into the two interventional sequences. Participants were not randomized and did not receive any study drugs during the entire duration of the study.
4
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1000
Overall StudyScreenfail0020
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2520
Overall StudyWithdrew from study but did not withdraw consent0100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMetoprolol Then PlaceboPlacebo Then MetoprololHealthy ControlObservational ParticipantsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants22 Participants22 Participants3 Participants70 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants14 Participants8 Participants2 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants7 Participants15 Participants2 Participants34 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants7 Participants15 Participants2 Participants34 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants13 Participants6 Participants2 Participants33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants22 participants23 participants4 participants72 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants22 Participants23 Participants4 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 430 / 420 / 450 / 400 / 40 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 4325 / 425 / 454 / 400 / 40 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 430 / 420 / 450 / 400 / 40 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Average Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) Scale

The average score comes from the Pain Experience, the first domain, of the MPI. Domain 1 includes five scales designed to measure important dimensions of the chronic pain experience including; 1) perceived interference of pain in vocational, social/recreational, and family/marital functioning, 2) support or concern from spouse or significant other, 3) pain severity, 4) perceived life control, and 5) affective distress. Higher scores indicate more impactful effects of the pain experience in daily life. Responses from individual questions range from 0-6. 0 indicated no pain/no interference/no change. 6 indicates very intense pain/extreme interference/extreme change. The final total score range is 0-6 with 0 being absent pain and 6 being the worst pain rating. A lower score is better. Scores were calculated for each participant at weeks 4 (baseline), 12 (post-first intervention) and 24 (post-second intervention) of their participation in the study.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24

Population: This assessment was not administered to all participants at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Metoprolol Then PlaceboAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 122.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Metoprolol Then PlaceboAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 242.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Metoprolol Then PlaceboAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 42.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Placebo Then MetoprololAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 242.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.747
Placebo Then MetoprololAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 121.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.863
Placebo Then MetoprololAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 42.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.878
Healthy ControlAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 241.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Healthy ControlAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 121.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Healthy ControlAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 41.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Observational ParticipantsAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 42.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
Observational ParticipantsAverage Score on the First Domain of the Multidimensional Pain Scoring (MPI) ScaleWeek 122.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Primary

Total Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) Scale

The total GUPI score is calculated from the sum of the 3 scores from the subscales. There is no uniformity in the ranges of scores for the individual questions. The 3 subscales are: pain, urinary, and quality of life. The total score range can go from 0-45. The higher the score indicates more female urinary symptoms. Scores were calculated for each participant at weeks 4 (baseline), 12 (post-first intervention) and 24 (post-second intervention) of their participation in the study.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24

Population: This assessment was not administered to all participants at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Metoprolol Then PlaceboTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 424.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.54
Metoprolol Then PlaceboTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 2423.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Metoprolol Then PlaceboTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 1222.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Placebo Then MetoprololTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 2422.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Placebo Then MetoprololTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 422.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.94
Placebo Then MetoprololTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 1221.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.88
Healthy ControlTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 42.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Healthy ControlTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 241.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Healthy ControlTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 122.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.67
Observational ParticipantsTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 1226.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
Observational ParticipantsTotal Score on Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) ScaleWeek 429.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.27
Other Pre-specified

Assessing Central Autonomic Network Connectivity in Subjects With Chronic Pelvic Pain

This exploratory aim for the sub-studyused functional MRI brain imaging to examine the evolution of the connectivity of the main autonomic processing nucleus, the periaqueductal gray region, with other cortical brain regions

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Correlation Between the Change in Autonomic Nervous System Responsiveness (ANS-R) and the Change in the Connectivity Between Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) and Periaqueductal Gray (PAG)

A linear model with connectivity at 24 weeks as outcome, connectivity at baseline as a covariate and change in ANS-R, demographics such as age and group and the interactions of group with other covariate.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026